logo
A Town Tried to Heal Racial Divides. It Energized Confederate Supporters Instead.

A Town Tried to Heal Racial Divides. It Energized Confederate Supporters Instead.

Yomiuri Shimbun2 days ago
EDENTON, N.C. – Confederate supporters arrived first, establishing a Saturday morning base near the town waterfront with 'Save our history' signs and Civil War information sheets. Some sported red MAGA hats and shirts that proclaimed 'America First,' or, in one case, 'If you don't like Trump then you probably won't like me and I'm OK with that.'
The opposition showed up about two hours later carrying stark white signs with black letters: 'Remove this statue.'
For the next two hours, as they've done nearly every Saturday for the past three years, the groups mingled with confused tourists in a seemingly unending fight over a Confederate monument at the heart of this historic town, which is nearly 60 percent Black.
What started as an effort to promote racial unity in Edenton by reconsidering its most prominent downtown symbol has done the opposite. A chapter of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, long extinct locally, sprang to life. The forgotten Confederate Memorial Day was resurrected and commemorated again last month with a wreath-laying and roll call of the rebel dead.
And the town council, which had formed a Human Relations Commission in 2020 to consider steps for racial reconciliation, last fall came up with a novel way to handle the statue of a generic Confederate soldier:
Take it down from the waterfront. Add it to the courthouse.
Facing north, the green-patina figure of the soldier – one of many that were once found throughout the South – stands atop a stone column on a grassy traffic median where the town market once stood. Enslaved people were bought, sold or offered for hire on that spot.
The Civil War is a small part of the long heritage of Edenton, a town of about 4,500 located in Chowan County near the western end of Albemarle Sound. Today the town thrives on tourism, its streets an Americana confection of pre-Revolution Colonial homes next to Victorian fantasies next to 1920s cottages. Broad Street is lined with shops and restaurants, a promenade of quaintness leading straight down to the water and the Confederate monument.
Now mired in legal challenges, moving the monument would be the first time in a decade that any locality in the United States has added a Confederate statue on courthouse grounds, according to a study published last month by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation.
At a moment when the Trump administration is scrubbing prominent Black historic figures from U.S. government websites and condemning Smithsonian exhibits on race as 'divisive ideology,' the Edenton statue drama – community activism, followed by a resurgence of the old order – seems to embody the nation's pivot from the reckonings of 2020 that were prompted by the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.
States and localities removed or renamed 169 Confederate memorials in 2020, according to the recent SPLC study, the fourth update of a survey originally conducted in 2016. Removals have declined every year since, plummeting last year to two, the study found through an analysis of federal, state and local data.
Head researcher Rivka Maizlish said the slowdown is at least partly attributable to the revival of Lost Cause sentiment by President Donald Trump, who has called for reinstating Confederate names on military bases and has issued an executive order that could restore Confederate monuments to federal property.
The tone from the White House gives an extra sense of empowerment to those who have come out to defend the Edenton monument every weekend for the past three years. On a recent sunny Saturday, Ron Toppin, 80, and two helpers set up a canopy over tables neatly lined with trays of Confederate information sheets and hit the sidewalk two hours before their opponents arrived.
Trump's election 'made the country a whole lot better,' said Toppin, whose late wife used to organize the informational materials for the group and who said his great-great-grandfather was a rebel soldier captured by the Union in 1863. 'We've got America back.'
Mike Dean, commander of the Edenton Bell Battery of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, roared up on his Harley – dubbed 'Traveller' after Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee's horse – and took command of the outpost. When a few protesters began marching up the sidewalk, Dean gestured to a woman walking by with a sign that read 'Remove this statue.'
'Understand,' Dean said, 'these are Marxists. Marxists want to destroy history.'
He was referring to Debra Miller, 66, a retired human resources specialist who grew up in Edenton. Miller is White but remembers protesting as a teenager when officials fired her high school's Black band teacher. She recalls White people saying the Confederate statue – completed in 1909 but moved to its current spot in 1961 – would remind Black people to stay in their place.
