People in California Warned Over Parasite-Riddled Fish
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Southern Californians have been warned that more than 90 percent of popular game fish have been found to contain invasive, parasitic worms that can infect humans.
Two species of the parasitic flatworms known as "trematodes" were found infecting five species of freshwater fish from San Diego County in a study by researchers from University of California, San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Infection with the worms typically causes gastrointestinal problems, lethargy and weight loss in humans—but severe cases have even been known to cause heart attack and strokes.
"Americans don't usually think about parasites when they eat freshwater fish because it hasn't historically been an issue here," said paper author and ecologist Ryan Hechinger in a statement.
However, he added: "These parasites are here in the U.S., and they're infecting fish that people are eating.
"We hope this study can help make public health officials, doctors and the public more aware."
This bluegill analyzed by the team (main) was found to contain 16,973 'Haplorchis pumilio' parasitic worms (inset)
This bluegill analyzed by the team (main) was found to contain 16,973 'Haplorchis pumilio' parasitic worms (inset)
Emma Palmer / Hudson Pinto
In their study, the researchers sampled 84 fish—representing seven species, including largemouth bass and bluegill—from five popular fishing spots around San Diego County.
The team identified two species of invasive trematode in the fish: Haplorchis pumilio and Centrocestus formosanus.
H. pumilio was found in 93 percent of all fish sampled—with some individual fish harboring thousands of the parasitic worms. C. formosanus, meanwhile, occurred in 91 percent of the fish from two of the locations.
Both worms are believed to have arrived in the U.S. from Southeast Asia more than a decade ago, traveling inside the bodies of one of their hosts—an invasive aquatic species known as the Malaysian trumpet snail (Melanoides tuberculata.)
Today, M. tuberculata can be found in 17 states, as well as Puerto Rico—and both it and its parasites are widespread in California.
The worms have a life cycle that involves living inside three hosts: first, the trumpet snail; then, a fish; and finally a warm-blooded vertebrate like birds or humans that are unlucky enough to eat the infected fish.
Hechinger said there is "no need to panic," as the risk from the parasites can be neutralized by either cooking the fish or, if planning to consume them raw, freezing for at least one week beforehand.
A survey of social-media videos conducted by the team alongside their field work, however, revealed that some Americans are consuming freshwater fish raw without these precautions—putting them at risk of infections.
"Nearly 5 million views shows there is widespread interest and possibly a widespread practice of folks eating freshwater fish raw," said paper author and marine scientist Emma Palmer of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in a statement.
Palmer conducted the research into the parasites while undertaking her graduate studies at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Stock image: A Malaysian trumpet snail ('Melanoides tuberculata') is seen on a white background.
Stock image: A Malaysian trumpet snail ('Melanoides tuberculata') is seen on a white background.
Marlonneke/iStock / Getty Images Plus
It is unclear what impact the invasive worms might be having on the fish connoisseurs of Southern California, the researchers said.
"There haven't been any reported cases of these parasites infecting Americans, but nobody is looking for cases, and doctors aren't required to report them," said Hechinger.
He added: "This kind of research is so important to identifying new public health threats."
Based on their findings, to better track the parasites, the researchers have recommended that these fish-borne worm infections be added to the list of diseases that doctors are required to report to public-health officials.
Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about astronomy? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference
Palmer, E. M., Metz, D.C.G., & Hechinger, R. F. (2025). Further Evidence for Plausible Transmission of Fishborne Trematodiases in the United States: Game Fish Carry Human-Infectious Trematodes and Are Eaten Raw. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf180
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
28 minutes ago
FDA vaccine official restricted COVID vaccine approvals against the advice of agency staff
WASHINGTON -- The government's top vaccine official working under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently restricted the approval of two COVID-19 vaccines, disregarding recommendations from government scientists, according to federal documents released Wednesday. The new memos from the Food and Drug Administration show how the agency's vaccine chief, Dr. Vinay Prasad, personally intervened to place restrictions on COVID shots from vaccine makers Novavax and Moderna. Both vaccines were approved by the FDA in May after months of analysis by rank-and-file FDA reviewers. But internal correspondence show Prasad disagreed with staffers who planned to approve the shots for everyone 12 and older, similar to previous COVID vaccines. The scientists had concluded the benefit from the vaccines and the risk of COVID-19 outweighed the risk of possible side effects, which are rare. Instead Prasad decided the shots should be limited to those who face special risks from the virus— seniors or children and adults with underlying medical issues. Prasad explained that the COVID vaccine benefits must be reconsidered in light of falling rates of death and hospitalization and the possibility for vaccine side effects. It's the latest in a series of vaccine restrictions imposed by officials working under Kennedy, who has long questioned the benefits of vaccines. 'Even rare vaccination related harms both known and unknown now have higher chance of outweighing potential benefits' Prasad wrote in a five-page memo explaining his decision. COVID-19 remains a public health threat, resulting in 32,000 to 51,000 U.S. deaths and more than 250,000 hospitalizations since last fall, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most at risk for hospitalization are seniors and children under 2 — especially infants under 6 months. Top FDA leaders are typically not involved in the review of individual products. Officials like Prasad can overrule staffers, but such cases are rare and often controversial. News of the FDA documents was first reported by the New York Times. Prasad was hired to lead the FDA's vaccine center in May, after the previous director, Dr. Peter Marks, was forced to resign over disagreements with Kennedy. An academic researcher specializing in cancer therapies, Prasad came to prominence during the pandemic for criticizing public health measures, including the FDA's approval of COVID boosters for healthy adults and children. Since arriving at the agency he has worked with FDA Commissioner Mark Makary on new guidelines that will limit approvals of future COVID boosters to higher-risk Americans, mainly seniors and those with medical conditions like asthma and obesity. Those limits match the terms FDA recently approved for Novavax's shot, Nuvaxovid and Moderna's mNexspike. Novavax's vaccine is the only protein-based coronavirus vaccine available in the U.S. Moderna's vaccine is an updated, lower-dose version of its existing mRNA-based vaccine. The review team for the Novavax vaccine pointed to data from a study in 30,000 adults, concluding that 'the risk-benefit assessment for this vaccine technology remains favorable.' FDA staff reached a similar conclusion for the Moderna vaccine, deeming it similar in safety and effectiveness to the company's original shot. Last week, the FDA finalized new warning labeling about the risk of myocarditis, a rare form of heart inflammation, on shots from Moderna and Pfizer, the other maker of an mRNA-based shot for COVID. In his 'override memo,' reversing FDA staff's decision on the Moderna shot, Prasad pointed to the ongoing risk of myocarditis and questions about its frequency. The agency ordered Moderna to conduct further studies of the risk as a condition for the approving its updated shot. A spokesman for the administration said Prasad 'has raised serious concerns' about the issue. 'We will not ignore these risks and will ensure that the gold standard of science is used for any decisions,' said Andrew Nixon, in an emailed statement. Outside researchers have noted that cases of the heart condition tend to resolve quickly and are less severe than those associated with COVID infection itself, which can also cause myocarditis. ___
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
What Most American Women Don't Know When It Comes to Breast Cancer Screening
