
My Tesla Model Y Juniper FSD Test Drive Fails Spectacularly
The images show the Tesla Model Y equipped with its Level 2 autonomous driving capabilities. The ... More photos highlight the vehicle's logo, the navigation screen displaying real-time traffic and autonomous driving interface, and the interior with hands-off steering functionality, underlining Tesla's advanced driver assistance systems in Bari, Italy, on December 10, 2024. (Photo by Matteo Della Torre/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
A brand-new 2026 Tesla Model Y with the latest available version of Full-Self Driving failed three times during my test drive on Thursday.
After a very successful (read: uneventful) 48-hour FSD v 13.2.9 test drive of a Tesla Model Y Juniper earlier this month, I had a disastrous one-hour test drive on Thursday. The difference: the drive on Thursday (June 19) was in much-busier West Los Angeles. The previous 48-hour drive was in slower-paced suburban northwest Los Angeles. In every case, I enter the destination address and then engage FSD, using it essentially as a robotaxi. But I closely monitor the drive, ready to take back control of the car immediately if necessary.
TL;DR: In brief, here's what happened in three separate incidents on Thursday: (1) the Model Y began to veer into opposing traffic. I had to intervene and take the steering wheel to get it back on course. The video below doesn't do the incident justice. It was the last thing I expected FSD v13.2.9 on a Tesla Model Y Juniper to do. (2) It took a right turn from the far-left lane. (3) It tried to go down a narrow 'no entry' private-access entrance that was blocked by a large gate.
Previous Tesla FSD tests were great, uneventful
I have been a proponent of Tesla FSD v13 because of the positive test drives I have had to date on various 2026 Model Ys with version 13 of FSD. (Before this test drive, a total of five.) Before Thursday's drive, the last was a 48-hour test drive. That test was uneventful (very favorable) and the Model Y with FSD performed essentially as a Robotaxi: I would punch in the destination and the Model Y would take me there safely, usually sans intervention. There were only a few interventions over the 48-hour period with most being very minor, such as the car going too slow or taking a route I didn't like.
West Los Angeles
That all changed on Thursday. Admittedly, West Los Angeles (Century City, Beverly Hills, West Hollywood) has some confusing intersections south of Santa Monica Blvd but I assumed FSD was capable of dealing with the occasional odd intersection. The first incident (video) was the worst mistake FSD made. It happened on Crescent Heights Blvd / McCarthy Vista. After the Model Y began to veer into opposing traffic, we ended up briefly at the end of a meridian strip. Then I steered the car back into the proper lane. In the second incident, it took a right turn from a left-hand lane that was marked as a through-lane (for traffic going straight). That was perplexing more than anything. In the third incident, when we had almost reached the end of our drive, it decided to turn down a narrow, rarely-used (as far as I could tell) service entrance with a pad-locked gate. I stopped the car immediately once it took the turn.
'Very Surprising' – says expert
Ironically, this happened only a few hours after I did a Zoom interview with Jason Corso, a professor of robotics at University of Michigan and a co-founder of computer vision data platform Voxel51. In that interview (before the incidents) I had expressed a favorable opinion of Tesla FSD because of the positive test drives I had previously had. But I followed up on Friday with Corso post-incidents.
The mistakes "are very surprising. Robust perception is hard," Coros said. "These types of incidences underscore the critical need to accurately study and assess safety across different scenarios and corner-cases, by studying model performance on them,' he said.
In the Zoom interview, Corso compared FSD to Google's Waymo. 'You know, that's why Waymo has rich maps, they have lidar sensors, they have radar. They use cameras for a full sweep. Their basic point is we have to be able to have a rich sense of the state of what's happening in order to make decisions on that," he said.
I also use Waymo often in West Los Angeles. Waymo occasionally makes mistakes with routes (i.e., taking a circuitous route) and can be a little too bold sometimes but it has never made a dangerous mistake in my experience.