Decades later, there are no Black-owned businesses along South Broad Street, the main downtown thoroughfare. Only two members of the town council are Black, and the community has never had a Black mayor.
Removing a statue that glorifies the Confederacy wouldn't be destroying history, Miller said. It would be correcting it.
'With this statue, there's so much prejudice that I've seen through the years,' she said, 'that I'd rather just see it gone.'
Settled in the mid-1600s, the town was the first Colonial capital of North Carolina and at one point rivaled nearby Norfolk as a port.
In 1774, Edenton resident Penelope Barker – whose husband was away in England – heard about the Boston Tea Party and rallied the women of Edenton to stage a tea dump of their own. The act drew ridicule from Britain but is remembered as arguably the first example of social activism by American women. A half-century later, Edenton was a maritime stop on the Underground Railroad. Over the centuries, some of its residents have earned national prominence for their roles in fights for freedom and civil rights.
Among the enslaved population of Edenton were Harriet and John S. Jacobs, a brother and sister who escaped to the North and eventually wrote about their lives. Harriet Jacobs's 1861 book 'Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl' is considered a classic narrative of the enslaved experience, while her brother's more incendiary work, 'The United States Governed by Six Hundred Thousand Despots,' was forgotten until being republished last year.
The tradition of resistance persisted into the civil rights era of the 1960s, when town resident Golden Frinks became a top lieutenant to Martin Luther King Jr. and spearheaded protests known as the Edenton Movement. His efforts to integrate the local high school, library and theater started shortly before town leaders decided to move the Confederate statue from a side street to the more prominent waterfront location.
'The statue was put up with malice,' said Andrean Clarke Heath, 62, who is Black and moved to Edenton in 2020 to take a job as a teacher at the high school. She didn't pay much attention to the monument at first, she said, but decided to do an experiment, meditating at the base of the statue on Sunday afternoons and watching peoples' reactions.
'I got some very hostile, curious looks,' she said. 'Black people were like, don't you know you're not supposed to be there?'
Many Black residents drive about a half-hour east to Elizabeth City for shopping and dining, said the Rev. John Shannon, 70, who lives in Elizabeth City and has pastored at Providence Missionary Baptist Church in Edenton for 20 years. He was named to the town's Human Relations Commission in 2020 and spent more than a year studying the town and its racial climate.
'Black people, you know, have been kind of told where their place is at,' he said.
Shannon belongs to an informal 'racial reconciliation group' that still meets every week in a local church. The diverse group discusses books and brings in speakers to help the members understand how Edenton and the nation have been shaped by issues of race.
They learned about the imprisonment of Japanese Americans during World War II and the displacement of Native American tribes. One speaker, historian David Cecelski, spoke about the white supremacy clubs that formed in North Carolina around 1900 with the express purpose of amending the state constitution to eliminate the Black vote.
When white-supremacist leaders were elected to statewide office and the constitution was amended, the historian said, the Edenton newspaper editor proclaimed in 1900: 'White supremacy now and forever.' The Confederate statue began going up four years later.
Shannon said the information he learned as part of the racial reconciliation group helped him understand his own childhood: the shabby textbooks before schools were integrated, the way his parents would have the kids wait in the car when they ventured into downtown Elizabeth City. 'It brought it fresh to us, man,' he said.
Armed with that knowledge, he and the town's Human Relations Commission returned with several recommendations. No. 1: Remove the statue from the waterfront.
'I grew up as a child kind of oblivious to it,' said Susan Inglis, 69, who is White and worked with Shannon on both the commission and the reconciliation group. The eighth generation since 1786 to live in her family's Edenton home, Inglis said her ancestors were members of the United Daughters of the Confederacy who raised money to build the statue.
But the family's views changed over time. Her mother was 'bothered by the glorification of the Civil War that she learned in her elementary school,' Inglis said. 'I learned from her to abhor the statue in our town.'
