logo
Terms of compensation scheme for losing power reviewed

Terms of compensation scheme for losing power reviewed

Independent5 days ago
The terms of a compensation scheme for households who lose power due to severe weather are being reviewed.
It comes after NIE Networks did not make payouts following Storm Eowyn after a severe weather exemption was applied.
The storm in January left widespread destruction across areas of Northern Ireland, and almost 326,000 homes and businesses without power.
Stormont Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald said the issue was brought into 'sharp focus' by Storm Eowyn.
She made a written statement to the Assembly on the Utility Regulator's (UR's) consultation of the Electricity Guaranteed Standards of Service (GSS).
'Currently these standards allow the electricity distribution company – NIE Networks – to apply for an exemption in cases of severe weather events. This exemption cannot be overruled by government,' she said.
'This issue was brought into sharp relief by Storm Eowyn – which left many households without electricity.
'The Utility Regulator is carrying out a fresh consultation on a range of GSS issues and it will include options for payments in severe weather conditions, along with the likely costs of those options.'
The consultation is to be published in the week commencing October 27.
The Utility Regulator will offer its decision paper and draft regulations to the Department for the Economy in March 2026.
Ms Archibald added that NIE Networks has commenced a strategic review of network resilience and its response to severe weather events.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's Senior reports 10% rise in profit on civil aerospace and defence demand
UK's Senior reports 10% rise in profit on civil aerospace and defence demand

Reuters

time14 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK's Senior reports 10% rise in profit on civil aerospace and defence demand

Aug 4 (Reuters) - British engineering firm Senior (SNR.L), opens new tab reported a 10% rise in first-half adjusted operating profit on Monday, helped by its aerospace division on robust civil aerospace and defence demand. Rising air travel demand, driven by growing disposable income along with increased defence spending amid heightened geopolitical tensions, has benefited firms like Senior, a key supplier to Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab and Airbus ( opens new tab. The company reported an adjusted operating profit of 31.2 million pounds ($265,760.00) for the half-year ended June 30, compared with 28.3 million pounds a year ago. Senior reiterated its expectations for 2025 and said trading had been in line with expectation. ($1 = 0.7526 pounds)

Lloyds keeps motor finance provision under review after Supreme Court ruling
Lloyds keeps motor finance provision under review after Supreme Court ruling

Reuters

time14 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Lloyds keeps motor finance provision under review after Supreme Court ruling

LONDON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Lloyds Banking Group (LLOY.L), opens new tab said on Monday it would keep its 1.2 billion pound ($1.6 billion) provision for motor finance claims under review, after a Supreme Court ruling last week went largely in favour of banks but still left them facing millions of potential compensation claims. "The Group currently believes that if there is any change to the provision it is unlikely to be material in the context of the group," the bank said in a statement. "The provision will continue to be reviewed for any further information that becomes available, with an update provided as and when necessary." Britain's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said on Sunday it would consult on a redress scheme for motorists claiming to have been overcharged, estimating the total bill could hit between 9 billion and 18 billion pounds ($12-24 billion). The cost is likely to be substantially lower than early analyst estimates of more than 30 billion pounds, after the Supreme Court on Friday overturned an earlier Court of Appeal judgment that had widened the scope of valid claims. Banking analysts at RBC said in a note that they expected the cost to come in at 11.5 billion pounds, but that scenario would still leave several banks under-provisioned and potentially needing to set aside more cash. Close Brothers, which had previously set aside 165 million pounds, also provided no update to its provision in a statement on Monday and said it looked forward to engaging with the FCA on its consultation. ($1 = 0.7534 pounds)

Banks warn £18bn car finance payouts ‘completely impractical'
Banks warn £18bn car finance payouts ‘completely impractical'

Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Banks warn £18bn car finance payouts ‘completely impractical'

A car finance compensation scheme that has left the City on the hook for up to £18bn in payouts is 'completely impractical', lenders have warned. Stephen Haddrill, director general of the Finance & Leasing Association said the industry had a 'major concern about the redress scheme going back to 2007'. He told BBC's Today programme: 'I just think that is completely impractical. It is not just firms that don't have the details about contracts back then, customers don't either.' The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on Sunday said motorists who had taken out loans to pay for their vehicles which included secret commission agreements between banks and dealers could be in line for payments of up to £950 under a redress scheme. Lenders could be forced to pay between £9bn and £18bn to customers who were mis-sold car finance. The FCA is now consulting on the proposals. Many banks that provided loans to car buyers failed to properly disclose the details of the schemes. On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected claims this commission amounted to a bribe, but ruled some rates had been excessive and unfair. The redress scheme being discussed by the FCA, which would address the historic claims, would still cost banks billions of pounds, but it would be far lower than the £44bn they had expected to pay before the Supreme Court decision. However, Mr Haddrill said the scheme could push up borrowing costs for car-buyers. He said: 'The more uncertainty there is for people who finance the car finance industry, the more expensive that finance becomes for the firms and ultimately the more expensive borrowing becomes for the customer.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store