MTG urges Donald Trump to commute George Santos' prison sentence
'George Santos has taken responsibility,' Greene wrote on X, sharing a letter she sent to the Justice Department's Office of the Pardon Attorney. 'He's shown remorse. It's time to correct this injustice.'
'I wholeheartedly believe in justice and the rule of the law, and I understand the gravity of such actions,' the letter reads. 'However, I believe a seven-year sentence for such campaign-related matters for an individual with no prior criminal record extends far beyond what is warranted.'
Greene claimed Santos, who has sold Cameo videos speaking to fans and hosted a podcast playing on his reputation called Pants on Fire, was 'sincerely remorseful and has accepted full responsibility for his actions.'
In April, Santos was sentenced to 87 months in prison for wire fraud and identity theft after pleading guilty last year and agreeing to nearly $374,000 in restitution payments.
The following month, the former New York representative, who prosecutors accused of pocketing thousands of dollars in donor funds, appealed to the president for a full pardon.
'Previously, I was not entertaining a pardon because I didn't know what my judgment would be. Now, I am in the process of filling an application to a pardon for the president. I'll take a commutation, a clemency, whatever the president is willing to give me,' Santos said in an interview with Piers Morgan.
'I do believe this is an unfair judgment handed down to me,' he added. 'There was a lot of politicization over the process.'
Santos, 37, is now in custody at a federal prison in Fairton, New Jersey. He was expelled from Congress in December 2023, following the release of a damning ethics report.
He shared a goodbye post on X before entering prison thanking his allies and critics alike.
'Well, darlings…The curtain falls, the spotlight dims, and the rhinestones are packed,' he wrote. 'From the halls of Congress to the chaos of cable news what a ride it's been! Was it messy? Always. Glamorous? Occasionally. Honest? I tried… most days.'
Santos was charged with 23 felony counts for three alleged schemes to use donor money and government assistance funds to enrich himself while running for Congress. He initially pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The Republican, who was elected in 2022, also grabbed headlines for exaggerating details about his education and work experience, as well as his mother's whereabouts during 9/11 and his Jewish heritage.
Greene has sought presidential intervention for controversial figures before.
In May, she asked the president to pardon Derek Chauvin, the then-Minneapolis police officer who murdered George Floyd in a widely seen 2020 incident that set off national protests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump on Sydney Sweeney controversy: If she's Republican, ‘I think her ad is fantastic'
President Trump on Sunday weighed in on actor Sydney Sweeney and her recent controversial ad campaign with American Eagle. 'You'd be surprised at how many people are Republicans,' the president said after a reporter stated that the 'White Lotus' and 'Euphoria' star is a registered Republican. 'That's what I wouldn't have known, but I'm glad you told me that. If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic,' the president said while en route back to Washington on Sunday evening from Bedminster, N.J. BuzzFeed reported over the weekend that Sweeney has been registered to the Republican Party of Florida since June 2024. The ad featuring Sweeney has caused backlash online, with social media users criticizing what they claim are racist undertones surrounding the campaign's message that Sweeney 'has great jeans,' a riff on the idea of 'good genes.' 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color,' Sweeney says in one video. 'My jeans are blue.' Vice President Vance mocked critics of the ad in a recent interview, blaming Democrats for those who argue the commercial backs eugenics. 'So you have a pretty girl doing a jeans ad and they can't help but freak out. It reveals a lot more about them than it does us. No question,' Vance said on the 'Ruthless Podcast.' White House communications director Steven Cheung pointed to the backlash as an example of 'cancel culture run amok.' The Hill has reached out to a contact for Sweeney for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kelly McParland: Bowing to Trump would betray Canada
