logo
India refuses to sign SCO statement over Pahalgam

India refuses to sign SCO statement over Pahalgam

Hindustan Times26-06-2025
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defence ministers' meeting couldn't issue a joint communique on Thursday after India refused to endorse the document because it didn't address its terrorism-related concerns, officials aware of the matter said. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh during the SCO Defence Ministers' Meeting, in Qingdao, China. (@rajnathsingh)
Defence minister Rajnath Singh, who attended the meeting at Qingdao in China, refused to sign the joint communique as it was silent on the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed but mentioned Balochistan and the hijacking of the Jaffer Express by Baloch militants in March, the officials said, asking not to be named.
Pakistan's insistence on not having any reference to the Pahalgam attack, while retaining the reference to the situation in Balochistan, stymied the finalisation of a joint statement, the officials said. The SCO works by consensus and a joint communique cannot be issued if even one member state doesn't endorse it.
China, the current president of the SCO, has deep military and strategic ties with Pakistan, which it strongly supported during the recent four-day clashes with India under Operation Sindoor. The operation was India's direct military response to the Pahalgam terror strike, the worst attack on civilians since the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.
External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal responded to a question about the SCO meeting's failure to issue a joint communique by tacitly pointing to Pakistan's role in the matter.
'I understand [the meet] could not adopt a joint statement. I also understand that certain member countries could not reach consensus on certain issues and hence the document could not be finalised. On our side, India wanted concerns on terrorism reflected in the document, which was not acceptable to one particular country, and therefore the statement was not adopted,' he said.
A press release issued by the Indian side is 'very instructive in how we look at the threat of terrorism', he said.
'The defence minister, in his address, called upon these 11 countries to come together to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations... He also reiterated the need to uphold that the perpetrators, organisers, financers, sponsors of reprehensible acts of terrorism, including cross-border terrorism, need to be held accountable and brought to justice,' Jaiswal said.
Singh further said SCO members must be 'in lockstep in our endeavour in strengthening stability and security in our neighborhood', he added.
In his address, Singh said every act of terrorism was criminal and unjustifiable, and the bloc must unite in eliminating the menace for collective safety and security. He said India launched Operation Sindoor, exercising its right to defend itself against terrorism and pre-empt and deter further cross-border attacks.
During the Pahalgam terror attack, victims were shot after they were profiled on religious identity, and the The Resistance Front --- a proxy of UN-designated terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) --- claimed responsibility for it, Singh said.
'The pattern of Pahalgam attack matches with LeT's previous terror attacks in India. India's zero tolerance for terrorism was demonstrated through its actions. We have shown that epicentres of terrorism are no longer safe and we will not hesitate to target them.'
India launched the Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7 and struck terror and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), It triggered a four-day military confrontation with Pakistan involving fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery before the two sides reached an understanding on stopping all military action on May 10.
The biggest challenges faced by the region were related to peace, security and trust-deficit, with increasing radicalisation, extremism and terrorism being the root cause of these problems, Singh said.
'Peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups. Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action.'
On May 15, Singh questioned if nuclear weapons were safe in Pakistan's control and custody and demanded that its arsenal be placed under the supervision of global nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), calling the neighbour 'irresponsible and rogue'.
'It is imperative that those who sponsor, nurture and utilise terrorism for their narrow and selfish ends must bear the consequences. Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations,' Singh said in Qingdao.
Singh called for proactive steps to check the spread of radicalisation among the youth, acknowledging the significant role of the RATS (regional anti-terrorist structure --- a body under the SCO) mechanism in tackling the challenge. 'The joint statement of the Council of SCO Heads of State on 'Countering Radicalisation leading to Terrorism, Separatism and Extremism' issued during India's chairmanship symbolises our shared commitment.'
SCO is a 10-nation Eurasian security and political grouping whose members include China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and Iran. Their defence ministers' meeting was held as a precursor to the annual summit of its leaders set for the autumn.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-Nato's threat to Russian oil buyers masks a bid to check China and corner the arms market
US-Nato's threat to Russian oil buyers masks a bid to check China and corner the arms market

