logo
Man charged after 45-year-old woman killed at southwest Edmonton home

Man charged after 45-year-old woman killed at southwest Edmonton home

Yahoo2 days ago

Homicide charges have been laid after a 45-year-old woman died of 'sharp force trauma' at a southwest Edmonton home on Monday, say police.
Officers and emergency personnel responded to the 8:30 a.m. call about an injured woman at the home near Charles Bay and Charles way in the Chappelle neighbourhood. EMS administered life-saving measures but she died on scene, police said in a Friday news release.
The Edmonton Medical Examiner's Office completed an autopsy on Ramona Bowen, 45, Thursday, determining the cause of death was sharp force trauma, and the manner of death, homicide.
The man arrested in the case was known to Bowen, police said.
Matthew Harper, 41, is charged with second-degree murder.
Man charged in death of southwest Edmonton senior
Killing of woman, 27, the latest in cluster of Edmonton homicide files
Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add EdmontonJournal.com and EdmontonSun.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.
You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Liberals taking ‘fresh' look at online harms bill, justice minister says
Liberals taking ‘fresh' look at online harms bill, justice minister says

Hamilton Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Liberals taking ‘fresh' look at online harms bill, justice minister says

OTTAWA - Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the federal government plans to take a 'fresh' look at its online harms legislation over the summer but it's not clear yet exactly what the bill will look like when it is reintroduced. It would be the Liberals third attempt to pass legislation to address harmful behaviour online. Fraser told The Canadian Press in an interview that the government hasn't decided whether to rewrite or simply reintroduce the Online Harms Act, which was introduced in 2024 but did not pass. He said Canadians can expect measures addressing deepfakes and child exploitation 'to be included in legislative reforms coming up in the near future.' In their election platform, the Liberals promised to make the distribution of non-consensual sexual deepfakes a criminal offence. They also pledged to introduce a bill to protect children from online sexploitation and extortion, and to give law enforcement and prosecutors additional tools to pursue those crimes. Fraser said the growth of artificial intelligence is influencing the discussions. The spread of generative AI has changed both the online space and everyday life since the federal government first introduced the legislation. 'We will have that in mind as we revisit the specifics of online harms legislation,' he added. 'The world changes and governments would be remiss if they didn't recognize that policy needs to shift.' Online harms legislation was first proposed by then-heritage minister Steven Guilbeault in 2021, but after widespread criticism, the government pivoted and shifted the file to the justice minister. Guilbeault is now back in his old ministry, which has been renamed Canadian identity and culture. Prime Minister Mark Carney has also created an artificial intelligence ministry, headed up by rookie MP Evan Solomon. Fraser said he expects 'significant engagement' with Guilbeault and Solomon but it will be determined later which minister will take the lead on it. The first version of the bill alarmed critics who warned that the provision requiring platforms to take down offending content within 24 hours would undermine free expression. When Fraser's predecessor, Arif Virani, introduced the Online Harms Act in 2024, the bill restricted that 24-hour takedown provision to content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor, or intimate content shared without consent, including deepfakes. It also required social media companies to explain how they plan to reduce the risks their platforms pose to users, and imposed on them a duty to protect children. But the government also included Criminal Code and Canadian Human Rights Act amendments targeting hate in the same legislation — which some said risked chilling free speech. In late 2024, Virani said he would split those controversial provisions off into a separate bill, but that didn't happen before this spring's federal election was called and the bill died on the order paper. Fraser said no decision has been made yet on whether to bring back online harms legislation in one bill or two. 'That is precisely the kind of thing that I want to have an opportunity to discuss with stakeholders, to ensure we're moving forward in a way that will create a broad base of public support,' he said. Fraser said the government could 'modify existing versions that we may have on the shelf from the previous Parliament as may be needed, or to accept the form in which we had the legislation.' He added he wants to have a 'fresh consideration of the path forward, where I personally can benefit from the advice of those closest to the file who know best how to keep kids safe online.' While the government hasn't set a date to introduce legislation, it could include some online harms measures in a crime bill Fraser plans to table in the fall. Fraser said online harms provisions that 'touch more specifically on criminal activity' could be 'included in one piece of legislation, with a broader set of reforms on online harms at a different time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 29, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Eight-year-old boy killed in tragic Brooklyn car accident
Eight-year-old boy killed in tragic Brooklyn car accident

