
Trump's 50-day shift on Ukraine is a big deal — but probably not for Putin
New developments Tuesday reinforced the idea that President Donald Trump has significantly shifted his view of the Ukraine war.
But his short time horizons and lack of specificity on what exactly he will do for Ukraine, which are hallmarks of his leadership, mean the most critical factor preventing an end to the conflict will remain unchanged. There is little reason to believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin will change his own calculations on a war he sees as a historic imperative and that may be existential for him politically.
Still, some things have undeniably changed.
Worst-case scenarios for what the first six months of Trump's second term could mean for Ukraine didn't come to pass.
This assessment excludes the Ukrainian civilians killed in Russia's recent deadly escalation of drones and missile strikes, including on apartment blocks.
But Trump hasn't folded to his erstwhile friend Putin. He's not left Europe in the lurch under the shadow of an increasingly expansionist Russia amid the continent's worst land war since World War II. Trump seems more warmly disposed toward NATO than he has been for years.
Ukrainian flags and portraits of soldiers are seen at a memorial for fallen fighters in Independence Square in Kyiv, Ukraine, on May 14.
Roman Pilipey/AFP/Getty Images
Ukraine faces the possibility of losing territory to a Russian summer offensive and more horror that civilians must bear. But diplomatically, it's in a more favorable position with the Trump administration than anyone could have dared hope when President Volodymyr Zelensky got an Oval Office dressing-down in February. That means its hopes of surviving as an independent, sovereign state have improved.
Trump's hostility toward Kyiv and misgivings about pumping US aid into a World War I-style quagmire might mostly be motivated by his dismay that Putin snubbed his peace plans, which were slanted toward the Kremlin.
But he at least has now shed some misconceptions that by force of personality alone he can bend Putin to his will. And by promising Patriot missiles to Kyiv — which Trump said on Tuesday are 'already being shipped' — and being open to a new Russia sanctions push in Congress, he's added steel to American peacemaking.
Trying to coerce Putin to the table may not work either. But at least Trump isn't giving Ukraine away.
A recalibration of expectations
Trump's shift will allow all sides to recalibrate to new realities. Although, as CNN's Matthew Chance pointed out, Trump's 50-day deadline for Moscow to talk peace offers a seven-week window for the cynics in Moscow to lock in as many gains as possible by raining fire and death on Ukraine.
Still, Trump has given himself some time to decide where he wants to go on Ukraine. And NATO states can enhance their own utility to Trump following a successful alliance summit.
Zelensky can try to build more goodwill with Trump to shape his approach to any future peace deals — though his experience in the Oval Office is a warning not to try to push the president too far.
And while the caveats about Putin being willing to wage indefinite war still apply, there's a small chance a few more weeks will persuade Putin to contemplate a US off-ramp to a deal likely to hand him territory he's seized in the three-year war and that he could spin as a win for Russian pride and security as well as a rebuke to the West.
Trump appeared optimistic Tuesday as he defended the ultimatum's timeline. 'A lot of opinions change very rapidly — might not be 50 days, might be much sooner than 50 days,' the president said.
How long will Trump's new outlook last?
It would be unwise to assume Trump's estrangement with Putin is permanent.
His anger seems mostly born of disappointment that Putin has not delivered him a win with a peace deal that might yield a Nobel Prize rather than any deep sentimental or geopolitical concern for the implications of abandoning Ukraine.
And, as usual, the president has tempered previous vehement criticism of the Russian leader. After slamming Putin's 'bullsh*t' last week, Trump on Monday told the BBC: 'I'm not done with him.'
Trump is transactional, operates in short windows of time and constantly seeks to land minor wins he can highlight. So, if he turned around and said he was meeting Putin in a summit next month or got mad at a new perceived slight from Zelensky, no one would be surprised.
'My concern here is that Donald Trump has the ability to be swayed very quickly,' said Sabrina Singh, a former Pentagon deputy press secretary who is now a CNN global affairs commentator.
