Hostage families fear ‘Russian roulette' offered by ceasefire talks
So one might imagine that growing rumours of a ceasefire and hostage exchange between Hamas and Israel would be welcome news.
But at an event in London calling for more international action to free those captured, the response from families is more trepidation than celebration.
The Israeli government believes that there are 20 living hostages still in Gaza but sources indicate that only 10 would likely be released as part of any ceasefire agreement.
'You know, it's like a game' sais Galia David, whose son Evyatar is in captivity.
'Like a lottery?' I ask her.
'Like Russian Roulette' is her response.
Evyatar was 22-years-old when he was abducted from the Nova music festival during the October 7 attacks.
In home videos and photos, he looks his age: healthy, happy and with a full head of curly hair.
It's a far cry from the most recent video his family has seen of him.
Released earlier this year, it shows Evyatar, looking gaunt with a shaven head, being taken to the handover ceremony of another hostage.
In an act of psychological torture, he is forced to beg for his own release.
Four months on and he is still being held captive.
Despite the chance that her son could be amongst the 10 potentially being released, she - as with all the other families - is insistent that all the hostages need to be released at the same time.
Otherwise, they fear that a handful could remain as collateral for years on end.
Bipin Joshi's family worry that he may be far down the list when it comes to an exchange.
He is a Nepalese citizen, with no family in Israel. His country has little international clout.
Joshi had only arrived in Israel three weeks before he was kidnapped, as part of an international program providing agricultural training to young people from rural Nepal.
Adi Radai has been helping to advocate on his behalf because his family don't speak English or Hebrew.
'They don't understand the conflict and it's heartbreaking,' said Adi. 'They just want their son back.'
The timing of this event in London is co-incidental. It was delayed because all flights in and out of Israel were cancelled as a result of missile strikes from Iran.
The families want to make clear that they aren't politicians - all they are interested in is the return of their loved ones.
But they believe that will only happen when there is a permanent end to the fighting and a proper peace agreement, rather than a ceasefire.
And even that is uncertain.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Exeter family's relief after immigration row 'victory'
An 11-year-old boy from Exeter who was told by the Home Office he would have to move to his native Brazil should now be able to stay in the UK after a bureaucratic its original email to Guilherme, the Home Office said moving to Brazil after six years in England "may involve a degree of disruption to family life" but this was "proportionate to the legitimate aim of maintaining effective immigration control".Guilherme's parents, an NHS nurse and a university lecturer who came to the UK legally with their children in 2019, said they had feared what it might also mean for their other son Luca, Home Office has now agreed to "exceptionally reconsider" the family's case. The boys' father, Hugo, who has indefinite leave to remain in the UK, had appealed for the same visa for his sons.A Home Office email addressed to primary school pupil Guilherme in June said: "I am satisfied that there are no serious or compelling reasons to grant you settlement."I am satisfied that you could return to Brazil and continue your education in Brazil where you would have the option to attend an English-speaking school."Speaking before the Home Office reconsidered her family's case, the boys' mother, Ana, said: "In the beginning it was like the floor just opened for me - I couldn't understand what it meant".She said her sons told her they did not want to go to Brazil and they wanted to keep their friends at a school they said: "We pay taxes every month and we do everything correctly and then suddenly we have this with our children - the most precious thing in our lives."It just makes you feel like nothing." Hugo and Ana separated in 2022 and they said the separation - and their different stages in the immigration process - had led to the issues with the Home family arrived in the UK in 2019 with Hugo on a skilled worker visa due to his job as a a senior lecturer in computer science at the University of 2024 he was granted indefinite leave to gained a skilled worker visa in 2022 after starting work as a nurse at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital but will only be eligible for indefinite leave to remain after five original Home Office email said both parents should be granted settlement at the same time, or be settled or a British citizen, unless one parent has sole responsibility for the children. The Home Office said it would refund the cost of the original visa applications - about £3,000 per child - and allow a new application for both children as dependants of a skilled spoke of his huge relief at the decision but said changes needed to be said the experience had been "mentally draining and exhausting" but he and his family were now "excited for the future".He added: "The most appalling issue was the fact they wrote a very tough and somewhat threatening letter to a young child."The other issue is their rules don't seem to be fit for purpose in a scenario where you have different family arrangements." Steve Race, the Labour MP for Exeter, argued the family's case with the Home Office and said there were "lessons to be learned" from the family's situation."When you've got cases that are slightly more nuanced, slightly more complicated, the Home Office needs to have processes in place to make sure they do look at what's going on with the family in the round and they don't put families through this process with all of the fear, stress and concern this has meant," he said the country needed "safe and secure borders" but also needed to treat families "who are here legally and correctly" in "the right way and with respect".The Home Office declined to comment on the case or the issues raised by the MP.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Macron not expected at UN summit on two-state solution for Palestine and Israel
