Triple murderer Nicholas Prosper spared whole life sentence after appeal refused
The 19-year-old spent a year plotting Britain's worst mass murder at his old school in September 2023.
He had bought the firearm, along with 100 cartridges, a day earlier with the aim of killing 34 people, outdoing US school killings at Sandy Hook in 2012 and Virginia Tech in 2007.
Those plans were only thwarted when his mum, Juliana Falcon, 48, woke early and discovered he had the shotgun.
Prosper blasted her in the head at close range, placing a copy of the novel 'How to Kill Your Family' on her legs', before killing 13-year-old sister Giselle Prosper as she cowered under a table.
He then shot his brother Kyle Prosper, 16, whom he also stabbed 100 times.
The teen had bloody hands and was still dressed in his yellow and black killing outfit when he was arrested at 7.50am on September 13, still too early to target the school.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Sentencing Prosper at Luton Crown Court in March, High Court judge Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said: 'You hadn't hated your mother or siblings and had had a good life with them.
'Your intention had been to kill them in their sleep and rape your sister.
'You had intended to leave the flat at around 8.30am, arrive at St Joseph's school at 9am, go into a class and pretend to rob the teachers then start shooting the four-year-olds, continuing in another classroom if necessary to achieve the target of 30 children.
'You wanted to cause the biggest massacre in 21st century as there had not been one.
'Your mother waking up at about 4.50am had triggered your activity early. You wished you had killed more.'
At the Court of Appeal today, three senior judges declined to replace his life sentence, with a minimum term of 49 years, with a whole life order.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Giving their ruling, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said: 'Appalling though these crimes were, we are not persuaded that anything less than a whole life order was unduly lenient.
'It is a sentence which requires a youth of 18, as he was at the time of his arrest, to remain in custody until he is in his late 60s, and one which might result in him never being released.
'Finally, as the courts have stated repeatedly, no sentence can ever reflect the value of lives lost.'
Whole-life orders are reserved for the most serious offences, with those handed the tariffs including Louis De Zoysa, who murdered Metropolitan Police Sergeant Matt Ratana in 2020, and Kyle Clifford, who murdered his ex-partner Louise Hunt, her sister Hannah Hunt and mother Carol Hunt last year.
Rules were changed in 2022 to allow younger defendants aged 18 to 20 to receive such orders in exceptional circumstances, but none of the whole-life orders imposed since then have been on criminals in that age bracket.
Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb set out why he would not receive a whole-life term, in line with what both the prosecution and defence barristers had argued the previous day.
She explained that for defendants over the age of 21, whole-life orders can be considered in cases involving two or more murders with a significant degree of pre-meditation or planning, or where one child is killed with similar pre-planning.
The judge said: 'The court may arrive at a whole-life order in the case of an 18 to 20-year-old only if it considers that the seriousness of the combination of offences is exceptionally high, even by the standard of offences which would normally result in a whole-life order.
'This is described accurately as an enhanced exceptionality requirement.
'Despite the gravity of your crimes, it is the explicit joint submission of counsel that a lengthy, finite term will be a sufficiently severe penalty, and this is not such an exceptionally serious case of the utmost gravity where the sentence of last resort must be imposed on an offender who was 18 at the time and is 19 today.'
While Prosper is 'indisputably a very dangerous young man', the risk to the public is met with a life sentence, she said.
'The question is whether in ensuring due punishment, the seriousness of the offences overall is such that it is not possible, consistent with my duty to the public, to specify any minimum term,' the court was told.
She said she would not impose a whole-life order because Prosper was stopped from carrying out the school shooting, having murdered his family earlier than he intended after his mother woke up.
He also pleaded guilty as soon as the charges were put to him after psychiatric reports had been completed, and he was 18 at the time of his crimes which is at the lowest end of the age bracket for whole-life terms.
Tom Little KC, for the Solicitor General, told the Court of Appeal: 'What the facts reveal is a case which, on any view, was exceptional, even in the context of a murder.
'This reference turns on a single issue.'
He continued: 'Was the judge wrong not to impose a whole life order, or was such a sentence the only sentence reasonably open to her, on the facts of this very unusual case?'
Mr Little added: 'It was a murder of three people, two of them were children, including the intended rape of the sister. That did not take place, but it had been intended.
'The murders were committed one after the other in their own home, heard by neighbours and each was aware they were being killed by their son or sibling, and one pleaded, that is the brother, for his life.'
Mr Little also said: 'It is difficult to see how this did not involve substantial premeditation and planning.'
