logo
For Australian Jews, the trauma of loss must not permit us to grow callous to the grief of others - ABC Religion & Ethics

For Australian Jews, the trauma of loss must not permit us to grow callous to the grief of others - ABC Religion & Ethics

Corinne Fagueret features in the Compass episode 'Friends During Wartime' which airs on ABC-TV on Sunday, 15 June at 6.30pm. Find it also on ABC iview and YouTube.
As a young child growing up in France, the Holocaust fascinated me. 10-year-old Corinne spent hours interrogating old black-and-white photos of starving people and dead, naked bodies. Some of these were taken by Nazis in the Warsaw ghetto, where many members of my mother's Polish family had been forced to move. One question obsessed my younger self: how had this been possible and how was it that human beings were living nearby, getting on with the ordinary business of their lives?
Much later, in my early forties, I visited the Treblinka death camp deep in the Polish forest, where my ancestors had been transported in cattle trains to be gassed and burned. I stood metres away from the train tracks — the same ones that carried almost one million humans to their carefully orchestrated deaths. There, I was struck by an unexpected realisation. The scene I was looking at was not black and white; it was real, in full colour. Suddenly, the Holocaust was no longer in the distant past; it was immediate. It could happen again, I thought. And it could be me this time, and my children. It could be any one of us.
This realisation loomed again with the events that occurred 7 October 2023, and with everything that has now transpired in its aftermath.
Living in two realities
I migrated to Australia with my mother at the age of 15, while my father remained in France. My grandparents on both sides were communist dreamers and my home was filled with a strong sense of social justice. During the Holocaust, my mother's parents escaped to the then USSR, even as my father's family fought in the French resistance. My childhood was thus steeped in the trauma and memories of this dark period.
Arriving in Australia in 1986, I felt culturally lost. My mother suggested I join a progressive Zionist youth movement, hoping I would find things in common with other young Jewish people. By 1990, I was deeply engaged in a group called Netzer , spending considerable time in Israel after the end of high school. There, I was taught an 'official version' of Israeli history. At the same time — perhaps because of my family background, or perhaps because of the stories I heard from young Israeli soldiers stationed at checkpoints in the West Bank — I found myself becoming increasingly aware that I was not being told the whole story. There was a large piece missing: the Palestinian perspective. No one told me about the effect that the creation of the State of Israel had on the lives of Palestinians.
The Nakba is not a term used in the mainstream Jewish community. It was certainly not a word I ever heard in Netzer or during my time in Israel. But in the wake of 7 October, I have heard many Palestinian Australians tell the stories of how their families were affected by Israel's 'War of Independence' in 1948. I heard them recount how they lost their homes forever and could not return, how members of their family were killed, and how others ended up living in permanent refugee camps — including in Gaza.
Over the past twenty months, I have had a strange and growing sensation of living in two realities: the one that I had grown up in, which was shaped by the Zionist version of history; and the one I am still learning about, the ongoing lived reality of Palestinians since 1948. As a result, my worldview has been fundamentally shaken.
I suspect that most Jewish Australians have had little to do with anyone of Palestinian heritage. As a consequence, many are simply oblivious to their distress. That's why dialogue is so important: because getting to know 'the other' breaks down stereotypes and overcomes prejudices. In this regard, I am particularly grateful to my neighbour and friend Selina Nasir and her father Munir, a Palestinian Australian man from Haifa whose family lost everything in 1948. Their kindness and friendship helped guide my journey.
The cost of speaking out
My increased awareness of Palestinian suffering and of Israel's ongoing atrocities in Gaza has also meant that I've become increasingly active in speaking out against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the conduct of his government. Shortly after 7 October, I joined a newly formed group, Jewish Women For Peace. This led to me co-founding the #OzJewsSayNO initiative which, in February this year, coordinated the publication of a full-page advertisement in The Age and Sydney Morning Herald stating our opposition to US President Donald Trump's plan to remove Palestinians permanently from Gaza.
More recently, almost 700 Jewish Australians signed a statement expressing their concern about the actions of the Netanyahu government in Gaza, calling on mainstream Jewish leaders to represent the views of those in our community who want the atrocities to end. My sense is the ground is rapidly shifting for Jewish Australians, with more and more individuals appalled at what's happening in Israel's name. I don't believe the number of signatures we collected reflects the level of discontent that exists within Jewish communities. Indeed, we received many secret messages of support — many said they couldn't sign or speak out, worried about the risk of losing family, friends, community or jobs.
For me, personally, speaking up has meant some members of my family in Israel have stopped speaking to me. I know that this has been very difficult for them, too. They live in a different world to me — a world directly affected and deeply traumatised by the events of 7 October 2023. It's a place that is still mourning the death of loved ones, and still waiting for the remaining hostages to be returned from their living hell.
The situation is undeniably horrific. I cannot imagine how the families of hostages can carry on with their lives, not knowing when or whether their daughters, their sons, their spouse, sister or brother might return home. But the depth of such human grief must not make us ignore or minimise suffering of the tens of thousands of Gazans maimed, killed and starving. In the name of our common humanity, this must end.
There are always reasons to remain silent. There is always a rationale for turning a blind eye. But for those of us whose lives have been shaped by the horrors of the Holocaust and who have pledged that such a thing must never happen again, we cannot let history repeat. We should never give up trying to understand 'the other', and we must never succumb to the temptation to dehumanise our fellow human beings. The commitment to peace and justice is nurtured in the small, seemingly insignificant gestures. Even during wars, it is still possible to make friends.
Corinne Fagueret is co-chair of Jewish Women 4 Peace Action Ready Group and co-founder of the #OzJewsSayNO initiative.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Home truths on housing target in leaked Treasury advice
Home truths on housing target in leaked Treasury advice

