Fan plays video game for 35,000 hours and then demands a refund
While it's important that digital platforms allow you to get refunds on video games you've purchased, there obviously need to be restrictions in place to prevent people from just playing the game all the way through and then asking for their money back.
That becomes tricky when it's a multiplayer game, but Steam's refund policy states that you not only need to request a refund within two weeks of purchase, but you must also have played the game for less than two hours.
There's an argument to be had about whether two hours is enough time to determine if a game is right for you, but we can all agree that if you've sunk in 35,000 hours, it's too late to be asking for your money back. And yet, one fan of dinosaur themed MMO Ark: Survival Evolved has done exactly that.
If you visit the game's Steam page, you'll find the user review at the top of the 'most helpful' section is a scathing takedown written by a player claiming to have 'enjoyed Ark for 35,000 hours, one of my favourite games to play with friends and family.'
35,000 hours is equivalent to playing the game for almost four years straight, which we don't need to tell you is a wee bit more than Steam's two hour limit for refund requests.
As for why they're only now asking for a refund, the fan says it's because their own custom server, that makes use of fan-made mods, no longer works. The review was posted on July 16, the same day as an update for the game and its Aquatica DLC, so the assumption is that the update is responsible for this.
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
'Server doesn't match, mods don't work, and of all this is to force us to [Ark: Survival Ascended],' continues the review, 'I have that game as well, and It sucks.'
For context, Survival Ascended is a remaster of Survival Evolved currently in early access and is meant to serve as a replacement, since the original game's official servers are shut down. Not that that's stopped fans from sticking with it through custom servers.
Surprisingly or not, there are plenty of other fans who agree with the sentiment. One reply to the review on Steam reads, 'Ark was one of my best games, but after this I will be joining the guy with the 35,000 hours…I also want my refund.'
Another adds, 'When the guy with 35K hours is saying this… you as a company need to pack it up and go home.' More Trending
Not everyone is sympathetic, though, with others pointing out the obscene playtime.
'Buddy you are not getting a refund, in no world would you get a refund for anything you spend this much damn time on,' reads one response on Steam. Another simply says, 'Bro go outside.'
Recent reactions to the review on Reddit are also split, with some mocking the player's refund demand while others think it's justified and agree that the new update is a ploy to push fans into getting the remaster (which, for the record, is a separate paid product).
There's no indication of how much he paid for the game originally but while it's £12.79 at the moment it cost as much as £54.99 during its peak. The remaster is currently £37.99.
Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter.
To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here.
For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.
MORE: The 13 best dinosaur video games ever made
MORE: Portal 2 is no longer the highest rated video game on Steam
MORE: Nintendo and Steam crack down on hentai and other 'eSlop' filling up game stores
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I'm 19 and my sister hasn't invited me to her 'child-free' wedding but STILL expects a gift. Am I wrong for being furious?