'I fear that it's only a matter of time until there's another call between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin where Putin gives some sort of concessions and says we'll give a temporary five-day ceasefire and then turns around and says well, 'Ukraine violated this ceasefire so we're going to continue on with our war,'' Singh said on CNN News Central.
Still, Trump's change of position is significant.
By following through on his vow to send 'top of the line weapons' to Ukraine quickly, he is taking a big step. Patriot anti-missile defense systems could save many civilian lives, but Trump is embracing a political risk in ditching campaign-trail skepticism toward Ukraine shared by many MAGA supporters.
A US Army commander discusses Patriot battery readiness with soldiers assigned to an Air Defense Artillery Regiment on February 19.
Staff Sgt. Clara Harty/US Army
Trump has also shown more openness to sanctions. Trade between the US and Russia is minuscule at this point, so bilateral punishments won't mean much. But if Trump does make good on a threat to impose secondary sanctions on nations that buy Russian products, especially energy exports, he could choke Moscow's economy and war machine.
Still, would he really target India and China — two leading purchasers of Russian goods, in a move that could severely disrupt US relations with those giant powers and throw the global economy into turmoil? His erratic history of imposing and then suspending tariffs as part of his global trade war suggests not. Moscow may be banking on it.
It also matters what, if any, additional weapons Trump may send to Ukraine. Its most optimistic supporters were delighted on Tuesday when the Financial Times first reported that the president had asked Zelensky in a phone call about Kyiv's capacity to target both Moscow and St. Petersburg. But Trump toned down the speculation on Tuesday, although aides told CNN that he has not ruled out shipping certain categories of offensive weapons to Ukraine that he's so far been unwilling to provide.
'No, he shouldn't target Moscow,' Trump told reporters, referring to Zelensky. 'I'm on nobody's side. You know whose side I'm on? Humanity's side.'
Though he'd likely not admit it, the president is in a similar spot to one long occupied by his predecessor President Joe Biden. He's considering how far he can push Putin while avoiding inflammatory steps that might cross his invisible red lines and widen the war.
NATO basks in Trump's rare praise
Trump's new tolerance and even appreciation for NATO follows genuine fears that his new term might trigger the political earthquake of a US withdrawal.
Credit goes to quiet diplomacy by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, who've worked on Trump and counseled Zelensky on how to approach the US in recent months.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, meanwhile, choreographed an alliance summit in the Netherlands last month that delivered a political triumph for the president. An agreement that NATO states would spend 5% of GDP on defense by 2035 allowed Trump to argue he'd forced Europe to get serious about protecting itself and alleviating the burden on the US.
Alongside Rutte in the Oval Office on Monday, Trump praised Europe's spirit for the war in Ukraine, adding, 'Ultimately, having a strong Europe is a very good thing — it's a very good thing.'
Now, NATO has solved another political problem for the president. It's effectively being used as a front for him to send Patriot missiles to Kyiv. European nations are sending the batteries to Kyiv, after which US NATO allies will buy replacements from the US.
President Donald Trump, right, shakes the hand of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on Monday.
Evan Vucci/AP
Rutte portrayed this diplomatic ballet as another win for Trump.
'Mr. President, dear Donald, this is really big, this is really big,' Rutte said, using characteristic praise that comes across as sycophancy to many but that Trump takes at face value. 'You called me on Thursday, that you had taken a decision, and a decision is that you want Ukraine (to have) what it needs to have to maintain — to be able to defend itself against Russia — but you do want the Europeans to pay for it, which is totally logical,' Rutte said.
The NATO conduit offers at least symbolic distance for Trump as he sends weapons to Ukraine for use in a war against Russia. It allows some level of plausible deniability if MAGA activists disapprove. And it satisfies Trump's obsession with driving a good financial deal. Expect to hear him argue he's secured new sales and even jobs for US defense workers.
