Why your laundry could be making you sick and what to do about it
But healthcare professionals who wash their work uniforms at home may be unknowingly spreading superbugs, according to a new study.
Professor Katie Laird of De Montfort University Leicester, a public university in England, tested home washing machines in a study and found the machines failed to remove potentially harmful material, even after running a hot water setting at the equivalent of 140 degrees Fahrenheit.
Shampoo Recalled For Bacteria Contamination That Could Cause Infection
"Our research highlights that domestic laundering of healthcare textiles may not consistently eliminate harmful bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant bacteria," Laird told Fox News Digital.
The team tested six different models of washing machines to see how well they cleaned fabric contaminated with bacteria that can cause a variety of health conditions.
Read On The Fox News App
Half of the machines did not disinfect the clothing during a rapid cycle — while a third of them failed to clean sufficiently during the standard cycle.
Laird, a professor of microbiology in the School of Pharmacy and head of the university's Infectious Disease Research Group, said the finding "highlights potential risks associated with laundering healthcare uniforms at home, particularly concerning the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) within community and hospital settings."
A Common Killer Bug Is Endangering Americans: 'Pandemic In Plain Sight'
In addition, this could mean home washing machines are a hub for antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Domestic detergents could even potentially create antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria, according to Laird.
Even if healthcare workers followed all washing guidelines, half the machines in the study didn't reach the correct temperature, the study found.
"What this means is that even if healthcare workers are following all the guidelines to domestically wash their uniforms, they will still not be reaching the disinfection level required to remove all pathogenic bacteria," the professor said.
The study was conducted with non-healthcare personnel, so the bacteria on that clothing may differ from the clothing of those who work in healthcare settings.
New Class Of Antibiotics Discovered: 'Promising Answer'
Potentially, however, the latter would see higher levels of "pathogenic and antibiotic resistant strains in healthcare workers' domestic washing machines," the professor said.
Laird recommended that healthcare professionals and their institutions re-evaluate policies that allow workers to wash their work clothing at home.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"Implementing standardized in-house laundering within healthcare facilities or using external industrial laundries will enhance infection control measures," she said.
Due to at-home machines not functioning as they should, per the study, the research team recommended using a disinfectant for those washing machines at least once a month.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
They also recommended doing an empty wash in the machine to disinfect it at a temperature of approximately 194 degrees Fahrenheit.
"For individuals laundering at home, it's crucial to adhere strictly to guidelines, such as using appropriate temperatures and detergents, to minimize risks," Laird told Fox News Digital.
The team also said that effective laundering practices are a critical component, but that these should be part of a multifaceted approach.
They should "includ[e] prudent antibiotic use, robust infection control measures, and public education on hygiene practices and antimicrobial resistance," she said.Original article source: Why your laundry could be making you sick and what to do about it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
20 minutes ago
- Medscape
Telehealth Isn't a Luxury — It's a Necessity
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hello, and thank you for joining me today. I'm Dr Alison Kole. I'm boarded in pulmonary critical care and sleep medicine, and I have been practicing for over a decade. I also am the creator and host of the Sleep is My Waking Passion podcast and the medical director of the Oak Health Center Concierge Sleep Telemedicine Program. Today I want to speak directly to you about a critical issue that's occurring in sleep medicine, which is the future of telehealth. There's a lot at stake, and decisions made now will impact patient care for years to come. Some of you may not be aware, but the American Academy of Sleep Medicine [AASM] issued a position statement in February of 2025, urging for the consideration of permanent telehealth services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency waivers allowed for widespread use of telehealth, including coverage for both video- and audio-only visits. This expansion was a lifeline for both patients and providers, and was able to ensure that care continued despite unprecedented times. However, these were temporary waivers and the waivers are set to expire. So, there is a real danger that coverage and reimbursement for telehealth, especially in sleep medicine, could be rolled back. You can think of the AASM's position statement as a call to action. Without permanent coverage in adequate reimbursement, millions could lose access to essential sleep care. And this isn't just a theoretical concern. If telehealth goes away, access will be cut off for many who cannot easily reach in-person services due to a variety of reasons, including geography, mobility, work, or technology barriers. So, why is it that sleep telemedicine is so especially suited to telehealth? There are several reasons for your consideration. Perhaps one of the most obvious reasons is that in order to diagnose sleep disorders, many of us can usually do that without much of a physical exam. Most of our assessments are dependent upon history, sleep diaries, and sleep study data. It's not necessarily a hands-on exam, so this makes remote care both practical and effective in sleep. There's also a couple of other reasons, including our ability to do remote patient monitoring. Most of our CPAP devices allow us to be able to track and see if a patient is being compliant with therapy, but also are they getting effective therapy so that we can triage and make adjustments remotely without the patient needing to come into the office for that. And last but not least, 12% of Americans are living with chronic insomnia in this country. The number-one recommended treatment is cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia. This is a series of visits to a behavioral health specialist that can be