How to see the flower moon in UK skies next week
A micromoon rises behind the so-called liver bird, the symbol of Liverpool that sits on top of the city's Royal Liver Building. (Alamy)
The flower moon will rise over British skies on 12 May, but it will be a little smaller than most full moons, making it what is known as a 'micromoon'.
The moon will appear full over most of the weekend, but will be at its best on Monday night.
A full moon is when the moon appears as a complete circle in the sky: this is because the whole side of the moon facing us on Earth is lit up by the sun's rays.
Because the moon does not produce its own light, we only see the parts of it that are lit up by other objects like the sun. This one will appear smaller, as it's further away.
Where and when is the best time to see it?
The flower moon will rise over the UK at 9.28pm BST on 12 May, according to Sky at Night.
The moon will rise in the southeast beneath the constellation Libra and will not rise very high in the sky, and will stay in the southern part of the sky, setting in the southwest before dawn.
A micromoon rises over the Czech capital of Prague last month. (Alamy)
Why is it called the flower moon?
The names we use for full moons today (such as cold moon, wolf moon and harvest moon) come to us indirectly from Native American traditions.
Nasa's Gordon Johnston wrote: 'In the 1930s, the Maine Farmer's Almanac began publishing Indian names for the full moons, tying these names to the European months."
The flower moon is named as such because it coincides with a time of year when flowers are abundant – it's also known as the corn-planting moon or milk moon, according to NASA.
What is a micromoon?
In contrast to the better-known supermoon, this month's flower moon will be a "micromoon".
This means it appears very slightly smaller from Earth.
Both supermoons and micromoons are due to the fact that the moon's orbit is not a circle – it's elliptical.
This means that the moon is sometimes closer to Earth and sometimes further away - a micromoon occurs when a full moon happens when it is furthest away from the Earth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Single Men Do This When Dating–and It's Not Working Out
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When it comes to dating, men aim high—but the dating game has other plans. This is the conclusion of an international team of researchers who analyzed heterosexual users on a Czech online dating app. The findings suggest that while men tend to "aim high" in their pursuit of partners, matches are more likely to occur among individuals with more similar levels of perceived desirability. In their study, published in the journal PLOS One, the team propose that this pattern of mutual interest and desirability is largely a result of rejection rather than an initial preference for similarity. A man gestures to his date as she appears bored. A man gestures to his date as she appears bored. Prostock-Studio/Getty Images The Dynamics of Online Desirability The study delved into data from July 2017, involving over 2,000 heterosexual users in Prague and 624 in Brno. The researchers used social network analysis to map "swipes"—or expressions of interest—between users, allowing them to establish a hierarchy of desirability based on how many swipes each user received. Their analysis, according to the study's abstract, found that "the structure of the networks is considerably hierarchical." A key finding was that women generally ranked higher in this hierarchy—largely because the app had many more male users than female users. Because of the uneven gender ratio on the app, and gendered dating norms, men were typically "pursuers", sending more messages than receiving, and women were typically "choosers", receiving more messages than sending. Men Aim High, Women Match More Similarly The research also revealed a distinct difference in pursuit strategies between genders. The researchers found that "men tended to express interest in women who were more desirable than themselves, while women typically pursued men of more similar desirability." Furthermore, the study's discussion even observed that women "chose slightly less desirable partners on average," though it cautioned that "women's willingness to partner down should be taken with a grain of salt due to the low variability in men's desirability." This contrasts with some prior research that suggested aspirational pursuit for both genders. However, the picture changed significantly when the researchers looked at successful matches—instances of "mutual swipes," indicating reciprocal interest. These mutual swipes mostly occurred between men and women of more similar desirability. Rejection Drives Similarity in Matches This pattern suggests a fascinating dynamic at play in the online dating world. The authors explained this key takeaway: "Successful matches tend to happen between people with similar levels of desirability," they said. "This pattern is largely the result of rejection, rather than an initial preference for similarity. The successful matching outcomes tend to align more closely with women's preferences than with men's. "This likely reflects women's stronger position in the online dating market, as men outnumber women and are often expected to make the first move." The authors acknowledged limitations of the study, like focusing only on heterosexual users and one type of dating app—future research could expand to include queer users and other platforms to refine these understandings of dating dynamics. But, still, the study offers valuable evidence for understanding the earliest stages of dating in the digital age—suggesting that reality ultimately brings aspirations back to a more balanced playing field. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about online dating? Let us know via science@ Reference Topinkova, R., & Diviak, T. (2025). It takes two to tango: A directed two-mode network approach to desirability on a mobile dating app. PLOS ONE, 20(7).
