logo
'It's about power': How sexual harassment affects those on the margins

'It's about power': How sexual harassment affects those on the margins

SBS Australiaa day ago

Warning: this story contains elements that may distress some people. For many people, reporting sexual harassment at work is not as easy as simply making a complaint. While laws are in place to prevent and eliminate sexual harassment at work, experts and victim survivors say there are still significant gaps between policy and practice. Now, the Australian Human Rights Commission says more needs to be done to support those most vulnerable to harassment at work. Dr Anna Cody is Australia's Sex Discrimination Commissioner. She tells SBS that for real change to occur, leaders have to take action. "What we need to see is leaders stepping up. So that's CEOs, directors of boards, managers, supervisors, but everyone within a workplace to make sure that people are safe and respected at work. And how we can then create a culture where it's not okay to not be respectful within a workplace. We need to ensure that our workplaces are diverse, that there is cultural diversity, people with disability at all levels within an organisation." The Commission's new report, called Speaking From Experience, aims to address gaps in understanding about what workers from diverse backgrounds think needs to change to make workplaces safer. Sexual harassment at work is a complex matter and extends beyond gender discrimination, occurring most often to those who experience various forms of overlapping disadvantage or discrimination. "Harassers definitely do choose who they are harassing though they'll choose the person who's on a temporary visa or who really needs this job and who can't afford to let it go. So they use that vulnerability as a way of protecting themselves. So workplaces and bosses and supervisors need to be conscious of that, particularly where there are systems in place or locations within a workplace. You can create safety within a workplace through systems as well as through the way in which you deal with the person who's experienced workplace sexual harassment." The Australian Human Rights Commission says one in three Australians report being sexually harassed at work. This figure was far higher for some, with almost half [[48%]] of people with a disability experiencing harassment at work and 56 per cent of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Those in insecure employment, LGBTIQ+ people, culturally or linguistically diverse people, and people with a disability, are not only more likely to experience sexual harassment, but less likely to feel safe enough to report it. Prabha Nandagopal is an award-winning human rights lawyer and founder of Elevate Consulting Partners, a firm that works with businesses to create safe, respectful and inclusive workplaces. She says leaders must be able to address their own blind spots and centre the voices of those affected. " We know that sexual harassment isn't just about gender, it's about power. And people who do sit at that intersection of racism, sexism, ableism, for example, are often more exposed and less protected. And as a woman of colour, I've seen how these layers of discrimination compound when it comes to leaders, it starts with really listening even when it's uncomfortable. So I'm briefing board directors and leaders and middle management almost every day in my day job, and it's very easy for me to talk about workplace sexual harassment. But the moment you start talking about racism in the workplace, that's when there's a bit of discomfort." While acknowledging changes to the national approach over the past decade and the greater responsibility placed on employers, experts say policy and practice gaps still exist. Drawing from the experience of over 300 victim-survivors of workplace sexual harassment, the report emphasises the need for people to feel safe enough to report. In 2022, a legal obligation called Positive Duty was added to the Sex Discrimination Act. Under the obligation, employers have a duty to eliminate and prevent, as far as possible, unlawful acts of sexual harassment at work. Prabha Nandagopal says she supports recommendations to impose civil penalties for companies failing to comply. "The positive duty regime under the Federal Sex Discrimination Act doesn't have civil penalties attached to it. So if someone doesn't comply with the commission's compliance notice that organization can be taken to the federal court. Where the federal court can make any order it sees fit. But unlike say your work health and safety regime, the commission's enforcement powers are quite limited." Workplace sexual harassment also extends beyond the physical workplace: it's not only harmful psychologically but can isolate individuals. Dr Shih Joo Tan is a professor of criminology at the University of Melbourne and has co-authored a series of reports on the experiences of migrant and refugee women with workplace harassment. She says aside from uncertainty around their rights, people from diverse cultural backgrounds are often dismissed as misunderstanding Australian culture. "For example, some migrant and refugee women might be on an employer-sponsored visa, which would sit very hard for them to even report or think about reporting because they would then have to consider the consequences that it could have on their visa status or which also links to their right to remain in a country. So there's that. And also the other issue that was also mentioned in the report was that a lot of times when they do try to say that this is what happened to me, or this person had said this really horrible thing to me, often the response that they could get is that this is just a joke or this is part of the Australian culture, learn how to, you just need to learn Australian culture in that way. So it was seen as a problem on their part that there was a lack of understanding." Another issue raised in the report was the lack of knowledge around different forms of harassment. Often mistaken as only the most blatant forms of harassment, sexual harassment in the workplace can be covert and is often dismissed as something more lighthearted. Dr Anna Cody says without proper understanding of what sexual harassment is, employers can't properly address it. "There have been significant changes over the last decade coming out of the Me Too movement and a greater understanding of workplace sexual harassment. But we still need to build our understanding of what constitutes workplace sexual harassment. So while many people understand touching, unwanted sexual touching, to be workplace sexual harassment, we need to think about messaging of sexual content or of leering or staring at someone in a sexual way or suggesting sexual acts with that person. All of those things also constitute workplace sexual harassment." The report offers policymakers and organisations eleven key recommendations. All of the recommendations centre around reducing barriers - barriers to information, to safety, to being heard, to accessing support, and to justice and accountability. Dr Tan says while many people never make a formal complaint, there were certain things people say made it easier when they did. "In the very first instance, most of them felt comfortable and secure with their direct supervisors. So there was immediate support from management level. The other thing was also assurance that this would not impact on their visa status or their financial security, or that they would not have to face small talk in the office, which was another thing that women had talked about as impacting on their mental wellbeing and things that they would consider as impacting on their positions. They felt like they were punished on a social level for speaking up or for complaining."]] Ms Nandagopal says employers need to take the time to understand the problems specific to their workplace. "So firstly, it's about really understanding the nature and prevalence of sexual harassment in their workplace by speaking to their workers and consulting, particularly those from marginalised groups, not only about what they're experiencing, but asking what they need to feel safe. Then investing in real quality education and training for leaders and workers. And then ensuring their policies and reporting processes are trauma informed and culturally safe. So going beyond that tick-a-box approach to really investing in quality effective measures to prevent and respond to sexual harassment." Commissioner Anna Cody says the landmark report is a crucial final step in the Commission's Respect at Work agenda. And while there is still a long way to go as the recommendations are considered, she says it's important to appreciate the work of victim survivors in telling their stories. "The people that we heard from, how strong and determined they were in trying to make our workplaces fairer and safer for everyone, that they wanted to share their stories so that we could act on them and ensure that other people didn't have to go through what they had gone through." If you or someone you know wants to talk about sexual harassment, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit www.1800RESPECT.org.au . In an emergency, call 000.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSW Liberal leader says women and young people have a ‘seat at the table' after election loss
NSW Liberal leader says women and young people have a ‘seat at the table' after election loss

