Fair Aim Capital Launches £30m Investment Fund to Bridge AI Transformation Gap for UK SMEs
LONDON, July 15, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Fair Aim Capital, a newly formed family-backed investment firm, today announced the launch of its £30 million fund dedicated to acquiring and transforming UK small and medium-sized enterprises through AI implementation and digital marketing optimisation. The fund addresses a critical market gap as ONS research reveals 68% of UK SMEs do not use artificial intelligence technologies, despite SMEs representing 99.8% of all UK businesses and employing 60% of private sector workers. Furthermore, 69% have no plans to do so in the next 3 months.
The investment firm will target profitable UK businesses generating £1-3 million EBITDA, acquiring majority stakes and working alongside management teams to implement AI-first operating models that accelerate revenue growth.
"We're witnessing a concerning divergence in the UK economy," said Andrew Harkness, CEO of Fair Aim Capital. "Large enterprises are investing heavily in AI transformation and pulling ahead, whilst the backbone of our economy, SMEs that employ three in five workers, risk being permanently left behind. This isn't about lacking ambition; it's about lacking the capital, expertise, and bandwidth to execute meaningful change."
Recent data from LinkedIn shows that amongst early AI adopters, 76% report substantial time savings and 50% achieve revenue growth exceeding 10% within 24 months, gains that successful businesses are reinvesting in innovation and customer relationships rather than workforce reductions.
Fair Aim Capital plans to invest in 3-5 assets over the next 3-4 years, working as transformation partners rather than traditional financial investors, with target exits in 3-5 years.
"AI transformation isn't about replacing people, it's about freeing talented teams to focus on creativity, strategy, and high-value client work that drives revenue acceleration," explained Alan Lipschitz, Founder of Fair Aim Capital, who previously led marketing technology company Incubeta to global scale before its successful exit to Carlyle in 2023. "AI-enabled businesses will command premium valuations compared to traditional operations."
The fund targets business services and professional services sectors where AI applications can deliver immediate improvements to customer acquisition, customer experience and operations.
"The window for transformation is closing rapidly," added Harkness, who brings 15+ years of private equity-backed leadership experience. "SMEs that act decisively in the next 12-18 months will establish competitive advantages that compound for years."
About Fair Aim Capital
Fair Aim Capital is a family-backed investment firm focused on acquiring and transforming UK lower mid-market businesses through AI and digital marketing driven growth. Founded by serial entrepreneur Alan Lipschitz and led by CEO Andrew Harkness, the firm combines capital with hands-on operational expertise to create long-term value for all stakeholders.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250715645659/en/
Contacts
Media Contact: Andrew Harkness, andrew@fairaimcapital.com, fairaimcapital.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
AI Hiring Favors Women Over Equally Qualified Men, Study Finds
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As artificial intelligence takes on a bigger role in corporate hiring — with many companies touting its impartiality — one researcher's findings suggest the technology may be more biased than humans, and is alread favoring women over equally qualified men. David Rozado, an associate professor at the New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology and a well-known AI researcher, tested 22 large language models (LLMs)—including popular, consumer-facing apps like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok—using pairs of identical résumés that differed only by gendered names. His findings revealed that every single LLM was more likely to select the female-named candidate over the equally qualified male candidate. "This pattern may reflect complex interactions between model pre-training corpora, annotation processes during preference tuning, or even system-level guardrails for production deployments," Rozado told Newsweek. "But the exact source of the behavior is currently unclear." A Problem With Men? Rozado's findings reveal not just that AI models tend to favor women for jobs over men, but also how nuanced and pervasive those biases can be. Across more than 30,000 simulated hiring decisions, female-named candidates were chosen 56.9 percent of the time — a statistically significant deviation from gender neutrality, which would have resulted in a 50–50 split. When an explicit gender field was added to a CV — a practice common in countries like Germany and Japan — the preference for women became even stronger. Rozado warned that although the disparities were relatively modest, they could accumulate over time and unfairly disadvantage male candidates. "These tendencies persisted regardless of model size or the amount of compute leveraged," Rozado noted. "This strongly suggests that model bias in the context of hiring decisions is not determined by the size of the model or the amount of 'reasoning' employed. The problem is systemic." The models also exhibited other quirks. Many showed a slight preference for candidates who included preferred pronouns. Adding terms such as "she/her" or "he/him" to a CV slightly increased a candidate's chances of being selected. "My experimental design ensured that candidate qualifications were distributed equally across genders, so ideally, there would be no systematic difference in selection rates. However, the results indicate that LLMs may sometimes make hiring decisions based on factors unrelated to candidate qualifications, such as gender or the position of the candidates in the prompt," he said. Rozado, who is also a regular collaborator with the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, emphasized that the biggest takeaway is that LLMs, like human decision-makers, can sometimes rely on irrelevant features when the task is overdetermined and/or underdetermined. "Over many decisions, even small disparities can accumulate and impact the overall fairness of a process," he said. However, Rozado also acknowledged a key limitation of his study: it used synthetic CVs and job descriptions rather than real-world applications, which may not fully capture the complexity and nuance of authentic résumés. Additionally, because all CVs were closely matched in qualifications to isolate gender effects, the findings may not reflect how AI behaves when candidates' skills vary more widely. "It is important to interpret these results carefully. The intention is not to overstate the magnitude of harm, but rather to highlight the need for careful evaluation and mitigation of any bias in automated