
The Brief – 11 July 2025: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
This Strasbourg week saw von der Leyen face the ire of MEPs, as a motion of censure offered the chance to air multifarious grievances against the Commission president. The vote itself didn't present an existential threat to the executive, as disunity among the plaintiffs made it almost inconceivable that the two-thirds majority would be reached.
But the debate three days before was entertaining nonetheless, as centrist parties upbraided the EPP for its dealings with far-right groups. And after railing against the European People's Party's "irresponsible" tactics to sideline old allies through dealings with the European Conservatives and Reformists, the Socialists landed a victory as von der Leyen promised to keep €150 billion social spending in the next budget.
Tariffs incoming
The spectacle of von der Leyen's dressing down didn't distract from the more ominous prospect of US tariffs, which had been scheduled to drop 9 July until that deadline was pushed back to 1 August – probably, as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was unable to firm up on details.
The bloc's point man on trade, Maroš Šefčovič, had been on numerous missions to Washington, in a bid to avoid a baseline duty of 50% on EU exports. But with the trade commissioner's efforts so far unfruitful, hopes for an agreeable deal sank throughout the week.
Fears for the worst started on Monday, as South Korea and Japan were handed a 25% blanket levy, despite Japanese negotiators having been seven times to Washington since April. Optimism faded further as Canada was served a fat 35% – and was cautioned not to retaliate.
Addressing MEPs on Wednesday, Šefčovič was fatalistic, only able to give assurances he would continue pushing for the best deal for Europe (ie. keep doing his job). The best-case scenario now seems a 10% deal, similar that secured by the UK, and which EU ministers had scoffed at when (some) time was still on our side.
At time of writing we are still waiting for Trump's letter. The Commission told journalists on midday Friday that "we've grown used to things happening very quickly, or not". And so we wait.
Schengen falters
The freedom of movement that goods and citizens enjoy thanks to the Schengen treaty is being unpicked, as various signatory nations impose border controls to stem the flow of refugees and migrants.
The Oder–Neisse line between Germany and Poland has become the most vigorously guarded border, as both countries enforce checks on vehicles, sparking delays and incurring costs to businesses. The issue has stoked anti-German sentiment in Poland, with far-right activists carrying out their own patrols to apprehend migrants.
Besides the annoyance for those crossing these borders, the economic repercussions are substantial, potentially impacting some 32 million businesses with additional bureaucratic costs.
Has Germany's great conservative hope had his day?
Jens Spahn was once considered a chancellor-in-waiting. But the leader of the parliamentary faction of Merz' CDU party has been tarnished by a scandal dating to his days as health minister during the pandemic.
Spahn had overseen procurement contracts for masks, but a recent report by Germany's National Court of Auditors found that the protective supplies – that cost the country some €6 billion – were largely faulty. Over half were eventually destroyed.
Whilst Merz has so far stood by his parliamentary chief (he wasn't in government at the time of the deals), the backlash is damaging for the chancellor's party.
Mediterranean migration crackdown
Greece is devising new ways to deter migrants, as boats from Libya have already brought around 10,000 to the island of Crete this year. Deeming the current conditions in migrant camps too comfortable – "hotel-style", in the words of the migration minister – one strategy is to provide less appealing meals.
Already, asylum requests for people arriving from North Africa have been suspended for at least three months. But the success of such measures will be undermined by deteriorating relations between the EU and Libya, as was highlighted when on Wednesday the EU Migration Commissioner Magnus Brunner was ejected from eastern Libya.
The situation is further complicated by a bilateral agreement between Turkey and the Tripoli government to establish exclusive economic zones close to Crete – an agreement condemned by the EU as illegal.
Macron gets a Great British welcome
Emmanuel Macron became the first European leader since Brexit to make a state visit to the UK, an extravagant trip that featured a banquet at Windsor Castle and a speech by the French president to the British Parliament.
Top of the agenda was finding a better arrangement to slow the influx of migrants crossing the Channel. A deal was reached that could see 2,600 failed asylum seekers returned from Britain to France every year. But critics point out that the same number are currently making the journey every three weeks.
The visit also saw the two leaders agree to coordinate on using their nuclear weapons to protect European allies against possible Russian aggression. This came in addition to a more formalised 'Coalition of the Willing': the Western nations that support Ukraine will now have a headquarters in Paris.