Prime Minister Mark Carney's post-midnight response to Washington's latest escalation of its tariff war was calm, measured, sensible and appropriate, everything the current regime in Washington is not. Canada, Carney said, will continue to negotiate in search of a reasonable agreement, notwithstanding the absence of any indication the U.S. is open to reasonable negotiations. What Washington wants is to continue operating what amounts to a global extortion racket, threatening all America's best customers with dire consequences if they refuse to bow to its demands and offer up supplication to whatever notion occurs to President Donald Trump at any given moment. It's well and good that Ottawa should keep up the attempt, even if the odds seem set against success. There's no use pretending this is a situation that can be handled in the traditional manner of friends and trading partners: a search for a fair-minded and equitable agreement that serves the interests of both parties. But we should keep trying, if only to demonstrate that the qualities of civility haven't broken down altogether, despite the U.S. administration's every apparent effort to ignore them. From the Trump administration's point of view, extortion has been working marvelously well to date. Japan has reportedly agreed to more than a half-trillion dollars in investments and loans in return for lowered tariffs. South Korea, according to Trump, will 'give to the United States $350 Billion Dollars for Investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself.' The European Union accepted a pact to buy US$750 billion in energy and invest US$600 billion in the U.S., a deal virtually none of Europe's leaders were happy with, and which France openly denounced. Lesser entities have been similarly cowed. Paramount Pictures agreed to a $16 million payoff rather than risk challenging a spurious suit that threatened a much-sought US$8 billion merger. Columbia University is to pay the government US$221 million rather than lose access to federal funding. Harvard initially put up a determined effort to resist federal threats, but is said to be open to a $500 million settlement. Many of the agreements are fuzzy and open to interpretation. All have resulted from one thing: the fear and uncertainty generated by the knowledge that the U.S. government has become a one-man operation that operates solely by the whim of a president shown unfailingly to be unpredictable, unreliable and contemptuous of the law, of accepted standards and even of his own word. There is nothing to be gained by betting the prosperity of Canadians on any assurances offered up by Washington as long as Donald Trump remains president. What must be done is to defend the country's integrity, its sovereignty, its independence and its standing as a place where fairness, trust, honesty and dignity are still treated seriously as core values, even if other entities are willing to bargain theirs away. The extent of the danger in bowing to Washington was underlined in the last hours before the supposed Aug. 1 negotiating deadline. Upset that Ottawa would join France and Britain in declaring plans to recognize a Palestinian state, Trump declared it would make it 'very hard' to finalize a trade deal, effectively seeking to control Canada's foreign policy in addition to its economic practices. Trump has been president for just seven months and has been fortunate thus far in avoiding the forecast consequences of his policies. The stock market has been up, overall growth has been reasonable, and his targets have been capitulating rather than retaliating. But it's early days, and no winning streak lasts forever. It takes time for the impact of bad ideas to filter through. Already, the decline in tourism is being felt as people avoid the U.S. 'Where Did All the Las Vegas Tippers Go?' the Wall Street Journal wondered, noting that visits to the gambling mecca have fallen so drastically that Trump's 'no tax on tips' law has had little benefit. The rise in stock prices has been credited largely to Wall Street's belief that Washington wouldn't follow through on its tariff threats — Trump was the TACO president, as in Trump Always Chickens Out. Except this time, he didn't. The latest economic figures aren't encouraging: hiring has slowed, unemployment has risen, imports fell sharply in the second quarter after increasing in the first, sales are struggling, and second quarter growth figures still leave the economy at less than half the rate of a year ago. The U.S. dollar is weakening, the spiralling debt and burgeoning deficit are a direct threat to health and pension benefits many Americans depend on, and which have already been cut back under Trump's 'big, beautiful' mega-bill. The Brookings Institute notes that federal debt is at the highest level since the Second World War, and warns that spending at this level is unsustainable. MAGA world, meanwhile, shows signs of splinters. America being what it has become, the discord arises not from tariffs, economics, or the brutalizing of immigrants, but from anger at Trump's handling of the Epstein affair and his obvious reluctance to share full details of his involvement in it. The U.S. position on Israel is causing similar ructions. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, MAGA to her soul, denounced Israel's actions, asserting that while the October 7 Hamas attack was 'horrific… so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza.' Trump has been forced to backtrack on his relations with Israel's prime minister, his reluctance to ship weapons to Ukraine, his relations with Russian president Vladimir Putin, and on numerous pledges and threats that ran into spirited pushback. Bullying and bluffing are central to his demeanour, but he doesn't recoil from retreat when required; he just insists it's another success. He'll be gone in three years or so. He has effectively humiliated the Republican party, turning it into a personal vehicle of the sort common in the autocracies he admires. It's far from certain whoever succeeds him will manage a similar level of control. Republican heavyweights are frightened of Trump, debasing themselves in their willingness to cower before him, but no one likes to be humiliated, and it's just as likely his departure sets off both an ugly battle to replace him and a determination to ensure no other figure ever gains a similar ability to dictate their actions. Carney is correct in stating that Canada's job now is to focus on 'what we can control.' Our dependence on the U.S. has long been recognized as overdone and dangerous; it's just been too easy to resist. Trump has shown us the consequences of our own lethargy. Caving to Washington now buys us nothing. Trump's unpredictability means nothing he agrees to can be treated with certainty. No one wants to invest in a country whose economy is controlled by a foreign renegade who operates by whim. Canada's task is to set our own course and deal with the short-term consequences, as Ukraine has done in a far deadlier conflict, but one bearing the same choice: to stand by its independence as nation, protect its sovereignty, its pride and its heritage. It will be painful, but a country that values itself too little to withstand temporary distress soon risks being a country at all. National Post Irwin Cotler & Noah Lew: We support a two-state solution. But not this way Michael Higgins: Mark Carney abandons Canadian principles for pinky promises on Palestine Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Company advised by Trump sons said it hoped to benefit from fed money, then took it back
NEW YORK (AP) — A public document filed by a company that just hired President Donald Trump's two oldest sons as advisers included a sentence early Monday that said it hoped to benefit from grants and other incentives from the federal government, which their father happens to lead. But when The Associated Press asked the Trump family business about the apparent conflict of interest, the document was revised and the line taken out. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are getting 'founder shares' worth millions of dollars in New America Acquisition 1 Corp., a company with no operating business that hopes to fill that hole by purchasing an American company that can play 'a meaningful role in revitalizing domestic manufacturing,' according to the filing. The president has geared his trade policy toward boosting manufacturing in the U.S. The original version of the securities filing said the target company should be 'well positioned' to tap federal or state government incentives. That reference was taken out of the revised version. The Trump Organization didn't reply to a question about whether New America still planned to benefit from government programs or why the line was cut. But the outside law firm Paul Hastings that helped prepare the document sent an email to AP saying it was 'mistake' made by 'scriveners,' an old term for transcribers of legal papers. Kathleen Clark, an expert in government ethics, said any excuses are too late because the Trumps had already tipped their hand. 'They just deleted the language. They haven't committed not to do what they said earlier today they were planning to do," said the Washington University law professor and Trump critic. "It's an attempt to exploit public office for private profit.' New America is what's know as a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. It's a publicly traded company that exists solely to use its funds to acquire another company and take the target public. New America plans to raise money by selling new stock on the New York Stock Exchange at $10 a share. That will hand the two Trump sons a potential total of $50 million in paper wealth the moment the stock begins trading on the first day. The company hopes to sell enough shares to raise $300 million, which it then plans to use buying a yet unidentified manufacturer. A press release issued by New America saying it was focused on 'American values and priorities." It made no mention of the aim to get government incentives. The filing to New America's potential new investors to the Securities and Exchange Commission was explicit about what it was looking for in a target company. It said, among other things, it wanted a company that can ride 'public policy tailwinds" by benefiting from federal or state 'grants, tax credits, government contracts or preferential procurement programs.' Bernard Condon, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