A UN summit on a two-state solution for Palestine and Israel – postponed by the Israel-Iran war – has been rescheduled for 28 and 29 July, but it is not expected that the French president, Emmanuel Macron, will attend, making it less likely that it will trigger a series of high-profile announcements on recognition of a Palestinian state. Macron, who last week told UK parliamentarians a two-state solution was 'the only way to build peace and stability for all in the whole region', has been trying to build momentum for recognition of a state of Palestine by a wide group of countries, but the lack of movement in ceasefire negotiations between Hamas and Israel is making such decisions more complex. Israel and the US both oppose recognition of a Palestinian state, and have been advising UN delegations not to attend the UN conference in New York. Israel has said that recognition would be seen as a reward for Hamas terrorism. The conference originally slated for June was postponed when the Israeli attack on Iran created a security crisis across the Middle East. The conference has a set of working parties that are designed to ease the path to a two-state solution, including plans for future Palestinian governance, economic renewal and challenging the narratives of hate. French sources insisted decisions on recognition had not been made, and a subsequent event in Paris would provide the platform. Recognition was discussed last week at the Anglo-French summit, where Macron made two public appeals without setting a timetable. Macron called for recognition in his speech to UK parliamentarians and in his closing press conference. 'With Gaza in ruin and the West Bank being attacked on a daily basis, the perspective of a Palestinian state has never been put at risk as it is,' he told MPs. 'And this is why this solution of the two states and the recognition of the state of Palestine is … the only way to build peace and stability for all in the whole region.' The joint declaration issued by Macron and the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, simply reaffirmed their commitment to 'recognising a Palestinian state, as a contribution to a peace process'. And they pledged to 'work together to support its development and the realisation of a two-state solution'. Le Monde reported at the weekend that neither Macron nor the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, would attend the UN conference, and that the summit would instead be led by foreign ministers. That does not preclude Macron making his long-trailed announcement at a different point. The French preference has been to make the historic recognition announcement jointly with the UK, and possibly Canada. Speaking about the issue at length to parliament's foreign affairs select committee, the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, referred to the country's role in shaping the Middle East through the Balfour declaration, saying: 'I would prefer that the United Kingdom is part of a process, particularly if you look at the history, including our relationship with Balfour and the two communities that were effectively brought together at the birth of the Israeli state.' He added: 'A ceasefire might be the beginning of a process, and I suspect that our French colleagues are also waiting to see whether there is a ceasefire in the next few days. That would be the beginning of something, particularly if it is a permanent ceasefire and not a pause.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Lammy said the decisions of some European countries to recently recognise a Palestinian state had not led to changes on the ground in the West Bank and Gaza, but he admitted it was a judgment call and said he had some sympathy with those who argued that the pace of building Israeli settlements on the West Bank was putting the existence of a Palestinian state in question. He stressed he did not see a wider normalisation between Saudi Arabia and Israel taking place unless Israel made some concession on the recognition of Palestine. 'From my conversations with the Saudis and the Saudi foreign minister, normalisation will be impossible to achieve until there is a ceasefire and unless there is tangible progress on two states. Frankly, I commend my Saudi counterparts for holding true to that,' he told MPs. Separately, foreign ministers from Israel and Palestine are expected to attend a dinner in Brussels on Monday. The Israeli foreign minister, Gideon Saar, and his Palestinian counterpart, Varsen Aghabekian, have both confirmed their attendance at an EU-Southern Neighbourhood ministerial meeting, but it is not clear if they will meet or talk to one another. The aim of the Brussels meeting is to strengthen relations between the EU and its 10 partner countries in the Mediterranean region.