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Revealed: The number of steps you need to improve your life expectancy
Walking 7,000 steps a day is the sweet spot for preventing many chronic diseases that can lead to an early death, a major study has shown. While the goal of 10,000 daily steps has become firmly established in the public consciousness, an international team of researchers found even a modest amount of walking brings major benefits. British scientists said it finally 'debunked the myth' of 10,000 steps and should encourage people to try and hit the lower target. The major review of 57 studies involving 160,000 adults, which was published in The Lancet, concluded that for most conditions health benefits tended to level off beyond 7,000 steps. Hitting 7,000 steps a day was found to reduce all-cause-mortality by 47 per cent, cardiovascular disease by 25 per cent, cancer by six per cent, diabetes by 14 per cent, dementia by 38 per cent and depression by 22 per cent. Health benefits were also apparent from 4,000 steps when compared to 'inactive' people who walked just 2,000, the study led by the University of Sydney found. Every extra 1,000 steps brought better outcomes, researchers found. Commenting on the study, Steven Harridge, professor of human and applied physiology at King's College London, said: 'Humans are designed to be physically active – our evolutionary heritage as hunter gatherers. 'There has been debate about the amount of activity an individual should be doing with 10,000 steps as a generalised target, not well evidenced. 'This paper shows that 7,000 steps is sufficient for reducing the risk for most diseases covered, and 10, 000 steps does not confer much additional benefit.' According to World Health Organisation data, insufficient physical activity is the fourth most frequent cause of death in the world, with 3.2 million deaths a year related to physical inactivity. Many health organisations recommend hitting 10,000 steps a day, although there is little evidence for the target, which is believed to have arisen from a Japanese marketing campaign in the 1960s. In the run-up to the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, the company Yamasa sought to capitalise on the sudden interest in fitness, so designed the world's first wearable step-counter. They called it the Manpo-kei, or '10,000-step meter'. The company appears to have chosen the figure at random, as a fun goal, but it has stuck ever since. The new paper found that for heart disease, walking more than 7,000 steps was beneficial, but for most conditions there was little gain from putting in more said it was still unclear why walking brings such striking benefits but said it is likely to increase cardiorespiratory fitness, which is known to be positively associated with better health and all-cause mortality outcomes. Commenting on the research, Dr Daniel Bailey, an expert in sedentary behaviour and health at Brunel University of London, said the 7,000 steps target was more achievable for many people than 10,000 steps. 'Just adding more steps from your starting point can have important benefits for health,' he said. 'This study adds to existing evidence by showing that the more steps people do, the less their risk of developing different health conditions. 'The finding that doing 5,000-7,000 steps per day is beneficial, is an important addition to the literature which helps to debunk the myth that 10,000 steps per day should be the target for optimal health.' The Alzheimer's Society also welcomed the study saying it demonstrated that inactivity is a major risk factor for dementia. Dr Richard Oakley, associate director of research and innovation at the charity said: 'It adds to the evidence that what's good for the heart is good for the head.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Hints of Life on Exoplanet Recede Even Further
In April, a team of scientists based at the University of Cambridge claimed that a planet orbiting a distant star bore a possible signature of life. The announcement kicked up a fierce debate among astronomers, with many skeptics arguing that the evidence was too ambiguous. Now a NASA-led team has made a new set of observations of the planet known as K2-18b, which lies 124 light-years from Earth. They have provided a clearer picture of the planet — confirming the presence of water, perhaps even as a liquid ocean. But the new observations have failed to confirm evidence for life. In the original study, the Cambridge team claimed that K2-18b appeared to have a gas in its atmosphere that on Earth is produced only by living things. The NASA study did not find strong evidence for that gas. What's more, the NASA team argues that even if the gas was on K2-18b, it might have formed through mere chemistry. What once seemed like a promising clue of life — a biosignature — might be a mirage. 'A key takeaway is that biosignatures are going to be hard, no matter what kind of planet we are talking about,' said Jacob Bean, an astronomer at Cornell University, who was not involved in the study. The NASA team, working with the leader of the Cambridge group, posted its new results online last week. The scientists have submitted the study to a scientific journal for publication. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
