NSW Liberal leader says women and young people have a ‘seat at the table' after election loss
NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman says women and young people have a 'seat at the table' in the state's Liberal branch amid calls to end federal intervention in the party following their bruising loss at last month's election.
Liberal leader Sussan Ley confirmed earlier this month the federal takeover of the NSW division would continue until at least March 2026 but without ex-Victorian Liberal treasurer Alan Stockdale and ex-senator Richard Alston.
Mr Stockdale stirred controversy when he told the NSW Liberal Women's Council in early June that 'women are sufficiently assertive now that we should be giving some thought to whether we need to protect men's involvement'.
The comments sparked quick condemnation from Ms Ley as well as Queensland and NSW members of the Liberal Party whose NSW branch is often seen as being more moderate, including on issues such as women's involvement.
In an exclusive interview, Mr Speakman said the NSW Liberal Party had made 'great strides' in recent years in increasing women's representation when asked whether the branch should act as a 'north star' to its federal counterpart.
'I'm not going to advise the federal branch whether or not they should have quotas, that's a matter for the feds, but in NSW our female representation in parliament has improved dramatically in recent years.
'Women now represent 45 per cent of our frontbench, they represent 45 per cent of our party room. We can always do better, but we have made great strides in getting female representation in the last few years.'
Mr Speakman also praised the party's investment in young people.
'We've got eight MPs who are under 40,' he said.
'About half of those are under 35. Labor have no MPs under 35 at all.
'It's important that young people have a seat at the table as well.
'If their voice is unheard at the table, often they are overlooked.'
The Liberal Party has faced immense scrutiny over the party's relationship with women following the 2025 federal election.
Labor seized on multiple scandals during the campaign, including claims then opposition leader Peter Dutton was out of touch with women due to his plans to reform work-from-home rights and position on women in the military.
Ms Ley said she was determined to get more women into the Liberal Party ranks and pushed back against condemnation of gender quotas from Liberal leadership rival Angus Taylor and former prime minister Tony Abbott.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
31 minutes ago
- ABC News
The economic reform round table should discuss AI and robots, not just tax and productivity
Let's hope the economic reform round table in August does not turn into a three-day argument about tax reform. Nobody can ever agree on whether a sustainable budget is best achieved by less spending or more tax, let alone what taxes should be increased or new ones imposed. The 25 citizens in the assembly would be better off trying to come up with a decent set of policies on artificial intelligence and robots. And they could start with a briefing about what US President Donald Trump will reveal in his AI Action Plan to be announced on July 23, and follow up with a rundown on China's eight-year-old strategy to become the global leader in AI by 2030. As for the five reports on productivity's five pillars commissioned from the Productivity Commission by Jim Chalmers in December, and the 453 ideas people have sent in, a way for PC chair Danielle Wood to instil a sense of urgency into the round table might be to read out this article from the Financial Times last week about Meta Platforms Inc offering as much as $150 million sign-on bonuses for AI engineers working for the developer of ChatGPT, OpenAI. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is trying to build a team that will help him create AI that is smarter than human beings. And the staff at OpenAI have apparently been knocking him back! The combined market value of the five leading AI companies – Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Nvidia – is $20 trillion, almost twice the value of all houses and units in Australia. The only way any of this makes sense is that Meta, OpenAI and the other peddlers of AI are going make more money from it than from any other technological revolution in history. And the only reason the rest of the business world will pay so much money for AI software and robots is because they will make even more money by replacing humans and increasing the productivity of those still employed. There are two ways of applying AI in a business: top down and bottom up. At the risk of over-simplifying it (but not much) top-down involves a business's executive leadership team deciding to use AI to replace a bunch of human workers by, say, getting it to write software code, or do data entry, answer phone calls or write articles like this one. Bottom-up is where individual employees use AI to become better at their jobs. The key to making the bottom-up use of AI work is writing a good prompt, which is rapidly becoming one of the more important modern workplace skills. An AI consulting business called Fourday is building a 'prompt library' for clients and has developed a prompt writing assistant called Prompt Cowboy. You write into it a sort of lazy, plain language prompt and it spits out a much longer one that is better designed to get the best answer from the AI. ChatGPT performs