New Statesman
43 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Xi Jinping's daddy issues
Xi Jinping was born into the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) equivalent of royalty. As the son of Xi Zhongxun, one of the first generation of CCP revolutionaries, he was educated at a prestigious boarding school in Beijing where he underwent military training intended to inspire the offspring of high-ranking cadres 'to give their lives to the desire to struggle', and read books such as Be a Successor to the Revolution. But the future Chinese leader's real political education began at the age of nine, when his father was purged from the party elite by Mao Zedong in 1962, and the Xi family was plunged into the violence and chaos of the Cultural Revolution. The elder Xi's downfall was triggered by his decision to support, albeit reluctantly, the publication of a novel about the life of Liu Zhidan, his former comrade and mentor, which was held to contradict the party's version of history. This might sound like a trivial matter, but as Joseph Torigian explains in The Party's Interests Come First, the first English-language biography of Xi Zhongxun, the past was a 'battlefield' for the CCP. Xi's political rivals seized the opportunity to move against the then vice premier and Mao agreed that he was guilty of 'anti-party activities'. During the years that followed, what had started as an attack on Xi transformed into a 'full-scale assault on cadres from the north-west', writes Torigian, with an estimated 20,000 people targeted as part of the 'Xi Zhongxun anti-party clique', of whom at least 200 were 'beaten to death, driven mad, or seriously injured'. Xi later described his disorientation at being persecuted by the organisation to which he had previously devoted his life as feeling like 'a person who fell off an 18-floor building'. When the Cultural Revolution ignited four years later in 1966, as Mao exhorted his zealous young followers – the Red Guards – to tear down what he saw as the remaining institutional resistance to his great revolution, Xi was targeted as a 'class enemy'. He was kidnapped by a group of Red Guards from the mining-tool factory where he had been working – he had requested the opportunity to 'transform myself into a new ordinary labourer in the style of Mao Zedong' while the Liu Zhidan case was being investigated – and subjected to repeated 'struggle' sessions. These included being forced to stand on stage with his head bowed and his body bent over in the 'jet-plane' position, with his arms twisted behind him, as the crowd screamed abuse and sometimes kicked and punched him as a purported 'counter-revolutionary'. He was held in various forms of confinement and not permitted to see his family for the next eight years. The supposed sins of the father were also visited on his children. One of his daughters, Xi Heping, hanged herself during the campaign after apparently being 'persecuted to death'. Xi Jinping, who was 13 at the start of the Cultural Revolution, was derided as 'a bastard' and a 'reactionary' by fellow students. In the spring of 1967, he was denounced at a mass rally in Beijing, where he stood on the stage in front of the jeering crowd, a slightly built teenager alongside a group of adults. 'Because of his young age, Jinping had trouble with the humiliating heavy steel cap they were all forced to put on their heads as part of the spectacle,' Torigian writes. 'He had to hold it onto his head with his hands.' Xi Jinping's mother was in the crowd, standing just a few feet from her son during the ordeal. 'When the slogan 'Down with Xi Jinping' was shouted, she too raised her hands and yelled along with everyone else,' apparently afraid that she, too, would be arrested and taken away from her remaining children if she was deemed insufficiently loyal. When he turned up on her doorstep one rainy night begging for food, having managed to run away from the school where he was being held, she sent him away and then personally reported him to the authorities. In January 1969, at the age of 15, he joined the millions of other 'sent-down' youths who were dispatched to the countryside to learn from the peasants during the Cultural Revolution. He boarded the train in Beijing carrying a 'bag knit by his mother bearing the words 'Mother's heart''. Yet these experiences did not prompt either father or son to turn away from the party. After Mao died in 1976 and the worst excesses of the campaign were formally pinned on the Gang of Four, a group of senior