David Bentley KC, representing Prosper at the Court of Appeal, said that his client 'clearly had an undiagnosed neurological condition' which contributed to the crimes. More Trending
He continued: 'It is very difficult to say how a 49-year sentence in itself, with all this background, can be said to be unduly lenient.'
Mr Bentley acknowledged that if Prosper was aged 21 or over, it 'would have been very difficult to argue' that he should not have been given a whole-life order.
He said: 'The reality is that with the existing sentence, the earliest date he could actually be considered for parole is in his late 60s, and the dangerousness is covered by the life sentence.
'As the court knows, if he remains considered to be dangerous, he never comes out anyway, so a life sentence is a life sentence, and the minimum term simply provides a time when it can be reviewed.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Five key questions answered about the Trump administration's Epstein files chaos
MORE: Why was the Sycamore Gap tree cut down and who was responsible?
MORE: The future of the Sycamore Gap tree has been decided
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Boys aged 15 and 16 are charged after attack on 11 Met police officers as they tackled gang of shoplifters
Two teenage boys, aged 15 and 16, have been charged after 11 police officers were injured in an attack whilst they were tackling a group of shoplifters. When officers arrived in Wood Green, north London, just before 5pm on Tuesday, a number of people attacked them, the Metropolitan Police said. All of the cops suffered minor injuries and were treated at the scene by the London Ambulance Service. The boys, aged 16 and 15 from Wood Green and Ilford, were charged with assault on a police officer on Wednesday 16 July, the force said. They have been released on bail and are due to appear at Highbury Corner Youth Court on Thursday 7 August. Passersby who gathered around to watch filmed the chaotic scene from multiple angles and posted the clips on social media. Videos show crowds of people surrounded by police vans and cars whilst officers were clashed with people on the street. Seven other people were arrested or held in relation to the incident. A boy, 12, was arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated public order and criminal damage. A girl, 13, had been held for common assault along with a boy, 15, who was detained for assaulting a police officer. Another 15-year-old boy is in custody on suspicion of affray, and a 16-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of assaulting a police officer. Two women, aged 20 and 29, were also held for assault. A spokesperson for the Met Police said: 'Four teenagers, a child and two adults remain in police custody after they were arrested following a large disturbance in High Road, Wood Green at 4.53pm on Tuesday, July 15. 'Officers responded to reports of a large group attempting to steal items from a shop in Wood Green. 'Upon their arrival, seven people attacked officers and were subsequently arrested for assaulting a police officer, racially aggravated public order, affray, common assault and criminal damage. 'Enquiries are ongoing.' Anyone with information can contact the Met via 101, quoting 6112/16JUL.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Notting Hill Carnival boss – ‘We can't ignore impact of knife crime on our event'
Matthew Phillip, the chief executive of Notting Hill Carnival Ltd, said the event is 'not the cause' of knife crime, but 'can be a part of the solution', after a number of deaths in recent years. The carnival has partnered with the actor's Elba Hope Foundation and its campaign Don't Stop Your Future (DSYF) to combat knife and violent crime in London communities, ahead of the event, which takes place over the August bank holiday weekend. It has also secured extra funding from local councils and the mayor of London to improve safety and infrastructure. Cher Maximen was stabbed in front of her three-year-old daughter during the Notting Hill Carnival (Metropolitan Police/PA) The carnival has faced criticism in recent years for not tackling violent crime. It comes after the murders of two people last year, Cher Maximen, who was killed in front of her three-year-old daughter, and chef Mussie Imnetu, who was repeatedly punched and kicked during an altercation. Takayo Nembhard was stabbed at the age of 21 in 2022. The carnival says it is often portrayed as the cause of knife crime, which it denies, but says it wants to use its spotlight for positive action. Concerns over safety at the carnival have also contributed to insecurity about its future, and the festival's organisers wrote to the Government earlier this year to ask for urgent funding. Carnival chairman Ian Comfort asked for money to steward the event and address safety concerns, amid ongoing warnings from police that there could be a fatality. Eventually City Hall, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea council and Westminster city council provided money, allowing this year's event to take place. Matthew Phillip, the chief executive of Notting Hill Carnival Ltd, said: 'We can't ignore the impact of knife crime on our event. The adults parade, part of the Notting Hill Carnival, in 2024 (Lucy North/PA) 'The tragic deaths of Takayo Nembhard and Cher Maximen broke the hearts of their friends and families as well as our communities and, three years on, the family and friends of Takayo still don't have justice. 'These young people didn't lose their lives because of carnival; carnival is not the cause of this crisis, but it can be part of the solution. 