Democrats should make 2026 a referendum on Trump and Epstein
Also, at every press conference about inflation, Ukraine or cuts to Medicaid, display a big photo of President Trump posing with Jeffrey Epstein and women.
Every camera should have a clear view of a poster with this Trump quote: 'I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do — and many of them are on the younger side.' Credit New York Magazine's 2002 interview with Trump.
Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) is a role model here. At his reelection campaign kickoff last week, he said plainly, 'Did anyone really think the sexual predator president who used to party with Jeffrey Epstein was going to release the Epstein files?'
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Cali.) is another model. He is demanding the release of all files related to the Epstein case. Khanna even tried to attach a resolution on releasing the files as an amendment to a cryptocurrency measure, only to have it blocked by House Republicans.
A cynic might ask: Why are House Republicans sitting on the files? Who are they protecting?
Many of Trump's loyalists in the House GOP conference used congressional oversight powers to push conspiracy theories about Benghazi and Hillary Clinton's email server. Democrats have far more evidence of wrongdoing and cover-up in going after the Epstein files.
Trump won in 2016 on the strength of a conspiracy theory, the false claim that President Barack Obama was not born in the U.S. Remember Trump saying his private investigators 'couldn't believe what they were finding'?
There is no need for false claims tying Epstein to Trump. You can watch the video of Trump partying with Epstein in Florida in 1992. You can also watch the video where Trump says of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime companion, 'I wish her well.'
Maxwell is in jail on charges of helping Epstein by 'facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of children,' in the words of Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney who oversaw her 2021 trial and conviction.
Open the facts of this case for all to see. Note that Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi served as Florida's attorney general from 2011 to 2019. Remind Americans that Trump was questioned by lawyers for Epstein's victims, according to Florida investigative reporter Julie K. Brown, who helped break the Epstein story open in 2018.
Trump's first Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta, was the U.S. Attorney in South Florida who cut Epstein a sweetheart deal. When asked why by the Trump vetting team, Acosta reportedly claimed he had been told to 'back off' because Epstein was connected to 'intelligence.'
That's not speculation. Neither Acosta nor the Trump administration officials who vetted him have denied it, according to the reporter who broke the story.
A special prosecutor should subpoena Acosta, place him under oath and ask, 'Mr. Acosta, is it true that someone told you to go easy on Epstein because he was connected to intelligence? If so, who told you that?'
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Trump sent a birthday greeting to Epstein in 2003 with a hand-drawn outline of a naked female.
Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief White House strategist, is calling for a special prosecutor. And let's not forget that Elon Musk, Trump's top campaign donor, said flatly that Trump was in the Epstein files in an X post last month. Why isn't Trump suing Musk for defamation?
Calling out Trump on his use of conspiracy theories is long overdue. Even in the White House, he has falsely claimed he was targeted by a liberal ' Deep State. ' Despite Russia being found to have supported his 2016 candidacy, he rightly said there was no proof of 'collusion,' but then he claimed Democrats had created a Russia 'hoax.'
When he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden, Trump spun yet another conspiracy theory about the election being rigged by Democrats in big cities. That led to a riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6. One of Trump's first acts upon returning to office was to pardon the people who attempted a violent overthrow of the election in service of that conspiracy theory.
For years, Trump and his supporters in the conservative media have pushed conspiracies featuring him as a truth-telling, right-wing avenger. But none of those charges against Democrats, including former President Bill Clinton and President Obama, have been more enduring than suspicions of a conspiracy involving Trump and a man convicted on prostitution charges, Epstein.
The shadowy former financier apparently committed suicide during Trump's first term before he could face added charges for sex crimes. His associate Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence in a federal prison in Florida for her role in Epstein's activities.
Now, as the Trump administration refuses to make good on its promise to release all files on Epstein's crimes, Democrats have an opportunity to heal the damage done by the president's use of social media to create a political base of people who follow his false claims.
Trump's critics have long asked: How does this end? What will it take for Trump's base to finally see through him?
Ironically, the conservative media's echo chamber may now lead to his undoing.
