logo
Lithuanian leaders taken to shelters after Belarus airspace violation

Lithuanian leaders taken to shelters after Belarus airspace violation

Euronews10-07-2025
Political leaders in Lithuania were briefly directed to air raid shelters on Thursday after the alarm was raised over an airspace violation from Belarus, Lithuanian media reported.
Media reports stated that Prime Minister Gintautas Paluckas and Parliament Speaker Saulius Skvernelis were taken to safety as a precaution while the situation was being investigated.
Lithuania's President Gitanas Nausėda is currently on a foreign trip in Ireland.
Authorities were initially concerned that the unidentified flying object could be an Iranian-made Shahed drone of the type used by Russia in ongoing air strikes on Ukraine, the BNS news agency reported.
The Lithuanian army confirmed in a post on Facebook that the object was detected at 11:30 am local time (10:30 am CEST).
Fighter jets that were already in the air as part of the NATO Baltic Air Policing (BAP) mission were scrambled to respond to the incident when the object fell to the ground around one kilometre from the border with Belarus.
A closer investigation revealed that the object was an unmanned, makeshift plane reportedly made of plywood and foam, and it did not pose any danger.
The Lithuanian State Border Guard Service (VSAT) said it had often recorded cases of attempts to transport contraband cigarettes from Belarus into Lithuania using balloons or makeshift drones.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lithuania blames Russia for large rise in GPS jamming incidents
Lithuania blames Russia for large rise in GPS jamming incidents

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

Lithuania blames Russia for large rise in GPS jamming incidents

Russia is ramping up its GPS jamming operations against Lithuania, with pilots particularly affected by such interference, according to local media reports. Pilots in Lithuania reported disruptions to their GPS communications on 1,022 occasions in June, up from just 46 times in the same month last year, the Baltic News Service (BNS) reported based on data provided by the air traffic control company Oro Navigacija. This also marked a huge increase in recent months, as 585 incidents were recorded in May and 447 in April. Darius Kuliešius, deputy chairman of Lithuania's Communications Regulatory Authority (RRT), told LRT Radio that the regulator had identified more than 10 locations in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad "from where Russia is causing this interference". Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, nations located on the Baltic Sea have reported several incidents of suspected hybrid warfare by Moscow, including damage to undersea power cables, incidents of arson and cyberattacks. The Kremlin has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. Lithuania's Transport Minister Eugenijus Sabutis told BNS that the data was "worrying" and said the issue also affected Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Sweden, Finland. Estonia and Finland last year criticised Russia for GPS jamming in the region's skies. The EU must realise "that these interferences will not go away, that Russia and Belarus will continue to behave maliciously," Sabutis said. Last month, 13 EU countries — the Baltic states included — called on the European Commission to respond to interference with Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) orgininating from Russia and Belarus. Russia told global regulators that EU countries using navigation and broadcast satellites for both civil and military purposes, notably in support of Ukraine, could not protest if signals were jammed by Moscow, trade publication Space Intel Report wrote last week. Russia's Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media has reportedly said that the country will attempt to avoid interference with non-military uses of GNSS. UN agencies including the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) recently issued a statement expressing "grave concern" about the rising cases of harmful interference. The ICAO last month urged Russia to stop interfering with GNSS signals, saying that this posed a "serious threat" to passenger flights, especially in the Baltic Sea region.

Anti-pesticide petition: An unprecedented grassroots movement
Anti-pesticide petition: An unprecedented grassroots movement

LeMonde

time4 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Anti-pesticide petition: An unprecedented grassroots movement

