New GOP bill would protect AI companies from lawsuits if they offer transparency
Lummis' bill, the Responsible Innovation and Safe Expertise Act, seeks to clarify that doctors, lawyers, financial advisers, engineers and other professionals who use AI programs in their decision-making retain legal liability for any errors they make — so long as AI developers publicly disclose how their systems work.
'This legislation doesn't create blanket immunity for AI — in fact, it requires AI developers to publicly disclose model specifications so professionals can make informed decisions about the AI tools they choose to utilize,' Lummis, a member of the Commerce Committee, said in a statement first shared with NBC News. 'It also means that licensed professionals are ultimately responsible for the advice and decisions they make. This is smart policy for the digital age that protects innovation, demands transparency, and puts professionals and their clients first.'
Lummis' office touted the bill as the first piece of federal legislation that offers clear guidelines for AI liability in a professional context. The measure would not govern liability for other AI elements, such as self-driving vehicles, and it would not provide immunity when AI developers act recklessly or willfully engage in misconduct.
'AI is transforming industries — medicine, law, engineering, finance — and becoming embedded in professional tools that shape critical decisions,' her office said in a release. 'But outdated liability rules discourage innovation, exposing developers to unbounded legal risk even when trained professionals are using these tools.'
Exactly who is liable when AI is used in sensitive medical, legal or financial situations is a bit of a gray area, with some states seeking to enact their own standards.
The House-passed 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which is advancing through Congress and supported by President Donald Trump, includes a provision that would ban states from enacting any AI regulations for 10 years. Senate Republicans last week proposed changing the provision to instead block federal funding for broadband projects to states that regulate AI.
Both Democratic and Republican state officials have criticized the effort to prohibit state-level regulations over the next decade, while AI executives have argued that varying state laws would stifle industry growth when the United States is in stiff competition with countries like China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
10 million Facebook accounts deleted in crackdown on ‘spammy' content
Facebook has deleted over 10 million accounts as part of an ongoing purge of its social network. The company said the action is aimed at cracking down on 'spammy' content and promoting authentic accounts, with over one million accounts removed monthly in the first half of 2025. Many legitimate users have reported their accounts being wrongly deleted, with some blaming artificial intelligence systems for misidentifying them as inauthentic. Referred to as the 'Meta ban wave', the mass deletions have also impacted Instagram accounts, which is also owned by Meta. Affected users receive an email notification and have 180 days to appeal any account suspension before their profile is permanently deleted.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What did the people of the Cotswolds do to deserve a visit from JD Vance?
You have to let politicians go on holiday, I guess. You have to accept the existence of world leaders with whose views you disagree, especially now that it's almost all of them. So why does it feel like a particular provocation for JD Vance to be planning a trip to the Cotswolds? His itinerary isn't yet known, but its bare bones are that, sometime in August, the Vances will visit London, Oxfordshire and Scotland. For a recap on what, exactly, is wrong with the US vice-president, there is nothing more evocative than February's press conference with Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Of course, many of Vance's more extreme views – calling Democratic politicians a 'bunch of childless cat ladies with miserable lives', claiming that staying in an abusive relationship was preferable to getting divorced, and saying that abortion should be banned – were already well known, from a combination of his voting record and his memoir, Hillbilly Elegy. But Republicans say a lot of things, particularly while seeking election. You may have been able to infer Vance's drive to dominate and control others, but it wasn't until that exchange with the Ukrainian president that you could witness it. Legacy media struggled with the right language to describe that press conference: the BBC called it an 'angry spat', CNN got a little bit closer to the mark when it said Zelenskyy 'bristled' at his 'berating'. To any normal human listening to it, unfettered by a muddled commitment to impartiality, it was bullying. Any description that fell short of picking a side, that did not say 'Trump and Vance set out to humiliate Zelenskyy', felt like a whitewash. Against a backdrop of implied financial control, Vance's repeated demands – 'You should be thanking the president'; 'Have you even said, 'thank you' once?' – were for public abasement, and it was strange, disgusting and sullying to witness. Two weeks before that, Vance had indulged in a mass gaslighting event at the Munich conference, claiming that Christians were persecuted in the UK, private prayer at home could be banned in Scotland, the EU had overturned an election in Romania, and freedom of expression was at risk in Germany, Sweden, almost everywhere, in fact, since