officials – which included Mao's widow – Xi Zhongxun was welcomed back into the party leadership. During the era of 'reform and opening up' that followed under Deng Xiaoping, Xi was given responsibility for overseeing China's first special economic zone in the coastal province of Guangdong, which included what is today the global manufacturing hub of Shenzhen. He served in senior roles for the next 15 years, retiring in 1993 at the age of 79. Xi Jinping appears to have been equally determined to demonstrate his unwavering commitment to the CCP. He applied repeatedly for membership in the years that followed, finally succeeding on his eighth attempt. Both men later related their suffering as a valuable process of 'forging' and strengthening their willpower and dedication to the party. As Torigian recounts, 'when people complained about party policies, Xi [Zhongxun] often bragged about his hardships to delegitimise their grumblings… [He] even boasted to a Western historian that although Deng Xiaoping had suffered at the hands of the party on three occasions, he had been persecuted five times.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The younger Xi has similarly mythologised the years he spent labouring in rural China as a 'sent-down' youth, claiming to have drawn inspiration from the 19th-century Russian novel What Is to Be Done? by Nikolai Chernyshevsky, whose protagonist sleeps on a bed of nails to forge his own sense of willpower. Whereas many of Xi's generation emerged from the Cultural Revolution determined to make up for lost time by turning their attention to 'romantic relationships, drink, movies and Western literature as a release from the hardships of the time', as one US embassy cable reported. '[Xi Jinping] chose to survive by becoming redder than red.' While many observers have since questioned why the future leader would remain so loyal to an institution that had persecuted him and his family, Torigian argues that this fundamentally misses the point. 'Perhaps the better question is: how could Jinping betray the party for which his father had sacrificed so much?' [See also: The People's Republic of iPhone] Xi Zhongxun grew up in a peasant family in Shaanxi, a province of north-west China, where he was born in 1913, less than two years after the collapse of the Qing Dynasty. He was drawn to communism at school, enraged by the abject poverty he saw around him, and took part in a plot to poison a local school administrator at the age of 14 (they chose the wrong bowl and succeeded in sickening several teachers instead). Xi was arrested and sent to prison, where he sharpened his knowledge of 'revolutionary principles'. His father and mother both died shortly afterwards, which he attributed in part to the anguish they suffered during his incarceration. Xi had to arrange for his mother's remains to be stored in a 'cheap coffin' for two years before he could afford to pay for a funeral. Two of his sisters then died during a famine. Reflecting on this period in his diary more than 60 years later, Xi recalled how his younger brothers and sisters had come to rely on him and he had wanted them 'to live like human beings'. As he concluded: 'The influence of this year on me was truly great, and it established the basis for a life of revolution.' He first encountered Mao in 1935, when the Red Army arrived in Shaanxi at the end of the Long March, the gruelling year-long retreat under fire from south-eastern China to what would become its new revolutionary base in the north-west. He credited Mao with saving his life, claiming that he would have been buried alive within days as part of an internal party purge – presaging the bitter intra-party struggles that would shape his later life – if the CCP leader had not appeared when he did. (Torigian is sceptical of this account, concluding that Xi's death was not imminent and that he likely overstated Mao's role, which in turn became part of the CCP's mythology.) Still, Xi proved his loyalty and his utility to Mao, fighting in the Sino-Japanese War and the Chinese Civil War in the years that followed. In recognition of his efforts, Mao presented him with a white cloth on which he had written: 'The party's interests come first.' Torigian writes that the cloth 'became one of Xi's most treasured possessions'. After the communists' victory in the Civil War in 1949, Xi Zhongxun rose swiftly through the ranks to the 'very top echelon' of the new People's Republic of China. Despite – or perhaps because of – the privileges the family