Democrats have to make 2026 a referendum on Trump's handling of Epstein.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
24 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Forget eggs, beef prices are soaring
Last August, then-candidate and former President Donald Trump promised to reduce the prices on everyday essentials on his first day in the Oval Office. "When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One,"Trump said at the time, according to CNN. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter While there have been some improvements, the latest data indicated that prices continue to rise, primarily for necessities such as food and housing. Experts agree that the inflation rate in the U.S. over the last few years is the worst in decades. The global pandemic started the surging prices show, due to lockdowns, disruptions in the supply chain, and everything in between. The challenge continues, and it is likely to increase due to new obstacles, such as tariffs. Before the 2024 presidential election, inflation notably dropped but remained above pre-pandemic levels. Related: Major grocery chain confirms closure of five locations The consumer price index (CPI) increased 2.7% in the 12 months through June, while fruit and vegetable prices were 0.9% higher. Goldman Sachs Global Co-head of Fixed Income and Liquidity Solutions Kay Haigh says we are only seeing "some early signs of tariff impact," reports CBS News. Over the last couple of months, egg prices have dropped; however, they were up more than 41% on a year-over-year basis. On July 9, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the State of California, Governor Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and other state officials, arguing that the state's laws on the production of eggs and poultry products nationally violate the U.S. Constitution. Related: FDA says yes to controversial new seafood delicacy The law enacted on January 1, 2022, requires that all eggs produced and sold in California (even though they are produced in another state) must be procured only from hens in cage-free housing. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins slammed California for hurting consumers by raising egg prices and said, "It is one thing if California passes laws that affect its own State; it is another when those laws affect other States in violation of the U.S. Constitution." The news raised serious concerns and various reactions among consumers. Many agreed that eggs from cage-free hens, which are proven to be healthier by various studies, should be the norm, while others said it is important to have a choice of regular, cheaper eggs. Eggs are among the most nutritious foods on the planet, and 87% of Americans consume them at least weekly. Indispensable in the kitchen as a common ingredient in numerous recipes, eggs are a staple more than four in five Americans always keep in their refrigerators. More on Food and Retail: Another healthy fast-food chain files Chapter 11 bankruptcyCostco quietly pulls popular product, upsets fansStarbucks brings back fan-favorite menu item after 2-year hiatus While high egg prices are frustrating consumers, the rising cost of another food staple is making them even more concerned about being able to afford essential foods. And the Trump administration just made an unexpected move in a desperate effort to reduce prices of this grocery item. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, ground beef was priced at $6.12 a pound in June, which is 12% higher than in June 2024. This is the first time since the Consumer Price Index started to track the data in the 1980s that ground beef price has surpassed $6, according to the Joint Economic Committee's minority arm. Steak prices increased 8% year-over-year, and they will not likely come down anytime soon. KC Cattle Company CEO Patrick Montgomery told Axios that these prices are "just the tip of the iceberg. Prices for beef will continue to be tumultuous for the next two to four years." Related: Taco Bell reveals new menu item with dream partner So what is causing skyrocketing prices? Several factors contribute to higher beef prices across the country. Those include climate, which has reduced cattle herds through a multi-year drought, as well as policy and economics, with global import changes directly impacting the supply chain. The temporary ban on live cattle imports, which started in May because of a parasitic flesh-eating maggot, also contributed to the higher prices. While the USDA recently announced a phased reopening of cattle, bison, and equine imports from Mexico, another challenge for global supply chains is on its way: a new 50% U.S. tariff on Brazilian imports, which starts on August 1. Reuters reported that Brazil, which accounts for about 23% of all U.S. beef imports, is reconsidering shipments due to tariffs. Data from the latest USDA Census of Agriculture report from February 2024 indicated that the number of farms in the U.S. has dropped by more than 141,000 from 2017 to 2022. Demand for beef continues to rise in the U.S., and it is projected that per capita beef consumption will grow 2.7% by 2025, above growth in consumption of broilers (2.3%) and pork (1.7%). Beef is an important food staple in the U.S., providing essential nutrients. According to Beef Cattle Research Council, a 100-gram serving of cooked beef provides 250 calories, 35 grams of protein, 10 grams of fat and 19% of the daily recommended value (DV) of iron, 77% DV of zinc, and 102% DV of B12. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republican Calls For Pam Bondi to Testify About Epstein Files
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Representative Warren Davidson of Ohio said he'd like to see Attorney General Pam Bondi answer questions regarding the Department of Justice's (DOJ) handling of the investigation against deceased sexual offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Newsweek reached out to the DOJ via online form Monday night for comment. Why It Matters The Epstein case remains a focal point of public and political attention due to longstanding questions about accountability, possible accomplices, and the adequacy of prior investigations. Fluctuating responses from Trump administration officials and new calls from Republican lawmakers, along with similar demands from Democrats, have highlighted the challenge of meeting transparency demands while observing legal constraints on classified and sealed records. The issue also touches on broader concerns regarding the handling of sensitive evidence, victims' privacy, and high-profile connections. In a memo earlier this month, the DOJ and FBI stated that there is no evidence of a so-called "client list" or attempts by Epstein to blackmail public figures, and that Epstein's death by suicide was confirmed in government inquiries. Bondi, in a previous Fox News appearance, said she intended to review Epstein material, but later clarified she was speaking generally about case documents on her desk. What To Know When asked on Monday if he would want to hear Bondi testify, Davidson said to CNN's Manu Raju, "Yeah. I mean I'm not on that committee, but you know I really would like the committee of jurisdiction to bring her in and say, you know hey, you start this off, you've got binders. Please explain." Davidson added, "You know, we're led to believe there are going to be some prosecutions. If we're going to prosecute, we assume there's going to be convictions. And I think that's really the disconnect." President Donald Trump announced over the weekend that he asked the DOJ to release all of the grand jury testimony related to the Epstein case saying on Truth Social: "I have asked the Justice Department to release all Grand Jury testimony with respect to Jeffrey Epstein, subject only to Court Approval. With that being said, and even if the Court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request. It will always be more, more, more. MAGA!" This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.
Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
New Pirro committee vote set for Thurs
House Republicans will scrap several votes this week as internal party drama over Jeffrey Epstein derails a key committee that handles legislation on its way to the floor. The House Rules Committee came to a standstill Monday night as GOP leaders struggled to contain rank-and-file Republicans and their Democratic allies clamoring for a floor vote to compel the publication of materials related to the late disgraced financier and convicted sex offender. Committee Democrats had planned to force a vote that evening on legislation that would call for the release of the materials, as the panel worked to tee up floor consideration on a slate of unrelated bills. It was poised to be a repeat of what transpired last Thursday inside Rules, which gummed up the works for several hours. But rather than this time work through the Democratic disruption, Republicans chose instead Monday to recess the rest of the Rules meeting altogether, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) saying it was 'unlikely' that the panel would reconvene this week at all. Later, lawmakers said there were no plans to return at all. That means House members will depart for August recess at the week's end without being able to vote on legislation that would not otherwise be able to pass on the chamber floor with a simple majority vote, including an immigration-related bill that would increase penalties for individuals who enter the country illegally and a water-permitting measure. The House will still vote on measures that can be taken up under an expedited procedure typically reserved for noncontroversial legislation that can pass with a two-thirds majority of those present and voting, such as a bill that would establish new ZIP Codes for certain communities and deter China in the ongoing Taiwan conflict. 'See you in September,' said Rules Committee ranking member Jim McGovern (D-Mass.). He was spearheading the effort to call up a vote on the legislation from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.). The two men are working to force a floor vote on that bill through a procedural maneuver known as a discharge petition, which allows members to put a bill on the floor without leadership approval if the effort gets 218 signatures. Scalise blamed Democrats for the meltdown. 'At the end of the day, look, Democrats are yelling and screaming,' he said in an interview. 'They spent four years covering up for Epstein, and you know, at least President Trump's in the courts right now trying to get documents released, and I really think you're gonna see, hopefully, a lot unsealed from that and then we've got some other options.' Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the Rules Committee, also accused Democrats of 'grandstanding' and said Republicans refused to give the minority party 'an endless microphone.' McGovern, in a statement, accused Republicans of making their own mess. 'Democrats on the Rules Committee gave Republicans a choice — either vote to release the Epstein Files, or keep them a secret. Republicans are so afraid of taking that vote that they are torching their own agenda instead of doing something they promised the voters they would do,' he said. 'Trump and his top allies have been pushing this for years — and people aren't going to forget about it in a month.' Massie, speaking to reporters Monday night, was unrepentant. He'd just been seeing walking onto the House floor with a binder labeled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 2,' and the bill number of his resolution with Khanna. 'Their Epstein bill resolution is non-binding so it's kind of fake. The resolution I have with Khanna would be binding on the President,' Massie said, explaining the breakdown between Republican leaders and other members of the House. Rules leadership last week teed up compromise legislation that would simply support the release of Epstein materials, which opponents called two week and which Speaker Mike Johnson has since said he won't bring to the floor, anyway. Scalise reiterated that decision, saying in a brief interview, 'the Trump administration's petitioned the courts to release some of the sealed documents. Hopefully, the court acts swiftly. It'd be important if they got that out.' Trump last week instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to begin the process of unsealing grand jury testimony in Epstein's criminal case. It followed publication of a Wall Street Journal report alleging Trump sent Epstein a racy birthday letter several decades ago, though Trump has said the letter is fake and is now seeking billions in a defamation lawsuit against the paper.