Battle over bresaola
The prized Italian cured beef has Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) status, but don't be fooled into thinking it's Italian. Turns out that 90% of the meat used today comes from South America.
Italy's agriculture minister has now backed a plan to use US beef which, after processing, could be shipped back to America where it might be sold without heavy duties. But the dubious sourcing workaround (which would greatly increase the product's carbon cost) may be incompatible with EU law, experts warn.
(jp)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
4 hours ago
- Euractiv
Carbon markets aren't a cop-out, they're a climate solution
Dr. Daniel Klier is the CEO of South Pole, a climate consultancy. A former Partner at McKinsey, Daniel is a recognised sustainability leader, having chaired climate finance groups for the Bank of England and the Institute of International Finance. The EU's 2040 climate target proposal is the boldest policy pivot in years. By backing the use of high-integrity Article 6 carbon credits and opening the EU Emissions Trading System to carbon removals, Brussels has delivered an unmistakable message: Carbon markets are back in the game. While no silver bullet, when the cost of inaction is mounting and public budgets are stretched, no credible climate tool can be left on the shelf. Cutting emissions by 90% based on 1990 levels by 2040 is the penultimate stop before full decarbonisation by 2050. It defines the EU's negotiating position ahead of COP30 in Brazil and will influence global climate ambition just as countries submit their updated national climate targets. One of its most significant provisions is the allowance of international carbon credits worth 3% of EU 1990 emission to be used towards the 2040 target. This may sound modest, but it's a breakthrough: the EU has formally backed the use of Article 6, a key provision in the global climate pact (also known as the Paris Agreement) that enables countries to work together by trading carbon credits to reduce emissions more efficiently and fairly. Even more notable: the expansion of the EU Emission Trading System (ETS) to include domestic project-based, technology carbon removals, opening one of the world's most influential carbon pricing mechanisms to a new category of climate solutions. These aren't tweaks, they're turning points. As the EU balances net zero with energy security, competitiveness, growth and defence, carbon markets are reemerging as a legitimate pillar of its climate policy. It's not just a residual fix, but a driver of finance, innovation and global cooperation. In practical terms, it amounts to around 140 million tonnes of CO ₂ equivalent by 2040, roughly equal to the annual emissions of 30 million cars. A fraction of the EU's overall emissions, yes, but a clear vote of confidence in international carbon trading. This matters. After years of technical negotiations – many led by European delegates – Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is finally in play. It allows countries to trade emissions reductions across borders, helping unlock climate finance for projects that wouldn't otherwise happen, particularly in developing economies. As climate finance from developed nations continuously falls short, private investment is non-negotiable. And high-integrity carbon markets can help close the gap. When well-designed and governed, these markets create powerful financial incentives for low-carbon transformation across sectors, from clean energy and transport electrification to modernised waste systems and the early retirement of coal-fired plants. One thing is clear: Article 6 is no excuse to stall or delay the low-carbon transition. So while the volumes of carbon that have been hotly debated these past few weeks are relatively small, the opportunity to channel finance to emerging economies is significant. The 2040 target also proposes opening the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to permanent, domestic project-based technology carbon removals. The ETS – with its scale, rules, and market discipline – offers what the sector badly needs: a credible price signal to develop new technology solutions and incentivise innovation. Europe has long claimed that innovation is key to its green growth strategy. Including high-integrity removals within its flagship climate mechanism makes good on that promise. It will drive down costs as demand grows and accelerate technology development at the pace needed. Crucially, the 2040 goal isn't just about setting targets, it's about delivering on them. That means putting Article 6 credits and removals into practice, not just leaving them on paper. The risk isn't utilising carbon markets. It's failing to act at the scale and speed the climate crisis demands.