decision tools," Rozado added. AI Is Already Reshaping the Hiring Process Even as researchers debate the biases in AI systems, many employers have already embraced the technology to streamline hiring. A New York Times report this month described how AI-powered interviewer bots now speak directly with candidates, asking questions and even simulating human pauses and filler words. Jennifer Dunn, a marketing professional in San Antonio, said her AI interview with a chatbot named Alex "felt hollow" and she ended it early. "It isn't something that feels real to me," she told the Times. Another applicant, Emily Robertson-Yeingst, wondered if her AI interview was just being used to train the underlying LLM: "It starts to make you wonder, was I just some sort of experiment?" Job seekers attends the South Florida Job Fair held at the Amerant Bank Arena on June 26, 2024 in Sunrise, Florida. More than 50 companies set up booths to recruit people from entry-level to... Job seekers attends the South Florida Job Fair held at the Amerant Bank Arena on June 26, 2024 in Sunrise, Florida. More than 50 companies set up booths to recruit people from entry-level to management. Open jobs include police officers, food service, security, sales reps, technicians, customer service, IT, teacher assistants, insurance agents, and account executives. More Photo byStill, some organizations defend the use of AI recruiters as both efficient and scalable, especially in a world where the ease of online job-searching means open positions often field hundreds if not thousands of applicants. Propel Impact told the Times their AI interviews enabled them to screen 500 applicants this year — more than triple what they managed previously. Rozado, however, warned that the very features companies find appealing — speed and efficiency — can mask underlying vulnerabilities. "Over many decisions, even small disparities can accumulate and impact the overall fairness of a process," he said. "Similarly, the finding that being listed first in the prompt increases the likelihood of selection underscores the importance of not trusting AI blindly." More Research Needed Not all research points to the same gender dynamic Rozado identified. A Brookings Institution study this year found that, in some tests, men were actually favored over women in 51.9 percent of cases, while racial bias strongly favored white-associated names over Black-associated names. Brookings' analysis stressed that intersectional identities, such as being both Black and male, often led to the greatest disadvantages. Rozado and the Brookings team agree, however, that AI hiring systems are not ready to operate autonomously in high-stakes situations. Both recommend robust audits, transparency, and clear regulatory standards to minimize unintended discrimination. "Given current evidence of bias and unpredictability, I believe LLMs should not be used in high-stakes contexts like hiring, unless their outputs have been rigorously evaluated for fairness and reliability," Rozado said. "It is essential that organizations validate and audit AI tools carefully, particularly for applications with significant real-world impact."
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
Stocks making the biggest moves midday: First Solar, Newmont, Wells Fargo, Nvidia & more
Check out the companies making the biggest moves midday: First Solar – Shares of the major domestic solar panel producer popped 6%. Bloomberg News reported that the U.S. Commerce Department has launched Section 232 investigations into imports of drones and polysilicon, which is used on solar panels. The move could be a precursor to tariffs, which may be imposed on goods under Section 232 if they are deemed a threat to national security. Newmont — The mining stock dropped 8% after Newmont disclosed CFO Karyn Ovelmen had left the company. JPMorgan Chase — Shares fell less than 1% even after the bank posted second-quarter earnings that beat analyst expectations. Investment banking and trading revenue drove the stronger-than-expected numbers. Wells Fargo — Shares were down 5% after the company lowered its 2025 net income guidance to roughly in line with 2024 levels. The bank previously expected an increase of 1% to 3%. The forecast reduction overshadowed better-than-expected second-quarter profits. Citigroup — Shares added 3% after the bank posted second-quarter results that exceeded analyst expectations. Citigroup earned $1.96 per share on revenue of $21.67 billion, while analysts polled by LSEG had expected earnings of $1.60 on $20.98 billion in revenue. BlackRock — Stock in the world's largest asset manager dropped 5% after second-quarter revenue missed Wall Street's expectations. BlackRock reported revenue of $5.42 billion, while analysts surveyed by LSEG were looking for $5.46 billion. The company also reported some outflows from an institutional client, though BlackRock still saw net inflows in Q2. CoreWeave — The AI cloud computing firm rose more than 8% after it committed to spending $6 billion on a new artificial intelligence data center in Pennsylvania. This was just one of several announcements Tuesday as part of a push by the Trump administration. Among those was Google 's plan to spend $25 billion on data centers and AI infrastructure. State Street — Shares slipped 4% after the bank reported second-quarter net interest income of $729 million, while FactSet analysts had estimated $733.2 million. This shortfall overshadowed its second-quarter beat. Nvidia — Shares jumped 4% after the graphics processing unit manufacturer announced it will "soon" resume sales of its H20 AI chip to China upon receiving licenses from the U.S. government. The Trump administration had previously told the company in April that it would require a license to sell the chips in China, effectively halting sales. Fellow semiconductor chip stocks Advanced Micro Devices , Broadcom and Micron Technology respectively rose 6%, 2% and 1%. Trade Desk — Shares surged 9% after S & P Global announced that the digital advertising company is set to join the S & P 500 as of Friday. It will replace software maker Ansys, which will be acquired in a $35 billion deal by Synopsys. Shares of AppLovin and Robinhood Markets both shed around 1% upon being left out of the index once again. National Fuel Gas — Shares popped 6% on the heels of Bank of America's double upgrade to buy from underperform. Bank of America said the energy company has improved productivity.
The Verge
36 minutes ago
- The Verge
One of Google's AI agents flagged a 'critical security flaw' in SQLite, an open-source database.
One of Google's AI agents flagged a 'critical security flaw' in SQLite, an open-source database. Big Sleep, an AI agent Google introduced last year for searching out security vulnerabilities in both Google products and open-source projects, used information from Google Threat Intelligence to discover the issue before it could be used by threat actors, according to the company.