better with a more detailed, better-written prompt. Fourday founder Henry Badgery says it is possible to get productivity increases of 30-40 per cent with AI but many businesses are reporting no extra value at all because: "You're not using it correctly. You're not asking the right questions because that's essentially what a prompt is, you're asking it the right question, you're giving it the right information to answer your question." If the round table is going to be pragmatically useful in lifting productivity, it should do two things: first, develop a national system for helping small to medium enterprises and employees to write better AI prompts, and second, modernise the welfare safety net so people don't have to be scared of it, allowing companies to replace workers with AI without worrying about contributing to societal breakdown. Specifically, the government needs to rethink unemployment benefits. The current JobSeeker system is not fit for purpose because it's assumed to be a temporary payment for a job seeker. The money is not enough, and the points system that includes the need to apply for four jobs each month won't work if there aren't any jobs to apply for. A Universal Basic Income for everyone, as some are pushing, is going too far, but the government needs to prepare for a period of more permanent unemployment – even if it's not needed in the end because AI does not cause mass unemployment. Business executives and staff need to embrace AI and a good safety net is needed for that to happen. It's another reason for more tax revenue, along with the need for more public housing. And more tax revenue comes down to a new tax – either a wealth or inheritance tax – or increasing the GST. Australia's two previous bouts of major tax reform when tax revenue was falling short of government spending also involved new taxes: capital gains and fringe benefits in 1985 and GST in 2000. Twenty-five years later revenue is short again because of the aging of the population, the NDIS and the decision to increase defence spending. But the near-hysterical response to the plan to reduce the tax break on superannuation balances above $3 million suggests that a new wealth or inheritance tax is too hard. Lifting the GST rate towards the global average of 15-20 per cent is what it will probably have to be. The problem with GST is that it's regressive – it hits the poor more than the well-off. But there is a solution to that, invented by UNSW Professors Richard Holden and Rosalind Dixon. In their book From Free to Fair Markets Holden and Dixon suggest increasing the GST rate to 15 per cent and applying it to all goods and services, but only levying it on spending above a threshold of $12,000 per year. How? By giving back each taxpayer 15 per cent of $12,000, or $1,800, each year, preferably in two six-monthly payments of $900 – simply put it in their bank accounts. Holden and Dixon have modelled the outcome and say the higher GST on a broader base would double GST revenue from $90 billion to $180 billion and that the refunds would give back half that, leaving $45 billion in net extra revenue which they say could be spent on income tax cuts and eliminating the budget deficit. Whether $12,000 ($1,000 per month) is the right threshold for GST-free spending could be debated, but the idea is worth spending an hour or two on at the round table. Then the 25 round tablers could get on with the real business of AI and robots. Alan Kohler is finance presenter and columnist on ABC News and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.
Sky News AU
43 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Sussan Ley should harness her inner Margaret Thatcher if she wants Aussie women back on side
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley blended autobiography with political reckoning when she delivered her sweeping address this week to the National Press Club. Her remarks and anecdotes were deeply personal, clearly intended to help restore the Liberal Party's damaged credibility after its devastating election defeat. But her speech and earnest manner was also a direct overture to a critical cohort her party had discarded as if we were a one-night stand. That would be Australian women who felt marginalised, taken for granted and in response ultimately showed her predecessor Peter Dutton a metaphorical middle finger on May 3. The question is - will we now listen and will her plea to the nation work? While Mr Dutton distanced himself from the symbolic recognition of indigenous Australians at public functions, Ms Ley has chosen a different path and opened her address with the words: "I'd like to begin by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which we meet today." Her gesture was loud and clear. To quote Ms Ley as the first woman elected to lead the Liberal party, she absolutely must follow through on this promise. 'I'm not here to speak about milestones or firsts,' she warned the room. 'I'm here to talk about the important work we are going to do over the next three years to rebuild trust with Australians so we're worthy of their support at the next election.' In Canberra on Tuesday, there was certainly some powerful stuff from Ms Ley about how she dug herself out of economic hardship. In a polished and prepared manner, she took the assembled lunch guests back to her 1980s. 'Between graduating from school and becoming - as I described myself - a farmer's wife, I worked my share of the tough jobs,' she said. 