A bride has been blasted online for expecting a wedding gift from her 19-year-old half sister - even though she banned her from the big day. The bitter family feud was laid bare in a now-viral Reddit post, where the younger sibling revealed she'd been left off the invite list for her sister's wedding because she's a teen. She later received an unsolicited link to the bride's lavish gift registry. Confused by the unexpected message, the teen messaged her asking if it was in fact her registry link. 'What else could it possibly be?' her older sister responded curtly. When the younger woman asked why it was sent to her, the bride replied: '??? You're my sister'. That's when her sibling pointed out the obvious - that she wasn't invited to the wedding. The bride, undeterred, claimed that it is common for people who can't make a wedding to still give the happy couple a gift. A bride has been blasted online for expecting a wedding gift from her 19-year-old half sister - even though she banned her from the big day The college student, who did not name herself didn't hold back. 'Can't make it =/= not invited,' she wrote. As it transpired, the real reason for the older sister had left her off the invite list was because it was a 'child-free wedding'. 'I'm a fully grown adult,' her sister argued. A defence for the argument, with both based in America, could be the view that the 19-year-old is a minor in regard to the country-wide drinking law of over 21. To which the younger sibling then pointed out the irony of the situation, writing that they were having a dry wedding - so it really shouldn't matter. Things quickly spiralled with the bride dismissing the argument altogether. Still standing her ground, the teen reiterated that she was an adult. And like many sibling quarrels, the exchange got rather petty with each trying to have the last word But the bride doubled down. 'It's my wedding and you're a teenager. It's clear by your reaction to my own wedding you are not mature enough to attend adult events or exist in adult spaces,' she said. Naturally, the exchange sparked a frenzy online, with thousands rushing to the teen's defence and labelling the bride 'entitled' and 'completely out of touch'. 'It's customary if you can't make it - not if you aren't invited at all. Your sister is delusional,' one Reddit user declared. 'And children aren't expected to give gifts at a wedding, regardless of whether they're invited.' 'This is the perfect response,' one said of the teen's blunt messages. 'And yes, OP needs to drag the parents into this too. Bridezilla is their creation.' Others were equally savage. 'Sis is being a child, who needs an etiquette lesson,' one wrote. 'Who begs a college kid for a gift and throws a hissy fit when she gets a reasonable no?' 'This is one of the craziest things I've ever seen. Older teens aren't children regarding being invited to a wedding - and mine was child free,' one more added. While the bride may have been expecting an air fryer or a fancy blender, it seems all she received was a viral roasting and a lesson in wedding etiquette. More hilariously, it was all courtesy of a Gen Z sibling who doesn't suffer fools (or unsolicited registries) lightly. And like many sibling quarrels, the exchange got rather petty with each trying to have the last word. 'It's my money. Not getting a gift. And begging for expensive crap from a broke college student is cringe as hell,' the younger sister wrote. 'You're being immature and unsupportive,' the bride replied. The final reply was perhaps the pettiest of all. '*Fart noises*,' the youngest wrote. 'My point stands,' the eldest concluded.
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Gradius Origins interview - ‘This is truly a wonderful thing'
GameCentral speaks to producer Ryosaku Ueno about Gradius Origins, Salamander 3, and how to get younger gamers into 2D shooters. We don't usually like doing email interviews, because you never get as much out of people if you're not meeting them face to face, but there's always an exception worth making and considering we're such big fans of 2D shooters we jumped at the chance to put some questions to Ryosaku Ueno – producer of Gradius Origins at Konami. You can read our review of the retro compilation here, but the short version is we loved it, especially the all-new sequel Salamander 3. It's a great example of the genre, that looks like it's stepped straight out of the 90s but we're well aware that that won't necessarily be a draw for many people nowadays. So we asked Ueno what the future for 2D shooters is in the modern games industry, and how franchises like Gradius and Salamander can continue to appeal to nostalgic veterans while also attracting younger players that are new to the genre. GC: Are you confident there is still a significant audience for 2D shooters? It seems a very old-fashioned kind of genre but can it still appeal to younger gamers who have little or no previous experience with it? RU: I can't say there are many, but I feel there is a certain number, and I have the impression that the number has been increasing over the past few years. The game system is very simple in terms of experience, so I think it will be easy for young players who have never played before to understand and enjoy. We have added various support functions so that even beginners can enjoy it, and we have made it possible to gradually reach the difficulty level of the original game, so I am looking forward to everyone's reactions. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. GC: How do you feel the games have stood the test of time? What makes a good 2D shooter in terms of the weapons, level design, and bosses? RU: It's like the origins of classical music. After Gradius, bullet hell shooters and other types of shooters were born. Weapons, stage design, bosses, etc. have gone through various trends over the years, and I think what constitutes a good game varies depending on the era and the player. However, I believe that masterpieces are works that transcend these trends and provide enjoyment, and have something that is passed down through the ages. What that something is really depends on the work itself. GC: What particular elements does Gradius do best and how has it influenced the genre as a whole? Would the 2D shooter genre even exist without Gradius? The innovative system which allows players to choose their own power-ups. Using three buttons to play alongside the advanced graphics for the time. Each stage featured different background music and stage concepts which were largely unprecedented at the time. The excellent soundtrack and challenging gameplay further enhanced the experience. While these elements may seem common today, this series remains a timeless classic, embodying the core enjoyment that made it so beloved originally. It's clear that this game had a significant influence on future 2D shooters; so whilst it may be arrogant to say that 'without Gradius…' there would be nothing, there are numerous works that have inherited the spirit of the Gradius series, as they continue to be created even today. This is truly a wonderful thing. GC: Why does Origins have such a particular focus on Salamander? I have to admit it's my favourite aspect of the franchise but how would you define the difference between it and regular Gradius? RU: There are two groups of thought regarding Gradius and Salamander: one considers them separate series, while the other views them as part of the same series. However, by 1990, the two series began to be treated as one. They are essentially two series with the same core line but different expressions. The difference lies in whether one focuses on the core line or the overall perspective. Still, since both lines are kind of the same, those who loved one are likely to lean toward the other as well… I hope. That's how I feel. For me, they are still both separate series and part of the same series, but I love both equally. However, to be honest, while the Gradius collection makes sense, the Salamander series is difficult to compile as a standalone collection… so we decided to release them together at this time. In my opinion, and Mr Hori from M2's opinion, Gradius is 'delicate' and Salamander is 'bold.' GC: Was it difficult to make Salamander 3, given there are presumably fewer and fewer people today that have the skill to make 2D shooters? How does the sequel attempt to evolve the gameplay and visuals of the franchise? RU: The production was handled by M2, but Konami was also involved from the beginning. There are fewer staff members and companies capable of producing 2D shooters these days, but that's precisely why we teamed up with M2, who possess the expertise and staff to make it happen. When creating this collection of original titles, we reluctantly had to exclude Gradius 4 due to production schedule, porting difficulty, and cost considerations. However, we discussed with M2's Mr Hori and decided to create a new title, Salamander 3, as an additional unique point. Both M2 and I simply wanted to create a new entry in the series, rather than focusing on making a sequel. The reason a new game was added for Salamander, rather than Gradius, is because we wanted to minimise scheduling issues, especially as the time needed for tuning the restart points within Gradius would have proven too difficult compared to Salamander, in which respawning is instant. Additionally, the Salamander series aligns better with our current ideal conditions of a playthrough time of approximately 15–20 minutes and six stages. New features include Burst Attack, which temporarily boosts weapon power for some seconds, allowing for powerful attacks, but reduces attack power during the cooldown period. However, the concept behind Salamander 3 is what if M2 had made a sequel to Salamander 2 in the late 1990s?' so the system, graphics, and music are designed to evoke the atmosphere of that time. The main appeal is probably the sense of familiarity, like 'Yes, this is it!' It's not a 'brand new Gradius series!' I think that experienced players will feel that 'it's Gradius'. The scenes that fans wanted to see appear one after another, and there are predictable developments that make you think, 'That's how it goes,' as well as moments that make you laugh. We've scattered various elements from Salamander and Salamander 2 throughout the game. Like Gradius ReBirth, the more knowledgeable you are, the more you'll find little details that make you smile. On top of that, there are also developments that surpass fans' expectations. So, in a nutshell, it's a 'solid yet chaotic Salamander.' However, the difficulty adjustment has been updated to suit modern tastes, rather than staying true to the original. It's not designed to be finished in 5 or 10 minutes like an arcade game, but rather balanced for home play while still feeling modern and it's not too easy either. After having some practice, I think you'll be able to complete the game once, so please give