Simplicity Living buys Kāinga Ora Northcote site for $65m to build nine-level build-to-rent apartments
Simplicity is planning to build 93 build-to-rent apartments in Lake Rd, Northcote.
Construction is to begin in November, with the building expected to be completed by the third quarter of 2027.
State house sell-up
Kāinga Ora is selling up to 900 state homes nationally annually.
Housing Minister Chris Bishop said priority was being given to selling homes in the most sought-after locations.
A Herald analysis has identified 841 of Auckland's most valuable state homes, worth a combined $1.7 billion, which might be considered for sale as part of a sweeping Government sell-off.
Northcote development
The Simplicity development is on the same road where another project is nearing completion.
The 183-unit Elevation container apartments are being developed by TLC Modular on the intersection of Lake Rd and Fraser Ave on land also bought from Kāinga Ora.
The container apartments have Vietnamese units which are imported and assembled by TLC.
The project is at least a year behind schedule but is expected to be completed by December.
Northcote's under-construction, 183-apartment project Elevation is, at six levels tall, the Southern Hemisphere's largest modular residential building development. Its units are manufactured in Vietnam and then shipped to the site. Photo / Jason Dorday
Simplicity said today that by the end of this year, it would have 982 apartments under construction in suburban Auckland.
The business is wholly owned by funds managed by Simplicity NZ, which is a default KiwiSaver and investment funds manager.
Brealey has developed in Northcote previously with his former business.
In 2023, NZ Living finished these new apartments on Greenslade Crescent, Northcote. Shane Brealey headed this project. He now works for Simplicity Living. Photo / Alex Burton
His NZ Living built 129 units in nine buildings on a 1ha block surrounded by four streets nearby.
That project was called Greenslade, after one of the streets.
Homes developed by NZ Living at 25 Greenslade Crescent, Northcote. Photo / Alex Burton
Simplicity Living is also building 264 apartments in Morningside and has a 297-unit scheme on the highway near Panmure called Te Reiputa.
Te Reiputa (whale tooth neck ornament) is at 80 Mt Wellington Highway and is a 12-level, $225m project. Work started last March on the project, designed by Brewer Davidson Architects.
The profit margin is to be $71m before interest, put at about $16m, giving total net profit of about $55m.
Te Reiputa units would be about 15% larger than average with full-sized kitchens and 2.7m stud heights instead of the usual 2.4m.
One-bedroom units are planned to be rented for $625/week and two bedrooms for $675/week.
That is much cheaper than Resido, NZX-listed Kiwi Property Group's new build-to-rent three-tower apartment scheme beside Sylvia Park.
Units at Resido start at $697/week, two-bedroom, two-bathroom 90sq m places are $921/week, while the same number of bedrooms and bathrooms in a 76-80sq m place is $889/week.
Anne Gibson has been the Herald's property editor for 25 years, written books and covered property extensively here and overseas.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Invest in public good for a sustainable future
Click here for an alternative view: Cutting red tape key to NZ's infrastructure success - Chris Bishop The Green Party is unapologetic about our commitment to the long-term benefit of our people and planet. We have a clear vision that is outlined by the action plans we have released in the past months, including our Green Emissions Reduction Plan, He Ara Anamata, as well as our Green Budget 2025 and Fiscal Strategy. We know that the status quo is not working, the truth is that it hasn't worked for a long time. In the 1980s and 1990s, many reforms saw public assets that had been built up over generations sold into private hands, like our rail network, some social housing, and some electricity generation. There was a mistaken belief that cutting public investment and jobs would make us better off as a country. Thirty-five years on, we can clearly say that approach has not worked for most of the country. Cutting down the responsibility of the state has increased inequality, which may suit the super-rich, but certainly doesn't benefit the rest of our society. Housing scarcity and unaffordability allow a gentry of landlords to exploit desperate renters without a foot to stand on. Handing the reins of our economy over to the private sector and moulding our laws around their preference makes it easy for corporates to exploit underpaid workers and our natural resources. Our people, and the planet we depend upon, pay the price. The 'privatise the benefits, socialise the cost' approach isn't fair, and it isn't working. It's time to be bold and brave. We can invest in the public infrastructure we need ourselves, rather than making ourselves dependent on the goodwill of private international financiers, who will be looking for returns. New Zealanders can be in control of our economy, our jobs and our future. We can take control of our destiny and build what we need while creating thousands of good jobs. Our people, and the planet we depend upon, pay the price. The 'privatise the benefits, socialise the cost' approach isn't fair, and it isn't working. Julie Anna Genter Over the past months, we have been across the country and have seen the harm private companies have done to communities by coming in, promising the world, and then upping sticks once the profits have dried up, leaving people without livelihoods and much hope. In the last year alone, we have seen this from the West Coast of the South Island, to Ohakune, to Tokoroa. It was the stories we heard from these communities that encouraged our Green Jobs Guarantee. This plan will create at least 40,000 jobs across Aotearoa to rebuild our infrastructure, restore nature and build the homes we so desperately need. These jobs will form the foundations of an economy that works for all of us and a society that leaves nobody behind. Before politicians took their hands off the wheel of the economy 40 years ago and sold off the assets we all used to own, we had a Ministry of Works. Our plan for a Ministry of Green Works builds on that proud tradition but is future-fit for the climate transition. With our future-focused workforce agency, Mahi Anamata, we will be able to plan for the skills we need. This will allow us to prioritise resources to the areas we need rather than allowing the private sector to dictate our job market on their terms. We have so many opportunities at our fingertips. Energy efficiency is a boon for productivity. The steps we need to take in transportation and urban development to reduce congestion will also reduce emissions, deaths and serious injuries, and petrol bills – by reducing the need to use private vehicles. We can take pressure off our hospitals and people's power bills with healthy homes, wind and solar, and walkable communities. A better world is possible. The only thing holding us back is this Government, which is firmly stuck in the past and beholden to the interests of a wealthy few. Julie Anne Genter is MP for Rongotai and Green Party spokesperson for Infrastructure, Transport, Urban Development and Building and Construction.
NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Cutting red tape key to NZ's infrastructure success
These days we find it difficult to get consent for a solar farm. Not even build it, just to get permission to build it. Click here for an alternative view: Julie Anne Genter: Time to prioritise public good over private gain In my view, New Zealand is at an inflection point and we have two choices. One option is we grow slowly – or not at all. We muddle along, take years to make tough decisions, react to things as they come up, and just largely accept the status quo. I call this managed mediocrity. At worst, it is managed decline. The other option is that we make the tough decisions that successive governments have put in the too-hard basket — on planning, housing markets, transport pricing, and more. We take advantage of our extraordinary natural competitive advantages – like cheap, renewable energy – to accelerate growth, increase our standard of living and make us better off than we are today. Achieving this prosperous future won't just magically happen. As I've said before, we need to start saying 'yes' a lot more, and 'no' a lot less. This is especially true for infrastructure. Chris Bishop. Photo / Getty Images Throwing money at the problem won't fix things, because our current system is too inefficient. Despite being in the top 10% of high-income countries for infrastructure spend, we are in the bottom 10% for outcomes. In reality, this looks like poor bang for our buck, funding gaps, cost overruns, delays, and – often – worn-down assets that don't do their job. It isn't good enough. The only way to fix our problems is to get the underlying system settings right, and that's what I've focused on as Infrastructure Minister: developing a National Infrastructure Plan, improving funding and financing, sorting out consenting and planning, improving education and health infrastructure, and strengthening asset management and resilience. These priorities are in response to what I've heard from industry and infrastructure experts, both in New Zealand and overseas. National Infrastructure Plan (NIP) Last month, the Infrastructure Commission released the draft NIP. As Minister for Infrastructure, I hear regularly that what New Zealand needs is a long-term infrastructure plan that transcends political cycles. I agree. A plan will give the private sector more certainty so that they can invest in people and equipment. But a plan is only as good as it's execution. So, the NIP will only be successful if it is – at least in part – accepted and adopted across successive governments over the long term. It's worth noting that this isn't our first plan. New Zealand had infrastructure plans in 2010, 2011, and 2015. Depressingly, some recommendations in these older plans are identical to those put forward in this plan, more than a decade later. I'm thinking of things like agencies completing 10-year capital plans and making better use of pricing tools. What differentiates this plan is that it has been developed independently by the Infrastructure Commission – separate from the government of the day. The NIP is not this Government's plan. It's New Zealand's plan. Each political party in Parliament was offered a briefing on the NIP. I'm really pleased that most parties accepted the offer and have had one or more meetings with the Commission. Building greater consensus on infrastructure is, unfortunately, not as simple as different political parties getting in a room and convincing each other of the other's view. That's not realistic. Instead, consensus will be enabled by strong systems and institutions, robust investment frameworks, high-quality evidence of our infrastructure needs, and advocacy for projects and policies from a better-informed public. That's what this plan is about. People also often say, we need a bipartisan infrastructure pipeline, as if that will solve all problems. We do have a robust infrastructure pipeline. The Commission has been running it for more than five years, and it's been progressively improved over that time. The pipeline has more than 8000 initiatives underway and in planning, from 114 contributing organisations. It represents more than $200 billion in investment value – with over $110b of the pipeline having a funding source confirmed. I suspect that almost all of the projects underway right now are supported by everyone in Parliament. It's the high-profile and high-cost disagreements that make the headlines. But it's the low-profile and often low-cost projects that actually make New Zealand. My own view is that we need to move away from the rhetoric of needing a bipartisan pipeline and instead build bipartisan consensus on the idea that governments of all flavours should use best-practice to plan, select, fund and finance, deliver, and look after infrastructure. That's not the case at the moment and it's what I'm working so hard to fix. Improving Infrastructure Funding and Financing An important priority is improving infrastructure funding and financing. Currently, infrastructure is primarily paid for by taxpayers or ratepayers. This makes sense for some infrastructure like schools and hospitals, but our reliance on this blunt approach has led to challenges like congestion, run-down assets, and the unresponsive provision of enabling infrastructure – contributing to unaffordable housing. In 2024, the Government released a suite of frameworks and guidance – like Treasury's Funding and Financing Framework and a new market-led proposal process – to help the Crown be a smarter owner and purchaser of infrastructure services. This year, I announced five changes to New Zealand's funding and financing toolkit including improving the IFF Act and shifting councils from Development