News.com.au

time8 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

NSW Liberal leader says women and young people have a ‘seat at the table' after election loss

NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman says women and young people have a 'seat at the table' in the state's Liberal branch amid calls to end federal intervention in the party following their bruising loss at last month's election. Liberal leader Sussan Ley confirmed earlier this month the federal takeover of the NSW division would continue until at least March 2026 but without ex-Victorian Liberal treasurer Alan Stockdale and ex-senator Richard Alston. Mr Stockdale stirred controversy when he told the NSW Liberal Women's Council in early June that 'women are sufficiently assertive now that we should be giving some thought to whether we need to protect men's involvement'. The comments sparked quick condemnation from Ms Ley as well as Queensland and NSW members of the Liberal Party whose NSW branch is often seen as being more moderate, including on issues such as women's involvement. In an exclusive interview, Mr Speakman said the NSW Liberal Party had made 'great strides' in recent years in increasing women's representation when asked whether the branch should act as a 'north star' to its federal counterpart. 'I'm not going to advise the federal branch whether or not they should have quotas, that's a matter for the feds, but in NSW our female representation in parliament has improved dramatically in recent years. 'Women now represent 45 per cent of our frontbench, they represent 45 per cent of our party room. We can always do better, but we have made great strides in getting female representation in the last few years.' Mr Speakman also praised the party's investment in young people. 'We've got eight MPs who are under 40,' he said. 'About half of those are under 35. Labor have no MPs under 35 at all. 'It's important that young people have a seat at the table as well. 'If their voice is unheard at the table, often they are overlooked.' The Liberal Party has faced immense scrutiny over the party's relationship with women following the 2025 federal election. Labor seized on multiple scandals during the campaign, including claims then opposition leader Peter Dutton was out of touch with women due to his plans to reform work-from-home rights and position on women in the military. Ms Ley said she was determined to get more women into the Liberal Party ranks and pushed back against condemnation of gender quotas from Liberal leadership rival Angus Taylor and former prime minister Tony Abbott.

Australians ‘have had an absolute gutful' of Welcome to Country ceremonies, survey finds
Australians ‘have had an absolute gutful' of Welcome to Country ceremonies, survey finds

News.com.au

time13 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Australians ‘have had an absolute gutful' of Welcome to Country ceremonies, survey finds