it a try and enjoy it! GC: Origins has an impressive range of features for more inexperienced players, including training mode, easy mode, and rewind, but do you worry that belated, faux-retro sequels focus too much on the high difficulty level? I've never considered it an important part of the appeal and yet it's usually the number one priority for most retro titles. RU: It depends on the preferences of the target users and the developers, doesn't it? If the demand and supply for extremely high difficulty are properly matched, then that's the right approach. Titles like Gradius and Parodius have also evolved towards higher difficulty levels in the past. Since the early Gradius titles have been ported multiple times in the past, when we decided to create the definitive collection, we aimed to pack in as many support features as possible so that even those who had purchased previous ports would feel that this collection was something entirely different and worth purchasing. Perhaps this is the result of all the accumulated experience we've gained over the years. GC: Is there any long-term future for 2D shooters beyond retro-themed sequels and remakes? The original Star Fox remains one of the few attempts to extrude the gameplay into 3D but there were very few clones and the series quickly moved into a different style of action. Can you imagine a future where there is a new 3D Gradius game of any kind? More Trending RU: 3D Gradius! There was a large arcade game called Solar Assault in the past, but the machine performance left much to be desired… A future that goes beyond sequels and remakes of 2D shooting games… That's a difficult question. It's like asking if classical music can become modern pop songs. If it's arranged in a modern style, is it still classical music? Can it still be called classical music? I am not sure of a future where a new 3D Gradius is released, but whether it can still be called Gradius is another matter. While some elements and the essence may remain, it would feel like a different game. On the other hand, if the project is too constrained by the 2D Gradius format, it will likely fail. And many 2D Gradius fans (or even me) can imagine a future where a new 3D Gradius is dismissed as 'this isn't Gradius (because it's not 2D).' It's a dilemma. Personally, I want to explore the possibilities, but I also dream that the new generation of young people who played the Gradius Origins will embrace the past and create a project that captures the soul of Gradius and 2D shooters for the next step. Email gamecentral@ leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter. To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here. For more stories like this, check our Gaming page. MORE: GTA Online will add age verification to comply with UK laws claims insider MORE: Battlefield 6 'doesn't need Nicki Minaj' says dev in knock against Call Of Duty MORE: Ubisoft threatened to sue voice actor over Assassin's Creed 4 remake hint
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I bought a children's toy, but the instructions were in Chinese...can you figure out what it is supposed to be?
Doctor's kits, construction tools, and kitchen sets are often very common items in the toy aisle. But as the years go on, they seem to get more and more intricate, and without an instruction manual it can be difficult to discern what exactly your child is playing with. That's the problem a parent on Reddit ran into before uploading a photo to the site's 'What is this thing' thread. FlakyPhilosophy5103 posted the picture in hopes of getting to the bottom of a toy box mystery that had been bothering them for months. Along with a picture of two colorful children's toys, the poster wrote: 'Is anyone able to help me know what these things are supposed to be please? It has been bugging me for months. 'The kit was in Chinese so I am none the wiser.' They described the small plastic items as a 'scraper' and a 'round item' which came in a child's doctor kit. Fortunately, parents flocked to the comment section to help the parent identify exactly which fictitious procedures their child would be performing with the mysterious plastic tools. At first, there were a couple of well-meaning, but totally off-base guesses. One user commented: 'Could the blue thing be one of those reflex hammers?' Another theorized: 'Maybe the blue thing is a strange tongue depressor? Like, with a funky angle to get the large handle out of the line of sight, from before disposables?' A third said: 'The pink thing looks like the eye test where the doc switches out lenses.' One person even though the pink round object and blue plastic toy could be a dental X-ray machine and tooth guard. But the overwhelming consensus took the right answer in a different direction. Comparing the items to play doctor's kits online and toys of their own, as always, Reddit commenters were able to get to the bottom of it. 'I think the blue thing is supposed to be a scalpel,' said one answer. The commenters confirmed that the pink toy was supposed to be a doctor's light 'It's a surgery light and a scalpel, we have the same kit,' said another. People uploaded photos of similar kits which labeled the items as a scalpel and a spotlight, confirming their theories. The original asker posted a response, confirming that the solution had been found: 'Solved! Thanks all. It seems scalpel and surgery light is the answer. Maybe I can listen properly next time she is playing rather than wondering!'