Contributions to a new Development Levy system. These changes will move us to a future state where councils can fully recover the costs of housing growth, and where infrastructure providers can recover costs of significant and city-shaping projects. And today, at the Building Nations summit, I will be announcing a shift in our approach to road user charges. Improving the consenting framework Arguably, the biggest improvement we are making to the infrastructure system is fixing the Resource Management Act (RMA). Consenting takes too long, costs way too much, and makes delivering the infrastructure we need too difficult. We are on track to replace the RMA with new legislation next year. Our new system will be effects-based, embrace standardised zoning and be far more permissive and enabling – while also protecting the environment. An independent analysis by Castalia estimated the new system could reduce compliance and administrative costs by $14.8b – potentially removing about 10 Transmission Gullys-worth of red tape from the economy. It will be a game changer. Better asset management is a key recommendation of the draft NIP. Everyone knows if you don't paint the weatherboards on your house, the wood will rot. Billion-dollar infrastructure is fundamentally no different. Unfortunately, due to decades of diverted maintenance spending, lack of asset registers, and lack of asset management plans, we have schools with leaking roofs, sewage leaks in our hospitals, asbestos in police stations, service outages of commuter rail, and mouldy defence accommodation. Strengthening asset management and resilience In May this year we started a work programme that will improve asset management in central government. We are considering fundamental changes such as legislatively requiring agencies to prepare and publish long-term Asset Management and Investment Plans, and to report on their performance. Regulated utilities and local government are legislatively required to do these things – I don't see why central government thinks it should hold others to a higher standard than it does itself. A couple of weeks ago the Minister for Economic Growth and I released an infrastructure update showing that more than $6b of government-funded construction is due to start between now and Christmas. Workers will start construction on $3.9b of roading projects – like Melling and Ōtaki to north of Levin, $800 million of school property projects, and a range of health projects and other government buildings. Some people said that these projects were 'already announced'. They missed the point. A non-trivial number of these projects were funded all the way back in 2016-2020 – but never started construction. As Government, we are getting on with building infrastructure — not just announcing it. And we're fixing the system, to help build and maintain better infrastructure for all Kiwis. Chris Bishop is the Minister for Infrastructure and National MP for Hutt South.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
NZTA to discuss investment in second Mt Victoria tunnel for Wellington at board meeting
Transport Minister Chris Bishop. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Friday could put the wheels in motion for a second Mount Victoria tunnel in Wellington after years of debate. As part of its election promises, the National Party campaigned on building a second tunnel through Mount Victoria and to get shovels in the ground on the project before next year's election. Improvements in the area had been discussed for years with projects such as the Basin Flyover and a second Mount Victoria Tunnel planned under the now-scrapped Let's Get Wellington Moving plan. In November, the Transport Agency | Waka Kotahi (NZTA) confirmed to move forward with a plan to duplicate the Terrace Tunnel , make upgrades around the Basin Reserve and build a second Mount Victoria Tunnel. Since then, NZTA has worked on an investment case which the agency confirmed would be considered by its board at its meeting on Friday. The agency said once a decision was made, Transport Minister Chris Bishop would be briefed. Bishop told RNZ that once the business case was considered announcements would be made in due course. NZTA's board will discuss an investment case for a second Mt Vic tunnel on Friday. Photo: 123RF Infrastructure NZ chief executive Nick Leggett said it could be a "game changer" for Wellington City residents, but noted it needed to cater for cars, bus, bikes and pedestrians. "We need a balanced approach to moving around the city and in and out of the city, and that should be catering for pedestrians, for cyclists, for buses and for cars. "We can't afford to have just one mode favoured above the other." Leggett said it was important to get the project started as soon as possible. "I think Wellington is sick of waiting and we do need some action and some activity to improve the city because it is not that hot out there in terms of our local and regional economy." Local Rongotai MP and Green Party transport spokesperson Julie Anne Genter said it was disappointing a "better option" was not on the table. "This is a very 20th century sort of project you know it's one that has been talked about for a really long time, but we know it's not really going to solve congestion and it's going to come at enormous cost and disruption to the city." Genter said she was not hopeful that the project would support walking or cycling. "In the government policy statement on transport they basically rule out using any funding from the state highways projects for walking and cycling or bus lanes or anything other than the car part of it." Bishop said that he still expected construction to start in 2026. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