Perth Now

time25 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Home truths on housing target in leaked Treasury advice

The accidental release of government department advice which warned Labor was not going to meet its housing target and urged them to raise taxes, has not rattled the treasurer. Independent advice from the Treasury department, which was unintentionally sent to the ABC, reportedly contained subheadings which said the federal government's promise to build 1.2 million homes by 2029 "will not be met" and called for "additional revenue and spending reductions" to achieve a sustainable budget. Though he acknowledged Treasury's advice had been sent "in error", Treasurer Jim Chalmers said such incidents could happen from time to time. "I'm pretty relaxed about it to be honest," he told reporters in Canberra on Monday. "Treasury advises governments of both political persuasions - that advice can't be always adequately captured in the subheadings." A 2025 report from the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council - another independent government advice body - in May warned Labor would fall short of its goal by about 300,000 dwellings. It followed a report in March commissioned by the Property Council of Australia showing the government needed to build another 462,000 homes to meet its 2029 target. Asked if the government regretted putting out a housing target, Dr Chalmers said his government needed to be ambitious. "We'd rather have a big, ambitious, difficult target and work around the clock to meet it ... than to continue the approach of our predecessors, which was to build too few homes," he said. The government has also attempted to address its bottom line by reining in spending on the National Disability Insurance Scheme and proposing an increased tax on super balances above $3 million. Dr Chalmers has pledged to strengthen Australia's economy ahead of a trip to South Africa, where he will meet with his counterparts from other G20 countries as they deal with "extreme global economic uncertainty". Economic ties with countries like Indonesia, Japan, the UK and Germany could be strengthened as leaders discuss capital flows, supply chains, critical minerals and issues within their own communities. But domestically, one of the key focuses of Labor's second-term economic agenda will be to boost productivity. The agenda of an economic reform roundtable, to be held in August, has been finalised with Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock set to kick off day one, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood to lead day two and Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson to head day three. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley claimed the government was "ignoring some of the very levers that matter most" in the productivity puzzle. While Dr Chalmers acknowledged he could not invite every industry, he said there would be many opportunities for people to contribute.