now enjoyed, he enforced frugality and strict discipline among his children. Xi Jinping, who was born in 1953, the third child of his second marriage, was required to kowtow before his father during annual Lunar New Year celebrations. If he failed to perform the ritual according to his father's exacting standards, he was spanked. He later recounted how the children had bathed in their father's used bathwater, which he had also required them to use to wash their clothes, before the bathtub could finally be drained. This abstemious approach applied to mealtimes too. Torigian describes one occasion when the ageing Xi Zhongxun abandoned his attempt to chew a tough piece of garlic rib, passing 'a piece that had already been in his mouth to Jinping [who was then in his thirties and already rising through the CCP ranks] to finish – which he promptly did'. 'Actually, eating with me is a form of suffering,' Xi Jinping remarked during an interview in 2001. 'I am the son of a peasant. I have never been picky about eating, and, moreover, I never allow people to leave any leftovers.' Most importantly, the elder Xi also instilled in his children the need to 'make revolution in the future'. As his son recalled, 'we heard so much about this that our ears got calluses.' Writing to his father on his 88th birthday in October 2001 – seven months before Xi Zhongxun died and just over a decade before he himself ascended to the leadership of the CCP – Xi Jinping reflected on the lessons he had learned from the older man's life. 'No matter whether you were libelled or you were in a difficult situation, in your heart, you continuously had a bright lantern that always lit the correct path forward,' he wrote. 'When people yelled at us for being bastards, I always stubbornly believed that my father was a great hero, that he was a father most worthy of feeling proud of.' Compared to his example, he confessed, 'I am too mediocre, and I am blushed with shame.' He vowed to 'respectfully study father' in his future life and work, signing the letter, 'Son. Jinping. Kowtow.' This book is an extraordinary work of scholarship. The list of Chinese-language sources alone runs to nearly 40 pages, many of which have been rendered into English for the first time. It is not for the faint of heart, running to more than 700 pages and tracing the precise contours of the complex intra-party debates and intrigues that spanned Xi Zhongxun's adult life. While nominally a biography of the elder Xi, the book is also an important history of the CCP's bloody struggle for power in the past century and the world that shaped Xi Jinping. Indeed, it is striking how recent many of these tumultuous events are – well within living memory for China's current leadership. Perhaps above all else, The Party's Interests Come First is a study in the nature of political power – what it means to have it, the complexities and fallibility of those who wield it, and how quickly it can slip away. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that has tended to portray Xi Zhongxun as a 'reformer' whose family suffered terribly under Mao Zedong, and whose son was therefore once expected to pursue economic reform, perhaps even a degree of political liberalisation when he took over, the truth was always more complicated. 'All the 'characters' in this book, not only Xi [Zhongxun] but also the people whom he despised, were full of contradictions,' writes Torigian. 'They were both victims and perpetrators.' In fact, he concludes, 'Xi's life is a powerful statement about the misleading nature of grand narratives.' His son, presumably, would agree. 'For people who rarely encounter power and are distant from it, they always see things as very mysterious and fresh,' Xi Jinping remarked in 2000, as he reflected on the connection between his family's experiences and his own political career. 'But… I didn't just see power, flowers, glory, and applause. I also saw the cowsheds [where people were confined during the Cultural Revolution] and the fickleness of the world. I have a deeper understanding of politics.' From an early age, he learned that when you lose power, you stand to lose everything. Maybe that is why he now seems so determined to hold on to it at all costs. The Party's Interests Come First : The Life of Xi Zhongxun, Father of Xi Jinping Joseph Torigian Stanford University Press, 718pp, £42 Purchasing a book may earn the NS a commission from who support independent bookshops [See also: Britain faces another showdown with the bond market] Related