'In that spirit, Carnival aligns perfectly with the principles of DSYF. 'Their ongoing work to help disenfranchised young people to make better choices is a productive and sustainable action to a very complex and, ultimately, sad problem. 'They show that there is choice, and we are working with them to amplify this message that we hope will let people know there are other options. 'The Elba Hope Foundation is about creating real pathways for young people, to build confidence, develop skills and find belonging. 'Carnival provides one of the few creative and cultural outlets left for our youth. That's why we must protect it, invest in it and use its platform to uplift others.' The carnival will run from August 23 to 25 and features parades, steelpan, costumes, bands, sound systems and stages. People will be invited to join a 72-second silence at 3pm on Sunday and Monday to honour people who died in the Grenfell Tower fire, and Kelso Cochrane, who was murdered in a racially motivated attack in Notting Hill in 1959.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Law should change to allow review of cases of jailed officers, lawyer says
Matt Foot said the change would be a 'very simple reform' to prevent cases such as that of Errol Campbell, whose name was posthumously cleared at the Court of Appeal on Thursday, almost 50 years after he was convicted. Mr Campbell, who died in 2004, was found guilty in April 1977 of theft and conspiracy to steal from the Bricklayers' Arms goods depot in south London, where he was a British Rail employee, and jailed for 18 months. The case against him was led by the discredited British Transport Police (BTP) officer Detective Sergeant Derek Ridgewell, who, along with two colleagues, later pleaded guilty to stealing from the same depot. The assistant chief constable of the BTP said following the Court of Appeal's ruling that he was 'disgusted' by Ridgewell's actions, and the force was 'sincerely sorry' to those affected. He also said the force is continuing to 'actively pursue a criminal investigation' into those involved. Lord Justice Holroyde, sitting with Mr Justice Wall and Mr Justice Butcher, said on Thursday it was with 'regret' that the court could not undo Mr Campbell's suffering. But they said they hope clearing his name 'will at least bring some comfort' to his surviving family, including his son, Errol Campbell Jr. Speaking to the media following the hearing, Mr Foot, who represented Mr Campbell Jr, said: 'In 1980, when Ridgewell was convicted, nothing happened to his cases. 'We are calling for a change in the law that, when a police officer goes to prison, there is an automatic review of their cases to look for miscarriages of justice. 'If that had happened, that would have saved more than 45 years of misery for the Campbell family.' When asked if he had political support for the law change, Mr Foot said: 'We are talking to the Justice Select Committee, we're talking to the junior minister, and we believe that it is something that could be put into Hillsborough Law, alongside that, as a very simple reform that could stop this sort of thing ever happening again.' He also called on BTP to name those who 'harboured' Ridgewell, claiming it was 'no secret' in the 1970s that the officer was 'racist and corrupt'. He added that there were 'bound to be others' who were victims of miscarriages of justice. Mr Campbell unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 1978, but his son applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), with the help of the charity Appeal, to look at the case in September 2024. The CCRC had already referred the convictions of Mr Campbell's co-defendants, Saliah Mehmet and Basil Peterkin, whose convictions were quashed in January last year. Henry Blaxland KC, representing Mr Campbell on Thursday, told the court it was dealing with victims of a miscarriage of justice brought about by 'state crime'. In a statement read out by Mr Foot outside the Royal Courts of Justice following the ruling, Mr Campbell Jr said that BTP knew that Ridgewell was 'corrupt' but 'let him carry on regardless'. He continued that his father's conviction 'caused absolute misery', but that his father was 'dapper' and 'a good man'. He also said that he was 'angry that Ridgewell is not alive for this day'. In 1980, Ridgewell, along with detective constables Douglas Ellis and Alan Keeling, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to steal from the Bricklayers' Arms Depot, with Ridgewell dying in prison before he had completed his sentence. In a previous judgment, the court found that their criminal activities between January 1977 and April 1978 resulted in the loss from the depot of goods to the value of about £364,000, 'an enormous sum of money at that time'. In a statement, BTP Assistant Chief Constable Charlie Doyle said: 'We are sincerely sorry to those affected by the criminal actions of former BTP Detective Sergeant Derek Ridgewell, whose appalling actions in the 1970s and 1980s led to the criminalisation of innocent people. 'We're continuing to review records relating to his corrupt practices, which includes those relating to officers who were associated with DS Ridgewell or may have assisted him in his criminal activity, and the review team has recently been provided with additional resources to support its work. 'I am disgusted by the actions of Derek Ridgewell, and while we know we can't change the past, his actions do not represent the BTP of today. 'We continue to actively pursue a criminal investigation into the actions of those involved and will present a file to the CPS for consideration once we have completed our inquiries.'
