Records reveal how Palace tried to secure show of support for a new royal yacht
It was widely thought Queen Elizabeth II strongly favoured the commissioning of a new yacht but the royal family could not afford to be seen to be trying to influence political decision-making.
However files released by the National Archives at Kew, west London, show that senior courtiers privately approached No 10 to see if the prime minister would make a Commons statement stressing Britannia's 'inestimable value' to the nation.
But the plan – which amounted to a thinly veiled show of support for a new yacht – was scotched by the Cabinet Office, which warned that any such comments would be highly 'prejudicial'.
One senior official noted caustically that a claim by the Palace that the Queen was 'indifferent' as to the outcome of a review of the yacht's future 'hardly rings true'.
The issue of a new yacht came at an extremely difficult time for the government and for the Palace, with support for the royals at a low ebb.
There had been an angry public backlash the previous year when ministers announced the taxpayer would pick up the bill – which eventually ran to £36 million – for the restoration of Windsor Castle following a catastrophic fire.
In the aftermath of her 'annus horribilis' – which also saw the separation of Charles and Diana – the Queen agreed that she would for the first time pay taxes.
With Mr Major due to announce the historic move in a statement to parliament, the Queen's private secretary Sir Robert Fellowes saw an opportunity to secure what would amount to a show of support for a new yacht.
He asked the prime minister's principal private secretary Alex Allan if Mr Major would insert a passage referring to the importance of Britannia as well as the Queen's flight and the royal train.
He suggested the prime minister should tell MPs that it was not just a question of cost 'but also the style in which we wish our head of state and members of the royal family to represent us' in their public duties.
'It is always difficult to put a price on prestige but I have no doubt that over the years these items have been of inestimable value to this country.'
Sir Robin's proposed addition to Mr Major's statement went on: 'I would also like to make clear that there is not, and never has been, any pressure from the Queen to build a replacement for HMY Britannia.
'Should the government decide it is in the national interest for the yacht to be replaced that would be of course another matter.'
However, Nicolas Bevan, the official heading the working group set up to consider the future of the yacht, warned that the proposed remarks could be 'prejudicial' to any future decisions.
'For example to say that the royal yacht has been of inestimable value to this country will not be a helpful remark if ministers in due course decide not to replace Britannia,' he said.
'Equally it hardly rings true to suggest that it is a matter of complete indifference to the Queen as to whether Britannia is replaced or not.'
Despite the palace's protestations of neutrality, the files suggest courtiers were involved in what amounted to some none too subtle lobbying on behalf of a new yacht.
On May 13 1993, senior government officials, led by the cabinet secretary Sir Robin Butler, were invited to a 'splendid lunch' on board Britannia where they were regaled by the former lord mayor of London, Sir Hugh Bidwell, and the Earl of Limerick, a senior banker, on the value of the yacht to UK business.
Expressing his thanks afterwards to the master of the Queen's household, Major General Sir Simon Cooper, Sir Robin noted that the setting had 'brought home the issues to those involved in a unique way'.
However, when news of the meeting leaked out, government press officers were instructed to impress upon journalists – unattributably – that the Queen and royal family were 'not fighting any kind of rearguard action on the yacht'.
Despite misgivings over the costs, the Major government finally announced in January 1997 that they would build a replacement yacht if they were returned to power in the general election later that year.
The move was however widely interpreted as a desperate attempt to shore up support among wavering Tory voters, and when Labour was swept to power in a landslide they promptly reversed the decision.