The town council spent a couple of years mulling what to do with the recommendation to move the statue. Under a North Carolina law passed in 2015, options were limited. A locality can't simply remove a Confederate memorial or any other public-owned 'object of remembrance'; if it wants to relocate one, the memorial has to go to a position of 'similar prominence, honor, visibility, availability, and access.' And the answer can't be a cemetery.
When Confederate heritage groups filed suit to block any move, the public process seemed to come to a halt. In November, though, the town council caught statue opponents off guard by revealing a plan to transfer ownership of the statue to Chowan County, which would then move it a few blocks over to the working courthouse. (Edenton's original 1767 courthouse is now a historical site.)
The Southern Coalition for Social Justice responded with a lawsuit of its own, claiming among other things that putting a statue at the courthouse violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment by intimidating Black people who show up for legal proceedings.
Both cases are mired in procedural delays.
Edenton Mayor W. Hackney High Jr. declined to comment, citing pending legal matters, and the other members of the town council did not reply to emails seeking comment.
In the meantime, Clarke Heath – whose Sunday meditations at the statue were joined by others until they morphed into the weekly protests – said she began to feel unwelcome in the town and moved north to Virginia.
Now Rod Phillips, 79, a White retiree from Raleigh with Confederate ancestors of his own, organizes the Saturday gathering.
He loves Edenton, he said, but believes it's hiding its true identity.
'All the shops are run by Whites, most visitors are White, so you don't really get a good feel for what this town is really all about,' he said. 'There's a lot of Black history here, but you have to get further away from the waterfront.'
Physical reminders of that Black history can be hard to find. A vacant lot behind a bank is the site of the home of Molly Horniblow, an enslaved woman who bought her freedom but could not do the same for her offspring. That included her granddaughter Harriet Jacobs, who hid in a garret at Horniblow's home for nearly seven years to escape the sexual advances of her White enslaver and the jealousy of his wife before heading north.
The state of North Carolina sponsors a tour of Harriet Jacobs-related sites and put up a historical highway marker. It also is renovating the home of Frinks, who died in 2004. But neither historic figure is prominently recognized downtown.
Dean, the battery commander for the Sons of Confederate Veterans, said he believes the town should consider putting a monument to Harriet Jacobs alongside the Confederate statue, which he reveres as a tribute to dead soldiers. 'This is a collective memorial, if you will, to 47 Chowan County boys who never came back,' he said, adding that their battlefield deaths left 'no head marker for their family to grieve over, no remembrances for their families going forward in history.'
That's more memorial than exists for thousands of enslaved people who toiled in Edenton, an unknown number of whom – including Horniblow – lie beneath a grassy lot in a residential neighborhood on the edge of town. But Dean said it's not fair to compare that to the soldiers killed in battle.
'The way I see it is, their people did not see to it that [the enslaved] had that Christian burial,' he said. 'Now, whether their owners were required to do that, I can't say. … But that doesn't have anything to do with this; it's two separate issues.'
Any attempt to associate the statue with slavery makes Dean angry. He says the figure isn't even technically a Confederate; it's a generic soldier 'made by Cincinnati Iron Works. And in the 1890s to 1910s, these were put up all over the South.'
Yet the wording on the base makes its intent plain: 'Our Confederate Dead,' along with a poem that in parts reads, 'Gashed with honorable scars, Low in Glorys lap they lie.'
On a recent Saturday, Shannon, Phillips and about a dozen opponents of the statue took turns standing in the shade and then striding past Dean with their signs. Police Chief David LaFon stopped by, as usual, making sure everything was calm. It usually is, he said.
The idea of the Human Relations Commission was to bring people together, Shannon said. And here they were, this Saturday and every Saturday, together but still very much apart.
'It's a good town, man, but you have some stuff that's been embedded in the hearts and minds of the people,' Shannon said. 'They ain't looking for no change, you know what I'm saying?'
He'll keep coming, he said, as long as the standoff endures.
'It's a struggle, man. I mean, I prayed so much for my children and my grandchildren,' he said. 'When I think about our own history – I mean, we kept coming or kept doing for a long time before we saw some change.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ASEAN nations pledge to buy more from US as tariff zero-day nears
ASEAN nations pledge to buy more from US as tariff zero-day nears

