Tesla to pay $243M for deadly 2019 Florida Keys accident
The accident occurred at a T-intersection after sundown in the Florida Keys in 2019 when the Tesla did not stop and rammed a parked SUV.
The collision killed Naibel Benavides Leon, 20, as she stood next to the SUV. Her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, was injured.
The Miami jury granted a $43 million award for compensatory damages for pain and suffering and another $200 million for punitive damages arising from the vehicular accident that occurred in the Florida Keys, NBC News reported.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs successfully argued Tesla officials overestimated the capabilities of the autopilot program in the Tesla Model S sedan that the defendant was driving.
The jury determined the plaintiff's pain and suffering merited a total of $129 million in compensatory damages, but Tesla only pays a third of that amount.
The jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla and two-thirds to the driver, who said he was distracted while reaching for his cell phone when the accident occurred.
The motorist was sued separately from Tesla and was not a party to the federal lawsuit that the jury decided on Friday.
U.S. District Court of Southern Florida Judge Beth Bloom accepted the jury's verdict and said she will order Tesla to pay the judgment.
The jury of eight found Tesla was partly liable because the vehicle's autopilot system did not brake in time to prevent the deadly accident.
Officials for Elon Musk-owned and publicly traded electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla said they will appeal the jury's verdict.
"Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," they said in a prepared statement.
"We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Warns of Losing Tesla Control, Denies Personal Loans Tied To Shares
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA), has expressed concerns over potentially losing control of the electric vehicle giant due to the influence of activist shareholders. What Happened: Musk, who currently owns a 12.8% stake in Tesla, is apprehensive about being dethroned by shareholders who may not align with his vision for the company's future. He suggests that a 25% ownership stake would offer him adequate influence, while still leaving room for his possible removal. Musk's fears are rooted in past instances where shareholders voted in favor of a compensation package tied to the company's growth targets, only to be overruled by Delaware Chancery Court Judge Kathaleen McCormick. Earlier in January in a post on X, he shared that about 25 percent ownership stake would be enough "to be influential, but not so much that I can't be overturned.'Musk has the opportunity to acquire an additional 304 million shares, which would boost his voting control by roughly 4% post-tax. Also Read: Elon Musk Returns To Intense Work Schedule: 'Back To Working 7 Days a Week and Sleeping in the Office' In a recent statement on Friday on X, Musk affirmed that he has no personal loans against Tesla stock and reiterated his anxieties about being ousted by 'activist shareholders'. He expressed optimism that these concerns would be addressed at the forthcoming shareholders' are rumors that Musk may resign if his ownership stake is curtailed, akin to the limitations imposed on his pay package. Nonetheless, a majority of shareholders who endorsed Musk's pay package continue to support his leadership of Tesla's operations. Why It Matters: Musk's concerns highlight the potential power dynamics at play within Tesla's shareholder base. His potential loss of control could significantly impact the company's strategic direction, given his instrumental role in shaping Tesla's innovative trajectory. The upcoming shareholders' meeting will be a critical event, potentially determining the future of Musk's leadership at Tesla. Read Next Elon Musk Commits To Intense Focus on X/xAI and Tesla: 'Back To Spending 24/7 at Work, Sleeping in Conference/Server/Factory Rooms' Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Elon Musk Warns of Losing Tesla Control, Denies Personal Loans Tied To Shares originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Your EV Battery Is Spying on You: MIT Research Uncovers Hidden Location & Privacy Threats
Think your shiny new electric vehicle keeps your secrets safe? Think again. Researchers from MIT recently proved that the innocent-looking battery gauge on your dashboard can betray your personal details to anyone tech-savvy enough to look. Simply put, the way your EV uses power isn't just about range anxiety - it's broadcasting your location and driving habits in surprising detail. This on top of the discovered cyber risks I detailed in previous articles. Related: Your Car Could Be Held for Ransom: The Rise of Automotive Cyber Attacks MIT researchers demonstrated how a seemingly harmless detail - battery power consumption - could expose sensitive data. They monitored electricity draw from batteries and linked specific consumption patterns to routes, speeds, and even driver identities. Turns out, every driver's habits create unique "fingerprints" in power consumption. It's as if your battery is dropping digital breadcrumbs wherever you go. This revelation isn't trivial. Unlike your smartphone, you can't simply install antivirus software on your car battery. And unlike a Tesla's touchscreen, battery data isn't password-protected. Anyone with basic hacking tools could, in theory, use this data to pinpoint your