When Britannia was finally decommissioned – after returning the last governor of Hong Kong, Chris Patten, following the handover to China – the Queen, who rarely displayed any emotion in public, was seen to shed a tear.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
MPs call for local authorities to be handed control of council tax
Councils should be given control over council tax as the current broken link between the local charge and the quality of services risks undermining local democracy, MPs have warned. An inquiry into the financial sustainability of local government concluded that councils should be given interim powers ahead of reform of 'the most unfair and regressive tax in use in England today', which it said should be more of a priority for the Government. This would include giving individual authorities the power to revalue properties in their area, define property bands, set the rates for those bands, and apply discounts, the Commons Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee said. The report said a broader devolution of fiscal powers, such as applying tourist tax, should also form part of fixing local government finances, which have been under growing strain since the onset of austerity in the 2010s led to reduced funding. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner recently said she wanted 'more push' towards fiscal devolution as part of the Government's pledge to transfer central decision making to local areas. The committee also recommended that central government ringfencing of funding be replaced with 'a rigorous outcomes-based system of accountability', so that local authorities are held accountable for achieving against a set of agreed outcomes within their overall budgets, not for meeting spending targets. Council tax bill rises hit 5% in April for the third year in a row, as almost all councils increased bills up to, or close to, the maximum permitted. The revaluation of properties has long been called for, with council tax bands in England still based on property values in 1991. The Institute for Fiscal Studies found that the most expensive properties (Band H) attract three times as much tax as the least valuable (Band A) despite being worth more than eight times more now, as prices have risen most in affluent areas. 'Council tax is therefore both increasingly out of date and arbitrary, and highly regressive with respect to property values,' it added. A recent analysis commissioned by the County Councils Network found allowing councils to administer and retain taxes generated locally would boost funding for services by more than £4 billion in many areas and 'supercharge' economic growth. Florence Eshalomi, Labour chair of the committee said: 'When residents are paying more and more in taxes but seeing less and less in regular, everyday services, such as libraries and fixing potholes, then trust in local democracy is at risk of being undermined. 'Government in England is overcentralised. The current financial pressures on local government are also driven largely by mandatory, high-cost, demand-led services, such as social care and special educational needs or disabilities, where councils have little control over these needs. 'Councils are trapped in a straitjacket by central government, with local authorities lacking the flexibility or control to devise creative, long-term, preventative solutions which could offer better value for money. 'If, as a country, we are going to deliver growth and improve local services, Westminster needs to ease its grip and let councils have more power to control their own affairs and be accountable to their own electorates.' The report also called called for the Government to reconsider its decision to freeze local housing allowance rates and extend its support for local authorities to acquire new housing stock through the local authority housing fund. Responding to the findings, the Local Government Association (LGA) said the findings provide further evidence of the fragile state of local government finances. Pete Marland, chair of the LGA's economy and resources board, said: 'Greater financial certainty and a simpler funding system are important. However, all councils remain under pressure and face having to increase council tax bills to try and protect services at the same time as making further cutbacks. 'A sustainable, long-term financial model for local government must lead to all councils having adequate resources to meet growing cost and demand pressures.' London Councils, which represents the capital's 32 boroughs, said the report shows 'change is long overdue', but raised concerns over the Government's plans for changing the way funding is distributed. Claire Holland, chair of London Councils, said: 'The Government's plans to reform council funding are pivotal for ensuring local areas receive funding that genuinely matches their levels of need and enables them to cope with fast-rising costs and pressures. 'It's right that the Government is targeting deprivation in the new formula, but we are concerned that the measures used in the current proposals will not sufficiently account for London's extreme housing poverty. This could mean London is left without the funding we need to deliver vital local services and return to financial stability.' A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'The Government is taking decisive action to fix the broken council funding system, so local leaders can deliver the vital public services their communities rely on. 'We have announced over £5 billion of new grant funding for local services on top of the £69 billion already made available this year to boost council finances, and we will go further to reform the funding system to make it fit for the future. 'This will ensure councils get the support they need and protect residents from further costs by keeping a 5% limit on the amount council tax can be raised without a referendum.'