New York Post

time10 hours ago

  • New York Post

Eight-year-old boy killed in tragic Brooklyn car accident

An eight-year-old boy was struck and killed by an SUV in Crown Heights on Saturday afternoon. A black Honda Pilot slammed into the child as he crossed Eastern Parkway at Albany Street, according to police. An eight-year-old boy was pronounced dead shortly after being struck by an SUV in Crown Heights. Advertisement The driver of the vehicle stayed on the scene, and was not arrested. Robert Mecea The 69-year-old driver of the southbound vehicle stayed at the scene as EMS attempted to save the eight-year-old's life. Advertisement He was pronounced dead on arrival at Kings County Hospital, according to police. The driver of the vehicle has not been arrested though an investigation is ongoing.

Government wants to execute Teresa Youngblut after Vermont shooting that killed border agent, her lawyer says
Government wants to execute Teresa Youngblut after Vermont shooting that killed border agent, her lawyer says

Boston Globe

time17 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Government wants to execute Teresa Youngblut after Vermont shooting that killed border agent, her lawyer says

The government holds Youngblut responsible in the death of a US border agent and for that, her lawyer disclosed on Tuesday, the government wants to execute her. At 21, Youngblut is the youngest and probably most unlikely known member of what appears to be Advertisement The members are called Zizians, after its purported leader, Steven Barth, Youngblut's public defender, said in US District Court in Burlington that federal death penalty charges will be lodged against his client in what he called 'short order.' He declined to elaborate when surrounded by reporters after Tuesday's routine hearing, a position of 'no comment' he has maintained since Youngblut first appeared in court in January, days after her companion, Felix Bauckholt, and Border Patrol agent David 'Chris' Maland died in a hail of gunfire that the government says began when Youngblut drew a gun after a traffic stop and started firing. Advertisement The apparent decision by federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty against Youngblut isn't a surprise. In a February memo announcing the moratorium against seeking federal death penalty charges under the Biden administration was over, Attorney General Youngblut was wounded in the gunfire, which began after Border Patrol agents pulled over the car she was driving on Interstate 91 in Vermont's Northeast Kingdom, about 10 miles south of the Canadian border. The government says Bauckholt, a German national who identified as female and went by the name of Ophelia, began drawing a weapon but was shot dead by an agent before she could fire. So far, Youngblut has been charged with using a firearm while 'assaulting, resisting and opposing, impeding, intimidating, and interfering with a US Border Patrol agent while he was engaged in official duties.' The government's charging document also charges that Youngblut 'carried, brandished and discharged a firearm.' But, to date, prosecutors have not explicitly said Youngblut fired the shot that killed Maland. Last month, officials from US Customs and Border Protection released a The summary said the lone agent who returned fire discharged 'approximately eight rounds.' So far, the government has remained tight-lipped about whether Youngblut shot Maland. Advertisement But that distinction won't make a difference if the government moves to seek the death penalty, according to David P. Hoose, a Massachusetts attorney who has worked on 17 death penalty cases, 15 of them federal and most of them in New England. Hoose, a partner at Strehorn, Ryan & Hoose in Northampton, said that in If, for argument's sake, prosecutors can't definitively assert that Youngblut fired the fatal shot, Hoose said, 'it creates additional hurdles for prosecutors and maybe some qualms in a juror looking for a reason not to give the death penalty.' As for finding jurors in mostly liberal Vermont willing to sentence someone to death, that's another potential hurdle for prosecutors, Hoose said. Vermont last executed someone in 1954, and the state outlawed capital punishment in 1972. Polls show most Vermonters oppose capital punishment. The US attorney's office in Vermont, which is prosecuting Youngblut, has said it was Youngblut's parents have attended their daughter's hearings, but have declined to speak to reporters. Last year, they Advertisement They seemed to be onto something. Records show Youngblut and Maximilian Snyder, who Like other members of the Zizian cult, Youngblut and Snyder, 22, who attended the University of Oxford, were good students with bright futures that were extinguished shortly after they got involved in the cult. Now they both face the prospect of landing on death row. Prosecutors in California are It seems the road from the comforts of affluence and privilege and one of the best high schools in the country to death row is not as long as one might think. Squeaky Fromme, who tried to kill a president, was released from prison after 34 years. Teresa Youngblut faces bleaker prospects. Kevin Cullen is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store