Cancer Risk in MMF-Treated Patients Differs by Indication
Patients with dermatologic conditions showed a 74% lower risk for malignancy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) than transplant patients, a study found.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers conducted a single-center retrospective chart of patients who had taken MMF for ≥ 5 years between 2012 and 2025 at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.
The analysis included 126 patients (mean age, 64.2 years; 35.7% men) who received MMF for dermatologic conditions, 226 organ transplant recipients (mean age, 59.6 years; 61.5% men) who received MMF plus other immunosuppressive agents, and 296 patients (mean age, 64.1 year; 34.5% men) with dermatologic conditions who had no exposure to systemic immunosuppression. About two thirds of patients were White individuals and one fourth were Black individuals.
Dermatologic patients received a mean daily MMF dose of 1390 mg over an average of 7.5 years, while transplant recipients received a lower mean daily dose of 807 mg for a mean duration of 9.9 years.
Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy was administered to 40% of the patients with dermatologic conditions (MMF plus prednisone) and to 100% of transplant recipients (tacrolimus, prednisone, or cyclosporine).
Researchers compared malignancy rates between the groups.
TAKEAWAY:
Overall, 9.5% of the dermatologic patients who received MMF developed malignancies compared with 36% of the transplant recipients (P < .0001); the risk for malignancy was 74% lower in dermatologic patients treated with MMF (95% CI, 0.1487-0.4518).
No difference was found between dermatologic patients who received MMF vs those without exposure to systemic immunosuppression (8.4%).
Cutaneous malignancies were significantly more common in transplant patients than in dermatologic patients who received MMF (26.5% vs 5.6%; P < .0001).
The prevalence of urological/reproductive cancers was higher in transplant patients than dermatologic patients treated with MMF (9.3% vs 2.4%; P = .0143).
IN PRACTICE:
'The use of MMF for dermatologic conditions does not appear to expose patients to the same malignancy risk as those treated with MMF and other chronic immunosuppressive treatments in the transplant setting and did not confer an elevated malignancy risk compared to dermatologic patients without systemic immunosuppression,' the authors of the study wrote.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Robin Yi, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and was published online on July 17 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
LIMITATIONS:
Limitations included the MMF dosing variability and small sample size.
DISCLOSURES:
The study did not receive any funding. One author reported receiving research, speaking and consulting support from numerous pharmaceutical companies including Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, and Janssen and disclosed being founder and part owner of Causa Research and holding stock in Sensal Health.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Life might have come from outer space, scientist say
The seeds of life on Earth might have come from outer space – and might be widespread throughout the rest of the universe, scientist say. Researchers have found complex organic molecules in a disc around a 'protostar' in a major breakthrough. Those molecules are seen as the precursors to the building blocks of life, which go on to become sugars and amino acids that are then combined into the complex flora and fauna that surrounds us. Researchers have found such complex organic molecules in other places before. But the new findings fill in a previously mysterious missing link – one that could suggest that life is more abundant than we realise. When cold protostar becomes a young star, surrounded by a disc of dust and gas, it is a violent process that includes intense radiation and the hurling out of gas. Researchers had been concerned that the extreme nature of that process could 'reset' the chemical compounds available around a star, meaning that they would have to be formed in the discs that at the same time are making planets. But the new findings suggest that complex molecules can stick around through that process, meaning they will be inherited by the discs that follow. The findings are reported in a new study, 'A deep search for Complex Organic Molecules toward the protoplanetary disk of V883 Ori', published in the The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Study Says That 'Micro-Walks' May Be More Effective Than Longer Ones—Even For Weight Loss
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." For years, doctors have stressed the importance of being active during your day—after all, research has found that sitting for too long raises your risk of a slew of serious health conditions, including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. But the idea of going for hour-long walks can be overwhelming. Now, new research suggests you don't need to jam in a massive stroll into each day: Instead, you can go for 'micro-walks.' That's the main takeaway from a study published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, which found that micro-walks may be even better for you than long ones. Here's the deal. Interested in making walks part of your regular fitness routine? Check out the exclusive WH+ 4-Week Walking Plan that burns fat and builds muscle at the same time. What are 'micro-walks'? In this study, a 'micro-walk' is defined as walking between 10 and 30 seconds at a time (with breaks in between your next walk). Are 'micro-walks' more beneficial for your health? Why? It depends on how you're looking at it. In this particular study, volunteers walked on a treadmill or climbed a short flight of stairs for different periods of time, ranging from 10 seconds to four minutes. The study participants wore masks to measure their oxygen intake (which can be used to calculate energy or calorie consumption). The researchers discovered that people who walked in short bursts used up to 60 per cent more energy than longer ones, despite the walks covering the same distance. (The more energy you expend, the more calories you can burn.) Basically, you may be able to rev up your metabolism and burn more calories if you do short bursts of walking versus longer cruises around. Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, a co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab, says there's something to this. 'Getting activity throughout the day, in general, is better for people,' he says. 'It's better for circulation, mental health, and digestive health.' You're also more likely to have a faster pace when you do shorter bursts of walking than if you're going on, say, a five-mile walk, he points out. How many steps should I get per day? This is debatable, and research has shown that the often-quoted 10,000 steps a day may not be necessary. Instead, 7,500 steps or so is ideal—but everyone is different. If you've already been walking, Matheny says that aiming for 10,000 steps a day is great. But if not or if you don't have many opportunities to walk during your day, 7,500 steps may be a better goal. 'It's really about doing what you can,' he says. 'If you're not a big walker and you think, 'I don't want to walk five miles,' then just do 30-second bursts. It's more attainable.'DMX Comfort+ Sneaker $108.49 at 26 $109.95 at 2 $240.00 at You Might Also Like Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Can You Lift Weights Instead of Taking Viagra? New Research Finds a Surprising Link Between Muscle and ED.
