logo
Britain 'extension of Scotland', medieval texts uncovered by historian suggest

Britain 'extension of Scotland', medieval texts uncovered by historian suggest

The National04-06-2025
Research by the University of Glasgow's Professor Dauvit Broun has revealed that Scottish historians and writers in the 1380s and 1520s regarded the Scottish kingdom as equivalent to Britain, adding it was not as common as the tendency to refer to Britain as England, but it was similar in effect.
Professor Broun argues that this discovery challenges the modern understanding of British identity, and that the research suggests that Scottish independence can be entirely compatible with being British.
He added that the findings also question whether, rather than a shared Britishness, there have for centuries been distinct Scottish, English, and Welsh versions of being British.
READ MORE: Glasgow set for skyscraper boom as new guide identifies suitable sites
Professor Broun's revelation comes from a recently discovered booklet from the early 16th century, which helps to reveal the unexpected relationship between Scottish independence and British identity that has been overlooked.
While England's identification with Britain has existed for over a millennium, Professor Broun has discovered a parallel tradition where Scots envisioned Britain as "an extension of Scotland".
Writing in the Journal of Scottish Historical Studies, which was published on Wednesday, three Scottish writers outlined a vision of Britain as a kingdom ruled by the Scottish monarchy – effectively a Scottish kingdom expanded to island-wide scale.
Scottish History professor Broun said: 'A close reading of work by medieval Scottish historians and scholars shows they firmly believed that Scottish independence was entirely compatible with British identity.
'In this era, Britain was not seen as an English-dominated kingdom, as is often how it is viewed today, but rather a space that could be ruled by the Scottish monarchy.
'This idea of Britain as fundamentally Scottish is a surprising and provocative viewpoint in today's often polarised debates around national identity.'
The so-called 'founding father of Scottish unionism', John Mair, was a key figure in Professor Broun's analysis as he held a vision of a Scottish kingdom which expanded to include England.
While advocating for a marriage-based union between Scottish and English royal houses, Professor Broun argues that Mair envisioned this primarily from a Scottish perspective with the assumption that a Scottish king would rule Britain.
Professor Broun's analysis includes a previously unpublished manuscript booklet – St Andrews Chronicles, which is now held at the University of St Andrews Libraries and Museums, from around 1511 which provided a rare insight into how ordinary educated Scots engaged with these ideas.
(Image: University of St Andrews Libraries and Museums)
The homemade booklet contains a collection of historical texts about Scottish and British origins, king lists and chronicles which suggested British-Scottish connections were of interest beyond elite scholarly circles.
Researchers said the physical characteristics of the booklet suggest it was created for personal use.
The booklet also appeared to have copied an earlier compilation, which itself may have expanded upon an even earlier collection of texts, Professor Broun said.
He added it suggests that British Scottish historical perspectives were being transmitted and expanded by ordinary educated Scots over time.
The arrangement of historical material in the booklet combines Scottish royal dynasties and events with outlines of Britain as a kingdom from ancient times similar to Mair's approach but predating his work.
The manuscript's significant focus on Malcolm III and St Margaret – appearing twice in different sections – mirrors the view that the Scottish royal line's connection to Anglo-Saxon royalty gave Scottish kings a claim to Britain as a whole.
Professor Broun said it reinforces the distinctly Scottish-centric view of British history articulated particularly by the Scottish historian John of Fordun in the 1380s.
Writing in the journal Professor Broun said that 'appropriating Britain as an extension of your country was not, therefore, unique to England: the Scots did it, too'.
Professor Broun finishes by asking 'if there is such a thing as a shared Britishness beyond the mere fact of inhabiting the same island: are there only Scottish, English and Welsh British identities, each with their own spectrum which have only occasionally intersected to become a common Britishness?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Row breaks out over closing the exam results attainment gap
Row breaks out over closing the exam results attainment gap

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Row breaks out over closing the exam results attainment gap