Nikkei Asia

time28 minutes ago

  • Nikkei Asia

ASEAN nations pledge to buy more from US as tariff zero-day nears

ASEAN countries are scrambling to make concessions with Washington to secure lower tariffs from the Trump administration. (Source photos by Yuki Kohara and Ken Kobayashi) NANA SHIBATA, MAI NGUYEN and ISMI DAMAYANTI JAKARTA/HANOI -- From buying dozens of Boeing planes to importing more U.S. soybeans, Southeast Asian countries are doubling down to appease Donald Trump as the deadline for a pause on the U.S. president's hefty tariff threats fast approaches. Trump's 90-day pause on "reciprocal" tariffs beyond a 10% baseline against most countries around the world is set to expire on Wednesday.

Concerns Loom Over Japan-U.S. Tariff Talks After Trump Comment; Ishiba Unable to Make Certain Concessions Ahead of Upper House Election
Concerns Loom Over Japan-U.S. Tariff Talks After Trump Comment; Ishiba Unable to Make Certain Concessions Ahead of Upper House Election

Yomiuri Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Concerns Loom Over Japan-U.S. Tariff Talks After Trump Comment; Ishiba Unable to Make Certain Concessions Ahead of Upper House Election

Concerns about trade talks possibly stalling is spreading within the Japanese government following U.S. President Donald Trump's comment on Tuesday that cast doubt on reaching an agreement on tariffs. With the July 9 deadline for the end of the suspension of the additional portion of 'reciprocal tariffs' approaching, some have begun making moves on the assumption that an agreement will not be reached anytime soon. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba spoke to the press at the Prime Minister's Office on Wednesday and stressed his intention to continue negotiations, saying: 'I will not comment on every one of [Trump's] remarks. Japan has been engaged in serious negotiations with our national interest at stake.' Economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa also said on the day, 'The negotiations are not supposed to be straightforward and easy, as the national interests of both countries are at stake.' 'We hope to reach an agreement while firmly defending our national interest,' Akazawa added. The two countries held administrative-level talks on Monday that were followed by a series of talks over the phone and through other means, according to Akazawa. As Japan's chief tariff negotiator, Akazawa has so far held seven ministerial-level talks with the U.S. side. However, disagreements have remained regarding the United States imposing tariffs on Japanese automobiles. Some within the Japanese government said Trump's remark 'severely hurt negotiations.' Others consider it as a 'bluff to get Japan to make more concessions' and think the government should not be swayed by it. With the House of Councillors election set to be held July 20, Ishiba has been unable to find something to negotiate with that is appealing for Trump. Ishiba cannot make concessions to increase rice imports from the United States — something that is strongly opposed by Japanese rice producers — or on automobile tariffs, which is a key industry in Japan. If negotiations do not progress, it is possible that the additional 14% will be imposed after July 9. Furthermore, the additional 25% tariff imposed on automobiles since April will further impact the industry. The government has begun to consider possible measures to deal with the situation. 'I intend to protect industries in Japan through such measures as expanding domestic demand and export destinations,' Ishiba said, regarding possible support measures if fewer automobiles are exported to the United States, at a debate between party leaders on Wednesday. 'No point in getting nervous' 'There is no point in getting nervous every time Trump makes a comment,' said Ken Kobayashi, chairperson of the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry, at a press conference on Wednesday. 'I will remain calm.' He also said the impact on the Japanese economy will be big if the tariff rates are raised. 'We might just have to bear with certain things to reach an agreement,' Kobayashi said.

Federal Judge Bars Trump Administration from Expelling Asylum Seekers
Federal Judge Bars Trump Administration from Expelling Asylum Seekers

Yomiuri Shimbun

time2 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Federal Judge Bars Trump Administration from Expelling Asylum Seekers