It can feel like you've tried everything to turn things around when you're dealing with erectile dysfunction (ED). But while the exact reason why you're having trouble getting and staying hard can be complicated, a new research review suggests there's a simple lifestyle move that can help fight ED: Building muscle. The scientific analysis, which was published in the journal Sexual Medicine Reviews, builds on previous research that has found that a gym routine that's good for your muscles and health is also good for lowering your ED risk and keeping your sexual function healthy. It also had some interesting findings on nutrition and erectile dysfunction, giving you more tools to add to your ED-fighting arsenal. You may know this, but it never hurts to repeat it: Erectile dysfunction is defined as the inability to sustain an erection that is firm enough for penetrative intercourse. It's estimated to affect 322 million men around the world and more than half of men over the age of 50. How does adding more muscle to your frame factor in? Doctors who treat ED break it down. What did the study find? For the study, researchers analyzed data from 32 studies on sexual dysfunction, muscle mass, and strength. After crunching the data, they saw that higher levels of skeletal muscle mass (the weight of the muscles in the body that are attached to your skeleton) and strength were linked to healthy sexual function, especially in men with risk factors for ED including diabetes and obesity and also in older men. The researchers also found a link between higher hand-grip strength—a common indicator of health and muscle strength—and a lower risk of erectile dysfunction. 'Maintaining skeletal muscle with nutrition and physical activity improves erectile and overall health outcomes,' the researchers wrote in the conclusion. 'Therapies that target sexual function and muscle health simultaneously—testosterone and L-carnitine—may further benefit sexual function.' There are a few things to take away. The link between ED and exercise isn't new. 'We published a paper about a year and a half ago, showing that exercise significantly reverses erectile dysfunction,' says study co-author Mohit Khera, MD, MPH, a urologist specializing in male and female sexual dysfunction at Baylor College of Medicine. And the latest findings add weight to the idea that increasing your muscle gains may help you below the belt, in addition to improving your overall health. There are a few things going on here:• Strength training can help with blood flow. 'While higher testosterone levels from strength training may play a minor role, the primary benefits are derived from improved vascular health,' Khera says. Strength training is linked with lower inflammation in the body, better function of the endothelial cells that line the inner surface of blood vessels, and more availability of nitric oxide, which widens blood vessels throughout your body (including in your penis), he explains. All of these elements support better blood flow and blood vessel health, which Khera calls 'critical' for erectile dysfunction. • Having more muscle mass also increases insulin sensitivity, which is linked with better erectile function, too, points out John Sigalos, MD, a urologist at Urology Austin. That influences how well your body uses glucose for energy. "As seen in diabetes and other metabolic syndromes, we know that poor regulation of sugar leads to dysfunction of the small blood vessels that affect erections," Sigalos says. • More muscle strength may mean you're healthier in general. That means you're less likely to have issues associated with ED, including type 2 diabetes or high cholesterol, says Philip Werthman, MD, urologist and director of the Center for Male Reproductive Medicine and Vasectomy Reversal in Los Angeles, CA. 'Doing more strength training may help you lose fat, build muscle mass, and change your overall hormonal dynamics,' he says. So will lifting more take down ED? Overall, Khera says it's not a bad idea to lift more to combat erectile dysfunction, although there's no specific prescription yet for how much and what kind of workouts you should do. 'Strength training can be an effective remedy for erectile dysfunction,' he says. Khera's past research has found that 160 minutes of exercise a week, including strength training, significantly improved erectile function in men. 'Notably, those with the most severe erectile dysfunction experienced the greatest improvements through regular exercise,' he says. Nutrients Might Matter, Too One more thing to consider: The study also found that L-carnitine, an amino acid found in red meat, poultry, and fish, may help work as a remedy for ED, too. 'L-carnitine plays a role in nitric oxide production, as it is a precursor to this crucial molecule,' Khera says. 'Nitric oxide is essential for vascular health, including penile blood flow." Werthman has also found that his patients have success with L-carnitine supplements. 'We've been using L-carnitine for male fertility for decades,' he says. 'It's an antioxidant that protects the sperm and it helps muscle recovery." Werthman points out that he's studied the impact of L-carnitine on sperm, and found that stronger erections happened, too. 'There were a number of men who came back after a couple of months on L-carnitine and said, 'Hey, my erections got better,'' he says. If you're experiencing erectile dysfunction, Werthman says it's important to see a healthcare provider for a full workup. Not only can a health professional help turn things around, they can also check in on what's going on behind the scenes that's contributing to or causing ED. 'Erectile dysfunction can be an early warning sign of cardiac dysfunction, type 2 diabetes, or other conditions,' Werthman says. 'Make sure you're OK before just getting a prescription for Viagra.' You Might Also Like The Best Hair Growth Shampoos for Men to Buy Now 25 Vegetables That Are Surprising Sources of Protein