Economic Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

US-Nato's threat to Russian oil buyers masks a bid to check China and corner the arms market

Play ball, our way Nato secretary general Mark Rutte may have thought he would cause jitters in India, China and Russia if he spoke the strident language of Donald Trump. That he caused no disquiet was evident in the stock markets in India, China and the Western 'ordered' India, Brazil and China - all BRICS members - to stop buying Russian oil after Trump threatened to punish them for non-compliance by imposing an additional 100% tariff. Curiously, he omitted mentioning Turkiye, a Nato member, being the third-biggest importer of Russian crude after India and China. It is amazing that some of the best strategists in the Western world would come up with a simplistic solution for resolving the Ukraine crisis: provide Ukraine with top-notch weapons and weaken Russia by blocking oil exports. Choking distribution of Russian oil, which accounts for 15% of global supply, would shoot up international crude prices, possibly by 20-30% from the present level of $68 a barrel. Markets were indifferent because they knew that European countries, and even the US, would not seriously commit themselves to such self-harm. Though the EU has moved away from Russian oil, it still purchases 19% of its natural gas requirements from Russia. Trump, once wary of Ukraine aid and banking on Putin ties, flipped after Rutte dangled big US arms sales So, why should India, which saves more than $11 bn a year by buying discounted Russian oil, accept this 'diktat', which is equal to an additional tariff? Indian officials prefer to wait. An earlier statement by S Jaishankar after US senator Lindsey Graham proposed a 500% tariff on buyers of Russian oil is an indicator of New Delhi's thinking. 'So, we have been in touch with Senator Graham. Our concerns and our interests on energy security have been made conversant to him. So, we'll then have to cross that bridge when we come to it, if we come to it,' Jaishankar said earlier this has protested the move, while Russian leaders are literally joking about it. 'China believes dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solution to the Ukraine crisis. We categorically oppose all illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction,' Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Wednesday. 'Coercion and pressure cannot resolve fundamental issues.'Trump, who consistently opposed high-spend support for Ukraine, and relied on his 'friendship' with Vladimir Putin to resolve the crisis, made a volte-face, offering top-notch military equipment to Kyiv. Some commentators have credited Rutte for bringing about this change by enticing Trump with promises of higher sales of US-made military there is more to it. Trump, and a section of European leaders, have been looking for ways to keep Beijing under pressure as they find Chinese companies surging ahead of Western businesses in sales and innovation. Cutting off Russian oil supplies could be a good way to force China, the biggest oil buyer, to pay more while weakening a supposed India-Russia-China 'alliance'.They are also hassled by the expansion and rising clout of BRICS, which Trump recently described as an 'anti-American' group. He takes the de-dollarisation threat more seriously than some BRICS members like India. The fact that the Russian economy has survived nearly four years of, in Putin's words, a 'special military operation' is seen by many as a direct affront to the supposed power of economic sanctions and Western plans to weaken the nation. India and China are blamed in some quarters for Russia's is the second-biggest arms buyer in the world after Ukraine. Russia remains the largest arms supplier, meeting 36% of India's arms requirements - though the number has declined from 72% during 2010-14, suggesting major changes in GoI's approach on the issue. According to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri), 'India is shifting its arms supply relations towards Western suppliers, most notably France, Israel and the US.'A key element in the growth of the defence industry is the existence of enemies and threat perception. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and, to a smaller extent, India help to meet this requirement for Western defence manufacturers. Qatar and Saudi Arabia are the third- and fourth-biggest buyers, mainly because of the threat perception from recently said that his success in persuading European countries to spend 5% of their GDP on defence has thrown up a potential market of $1 tn for the sector. It is obvious that American defence companies and politicians do not want China to start bidding for a piece of the new market by offering discounted rates. They don't want to share the fate of US construction and railroad companies, which failed to stop Chinese players from penetrating parts of Europe over the past also want a share of the Indian defence market, even if it's necessary to ensure continued discord between Asian neighbours, India, Pakistan and China. Trump's repeated claims about ending the recent India-Pakistan conflict should be seen in this the goals set out by the Trump-Nato combine cover several aspects other than oil. They include countering China's influence, weakening BRICS and enlarging the market potential of Western arms producers. The question is whether it will succeed in bringing India closer to the West (read: the US). Or, make New Delhi and Beijing strange tactical bedfellows. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. As deposit ground slips under PSU banks' feet, they chase the wealthy If data is the new oil, are data centres the smokestacks of the digital age? Can Grasim's anti-competition charge against Asian Paints stand amid intense war Can Indian IT's 'pyramid' survive the GenAI shake-up? Stock Radar: Igarashi Motors showing signs of momentum after 30% drop from highs; time to buy? These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts Multibagger or IBC - Part 15: Strong margins & no loans. Is this the auto sector's dark horse? Get ready for volatility with the big, better & experienced. 7 large-caps from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 39%