Jim Chalmers urged by Treasury to increases tax, urged Australia won't make 1.2 million homes target
Jim Chalmers urged by Treasury to increases tax, urged Australia won't make 1.2 million homes target

News.com.au

time36 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Jim Chalmers urged by Treasury to increases tax, urged Australia won't make 1.2 million homes target

Jim Chalmers has brushed off hints of a scandal after advice from Treasury which urged the Treasurer to increase taxes to return the budget to a 'sustainable' position was accidentally made public. First reported by the ABC, the details were mistakenly revealed in an unredacted Freedom of Information request submitted by the broadcaster and shared in an incoming government brief issued by Treasury after Labor won the May 3 election. Although Treasury requested the documents be deleted and unpublished after noting the error, the ABC said the details were 'in the public interest'. While the Treasurer said he was 'pretty relaxed' about the newly revealed details. He said that they had been 'sent in error,' adding that the advice could not have been 'adequately captured' in the mistakenly published subheadings. Responding to specific taxes, Mr Chalmers ruled out changes to GST reform, and an immediate implementation of a road user charge for electric vehicles. However he said the inevitable take up of EVs would 'have implications for the tax base' in the medium and long term. Mr Chalmers added further tax reform would be debated at the upcoming Productivity Roundtable in August, which will focus on ways to 'simplify the tax system'. 'When we speak with tax experts and people that have a view about tax reform, they're interested in efficiency and equity and simplicity, and other design principles like that,' he said. 'The views we have expressed publicly is (that) if there are ways we can simplify and consolidate regulations in our economy, then that would be a good thing for productivity as well, so long as we don't trade away reasonable standards and protections for people.' While the unredacted files didn't identify specific taxes, Mr Chalmers was told he would need to identify 'additional revenue and spending reductions' in order to put the budget in a 'sustainable' position, the ABC reported. The papers said 'tax should be raised as part of broader tax reform,' and suggested 'indirect taxes' and superannuation taxes as potential avenues. This comes as Labor intends to double the taxes on superannuation accounts above $3m, from 15 to 30 per cent, with Mr Chalmers stating the move would only affect 0.5 per cent of people. However the Opposition has opposed the tax as the $3m threshold will not be indexed, with the tax also affecting unrealised gains, penalising people who hold property and other assets in their super portfolio. Housing Minister Clare O'Neil was also advised to 'adjust' Labor's 1.2 million homes target, which it currently must meet by June 30, 2029. Ms O'Neil was urged to look at how migration and skills training could boost the construction workforce, and reassess how to best use state and territory grants as 'leverage' for improved home building rates. However Mr Chalmers said he believed Australia would still meet the target, and backed the 'ambitious' goal. 'It's not the worst thing from time to time for it to be understood in the broader community, that this will be a difficult target to meet, but if we all do our bit, we all play our part, as the Commonwealth has been willing to play, then we can build the homes that people desperately need.,' he said. 'It's one of the defining challenges in our economy, and we're ambitious when it comes to trying to solve it.' Speaking on ABC RN on Monday, Environment Minister Murray Watt said it was 'not unusual' for a minister to receive advice from government departments. He also said Labor remained committed to the Housing Accord targets. 'I, of course, haven't seen them (the Treasury advice documents) myself, but you will have seen that we've taken a lot of steps already to ensure that we can meet that housing goal,' he said. 'We recognise that it's ambitious, but it's certainly our intention to meet it.'