South Wales Argus
34 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Monmouthshire council putting £1.4m towards Chepstow station
However members of Monmouthshire County Council again raised their displeasure there is no plan to improve disabled access at Chepstow railway station where passengers unable to reach the westbound platform have to cross the border into England to make trips further into Wales. Chepstow Mount Pleasant councillor Paul Pavia said: 'Step free access isn't an option it is mandatory. Passengers have to travel to Lydney or Gloucester first to come back to travel west.' The Conservative criticised Network Rail, which is responsible for tracks and other infrastructure on the railways, for failing to put in place access improvements at Chepstow and the Equality and Human Rights Commission which he said has been 'slow' to ensure the railways are meeting disability discrimination legislation. Monmouthshire County Council was asked to make up to £1.4m available from its funds for the scheme intended to provide parking and turning areas for buses at the station, additional car parking spaces and improve the station with the addition of public toilets and possibly a wating room. Council deputy leader Paul Griffiths said an access bridge is 'very much needed' but said Network Rail hasn't been able to meet the timetable the council has to spend the £5m awarded by the UK Government but the authority would continue to lobby it to invest in a bridge. Cllr Pavia suggested access could be created to the westbound platform across land already in Network Rail's ownership and Cllr Griffiths said he would make Network Rail aware of all comments on access made by councillors. The original plan, developed by the previous Conservative council administration, was to only provide a bus parking and turning area, at the front of the station, as well as other traffic improvements in the town but that was rejected by the then UK Government. However in its autumn statement in November 2023 it made a surprise announcement it would provide £5m for the bus turning area and the Labour councillor said since then it has managed to persuade the government to allow it to extend the period it has to spend the money and make the other changes at the station. Cllr Griffiths said there was also concern at the loss of parking spaces for the original bus turning area. He also suggested the existing C1 Bus, that goes from Chepstow Hospital to the Bulwark and the Tesco store, would be able to call at the railway station while buses serving Tintern could also make use of it, improving services for tourists.
South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Claim tourism tax will damage Monmouthshire's economy
The possibility of using new powers to tax overnight stays as soon as they become available was ruled out at Monmouthshire County Council's July meeting. Councillor Sara Burch, the council's cabinet member responsible for tourism, said it would hold talks with tourism operators before considering whether to introduce a charge and said: 'We've no intention of even getting to the point of consulting on a visitor levy within this administration.' The next council elections are due to take place in 2027 while the Welsh Government has said the earliest any local authority could introduce the tax, which it calls a visitor levy, is 2027. The Senedd, in July, approved legislation that will allow Wales' 22 unitary authorities to introduce a £1.30 per visitor, per night charge on overnight stays. It will be up to individual authorities if they wish to use the powers that also include a 75 pence per person, per night charge for hostels and campsites. An exception for under 18s would only apply at hostels and campsites. If every council in Wales introduced the charge it's estimated it could raise as much as £33m a year to invest in services and infrastructure to support tourism. While councils including Cardiff and Gwynedd have shown an interest in the charge it has been ruled out by Newport council, at the beginning of this yea, and Blaenau Gwent councillors say they believe it could have a negative economic impact. Figures produced for Monmouthshire council estimated in 2023 there were 2.29 million visitors, spending 3.53m visitor days in the county, generating more than £329m for the local economy, and supporting 3,462 full time equivalent jobs. The council was asked by its Conservative opposition group to commit to ruling out introducing the charge in June 2023, but at that time the ruling Labour group said it was too soon to make a decision on legislation that had yet to pass through the Senedd. At July's full council meeting Tory leader Richard John asked if the cabinet had given further consideration to his group's proposal the council 'should rule out introducing a tourism tax in Monmouthshire?' Cllr Burch said she assumed Cllr John was 'referring to the visitor levy' – to which he replied 'I am' – and she said: 'Our position remains unchanged we've no immediate plans to introduce a visitor levy.' The Abergavenny Cantref councillor said the council is working with tourism providers on destination management plans and to 'understand the advantages and how money raised could go to improving our offer to visitors'. She also said she welcomed the legislation as it also introduces a compulsory register of visitor accommodation. The destination management plans could go the council's scrutiny committees and cabinet in the autumn and Cllr Burch said: 'From there we hope to strengthen the Monmouthshire tourism partnership and discuss how any discussions may further take place but we've no intention of even getting to the point of consulting on a visitor levy within this administration.' Cllr Burch was prompted by council leader Mary Ann Brocklesby to say there were 'no plans on consulting' during the council term when responding to Cllr John. The Mitchell Troy and Trellech councillor said the response was 'disappointing to hear' and said 'the downsides of a tourism tax are really quite evident particularly in a boarder county like Monmouthshire.' He said families wanting to holiday in the Wye Valley will have a choice between staying in Gloucestershire or 'coming to Monmouthshire where a tourism tax will add an additional £40 for a week's holiday for a family of four. It could do enormous damage and as a council we should rule it out.' Cllr Burch said she considered the downsides and possible advantages to be 'evident' and said they would benefit from further discussion.