time-consuming, and there is data that demonstrate that digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia platforms performs almost equivocally to that of in-person visits. There are several benefits to sleep telehealth access, and these include access, equity, safety, and cost. So, let's get into it. Expanded access: What do I mean? Well, telehealth bridges gaps for rural patients, those with mobility challenges, and people who live far from specialty centers. It also allows sleep specialists, such as myself, to serve patients across state lines. With regard to health equity, audio-only telehealth happens to be crucial for patients without reliable internet or smart devices. Cutting this option would disproportionately harm lower-income, elderly, and rural populations. There's also a patient and public safety issue worth considering. Many sleep patients happen to be at higher risk for drowsy driving. Telehealth eliminates the need for these patients to travel, which directly reduces accident risk. This protects not only the patient but also the public. And lastly, there is an economic value to sleep telemedicine services because treating sleep disorders like obstructive sleep apnea saves the healthcare system billions by preventing complications related to chronic comorbid conditions. These include hypertension, heart disease, and diabetes. Telehealth adds further savings by reducing travel time off from work and no-show rates. If telehealth goes away, you're looking at a loss of access, worsening health disparities, reduced public safety and patient safety, as well as higher costs of care for patients. Telemedicine is not a luxury; it's a necessity for modern, equitable, and effective care. As primary care providers, you play a crucial role in advocating for and utilizing these services to ensure your patients get the care they need when and where they need it. If you'd like to check out the completed episode with my interview featuring Dr K. Praveen Vohra, the lead author of the AASM position statement, please check out my YouTube channel,
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Do you really need three meals a day? Experts debate the traditional rule
Breakfast, lunch and dinner have been a staple regimen for diet and nutrition — but is it necessary for overall health? Statistics show that most Americans (64%) consume three meals daily and 28% consume two meals — but some may struggle to hit three meals a day, while others prefer smaller, more frequent meals. Serena Poon, a certified nutritionist and longevity wellness advisor based in Los Angeles, said she considers the concept of three meals a "more cultural convention" than a "biological necessity." "There's no magic in 'three meals a day,'" she told Fox News Digital. "What matters is the quality of your food, the timing of your meals, and how well both align with your unique biology and lifestyle." "A flexible routine, such as two nourishing meals and a snack, or three well-balanced meals eaten within a 10- to 12-hour window, has strong scientific backing and fits comfortably into most modern schedules." A 2024 review published in JAMA found that lower meal frequency, earlier calorie distribution and time-restricted eating led to greater weight loss and metabolic improvements than the traditional three-meal pattern, Poon pointed out. "From a nutrition and metabolism perspective, what you eat matters more than when you eat." In another study published this year in Nature Medicine, overweight or obese adults who ate only during an eight-hour window "reduced visceral fat and cardiometabolic risk" just as effectively as standard eating. Extremely low frequencies of eating, such as one meal a day, can "heighten hunger and risk micronutrient gaps, so they require professional guidance," Poon warned. Lauri Wright, PhD, RDN, director of nutrition programs and associate professor at the USF College of Public Health, agreed that the idea of eating three meals a day is cultural, evolving largely from social norms, work schedules and industrialization rather than scientific evidence. "From a nutrition and metabolism perspective, what you eat matters more than when you eat for most people," she said. "Some individuals thrive on three balanced meals a day, while others do well with smaller, more frequent meals. What's important is meeting your body's nutritional needs across the day." Regular meals can help stabilize blood sugar, support energy levels and prevent overeating, especially for those who have conditions like diabetes or are prone to "energy crashes," Wright noted. "But there's no one-size-fits-all pattern," she said. "Skipping breakfast or consolidating meals, for example, can work for some people without negative health effects, as long as nutrient quality and total intake are adequate." "In short, three meals a day can be a helpful guideline, but it's not a strict requirement for health." Poon suggested that "personalization is key" when it comes to eating frequency, but most healthy adults thrive on an eight- to-12-hour eating window that begins within two hours of waking and ends at least three hours before bedtime. She also pointed to study data showing that eating within a 10-hour window for eight weeks improved appetite regulation, sleep quality and morning GLP-1 levels in young adults. People who rise early in the day may benefit from "front-loading" calories into breakfast and lunch, Poon suggested, while shift workers may function better with a later window. Those with conditions such as diabetes, eating disorder histories or pregnancy should ask their doctor about individualized diet plans. "Consider lifestyle, medical needs (like diabetes), age and preferences," Poon advised. "Some thrive on three meals, others on intermittent fasting or grazing — it's about consistency, nutrient quality and listening to your body." The expert also recommended paying attention to internal signals and hunger cues, like gentle stomach rumbling, a dip in focus or mild irritability. A meal should end at "comfortable satiety," or a feeling of satisfaction. "Intuitive eating practices have been linked to lower morning cortisol, better mental health and sleep scores, and improved mood metrics," she said. Instead of eating based on the clock, listening to authentic hunger and fullness cues will help maintain steady energy, sharpen focus and avoid last-minute, less-nutritious choices, Poon added. For more Health articles, visit "Whatever cadence you choose, keep the focus on whole foods, balanced macronutrients and nutrient-rich options," she recommended. "Most importantly, stay consistent in a pattern that honors your circadian rhythm, accommodates your social life and supports your personal health goals."