Euractiv
16 hours ago
- Euractiv
‘A slap in the face': EU leaders, industry reel from Trump's tariff shock
Donald Trump's announcement on Saturday of 30% tariffs on EU products has major implications for European economies, triggering a flurry of responses from national leaders and industries. The tariffs, which are a significant jump from the 10% baseline levy that is currently in place, are due to be effective from 1 August. Whilst the EU had previously indicated that it might be prepared to accept terms similar to those secured by the UK in May, the current "deal" has led stakeholders to reassess their stance. EU ambassadors will hold an emergency meeting on Sunday afternoon to discuss the response. But even on Saturday, reactions called for unity and stressed the bloc's trade strength – while urging Brussels to respond firmly to Washington's move. The US is the EU's top trading partner, with goods trade totalling €867 billion in 2024. Trump's letter is "impertinent and a slap in the face," said socialist MEP Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, adding that the EU had been negotiating intensely "for more than three weeks." He added that EU countermeasures "should come into force as planned on Monday, quickly followed by the second list." France shared a "very strong disapproval" of the announcement of 30% tariffs on EU exports, French President Emmanuel Macron said, adding that Brussels should adopt countermeasures if no agreement is reached by 1 August. "It is more than ever up to the Commission to assert the Union's determination to defend European interests resolutely," he added. Brussels has repeatedly delayed retaliatory action in hopes of reaching a negotiated solution – despite the EU already facing a blanket 10% tariff since April, alongside duties of 50% on steel and aluminium and 25% on cars and car parts. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the EU should use its collective single market strength to achieve a 'fair deal'. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – one of the few EU leaders to enjoy cordial relations with the Trump administration – said she still trusted the "goodwill of all players" to reach an agreement. "It would make no sense to trigger a trade clash between the two sides of the Atlantic," she said. Hungary, expectedly, lashed out at the European Commission for not having secured a deal yet. "EU tariffs on the US should've been lowered after Trump took office," Hungary's Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said. Industry warns of severe losses German industry, which accounts for the largest share of EU exports to the US, was quick to react. "President Trump's announcement is a wake-up call for industry on both sides of the Atlantic," said the Federation of German Industries (BDI), in a statement quoted by AFP. The federation urged Berlin, the European Commission, and the US administration to "very quickly find solutions and avoid an escalation." Ongoing tariff threats have already driven German exports to the US down to their lowest level since March 2022, according to government data released last week. The EU's food and drink sector would also be among the hardest hit by a 30% tariff. Italy's wine association, UIV, said on Saturday that Trump's letter had written 'the darkest page in relations between the two historic allies.' The US is the largest export market for EU wines, accounting for 27% of export value and 21% of volume. If implemented, a 30% duty on wine would amount to an embargo on 80% of Italian wine exports, the group said. "At this point, the fate of us and of hundreds of thousands of jobs is tied to additional time, which will be crucial, because it is unthinkable to place these volumes of wine elsewhere in the short term," said UIV President Lamberto Frescobaldi. Alexandra Brzozowski contributed reporting. (ow)


Euractiv
16 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU to tax tobacco, large companies to fund next budget
Whilst EU countries want an ambitious budget, they will also have to repay the bloc's €650 billion covid loans from 2028. The budget proposals must be approved unanimously. Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Eddy Wax and Jacob Wulff Wold Euractiv Jul 12, 2025 15:19 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The European Commission is hoping all EU countries can agree on new taxes on tobacco, large companies, electronics waste and carbon emissions to fund the EU budget, according to a draft proposal seen by Euractiv. The bloc's members are straining their finances, but the Commission wants an ambitious 2028 to 2034 budget (MFF) to boost competitiveness and defence. Direct contributions based on GNI, which financed 56% of the previous budget, "will reach its limits as financing needs increase," writes the Commission in its draft, before presenting its proposal for five new EU-level income sources. A Tobacco Excise Duty Own Resource (TEDOR) would "generate significant revenue" and also help towards the EU's health policy objectives. The document does not detail the excise duties, but Euractiv previously reported that the Commission has considered a 139% tax hike on cigarettes. A Corporate Resource for Europe (CORE) would tax companies with a permanent establishment in the EU and over €50 million in annual net turnover. To aid its green ambitions, the Commission proposes new contributions based on electronics waste. Two carbon levies which have already been floated – ETS1 and CBAM – will tax emissions inside and outside the EU. These proposals will stir debate among EU countries, which must approve them unanimously. To sweeten the deal, most ETS revenues would go to national budgets, and a temporary "solidarity adjustment mechanism" would balance differences between winners and losers of the new system. Proposals from 2020 and 2023 have not progressed much in the council, but the next budget is a unique opportunity. It is very difficult to agree on new revenue sources without also discussing expenditure, one EU diplomat told Euractiv this week. Whilst EU countries want an ambitious budget, they will also have to repay the bloc's €650 billion covid loans – known as the Recovery and Resilience Facility – from 2028. The EU will dedicate roughly one-fifth of its current annual budget size to these repayments (equal to €25-30 billion each year). (ow) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project