In just 10 days, a petition on the website of France's Assemblée Nationale, launched by a student who says she has no political affiliation, has garnered more than 1.5 million signatures. The record is striking: Never before had a grassroots initiative of this kind surpassed the 500,000-signature mark. The momentum behind it now appears to be so strong that no one can predict where it will stop. The petition calls for the "immediate repeal" of legislation known as the Duplomb Law, which was definitively adopted on July 8 and provides for rolling back a series of environmental measures. These include speeding up water storage projects, facilitating intensive livestock farming, and, above all, reintroducing certain pesticides, including acetamiprid, a neonicotinoid that has been banned in France since 2018, but still permitted in the European Union until 2033. After intense lobbying, beet and hazelnut producers convinced lawmakers to allow it to be reauthorized for use, arguing that it was their only way to not fall prey to competition from neighboring countries. The unprecedentedly large grassroots movement making itself heard on environmental issues through the now-famous petition has caught everyone off guard. It comes as a contrast to the 2024 European elections, in which, in France and many other European Union countries, environmentalist parties lost ground while the far-right surged in the polls. The petition reveals not only a genuine surge in environmental awareness but also a determination to have an impact when public health is at stake. Acetamiprid has been accused of harming pollinating insects, accumulating in soil and groundwater and posing risks to human health. The petition's many signatories easily identified with its wording, condemning what it described as a "scientific, ethical, environmental and public health aberration." The influence of the FNSEA farming union, which staunchly defends intensive agriculture practices, has undoubtedly also been targeted by the movement. Before becoming a senator (from the right-wing Les Républicains party, LR), Laurent Duplomb, the legislation's author, was the president of a farmers' representative body in central France. Democratically speaking, the grassroots movement's success is significant. Its first effect has been to highlight the French Parliament's recent shortcomings. By surpassing 500,000 signatures, the petitioners have secured the possibility that a public debate on the law could be held when Parliament reconvenes, after the Assemblée, far too divided, failed to hold such a debate when the bill was being examined in late May. A maneuver by the bill's rapporteur, Julien Dive (LR), to initially reject the bill as a way to circumvent obstruction tactics from the left, resulted in the debate being held behind closed doors, conducted in a joint committee composed of seven members of each chamber. While the process was legal, it has proven unsatisfactory. Given the stakes raised by the bill, it was imperative that both sides be able to openly express their positions on it. The petition's second effect has been to put the entire political class on edge. Riding this newfound surge of momentum, the left has vowed to scrap the Duplomb law. However, aside from waiting for the Constitutional Council to decide on the matter, it has fewer options at its disposal than the president, who can request that a new deliberation on the law be held or even hold back on promulgating it, if the public outcry grows further. The petitioners likely did not intend to bring Emmanuel Macron back into the center of the public debate, but the implacable logic of the Fifth Republic has led to just that.

Trump says US could hit Iran's nuclear sites again 'if necessary'
Trump says US could hit Iran's nuclear sites again 'if necessary'

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Trump says US could hit Iran's nuclear sites again 'if necessary'

President Donald Trump has warned that the United States could strike Iran's nuclear sites again "if necessary." Trump issued the warning in a social media post on Monday evening after Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Fox News that Tehran cannot give up its nuclear enrichment programme, even though it was damaged in US bombings last month. "It is stopped because, yes, damages are serious and severe. But obviously, we cannot give up on enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride," Araghchi said. On his Truth Social platform, Trump referenced Araghchi's comments about the nuclear sites being severely damaged and said: "Of course they are, just like I said, and we will do it again, if necessary!" The US strikes on 22 June hit three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites — Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — during Israel's 12-day conflict with Iran. Days after a US-brokered ceasefire was announced, Trump claimed that Washington's strikes had "completely and fully obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites. However, Trump's claim was called into question when a subsequent US intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear programme had only been set back a few months. The White House firmly pushed back on the assessment, calling it "flat-out wrong". Trump's social media post followed an announcement by Iran on Monday that it would hold renewed talks on Friday with European nations over its nuclear programme. The meeting in Istanbul will be the first since the Israel-Iran ceasefire was reached late last month, and follows similar discussions in the Turkish city in May. The talks will bring Iranian officials together with counterparts from the UK, France and Germany — known as the E3 nations — and the European Union's foreign policy chief. "The topic of the talks is clear, lifting sanctions and issues related to the peaceful nuclear program of Iran," Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said on Monday. Under a 2015 deal designed to limit Iran's nuclear activities, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Tehran agreed to tough restrictions on its nuclear programme in exchange for an easing of international sanctions. The deal began to unravel in 2018, when the US pulled out and started to reintroduce certain sanctions. European nations have recently threatened to trigger the 2015 deal's "snapback" mechanism, which would allow sanctions to be reimposed in the case of non-compliance by Tehran. Iran has gradually increased its nuclear activities, including enriching uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog. Tehran denies allegations that it is seeking a nuclear weapon and has long said its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store