On exam results day in Scotland the Education Secretary was quizzed about a commitment to closing the gap. Jenny Gilruth was asked about an election promise to close the gap by next year. READ NEXT:Details and cost of Glasgow city councillors foreign trips revealed Gilruth mentioned making progress on literacy and numeracy in primary and secondary schools and progress on widening access to higher education. Speaking on BBC Radio, she said the Covid pandemic and the impact of austerity on poorer families have been a factor schoolshave had to deal with. Asked if the gap could be closed by next year, she said: 'I'm here today to talk to you about the exam results. ' I've spoken to some of the progress, and I'm absolutely committed to our continued work to close the attainment gap, but I am in no way shirking away from the challenge we've seen in terms of the Covid pandemic and austerity in our schools.' READ NEXT:Glasgow recovery charity performs hard hitting play about suicide and survival (Image: Andrew Milligan) Earlier, she said the poverty-related attainment gap has 'narrowed at National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher levels'. She added: 'While there is more to do, each success of every young person from the most disadvantaged areas creates a route out of poverty.' Opposition MSPs have criticised the Education Secretary and the SNP, following the remarks. Glasgow MSP, Pam Duncan-Glancy, Scottish Labour [[Education]] Spokesperson, said: 'It is damning that Jenny Gilruth cannot say whether the attainment gap will be closed by next year. 'This once again proves that any promises made by the SNP are simply not worth the paper they are written on. 'In 2015, Nicola Sturgeon said she wanted to be judged on closing the attainment gap, with the SNP promising to 'substantially eliminate' it within a decade. 'Almost a decade on and SNP ministers are refusing to own up to Scots that they have repeatedly made promises that they are unable to deliver upon." The Conservatives said the exam results for 2025 show the gap between the most and least deprived pupils obtaining A-C grades at National 5 was still 16.6%, with the gap at Higher 17.1% and Advanced Higher standing at 12.8%. Miles Briggs, education spokesperson, said: 'Nicola Sturgeon's promises in relation to the attainment gap lie in tatters. 'She wanted to eradicate it completely, yet still there is a huge gap in the results achieved by those from our most and least deprived communities. 'And John Swinney was education secretary when the [[SNP]] said it would be the defining mission of their government and promised to substantially eliminate it by 2026.'

Starmer has ‘made a mistake' with plan to recognise Palestinian state
Starmer has ‘made a mistake' with plan to recognise Palestinian state

Powys County Times

timean hour ago

  • Powys County Times

Starmer has ‘made a mistake' with plan to recognise Palestinian state

Sir Keir Starmer has 'made a mistake' in announcing plans to recognise Palestine as a state, Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said. The Government last week said it will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to meet certain conditions, including a ceasefire and a revival of the two-state solution. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister reiterated that Hamas must release the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and play no role in the government of Gaza. The Government will then make an assessment in September 'on how far the parties have met these steps', the Prime Minister said. During a visit to a farm in Little Walden, Essex, on Tuesday, Mrs Badenoch said she would never agree to recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas is still in power in Gaza. She said: 'Absolutely not. No. Hamas is a terrorist organisation. We should not be creating a new terrorist state. 'This is basic stuff, and I don't understand why Keir Starmer doesn't understand that.' The Tory leader added: 'Keir Starmer has made a mistake. What we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home. 'We've been seeing images of a hostage who looks like he's being starved to death, forced to dig his own grave. This is what Hamas is about. 'Now is not the time to reward them for their atrocities and for the massacre they committed on October 7 by giving them statehood recognition. 'We want to see a two-state solution after a peace settlement done in the right way at the right time. It is not the right thing to do now. 'And I'm not surprised that British hostages like Emily Damari have condemned the Government for the approach they've taken.' Ms Damari, a British-Israeli woman who was held hostage by Hamas for more than a year, has said she believes Sir Keir is 'not standing on the right side of history' after his conditional pledge to recognise Palestine. Mrs Badenoch's comments came as it was announced a protest will take place in London this weekend opposing Sir Keir's plans to recognise Palestine as a state. Demonstrators, including some British family members of hostages still held by Hamas, will march on Downing Street calling for the release of the remaining hostages before any talk about the recognition of Palestine. Marchers will include the relatives of Avinatan Or, who was kidnapped from the Nova music festival with his girlfriend Noa Argamani. Mr Or's cousin Ariel Felber, from London, said: 'Keir Starmer has failed the hostages and their families by not making it a condition that all the remaining hostages are brought home to their loved ones before he can even entertain talk of state recognition of Palestine. 'He urgently needs to correct this.' Steve Brisley from Bridgend, Wales, whose sister and nieces were murdered on October 7 and his brother-in-law Eli taken hostage, said: 'As British families of hostages and victims, devastated by the ongoing suffering of our loved ones, our emotional torture has been exacerbated by the suggestion that the UK may recognise a Palestinian state without securing the release of the hostages as an absolute precondition. 'This is not about politics. This is about basic humanity.' The family members are expected to be joined by Jewish leaders and other supporters on their National March For The Hostages through central London on Sunday afternoon. Tzipi Hotovely, Israeli ambassador to the UK, said on X that Hamas's actions 'must never be rewarded' as she highlighted the plight of one of the hostages, 24-year-old Evyatar David. Hamas released a video on Saturday which showed Mr David looking skeletal and hollow-eyed in a dimly lit Gaza tunnel. Ms Hotovely said: 'He is clearly malnourished and ill-treated. A shadow of his former self, his suffering is unimaginable. 'Like countless others who saw it, I was appalled by the sickening footage of Evyatar being forced to dig his own grave. 'This abhorrent footage shows Hamas for what they are – wicked terrorists who seek to inflict as much death, destruction and suffering on as many Jews and Israelis as they can. Their actions must never be rewarded.'