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Hot In The City: Why The Wrong Trees In The Wrong Places Matters
Cooling down: New York has recorded temperatures of nearly 100 degrees Fahrenheit In the last days of last month, the death toll tripled in several major European cities in the face of sweltering heat. Milan, Paris, Barcelona and London were the worst hit. With more than two thirds of the world's population expected to live in cities by 2050, the race to cool them down is on. Tree planting has become an important part of urban heat mitigation efforts. But a Cambridge University-led study shows that planting the wrong species or combinations of trees may not just reduce the benefits, but actually make things worse, elevating night time temperature. The scientists found that planting trees in urban areas can lower pedestrian-height air temperature by up to 12 degrees centigrade (53.5 F). Introducing trees reduced the highest temperature in 83% of the cities studied. However, the extent will vary, depending on urban layout and species' traits. 'Our study challenges the common perception that trees are the ultimate panacea for overheating cities worldwide,' says Professor Ronita Bardhan from the University of Cambridge. 'Trees have a crucial role to play in cooling cities down, but we need to plant them much more strategically to get the best results.' For instance, adds Bardhan, 'The cooling behaviour of a species in a rural environment may be very different in an urban setting. It also matters where these trees are placed. In more sparsely populated areas they will do well, but in heavily built-up areas, they won't.' Until now, we've known relatively little about unique tree cooling mechanisms and how these interact with different urban features. Previous research has tended to focus on specific climates or regions, relying on fragmented case studies. The first comprehensive global assessment of urban tree cooling has changed all that. The authors looked at a wide range of studies over 17 climates in 100 cities and regions for the period 2010 – 2023. Understanding why planting matters is the first step in getting green right. How Trees Cool Cities In daytime, trees help reduce temperature by blocking solar radiation while water evaporation and foliage alters the airflow. In some circumstances, however, the 'wrong' trees can also increase air temperature at night. 'When the aerodynamic resistance is high and the leaf stomata close, heat dissipation through transpiration is reduced, limiting the escape of heat energy,' Bardhan says. 'This typically happens at night. If there is a high humidity load, this humid-warm air can be trapped and re-circulate beneath the tree canopy.' The scientists found that urban trees in compact settings are most effective in cooling cities in hot and dry climates but are less effective in hot, humid ones. In tropical wet and dry climates with distinct wet and dry seasons, such as central Africa, parts of South America and northern Australia, trees can be very effective in cooling cities by day. In Nigeria, trees can cool temperatures by as much as 12 degrees centigrade. But at night, trees warmed cities the most, by up to 0.8 degrees. Evergreens beside Dubai's International Financial Centre A lush green canopy hangs over parts of Dubai City. Among the acacias, neem, olive, palm and other desert trees the evening air carries the scent of Indian jasmine. Last year the municipality planted 216,500 new trees as part of its ambitious 2023 Quality of Life Strategy. Bardhan and colleagues found that trees performed well in arid climates such as Dubai's, cooling cities by just over 9 degrees and warming them at night by 0.4 degrees. Elsewhere, however, in a tropical rain forest climate with higher humidity, daytime cooling was only 2 degrees. Closer to home, trees in more temperate climates, such as London, can cool cities by 6 degrees but warm them up by 1.5 degrees. In many hot countries, trees tend to be evergreen. By including deciduous trees in the mix, the cooling effect can often be greater. Recent planting schemes in Saudi Arabia have incorporated deciduous as well as evergreens. The nature of the local urban environment will have an impact on the potential cooling while the idea balance of temperate and deciduous trees will vary. Urban layouts such as London's are more likely to benefit from the inclusion of deciduous trees alongside evergreens, but to a lesser extent than in Saudi Arabia. 'If you plant deciduous trees in a densely populated part of London, they won't perform in the same way as in the wild,' Bardhan observes. 'It's also important where these trees are placed. Trees may perform well in sparsely populated areas, but in dense urban settings the limited cooling impact reflects failed design. "To be effective for the climate, cities need to treat nature as a fundamental design variable, rather than an afterthought.' Selecting the optimum type and location for trees in an urban setting is critical. Few cities can afford projects on the scale of Dubai's and those who may need the right trees most because of global warming – are often the poorest. Bardhan and her colleagues at Cambridge have come up with a solution. They are developing a prototype shading device, inspired by nature's way of cooling. It's already been tested out successfully in dense urban areas. 'It mimics everything that natural trees do,' explains Bardhan 'We can control humidity along with temperature unlike standard shading devices that only regulate temperature. The design also allows the release of trapped radiation at night, unlike a tree.' The shading device can resemble a tree or take other forms, such as a vending cart. Rather than just being a luxury in affluent neighbourhoods, shade and cooling can come to schoolchildren and the most vulnerable communities at relatively low cost. As Bardhan says, it's climate action put into reality. With the data provided by the Cambridge study, urban planners have an invaluable tool that could transform efforts to reduce heat. You can see the cooling effect of trees in the cities researched on the interactive map here.
