Special grant formula among top priorities in MA63 talks, S'wak assembly told
Datuk Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali said this was one of the unresolved issues prioritised by the Sarawak government in the ongoing negotiations with Putrajaya on the implementation of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
"For now, our top priorities include the special grant formula as part of the financial review under Article 112D.
"We hope discussions on this will be expedited and that it will be acted upon and agreed to," she told Lidam Assan (GPS-Katibas) during question time in the Sarawak Legislative Assembly on Wednesday (May 21).
Sarawak and Sabah are entitled to special grants from the Federal Government under Article 112D, which provides for a review of the grants every five years subject to the Federal Government's financial position and the states' needs.
Putrajaya increased the amount of Sarawak's special grant from RM16mil to RM300mil last year and RM600mil this year, pending the outcome of negotiations for a fixed formula.
Sharifah Hasidah said another matter of priority was the proposed increase in parliamentary seats for Sabah and Sarawak to better reflect the spirit and intent of MA63.
She said Sarawak would continue to pursue these matters through dialogue, consultation and diplomacy.
"I want to reiterate that our stand and firm position in all our negotiations is always 'Sarawak First'," she said.
"This means the Federal Government must acknowledge our constitutional and legal rights as enshrined in MA63, the Inter-Governmental Committee Report, Federal and state constitutions,and state laws."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
2 extra judges' panels to expedite appeal hearings
Abu Bakar Jais is the 13th Court of Appeal president since its establishment in 1994. (Bernama pic) PUTRAJAYA : Two more judges' panels will be set up to speed up the disposal of criminal and civil appeals, newly appointed Court of Appeal president Abu Bakar Jais said. He said there are currently eight panels. 'Hopefully, with more judges appointed, we can expedite the disposal of cases,' he told reporters after witnessing the elevation of six Court of Appeal judges and the confirmation of 14 judicial commissioners as High Court judges here today. With the appointment of the six judges, the Court of Appeal now comprises 32 judges, the maximum allowed under the Federal Constitution. Bakar is the 13th president since the appellate court's establishment in 1994. The Court of Appeal is often referred to as the 'engine of the judiciary' since it serves as the intermediate appellate court, reviewing decisions made by the High Court and the apex court for cases that originate from subordinate courts. Bakar described his appointment as a huge responsibility and a significant challenge in a country with a multiracial and multireligious population. 'Of course, as president, I cannot satisfy everyone, but I will discharge my duties without fear of favour,' he said. He also said there were highly capable judges who would assist him in fulfilling his responsibilities. Newly appointed Chief Justice Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh, who had earlier taken his oath of office before the Yang di-Pertuan Agong at Istana Negara, was also present. At the Palace of Justice, Bakar took his oath of office before senior Court of Appeal judge P Ravinthran. Justice Azizah Nawawi, the new chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak, took her oath of office before Dean Wayne Daly, the most senior judge in East Malaysia. She is also the first woman to hold the position.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ex-CJ denies interfering in apex court judges' decisions
Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat stepped down as chief justice on July 1, and Abdul Rahman Sebli retired as the chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak on July 24. PUTRAJAYA : Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat has denied allegations that she had attempted to sway the opinions of Federal Court judges during her tenure as chief justice, particularly in matters of constitutional interpretation. Tengku Maimun, who served as the top judge from May 2019 to July 1 this year, said the Federal Court had decided 19 constitution-related cases during that time and she was in the minority on five occasions. 'Statistically, five out of 19 represent about 25% of the dissenting judgments. 'That fact alone would manifest that judges decided independently without fear of favour, without external and internal pressure,' she told reporters after attending the elevation ceremony for 20 Court of Appeal and High Court judges here today. She said if she had truly wielded influence over the apex court's decisions, she would not have found herself in the minority or issued dissenting opinions on so many occasions. She was responding to claims by Abdul Rahman Sebli, who retired as chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak on Thursday, that he once came under pressure from a 'very senior member of the judiciary' to rule in favour of a litigant who had sued the federal government in a controversial constitutional case. Rahman dropped the bombshell during a farewell speech to judges, lawyers, judicial officers and legal officials in Kuching on Wednesday. He said that as a Federal Court judge at the time, he had prepared a draft judgment which he circulated to six other members of the bench for their review. 'Not long after that, I received an email from a very senior member of the judiciary telling me how wrong my opinion was on the constitutional issue. 'I was a relatively junior (judge) compared to the judges who pressured me,' Rahman said, adding that he was essentially asked to toe the line. Rahman said he stood by his draft judgment in the case, which held that the constitutional issue should be decided in favour of the federal government and not the litigant. His opinion was supported by three other panel members, making it a narrow 4-3 majority decision. He said among those in the majority was the then-president of the Court of Appeal. Tengku Maimun was in the minority. However, the majority decision was later set aside in what he described as an unusual move by a three-member Federal Court panel less than a year later. Rahman was referring to the final appeal by Maria Chin Abdullah, who was barred from travelling overseas in May 2016 without any reasons provided by the immigration department. In her minority ruling, Tengku Maimun declared that the ban was unlawful. It had been imposed on Maria, who was the Bersih 2.0 chairman, on grounds that she had allegedly disparaged the government. The majority of four judges, with Rahman writing the main judgment, had upheld the validity of an ouster clause in the Immigration Act, barring decisions from being challenged in court. Rahman held that judicial power was determined by Parliament. In her minority ruling, Tengku Maimun declared the clause unconstitutional and said the right to travel fell within the scope of the constitutional guarantee on personal liberty. She also stated that the Federal Constitution's clause on the powers of the judiciary should be read in the context of its original meaning, as it represented a basic feature of the constitution, regardless of later amendments. Article 121(1) originally vested the judicial power of the federation in the courts. An amendment in 1988 removed the words 'the judicial power of the federation' and merely stated that the courts would derive their powers from federal law. Rahman, who also attended today's event, said he stood by what he had said in his speech last week. 'There is nothing to worry about as what I spoke was the truth,' he said.
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Malaysia to highlight Gaza oppression at Geneva parliament conference
KUALA LUMPUR: Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul will reinforce Malaysia's stance on the ongoing oppression of Palestinians in Gaza during the 6th World Conference of Speakers of Parliament in Geneva. The event, held from July 28 to 31 at the Palais des Nations, gathers over 110 parliamentary leaders worldwide. Johari is set to speak at the General Debate session on July 29, themed 'A World in Turmoil: Parliamentary Cooperation and Multilateralism for Peace, Justice and Prosperity for All.' His address will focus on advocating for an international system rooted in justice, rule of law, and strong parliamentary institutions. 'He will emphasise Malaysia's firm position on the continuous suffering in Gaza and urge global parliaments to act when humanitarian principles are violated,' stated the Office of the Speaker. The conference, co-organised by the Inter-Parliamentary Union and the United Nations, serves as a key platform for legislative leaders to collaborate on global peace efforts. As AIPA President, Johari will also hold bilateral talks with counterparts, including Iran, to strengthen UN Charter adherence and international law. 'ASEAN's collective voice supports Palestinian sovereignty and peaceful resolutions based on humanitarian principles,' the statement added. - Bernama