Nine denies Lattouf contempt over pro-Israel lobbyists
Nine denies Lattouf contempt over pro-Israel lobbyists

The Advertiser

time38 minutes ago

  • The Advertiser

Nine denies Lattouf contempt over pro-Israel lobbyists

Pro-Israel lobbyists harassed for complaining about an ABC radio host's views on Palestine want another media company to be prosecuted for revealing their names. Antoinette Lattouf was ousted from her casual position on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023. She was awarded $70,000 for her unlawful termination in June. Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah found the national broadcaster removed her from air following pressure from an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists. Nine of those who complained had their names suppressed in February as the hearing started. The group returned to court on Monday, asking Justice Rangiah to refer Nine-owned newspapers to a registrar for prosecution for alleged contempt of court. Prominent barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC argued at an earlier hearing Nine failed to promptly take down or amend January 2024 articles published in the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age containing the names of four individuals who complained. It took the publisher six weeks to remove the names despite repeated letters, she said. A separate article by the Nine-owned Pedestrian TV also identifying some of the complainants was taken down in April. There had been no apology nor a promise to not divulge the names in the future. "All of the respondents are completely unrepentant in relation to the infringement of the order," Ms Chrysanthou said in June. The contempt case has also been brought against journalists Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan, editors Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett and Nine's in-house lawyers Larina Alick and Sam White. Nine's barrister Tom Blackburn SC denied there was any contempt at all when the hearing continued on Monday. His clients could not have breached the court's order suppressing any names or identities because the wording did not specify who the order related to, he argued. 'It's just impossible that there could be a wilful and contumacious contempt in this case in circumstances where we didn't know who the protected people were," he said. The case against the two journalists was "utterly hopeless" as neither had the power to remove or amend the articles, Mr Blackburn said. Similar submissions were made regarding the "incoherent" case brought against the two in-house lawyers. Mr Blackburn argued the case should not be referred to a registrar and that the pro-Israel group should be made to pay his clients' legal costs. Ms Chrysanthou urged Justice Rangiah to refer the matter on, saying the judge only needed to be convinced there was an arguable case of contempt. Nine knew exactly who the suppression order referred to and eventually removed the precise names of the complainants from the articles, she said. Justice Rangiah will deliver his decision at a later date. Pro-Israel lobbyists harassed for complaining about an ABC radio host's views on Palestine want another media company to be prosecuted for revealing their names. Antoinette Lattouf was ousted from her casual position on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023. She was awarded $70,000 for her unlawful termination in June. Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah found the national broadcaster removed her from air following pressure from an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists. Nine of those who complained had their names suppressed in February as the hearing started. The group returned to court on Monday, asking Justice Rangiah to refer Nine-owned newspapers to a registrar for prosecution for alleged contempt of court. Prominent barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC argued at an earlier hearing Nine failed to promptly take down or amend January 2024 articles published in the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age containing the names of four individuals who complained. It took the publisher six weeks to remove the names despite repeated letters, she said. A separate article by the Nine-owned Pedestrian TV also identifying some of the complainants was taken down in April. There had been no apology nor a promise to not divulge the names in the future. "All of the respondents are completely unrepentant in relation to the infringement of the order," Ms Chrysanthou said in June. The contempt case has also been brought against journalists Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan, editors Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett and Nine's in-house lawyers Larina Alick and Sam White. Nine's barrister Tom Blackburn SC denied there was any contempt at all when the hearing continued on Monday. His clients could not have breached the court's order suppressing any names or identities because the wording did not specify who the order related to, he argued. 'It's just impossible that there could be a wilful and contumacious contempt in this case in circumstances where we didn't know who the protected people were," he said. The case against the two journalists was "utterly hopeless" as neither had the power to remove or amend the articles, Mr Blackburn said. Similar submissions were made regarding the "incoherent" case brought against the two in-house lawyers. Mr Blackburn argued the case should not be referred to a registrar and that the pro-Israel group should be made to pay his clients' legal costs. Ms Chrysanthou urged Justice Rangiah to refer the matter on, saying the judge only needed to be convinced there was an arguable case of contempt. Nine knew exactly who the suppression order referred to and eventually removed the precise names of the complainants from the articles, she said. Justice Rangiah will deliver his decision at a later date. Pro-Israel lobbyists harassed for complaining about an ABC radio host's views on Palestine want another media company to be prosecuted for revealing their names. Antoinette Lattouf was ousted from her casual position on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023. She was awarded $70,000 for her unlawful termination in June. Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah found the national broadcaster removed her from air following pressure from an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists. Nine of those who complained had their names suppressed in February as the hearing started. The group returned to court on Monday, asking Justice Rangiah to refer Nine-owned newspapers to a registrar for prosecution for alleged contempt of court. Prominent barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC argued at an earlier hearing Nine failed to promptly take down or amend January 2024 articles published in the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age containing the names of four individuals who complained. It took the publisher six weeks to remove the names despite repeated letters, she said. A separate article by the Nine-owned Pedestrian TV also identifying some of the complainants was taken down in April. There had been no apology nor a promise to not divulge the names in the future. "All of the respondents are completely unrepentant in relation to the infringement of the order," Ms Chrysanthou said in June. The contempt case has also been brought against journalists Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan, editors Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett and Nine's in-house lawyers Larina Alick and Sam White. Nine's barrister Tom Blackburn SC denied there was any contempt at all when the hearing continued on Monday. His clients could not have breached the court's order suppressing any names or identities because the wording did not specify who the order related to, he argued. 'It's just impossible that there could be a wilful and contumacious contempt in this case in circumstances where we didn't know who the protected people were," he said. The case against the two journalists was "utterly hopeless" as neither had the power to remove or amend the articles, Mr Blackburn said. Similar submissions were made regarding the "incoherent" case brought against the two in-house lawyers. Mr Blackburn argued the case should not be referred to a registrar and that the pro-Israel group should be made to pay his clients' legal costs. Ms Chrysanthou urged Justice Rangiah to refer the matter on, saying the judge only needed to be convinced there was an arguable case of contempt. Nine knew exactly who the suppression order referred to and eventually removed the precise names of the complainants from the articles, she said. Justice Rangiah will deliver his decision at a later date. Pro-Israel lobbyists harassed for complaining about an ABC radio host's views on Palestine want another media company to be prosecuted for revealing their names. Antoinette Lattouf was ousted from her casual position on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023. She was awarded $70,000 for her unlawful termination in June. Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah found the national broadcaster removed her from air following pressure from an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists. Nine of those who complained had their names suppressed in February as the hearing started. The group returned to court on Monday, asking Justice Rangiah to refer Nine-owned newspapers to a registrar for prosecution for alleged contempt of court. Prominent barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC argued at an earlier hearing Nine failed to promptly take down or amend January 2024 articles published in the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age containing the names of four individuals who complained. It took the publisher six weeks to remove the names despite repeated letters, she said. A separate article by the Nine-owned Pedestrian TV also identifying some of the complainants was taken down in April. There had been no apology nor a promise to not divulge the names in the future. "All of the respondents are completely unrepentant in relation to the infringement of the order," Ms Chrysanthou said in June. The contempt case has also been brought against journalists Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan, editors Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett and Nine's in-house lawyers Larina Alick and Sam White. Nine's barrister Tom Blackburn SC denied there was any contempt at all when the hearing continued on Monday. His clients could not have breached the court's order suppressing any names or identities because the wording did not specify who the order related to, he argued. 'It's just impossible that there could be a wilful and contumacious contempt in this case in circumstances where we didn't know who the protected people were," he said. The case against the two journalists was "utterly hopeless" as neither had the power to remove or amend the articles, Mr Blackburn said. Similar submissions were made regarding the "incoherent" case brought against the two in-house lawyers. Mr Blackburn argued the case should not be referred to a registrar and that the pro-Israel group should be made to pay his clients' legal costs. Ms Chrysanthou urged Justice Rangiah to refer the matter on, saying the judge only needed to be convinced there was an arguable case of contempt. Nine knew exactly who the suppression order referred to and eventually removed the precise names of the complainants from the articles, she said. Justice Rangiah will deliver his decision at a later date.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store