‘Don't mess with India': Shah hails PM Modi over Op Sindoor
‘Don't mess with India': Shah hails PM Modi over Op Sindoor

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Don't mess with India': Shah hails PM Modi over Op Sindoor

Jaipur: Union home and cooperation minister , while addressing a public rally at Jaipur's Dadia village Thursday, said Prime Minister sent a strong message to the world by conducting Op Sindoor after the Pahalgam attack, emphasising that Indian citizens, defence forces and borders are not to be trifled with, or there will be consequences. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Narendra Modi has done the most significant work by ensuring the country's there was an attack in Uri, and Modi responded with a surgical strike; then in Pulwama, there was an attack, and he conducted an airstrike; and when there was an attack in Pahalgam, Op Sindoor was carried out, striking at the heart of Pakistan and eliminating terrorists," Shah said. "A strong message was sent to the entire world that India's citizens, army and borders are not to be trifled with, or there will be consequences. Modiji has conveyed this message and worked towards realising the dreams of a prosperous, secure and developed India," he said. Speaking at a Cooperative and Employment Festival organised on the occasion of International Year of Cooperatives, Shah highlighted that under Modi's leadership, India has jumped from 11th position to become the world's fourth-largest economy, with 27 crore people rising above the poverty line.

BJP MLC cites ‘research', says Indian butterflies don't sit on foreign flowers
BJP MLC cites ‘research', says Indian butterflies don't sit on foreign flowers

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

BJP MLC cites ‘research', says Indian butterflies don't sit on foreign flowers

Nagpur: Many Indian butterflies don't hover over flowers of foreign origin planted in state PWD rest houses because of 'DNA mismatch', claimed BJP MLC Shrikant Bhartiya citing a research conducted three years ago. Speaking in the legislative council on Thursday, Bhartiya said a biotech focussed research also revealed that trees having 'foreign genetics' have higher mortality rates, thus impacting roadside tree plantation drives. Bhartiya said, "Three years ago a research team revealed that trees with foreign genetics, like gulmohar and babool, have higher mortality rates. I want the govt to clarify if it can mandate plantation of India-based (sic) trees which have higher survival rates even when planted on the roadside." Replying to his query, state public works minister Shivendrasinh Bhosale said the policy is already in place. "We always ensure that only those trees are planted which can survive in the local climatic condition. I am from Satara, and some specific trees thrive in the red soil of my taluka. We stick to these varieties during plantation drives. Our officials have been directed to plant trees which are suitable for local conditions," said Bhosale. MLC Bhartiya added that the same research also revealed that butterflies no longer flock to PWD rest houses. "After 1989 hardly any butterflies are to be seen in the PWD rest house gardens as non-native plants are being used in the beautification drives. Butterflies do not come because the DNA of the foreign plants do not match their DNA. We need to plant mogra, jai and other species which are of Indian origin," said Bhartiya. Bhosale assured Bhartiya that PWD officials will be directed to plant Indian-origin trees on their premises for beautification purposes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store