'Cleaner, waitress, short order cook … and outback pilot. I was not taken seriously in pilot training. I was nearly always the only woman in the group. 'The privileged boys whose parents bankrolled their lessons attracted more street cred than me. 'I lived in a bedsit under the bridge in Queanbeyan and my clothes were from Vinnie's because every dollar I made went towards flying lessons.' By painting herself as the anti-privilege politician bereft of silver spoons and inner-city elitism, Ms Ley is banking on this narrative cutting through. This is especially among women outside the Teal belt and in the regions - the ones juggling night shifts and school drop-offs, stretching every dollar to cover eye-popping grocery bills or trying to claw their way back into the workforce in their 40s. Ms Ley explained: 'I understand just how tough it can be for those who live a life on the land. 'Balancing the family budget was becoming too hard so I made a decision that many mums have made before (to) get new skills and bring in extra income. 'As I raised my own family I went to university for the first time, aged 30.' Then there was the sting of dismissiveness in blokeish industries, endemic in her generation. 'One male (flying) instructor said 'Why are you doing this? You're no good at it'. I wasn't, to begin with, but that's not the point. 'I was told I couldn't get a crop dusting rating because the chemicals would damage my unborn children. 'I was yelled at, hit on and then ignored. In my early 20s I was working in air traffic control at Sydney airport (as) I wanted to pursue something different. 'I wanted to actually fly. I advertised my recently acquired skills as an aerial mustering pilot in rural newspapers across the country.' She went on to recount the job-hunting hustle including one call to a cashed-up grazier who didn't bother with small talk. First question: 'Can you cook?' followed immediately by: 'What sort of plane do you want?' She said: 'A machinery dealer asked if I was single and mentioned vague extracurricular activities' which got a ripple of laughter in the room. Later changing tack, Ms Ley hit a rare emotional register for a Liberal leader, especially on coercive control in domestic relationships and the threat of violence against women. Ms Ley's candid acknowledgment - 'I understand the fear you feel when you walk alone because I have felt it too' - is the kind of vulnerability that can resonate and long overdue for a party that's struggled to connect with women on this issue. Overall, it was an hour plus speech anchored in lived experience. But I'm wary of terms like existential 'review' and 'reflect and represent modern Australia' which seem like code for soft Left. And a bit of retro sexism will not cut it when the Liberal Party has been promising to 'do better' on female representation for decades and yes it was a relief to hear Ms Ley say she was 'agnostic' on quotas. Politically engaged women - and that is the vast majority of us in 'modern Australia' - want targets and action but based on merit and skills. The impact and style of the late British MP Maggie Thatcher inevitably crops up when analysing an Australian female political leader and with good reason. When she took control of the UK's Conservative Party in 1975, Mrs Thatcher inherited an outfit that had lost not only an election but its sense of purpose. The Tories were drifting, cowed by the Left's narrative and unsure of what they even stood for. Familiar, ain't it just. The Iron Lady, a nickname from a Soviet journalist and one I'm told she loved, didn't seek consensus. Individual responsibility was a passion point for her. Mrs Thatcher smashed it and spoke directly to the people in an uncompromising style which transformed not just her party but her beloved country. Women today aren't voting for inspirational backstories as a type of therapy. We're voting on policies that affect our wallets and families. Get that right Ms Ley and you might find Australian women back on side. Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Turnbull and Kovacic are the latest to weigh in over quotas for women in the Liberals
As the Liberal Party grapples with its spectacular election loss and works out how to rebuild, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley is approaching it as if there's a giant sign above her head that screams, "I'm not Peter Dutton". Her speech at the National Press Club this week was loaded with hints that fit this thesis. Even the decision to address the National Press Club itself — a forum Dutton viewed as a space of the Canberra journalistic elite and snubbed consistently — was a signal. She has also flooded the youth and women's podcast space to send the same point. And from the moment she was on her feet at the press club she acknowledged the traditional owners of the land — a sentence that had not only become absent from the Liberal leadership lexicon — it was by the end of the election campaign a full-blown culture war that put even more nails in the Liberal Party's already bolted-in coffin. If you swim in right wing algorithms — especially on X — you'll see that all of these choices by Ley are being mocked as symbols of "Labor Party-light". In the subterranean online world Ley's leadership is being painted as too "woke". Ley's job over the next year is fraught with danger. She might be given a period of brief peace but most Liberals you speak to privately concede that it will be difficult to keep that peace for the entire term. One of those big debates that's just starting to get heated is the issue of women's representation. On this issue you will hear a lot of over the top language. Ley says she will be a zealot for women's representation in the party. Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor says he will crusade to have more women elected. Fancy words. But after the two previous elections, leaders said similar things. The issue of gender quotas is the one philosophical and cultural mountain that the Liberal Party has never been prepared to climb. And even by the party's own reckoning, it is failing. Beyond the hard arithmetic of imposing quotas, every other strategy is little more than vibes and positive thinking. Vibes don't get women elected, and if women are not at the table in large numbers Australian voters will continue to turn their backs on the Liberal Party. If everyone agrees with such a passion that the party needs a stampede of women — what's the hold-up? Opposition Defence spokesperson Angus Taylor this week rebuked gender quotas for political parties, a move that was widely regarded as undermining Ley's openness to the idea. Timing is everything in politics and just six weeks earlier Ley and Taylor fought for the Liberal Party leadership. One pitched her credentials as the modern Liberal centrist leader — the other as the centre right cultural figure that could re-engage the existing base. The problem is the existing base is old, white and male. Ley's National Press Club speech featured her claims she would consider quotas if the party's state divisions saw them as the solution to gender equity. Days later Taylor said mentoring and recruitment was a better way to do it, adding that the Labor Party "subverted democracy" with its quota strategy. "I believe in democratic processes, and I don't believe in subverting them, but I also know from my past experiences that mentoring, recruitment support is the way to make sure you have the people you need," Taylor said. "The Labor Party will do things their own way. And they do subvert democracy, and that's a matter for them. At the end of the day, if you're going to have quotas, it means you are going to subvert democratic processes." Subverting democracy? Labor women were lining up to respond. The numbers speak for themselves. Only one-third of Liberal MPs are women. That compares to 56 per cent of Labor MPs who are women. Cabinet Minister Tanya Plibersek told Insiders the Liberals used quotas for Nationals MPs on their frontbench pointing out the contradiction in the tools they use for promotion and representation. "They've got a quota of National Party MPs that have to be on the frontbench," she said. "So they're happy to have quotas for National Party MPs. It's just quotas for women that they're not prepared to use. "Does Angus Taylor really want people to believe that the 28 most talented Liberals in the whole country are the people who've made it into the federal parliament?" Plibersek pointed out that the Liberals had ignored a non-binding 50 per cent target for female representation put in place after the 2022 election. Here is some free advice to the Liberal Party. Every time they talk about women and quotas and anyone implies that the Labor quotas have led to the promotion of women without merit the ALP has a literal party. They won this debate so long ago it provides Labor with a free kick of monumental proportions. I was a high school girl when Labor had this debate and settled it. Now, here we are 30 years later and the Liberals are still having a debate the community resolved in the 1990s. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull told this column senior Liberal men, including former prime minister Tony Abbott and Angus Taylor, left the impression that they were happy with the male dominated party as it is. "The Liberal Party has said it needs to recruit more women into its parliamentary ranks for years and for just as long resisted quotas on the basis it undermines the right of party members freely to choose their own candidates. But nothing has changed and the party room has fewer women than ever," Turnbull told me. "Those who oppose quotas need to explain what their alternative is, otherwise people will reasonably conclude they are quite happy with the male dominated status quo." Opposition frontbencher Julian Leeser has called for preselection primary contests, instead of quotas, and other Liberals including former minister Simon Birmingham and NSW senator Maria Kovacic have called for mandated quota systems. Kovacic tells this column that quotas are no longer a philosophical discussion, but have become a source of urgency. "We must address the persistent and systemic under-representation of women in our party, the temporary implementation of quotas is now both necessary and urgent," she tells me. "Quotas will serve as an effective interim measure to correct these structural imbalances." Kovacic believes the scale of the gender imbalance in the Liberal Party demands "immediate and decisive action". "Delaying the adoption of quotas in favour of softer incremental approaches alone, such as mentoring and leadership programs is no longer viable. That opportunity has passed. We must change, and change now." The NSW Liberal Women's Council will debate gender quotas at a meeting in Sydney this week. Those pushing for change won't go down without a massive fight. Patricia Karvelas is host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