Europe had gone off the rails. It felt strange and unsettling to hear him use this language – humiliation, defiant untruth, his upside down world in which the victim is painted as the offender are components of coercive control. It is infinitely preferable to avert your eyes than to consider what this means for the rules-based international order. And it is much harder to look the other way when he is holidaying in Chipping Norton. Somehow, the London leg of his journey doesn't feel so confronting; larger, more sprawling and anonymous, the capital is bound to contain some nefarious visitors at any given time, and those of us who live here can't react to everything. In the Cotswolds, by contrast, nothing happens that isn't immediately visible. Boris Johnson can't have a pint in Charlbury or buy a stately home with a three-sided moat; David Cameron can't borrow Jeremy Clarkson's tractor and blow it up; the place is like a petri dish, every minute change in its makeup immediately registers. Yes, it is exceedingly pretty, but it has done nothing to invite high-profile, divisive politics to its doorstep. The Telegraph reports that activists plan to disrupt Vance's trip, which is possible, but a logistical nightmare, given that public transport is rubbish across the Cotswolds. But really, Vance himself is the activist; it is a troll move to holiday in the most visible part of a country that you loudly claim has gone to the dogs. The rest of us are more re-activists. Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Ellen DeGeneres says she moved to Britain because of Trump
LONDON — Ellen DeGeneres has made no secret of her new British life, posting social media clips of sheep charmingly trotting into her luxury rural home while she mows the lawn of the sprawling estate, her trademark hair now natural and undyed. But on Sunday she confirmed for the first time that she moved to the United Kingdom permanently for one reason: the election of President Donald Trump last November. 'We got here the day before the election and woke up to lots of texts from our friends with crying emojis, and I was like, 'He got in.' And we're like, 'We're staying here,' she told an audience at the Everyman Theatre in Cheltenham, central England. After her long-running talk show ended amid allegations of workplace bullying, DeGeneres, 67, bought a home in England's picturesque Cotswolds region with her wife, 'Arrested Development' star Portia de Rossi, 52. With its honey-colored stone, lush greenery and chocolate-box villages, this 800 square-mile haven is home to a slew of celebrities including David and Victoria Beckham, music mogul Simon Cowell and supermodel Kate Moss. This was initially meant to be a transatlantic bolthole, she said. But asked Sunday if Trump's election cemented that move as permanent, she answered an unequivocal, 'Yes,' in comments the theater confirmed as accurate Monday. 'Everything here is just better,' DeGeneres said, while lamenting the current state of her homeland. 'I wish we were at a place where it was not scary for people to be who they are. I wish that we lived in a society where everybody could accept other people and their differences,' she said. 'So until we're there, I think there's a hard place to say we have huge progress.' NBC News has contacted the White House for a response to the criticisms. DeGeneres also referenced moves by the Southern Baptist Church to endorse banning same-sex marriage and overturn a Supreme Court ruling legalizing it nationwide. 'They're trying to literally stop it from happening in the future and possibly reverse it,' she said. 'Portia and I are already looking into it, and if they do that, we're going to get married here.' She also addressed the demise of "The Ellen DeGeneres Show," after 19 seasons, almost two decades and more than 60 Emmys, after staff complained of a toxic workplace environment. 'I'm a direct person, and I'm very blunt, and I guess sometimes that means that," she said with a pause, "I'm mean?' The theater's CEO, Mark Goucher, told NBC News in an email that it "was a huge privilege to meet her and have her at The Everyman. Our door will always be open to our new neighbor.' DeGeneres is not the first person to toy with leaving America's increasingly polarized social and political landscape. Starting in June last year, around the time of then President Joe Biden's disastrous TV debate against Trump, Google data showed a spike in Americans searching 'how to move to X country,' according to an analysis by CNBC. In early February, days after Trump's inauguration, a poll of 2,000 people by Talker Research found that 17% wanted to leave in the next five years, with the top destination of choice being Canada. Some 69% of these respondents said they didn't like the direction in which the country was headed, and 65% said it had become too toxic. Trump has previously given short shrift to these potential wantaways. 'If you're not happy, you can leave,' he said in 2019. While DeGeneres appears to be enjoying an idyllic rural life, there is some evidence the grass may not be greener on the other side of the Pond. Though the U.K. is often vaunted for its universal free healthcare, public transportation network, and lack of mass shootings, it actually performs worse than the U.S. on a raft of quality-of-life indices measured by the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which tracks such data. Out of 40 countries in the OECD, the U.S. ranks 10th in the 'Better Life Index,' which rates nations on everything from housing and income to life satisfaction, community and work-life balance. The U.K. is 14th. Alexander Smith