commute, figure out where you live, or even track your kids' school drop-offs. Related: Bricked in 14 Minutes: The Hidden Risk That Could Kill Your Tesla According to the researchers, primarily, skilled hackers pose the greatest threat. They can intercept battery data to track your driving patterns, habits, and locations, potentially leading to identity theft, stalking, or burglary. Additionally, government agencies or law enforcement (if that behavior worries you) might exploit battery data for surveillance or tracking purposes, often without explicit consent. Automakers also collect detailed battery performance data, but vulnerabilities mean unauthorized third parties could access this data, either maliciously or commercially. As vehicles become increasingly connected to mobile apps and Wi-Fi networks, these connections present another potential vulnerability point for data interception. Hackers primarily use indirect methods known as side-channel attacks. These attacks analyze subtle patterns in battery power consumption, allowing them to decipher specific routes and driving habits. Public charging stations or compromised home chargers provide attack vectors and can log your battery's energy patterns, potentially providing a way for unauthorized monitoring. Let's put that in context. Picture a typical day running errands. Researchers found your battery's unique consumption pattern could reveal that you hit Starbucks at 7:15 am, clock 15 freeway miles at 75 mph, and spend precisely 42 minutes parked at Target. And pick up your kids at their playgroup at 3.20pm, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. That's creepy if you ask me. And how about longer trips? On road trips over 150 miles, distinct battery signatures pinpointed exact rest stops, hotel stays, and even recreational detours with astonishing precision. For privacy-conscious drivers, put mildly this raises some serious red flags. As for usability, modern EVs like Tesla's Model Y with a 75 kWh battery or Ford's Mustang Mach-E with 91 kWh packs aren't designed with this vulnerability in mind. Both vehicles boast impressive specs - Model Y hits 0-60 mph in 4.8 seconds; Mach-E manages it in about 4.9 seconds. But, just like with public charger hacks and ransomware, neither maker – indeed no EV maker – yet addresses how battery power data could compromise your privacy. Cabin comforts and slick infotainment systems won't help here. Sure, the Mustang Mach-E's plush interior makes highway cruising effortless, and Tesla's minimalist cockpit is pretty and impresses tech fans, but none of that protects your privacy. Unfortunately, this isn't some theoretical scenario - it's real research from credible experts, revealing a vulnerability automakers haven't yet addressed. Should you toss your Model Y or Mach-E out of panic? No, but be aware. The MIT study makes it clear: battery data isn't just about mileage - it's a privacy leak waiting to happen. And, of course, this is only a matter for those who care about their privacy and don't like to be hacked, tracked, or spied on. Enthusiasts love EVs for their acceleration and tech-packed cabins. But this privacy flaw demands serious attention. Carmakers need to step up their game and close this loophole. Fast. Until then, remember: Big Brother might not be watching, but your battery just might be telling him where you are. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
OpenAI ends ChatGPT users' option to index chats on search engines
Aug. 2 (UPI) -- OpenAI is ending the option to have Google and other search engines index user chats with ChatGPT and make the content of those chats discoverable on searches. Google accounts for more than 89% of all online searches, which made private chats on ChatGPT potentially widely accessible when indexed on that search engine and others. "This feature introduced too many opportunities for folks to accidentally share things they didn't intend to, so we're removing the option," Dan Stuckey, OpenAI chief information security officer, told PC Mag. Bing, DuckDuckGo and other search engines will continue to index discoverable chats, but only for a while longer. "We're also working to remove indexed content from the relevant search engines," Stuckey said. OpenAI recently enabled the index option for private ChatGPT discussions as an experiment, Stuckey added, but that experiment is ending. A message informed users their indexed chats were searchable on Google and other search engines, but many users did not read the message or don't understand the extent to which their conversations might be available to others. Such conversations are accessible when affixing "site:chatgpt/share" to search queries when those conversations are indexed. News of the indexed private conversations with ChatGPT first was reported by FastCompany on Wednesday in a story detailing Google's indexing of ChatGPT conversations. The indexing does not provide information on respective users, but the conversations might include personal information when mentioned by the users while conversing with ChatGPT. Many users also were unaware that sharing a conversation with someone via social apps, such as WhatsApp, when saving the URL for future use would cause Google to make it potentially widely available to millions of people. OpenAI officials recently announced they were appealing a court order requiring the preservation of all chats that users delete after conversing with ChatGPT, Ars Technica reported. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