A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Wednesday barred the Trump administration from expelling asylum seekers from the United States, dealing a blow to the administration's efforts to curtail crossings at the U.S. southern border. In a 128-page decision, U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss invalidated a proclamation that President Donald Trump signed on his first day in office that declared an 'invasion' on the border and invoked emergency presidential powers to deport migrants without allowing them to apply for asylum. Migrants and advocacy groups sued in February, saying federal law allows people to apply for the humanitarian protection no matter how they entered the United States. Moss stayed his ruling for 14 days pending a likely appeal from the Trump administration. But he wrote that the executive branch cannot create an 'alternative immigration system' that tramples on existing federal law. 'The Court recognizes that the Executive Branch faces enormous challenges in preventing and deterring unlawful entry into the United States and in adjudicating the overwhelming backlog of asylum claims of those who have entered the country,' Moss wrote. But he added that the Immigration and Nationality Act 'provides the sole and exclusive means for removing people already present in the country.' Depending on the appeal, the ruling could reopen asylum processing on the southern border and enable migrants to cross into the United States in hopes of seeking refuge. The decision is the latest in a long line of litigation over federal asylum law, and the case ultimately could reach the Supreme Court. The White House warned that the decision could lead to another surge on the southern border with Mexico. 'A local district court judge has no authority to stop President Trump and the United States from securing our border from the flood of aliens trying to enter illegally,' said White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson. 'This is an attack on our Constitution, the laws Congress enacted, and our national sovereignty. We expect to be vindicated on appeal.' The Supreme Court, ruling last week on Trump's attempts to end birthright citizenship, curtailed judges' authority to issue the type of sweeping nationwide injunctions that have paused several administration policies while they were under legal review. But Moss, as part of his ruling Wednesday, certified all asylum seekers 'currently present in the United States' as a legal class, making his ruling applicable to most people who would be affected by Trump's policy. Class-action lawsuits were one avenue the Supreme Court justices suggested in their birthright citizenship ruling that lower courts could still provide broad relief to many people in the same situation. Attorneys in the asylum case had sought class certification from the judge well before Friday's birthright citizenship ruling. Still, Trump administration officials quickly attacked Moss as 'a rogue district court judge' and his ruling as an attempt 'to circumvent the Supreme Court.' 'The American people see through this,' Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on social media. 'Our attorneys … will fight this unconstitutional power grab.' The ruling is a legal roadblock for the Trump administration as it pursues an aggressive plan to deport 1 million undocumented immigrants this year. Federal courts have limited some of Trump's policies – a judge on Wednesday blocked him from terminating temporary protected status for Haitians, for instance – but immigration arrests are up sharply, border crossings are down dramatically and Congress is working through the final stages of a sprawling tax bill that would turbocharge funding for immigration enforcement. Illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border have been reduced to a trickle, with fewer than 9,000 apprehensions in May, the most recent month available, compared with fewer than 118,000 in May 2024. Trump officials have celebrated the sharp decline and noted that it is in stark contrast to the average of 2 million apprehensions annually in the first years of the Biden administration as migrants fled pandemic-ravaged economies and authoritarian regimes in nations such as Venezuela. But advocates for immigrants argued that the Trump administration achieved the lower numbers by overstepping presidential authority and ignoring laws passed by Congress. Federal law stipulates that immigrants on U.S. soil may apply for asylum, even if they crossed the border illegally. In the lawsuit, lawyers for 13 immigrants from countries including Afghanistan, Cuba and Turkey argued that their clients fled persecution and deserved a chance to apply for protection. Some plaintiffs had already been deported back to their native countries or to an alternative country, including Panama. Moss has not yet ruled on whether the government must bring back the deportees. Advocacy groups had also argued that migrants were being deprived of protection. 'The importance of restoring asylum in the United States cannot be overstated, not only for the people whose lives are in danger but for our standing in the world,' said Lee Gelernt, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union who argued the case. 'The decision also sends a message that the President cannot simply ignore laws Congress has passed.' To qualify for asylum protection, migrants must demonstrate a fear of persecution based on their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or another reason that makes them a target in their native country. Trump's first term, from 2017 to 2021, also was marked by immigration surges, and he implemented multiple asylum restrictions that were overturned by federal courts. Illegal border crossings declined during the pandemic, but they began to rise again before Trump left office. After returning to the White House in January, Trump renewed his efforts to curb asylum. He signed a proclamation on his first day called 'Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion' and began to reject asylum seekers from the border. Trump has argued that he maintains the legal authority to bar entry to migrants under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the president to suspend the entry of foreigners deemed detrimental to the United States. The Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that Trump could use that legal authority to implement the third version of his travel ban targeting people mainly from Muslim-majority nations. But Moss drew a bright line between people outside the United States and those who are already here, saying the authority to bar entry 'does not mean that the President has the authority to alter the rules that apply to those who have already entered.' Trump and his surrogates have long argued that smugglers abuse U.S. asylum laws to help migrants gain entry into the country and remain for years as their cases wind through the backlogged immigration system. Biden officials restricted asylum access last year after record numbers of border apprehensions damaged his political standing. Biden officials curtailed asylum for those who crossed the border illegally, but they also created legal pathways into the country so that people could apply for legal protection, such as parole programs for Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans. That administration also allowed migrants waiting in Mexico to schedule appointments to cross the border legally through a Customs and Border Protection app called CBP One. Trump, in contrast, essentially foreclosed access to asylum after taking office in January, advocates for immigrants argued, by flatly rejecting migrants at the southern border. Trump officials also ended the parole program and discontinued the app appointments. In the Mexican border city of Matamoros, across from Brownsville, Texas, there were between 700 and 800 migrants who had applied for or obtained appointments through CBP One when Trump took office. His administration canceled them all. Many lost hope and gave up, said the Rev. Abraham Barberi, leader of One Mission Ministries, which helps feed migrants in the Mexican government shelter. But about 200 – mostly families with children – have remained in the shelter for two reasons, he said. 'One, because they still have hope something will change,' Barberi said. 'And two, because they have nowhere else to go.' Immigrant rights lawyers said Moss's ruling on the asylum issue could lead to increased border crossings if the Trump administration is forced to restore access to asylum. 'People remain fearful of what is happening in this country. I don't know how people will react,' said Keren Zwick, the director of litigation at the National Immigrant Justice Center and co-counsel with the ACLU on the case. 'But sometimes the news, and how our legal system works, does not really matter to someone fleeing for their lives.' Migrants are aware of the Trump administration hard-line enforcement tactics – including a new detention facility that opened this week in alligator-infested swampland in Florida – and many remain afraid to cross into the country, some advocates said. 'They've seen the deportations and all that's happening in the U.S., and they are not sure it's a place for them anymore,' said the Rev. Juan Fierro of El Buen Samaritano migrant shelter in Juarez, across the border from El Paso.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store