Australians have tired of 'pointless' Welcome to Country ceremonies, new polling data has revealed, amid calls for a 'review' of their use at public events. A survey of 1005 Australians conducted by independent marketing research firm Dynata on behalf of the conservative Institute of Public Affairs last month found that more than half (56 per cent) of participants agreed the practice has 'become divisive'. Only 17 per cent disagreed with the statement, while 27 per cent said they were unsure. Surprisingly, 48 per cent of those aged 18 to 24 — a demographic often thought to be more progressive than generations past — did not believe the ritual to be a unifying one. Sentiment around the performance of Welcome to Country before major events like Anzac Day or sporting matches was more mixed — 46 per cent and 49 per cent respectively said they should no longer be performed before either event, versus 34 per cent and 30 per cent who said they should continue. IPA deputy executive director Daniel Wild said the survey results were proof 'Australians have had an absolute gutful' of the 'divisive and pointless' tradition. 'Even younger Australians, who the political class insist are left-wing and woke, by a two-to-one margin believe Welcome to Country performances are divisive,' Mr Wild said in a statement accompanying the findings. 'And they are evenly split on the performances at sporting events and Anzac Day ceremonies, further underscoring how divisive it is. 'Commonsense, working class, mainstream Australians understand something that the highly credentialed elites do not: Australians do not want to be divided by race, and we do not want or need to be welcomed to our own country.' He also took aim at Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who opened her National Press Club address on Wednesday by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land and maintained that while it should not become a box-ticking exercise, there is 'a time and a place' for the declaration and Welcome to Country ceremonies. 'Look, I think Acknowledgement of Country have their place, but in significant moments like yesterday was one of those places,' Ms Ley told ABC Radio on Thursday, asked if her speech 'settled' the ongoing debate over their use. 'And as Environment Minister and Health Minister, I listened carefully and I participated in what I would describe as meaningful Welcome to Country ceremonies that involved the circumstances of Indigenous Australians with respect to our natural environment and their health that were relevant and important. 'I don't think it should be ticking a box on a Teams meeting. I don't think it should be at every work meeting, because I think that actually diminishes the value of what it is. 'So there is a time and a place, and it's about striking the right balance.' Her words were a marked departure from the stance of her predecessor Peter Dutton, who omitted Acknowledgement of Country statements at major events and speeches during his election campaign, said the practice was overdone and went as far as to say he didn't support Welcome to Country ceremonies on Anzac Day. Mr Wild argued Ms Ley's stance was also 'at odds with modern Australia', and accused her of '[failing] to state who the purported traditional owners of the National Press Club are'. A number of Indigenous community leaders and academics, speaking to The Daily Telegraph, also questioned the frequency with which Welcome to Country ceremonies were being performed, as well as the motives behind them. 'Welcome to Country is overused. It is meant to be a sacred ceremony between tribes, not to be commercialised like a money-making machine,' former South Australian AFL player Tyson Lindsay said. 'I talk to my elders about it and they say it is not acceptable, every time we hear it we cringe now … There are too many real issues facing Aboriginal people to be worrying about these empty symbolic gestures. 'I am looking for real change for the good of rather than symbolic tokenism.' Prominent Indigenous leader and businessman Warren Mundine said he was sick of the practice being hijacked for political purposes. 'A welcome is supposed to be, 'I'm glad you're here',' Mr Mundine explained. 'It's like welcoming someone into your house.' Speaking to earlier this year, Wiradjuri woman and University of Melbourne Associate Professor of Indigenous Education, Dr Jessa Rogers, said the misconception the tradition is 'about welcoming you to Australia' was 'completely ridiculous'. 'People think that a Welcome to Country is welcoming them to Australia, when in fact it is welcoming them to the specific Country of that local Aboriginal nation,' Dr Rogers said. Simply put, Dr Rogers explained, Welcome to Country is a formal welcome by the traditional owners and custodians of a particular place, to their country. 'Country is not the same as 'Australia',' she said. 'It is a spiritual concept as well as a physical one — it encompasses landmarks but also people, skies, waterways and beings. Country is what we belong to as Aboriginal people.'

Albanese government ‘glad' Iran's nuclear program ‘set back', senior minister says
Albanese government ‘glad' Iran's nuclear program ‘set back', senior minister says

News.com.au

time13 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Albanese government ‘glad' Iran's nuclear program ‘set back', senior minister says

The minister in charge of Australia's national security has kept tight-lipped on the damage US strikes dealt to Iranian nuclear facilities last week. Leaked US intelligence suggested the attack had only set Iran's nuclear program back a few months, casting serious doubt on Donald Trump's claim it had been 'obliterated'. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke on Sunday refused to comment on intelligence on the US strikes, but said there is no doubt they set back Iran's nuclear program. 'First of all, it is in the interests of global peace that Iran does not have a capacity with nuclear weapons,' Mr Burke told Sky News. 'Iran has been in breach of international obligations on that and the US strikes were targeted very specifically at the potential of nuclear weapons from Iran, and we are glad that those setbacks have occurred.' The US President has responded to the leaked intelligence by lashing out at the 'fake news' media that reported it and ordering an investigation while doubling down on his original assessment. Mr Trump's position has been closely echoed by his cabinet, including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who accused the White House press corps of cheering 'against Trump'. 'Because you want him not to be successful so badly, you have to cheer against the efficacy of the strikes,' he told reporters earlier this. 'You have to hope they were not effective.' Asked directly about the debate raging in the US over the outcome of the strikes, Mr Burke said he understood the conversation 'has been the extent of the setbacks'. 'But I haven't seen anyone doubt that the US strikes on those sites has caused a significant setback for Iran's capability in terms of developing nuclear weapons,' he said. Last week's operation involved US B-2 stealth bombers flying 36 hours to drop so-called bunker-buster bombs on three Iranian facilities, including Fordow, which is nestled deep in a mountainous area. The US action came after Israel launched an air offensive targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites. The offensive killed dozens of senior atomic scientists and military officials. In the week leading up to Israel's 'pre-emptive' strikes, the UN's atomic watchdog declared that Iran was breaching its obligations, with inspectors admitting they could not say if the Islamic republic's nuclear program was 'exclusively peaceful'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store