Why Craig Murray is lobbying UN ambassadors Scottish independence
Why Craig Murray is lobbying UN ambassadors Scottish independence

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Why Craig Murray is lobbying UN ambassadors Scottish independence

His latest – and unofficial – diplomatic role took him to Manhattan, there to rub shoulders with ambassadors and activists in the 'New York radical scene' with the ultimate aim of having Scotland 'decolonised' by the international body. Murray's career as a diplomat culminated with a posting to Uzbekistan as the British ambassador, a post from which he was sacked after raising concerns about human rights abuses in the country. He is now flexing his diplomatic muscles as part of the campaign group Liberation Scotland's attempts to have the UN recognise Scotland as a 'colony', which would put it on course for gaining independence in the same manner as did countries such as Ghana, Cameroon and Somalia. During his visit in June, Murray made an intervention on behalf of the Kanak people of New Caledonia. He told The National that this was because Liberation Scotland supports 'the freedom of other colonies' but admits an ulterior motive. It was 'to show that I understand the legal structures and the legal arguments' around decolonisation, and to demonstrate that the group is 'not disruptive' as it may otherwise be characterised, said Murray. It was a demonstration that the group are approaching the committee sincerely and in good faith. The former diplomat, now an activist, blogger and sometime political candidate, said that networking was fundamental to the trip and met with high-profile activist lawyersMargaret Ratner Kunstler and Dan Kovalik. READ MORE: Top historian of nationalism weighs in on bid to 'decolonise' Scotland His initial pitch to the UN ambassadors with whom he spoke – many will represent countries colonised with the help of Scottish soldiers - was to ask whether they considered Ireland a colony. 'Everyone does, that's a perfectly accepted idea,' said Murray. 'And then explain to them that Scotland's a colony in the same way, we're actually extremely similar cases and that all the things that are said against Scotland being a colony, like the fact that we had a Treaty of Union, the fact that Scottish people used to serve in imperialist forces or benefitted from the slave trade, all of those things are also true in Ireland and that doesn't stop Ireland from having been a colony.' Murray said that despite the baggage of history, his arguments for Scottish independence were met with 'warmth' from those he lobbied. (Image: Getty Images) 'That does bring an initial willingness to listen, which is very important,' he added. By the same token, said Murray, there is a historic and growing anger at the UK in UN circles, especially given Keir Starmer's assault on the aid budget to fund military spending and the perception of Britain as 'one of Israel's closest allies' during the genocide in Gaza. 'People are receptive to breaking up the UK, because they don't like the UK,' he added. June's trip was marked down by Murray as a success and he said that he would reconnect with people he met when he returns to New York in September for the General Assembly. He and a team potentially numbering dozens of others are due in Geneva in the autumn for further UN lobbying. But he concedes that the battle is likely to be a long one and it is 'in no sense a substitute for campaigning at home'. 'We've made a good start, it will take a couple of years and success is not guaranteed,' Murray said. 'But it's a lot easier, it's a lot more realistic than getting Keir Starmer to agree to a referendum.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store