I will keep testing
I test Advanced Driver Assist Systems (ADAS) constantly. Many from General Motors, which graciously has allowed me to test a number of their electric vehicles with the latest versions of Super Cruise. (This week I'm testing a Cadillac Vistiq, a new Cadillac EV model recently released.) But I will go back and test the Model Y again and plan to do another 48-hour test drive of the Model Y soon.
I talked with a Tesla store representative after the incident and made it clear to him what happened. I emailed Tesla corporate but have yet to get a response.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
Ford CEO Jim Farley Favors Waymo Over Tesla On Self-Driving: Report
Ford Motor Company's chief executive officer Jim Farley poses next to the newly unveiled electric ... More F-150 Lightning outside of their headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan on May 19, 2021. - One day after winning an enthusiastic endorsement from President Joe Biden, Ford will officially preview the all-electric version of its best-selling F-150 truck on May 19, 2021. The battery-powered Ford F-150 "Lightning" is part of the US auto giant's $22 billion campaign to ramp up its electric vehicle offerings by 2025. (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images) Ford CEO Jim Farley doesn't agree with CEO Elon Musk on what technologies work best for self-driving. TL;DR: Farley said Waymo's approach, which uses LiDAR in addition to cameras and radar, is the best approach for Ford. Tesla's Robotaxi service and Full-Self Driving (FSD) vehicles use a cameras-only approach. 'When you have a brand like Ford, when there's a new technology, you have to be really careful. We really believe that LiDAR is mission critical," Farley said at the Aspen Ideas Festival on Friday, according to a report from Fortune. Waymo vs Tesla: Farley vs Musk 'To us, Waymo,' Farley said, according to the report, adding that Ford considered LiDAR to be important because 'where the camera will be completely blinded, the LiDAR system will see exactly what's in front of you.' One way of thinking about LiDAR is that it's a safety net for what cameras may miss. In contrast, Tesla and CEO Musk have been adamant about a cameras-only approach. Tesla, which launched its Robotaxi service in Austin earlier this month, is going with cameras-only for its Robotaxi service and FSD, the latter on option on Tesla vehicles and being promoted for the newest 2026 Model Y. 'The way that the road system is designed is for AI. I should say it's for intelligence, biological neural net and eyes. That's how the whole road system is designed,' Musk said in a CNBC interview in May. And Musk has also argued that Waymo's system is too expensive. 'The issue with Waymo's cars is that they cost 'way mo' money,' Musk said during the first quarter earnings conference call. 'The car is very expensive. Made in low volume. Teslas probably cost a quarter or 20% of what a Waymo costs,' he said. Ford, for its part, currently offers BlueCruise, an Advanced Driver Assist System, that is analogous to Tesla's Autopilot and General Motors Super Cruise. Like GM's Super Cruise, Ford's system is designed primarily for hands-free highway driving. Neither is as ambitious as Tesla FSD which is designed to handle both local and highway driving.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich?