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. More than half of American women may be confused about when to start having regular mammograms to screen for breast cancer. This is the finding of a survey by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg Public Policy Center, which revealed the greatest uncertainty among younger women. Women with an average risk of breast cancer should start getting screened every two years from age 40 onwards, according to the latest guidance issued in April last year from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent panel of medical experts. Mammograms enable doctors to detect cancer early, before symptoms become visible. Regular screening has been shown to decrease the risk of dying from breast cancer. Stock image of a woman undergoing a mammogram. Stock image of a woman undergoing a mammogram. peakSTOCK/iStock / Getty Images Plus "Confusion can arise when medical guidance about detection of treatment changes, as it has in recent years with mammograms," said Annenberg Public Policy Center director Kathleen Hall Jamieson in a statement. Recommendations have previously shifted from 40 up to 50 and then back down to 40 again. Confusing matters is how some medical groups offer different guidance. The American Cancer Society, for example, suggests that women start screening between 40–44, have mammograms annually from 45–54, and then every other year after that. Jamieson added: "Our data suggest that the recommendation that such screening ordinarily start at 40 years old is not yet widely enough known." A plot showing the results of the survey. A plot showing the results of the survey. Annenberg Public Policy Center The survey—which was conducted back in late April this year on a sample of more than 1,653 U.S. adults—found that only 49 percent of respondents knew that women are recommended to start having mammograms every other year from the age of 40 onward. Meanwhile, 10 percent said that screening should begin at age 20, 21 percent said age 30, 9 percent said age 50 and 11 responded that they weren't sure when they should start. (Each number is rounded to the nearest 1 percent, which accounts for why these figures do not add up to 100 percent.) Breaking down responses by age, the survey results suggest that there is a greater uncertainty on this topic among younger women. Specifically, only 37 percent of women aged 18–29 knew the correct age to start screening. In contrast, 72 percent of women aged 40–49, 63 percent aged 30–39 and 59 percent 50–74 knew that the current recommended age is 40. Alongside this, 16 percent of women aged 18–29 and 11 percent aged 30–39 reported that they were not at all sure when to begin regular screening; this figure was just one percent for women aged between 40–49. Among the 18–29 age group, the most commonly reported incorrect age for when to begin mammography was 30 (selected by 27 percent of women); this is a decade earlier than recommended. However, the most common misconception among those aged 30–39 (that is, approaching the recommended starting age of 40) was 50 years old—a decade later than current recommendations. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about mammograms? Let us know via health@ Reference Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. (2025). ASAPH W24 mammogram items.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Dalmatian and Doberman Have Puppies—Internet Not Ready for the Result
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A video revealing the result of two unexpected dog breeds having a puppy left people falling head over paws. Hopping on a social media trend that showcases photos of one's parents and their offspring, TikTok user @yes_510 decided to use the same method but with the family's two dogs—a Dalmatian and Doberman Pinscher—in a June 10 video. The video highlighted the canine parents, with viewers instantly falling in love with the unique puppies. The owner shared in a comment that these two dogs are about four years apart, yet the female Dalmatian and male Doberman became best friends, constantly staying by each other's side. The two snuggled together every chance they could get, with the Dalmatian typically sleeping right on top. Eventually, these two dogs mated. The last clip on the owner's TikTok showcases one of their pups, often referred to as a Dalmatian Pinscher. The puppy began marching toward the camera. The brown fur nearly covered the pup's entire tiny body, a strong indication that the Doberman's genes are strong, but as viewers pointed out, the paws are all mom. Newsweek reached out to @yes_510 via TikTok for comment. Viewer Reactions As is often the case with videos featuring mixed dog breeds, several viewers expressed concerns about the puppies' ethical and health implications. Dalmatian Pinschers are susceptible to several health conditions, including urinary tract infections, dental diseases, dilated cardiomyopathy, progressive retinal atrophy and Von Willebrand's disease, according to Dogster. The report emphasized the importance of acquiring a dog from a reputable breeder who conducts genetic health testing on the parents and screens for health conditions before selling the puppies. "...Health testing, stable temperaments, avoiding genetic issues, all of it gets thrown out the window for the sake of a 'cute' mix. The ignorance is honestly exhausting," one person said in the comments on @yes_510's video. Screenshots from a June 10 TikTok video of a Dalmatian and Doberman who became parents. Screenshots from a June 10 TikTok video of a Dalmatian and Doberman who became parents. @yes_510/TikTok The owner commented that this was an accidental "one-time thing." The family will be getting the Dalmatian fixed soon as they work on finding homes for the puppies. They plan on keeping the runt of the litter as their third dog. Meanwhile, many of the nearly 700,000 TikTok viewers fell in love with the result, calling the puppy the "collab" they didn't know they needed. "Shoe game goes crazy," someone wrote about the unique paws, while a viewer called the paws "cookies and cream socks." "Justice for the mom. Why she got 10% of the deal?" asked another. Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@ with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