The Magnificent 7 stocks have made headlines in recent years for their eye-popping returns. In fact, taken as a whole, Amazon (AMZN), Google parent company Alphabet (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla (TSLA) have been credited with propping up the entire market — and that's not much of an exaggeration. According to J.P. Morgan, those seven stocks alone contributed a whopping 55% of the S&P 500's entire return in 2024. But their outperformance was even greater in 2023, when they made up an incredible 63% of the S&P 500's return, helping them earn their 'magnificent' nickname. Read Next: Learn More: In a nutshell, if you had the foresight to invest in the Magnificent 7 stocks at the beginning of 2023, you would have done quite well. How well? Read on to see how this statistical performance translates into real dollars and cents. Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $87.70 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $176.77 Total percentage return: 101.6% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $20,160 Check Out: Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $84.00 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $216.10 Total percentage return: 157.3% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $25,730 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $128.27 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $198.42 Total percentage return: 54.7% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $15,470 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $14.60 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $144.69 Total percentage return: 891.0% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $99,100 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $119.78 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $702.12 Total percentage return: 486.2% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $58,620 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $235.04 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $479.14 Total percentage return: 103.9% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $20,390 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $123.18 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $329.13 Total percentage return: 167.2% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $26,720 Total return in 2023: 76% Total return in 2024: 48% Year-to-date return in 2025 as of June 16: 0% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $26,048 As a whole, the Magnificent 7 stocks would have more than doubled your money over the past 2 1/2 years. Individual stocks within the Magnificent 7, however, would have multiplied your money exponentially. Nvidia, for example, single-handedly blew away the returns of both the S&P 500 and the other stocks within the Magnificent 7, returning a massive 891%. If you had invested $100,000 in Nvidia at the end of 2022, you'd be sitting on a nearly $1 million portfolio in just 2 1/2 years. The bottom line is that yes, investing any amount of money in the Magnificent 7 stocks at the start of 2023 would have earned you considerable gains. While some analysts are predicting more gains ahead, bear in mind that to earn these types of returns, you have to take on considerable risk. In 2022, for example, the Magnificent 7 stocks dropped 40% as a whole, with some of its individual components losing more than 65% of their value. As high reward comes with high risk, be sure that investing in the Magnificent 7 stocks matches up with your financial objectives and risk tolerance. Editor's note: All historical closing prices were adjusted for splits, dividends and capital gain distributions, and were sourced from Yahoo Finance. More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich?
The Magnificent 7 stocks have made headlines in recent years for their eye-popping returns. In fact, taken as a whole, Amazon (AMZN), Google parent company Alphabet (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla (TSLA) have been credited with propping up the entire market — and that's not much of an exaggeration. According to J.P. Morgan, those seven stocks alone contributed a whopping 55% of the S&P 500's entire return in 2024. But their outperformance was even greater in 2023, when they made up an incredible 63% of the S&P 500's return, helping them earn their 'magnificent' nickname. Read Next: Learn More: In a nutshell, if you had the foresight to invest in the Magnificent 7 stocks at the beginning of 2023, you would have done quite well. How well? Read on to see how this statistical performance translates into real dollars and cents. Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $87.70 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $176.77 Total percentage return: 101.6% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $20,160 Check Out: Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $84.00 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $216.10 Total percentage return: 157.3% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $25,730 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $128.27 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $198.42 Total percentage return: 54.7% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $15,470 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $14.60 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $144.69 Total percentage return: 891.0% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $99,100 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $119.78 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $702.12 Total percentage return: 486.2% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $58,620 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $235.04 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $479.14 Total percentage return: 103.9% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $20,390 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $123.18 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $329.13 Total percentage return: 167.2% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $26,720 Total return in 2023: 76% Total return in 2024: 48% Year-to-date return in 2025 as of June 16: 0% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $26,048 As a whole, the Magnificent 7 stocks would have more than doubled your money over the past 2 1/2 years. Individual stocks within the Magnificent 7, however, would have multiplied your money exponentially. Nvidia, for example, single-handedly blew away the returns of both the S&P 500 and the other stocks within the Magnificent 7, returning a massive 891%. If you had invested $100,000 in Nvidia at the end of 2022, you'd be sitting on a nearly $1 million portfolio in just 2 1/2 years. The bottom line is that yes, investing any amount of money in the Magnificent 7 stocks at the start of 2023 would have earned you considerable gains. While some analysts are predicting more gains ahead, bear in mind that to earn these types of returns, you have to take on considerable risk. In 2022, for example, the Magnificent 7 stocks dropped 40% as a whole, with some of its individual components losing more than 65% of their value. As high reward comes with high risk, be sure that investing in the Magnificent 7 stocks matches up with your financial objectives and risk tolerance. Editor's note: All historical closing prices were adjusted for splits, dividends and capital gain distributions, and were sourced from Yahoo Finance. More From GOBankingRates 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money This article originally appeared on Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich? Sign in to access your portfolio