The promise that other offensive weapons could also get to Ukraine using the same route is unspecific, however. It's not clear whether Ukraine will get weapons that will enable it to make battlefield advances against Russia. And it's unlikely that any US assistance will mirror the vast packages of military assistance and aid that were approved by Congress in the Biden administration.
New moves in Congress
The atmosphere on Capitol Hill is also changing. A drive to sanction Russia more severely already had strong bipartisan support in the Senate, and Trump has shown he can muster majorities in the House for his priorities.
Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham and his Democratic co-sponsor Sen. Richard Blumenthal said Monday that their bill could be a 'real executive hammer' to isolate Russia. But the measure could still stir dissent in the GOP base at a time when Trump is already upsetting some supporters over the Jeffrey Epstein case.
Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who opposes more aid to Ukraine, said Tuesday he doesn't see an urgent need for a bill now that Trump has threatened to impose sanctions on Russia and even secondary punishments on India and China.
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul blasted the initiative as 'one of the most dangerous bills ever to come before the Senate.' He predicted a total cut-off of trade with China, India and Turkey if they were to be hit by US punishments.
So the domestic politics of Trump's Ukraine shift are not yet fully settled.
And neither, really, is the geopolitical situation.
Trump has adopted a tougher policy toward Putin, but it's not definitive or guaranteed to last. The extent of future US military support for Ukraine remains unclear, even if Kyiv's government is in better standing with the president than ever before. And European NATO states can breathe a sigh of relief about Trump, but his trade war threats have caused a deep transatlantic rift.
All of this means that Putin's key calculation all along — that he can outlast the West on the war in Ukraine — seems unlikely to significantly shift.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Security Council to hold session on Israeli escalation in Syria
Basant Ahmed Syrian media reported, citing a diplomatic source, that the UN Security Council will hold a session, Thursday, regarding the Israeli escalation in Syria. A diplomatic source said the Security Council received a request from Syria to hold an emergency session regarding the Israeli escalation. Syrian media, citing a diplomatic source, confirmed that the UN Security Council received a request from Syria to hold an emergency session regarding the Israeli escalation. Thousands of Syrians demonstrated on Wednesday in Damascus, Aleppo, Hama, and Latakia to condemn the Israeli aggression against the country and reject foreign interference in its affairs. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Arts & Culture Hawass Foundation Launches 1st Course to Teach Ancient Egyptian Language Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream


Al-Ahram Weekly
10 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
US-Israeli Humanitarian Foundation says 20 Palestinians killed at aid point in Gaza - War on Gaza
The Us-Israeli Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) said at least 20 people killed at an aid point in Khan Younis, in the south of the Palestinian territory on Wednesday. "Our current understanding is that 19 of the victims were trampled and one was stabbed amid a chaotic and dangerous surge," the US- and Israel-backed organisation said in a statement. It was the first time the GHF acknowledged the killing of Palestinians at one of its distribution sites, following weeks of chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of hundreds being killed, by Israeli forces and contractors securing GHF sites, while waiting to collect food rations. Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 20 people were killed in the incident by fire from Israeli troops. Agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that thousands had gathered at the site when "Israeli forces opened fire and used (tear) gas, causing panic and a stampede after aid centre guards closed the main gates in front of the hungry crowd". AFP footage showed lifeless bodies taken to a nearby hospital in the city of Khan Younis, with some placed on the floor and others on already-bloodied beds. Abdullah Alian, a witness, said that mayhem unfolded as the crowd of aid-seekers was hit with stun grenades and pepper spray. "When they saw people starting to die on the ground and people on top of each other suffocating, they opened the gate and people started climbing on top of each other." Paramedic Ziad Farhat said that after more than 21 months of Israeli genocidal war, "there are not enough hospitals for the injured or the martyrs". "Enough of the tragedies that we are living." The GHF claimed the stampede was "driven by agitators in the crowd", and attempted to to pin the blame on Hamas. "For the first time since operations began, GHF personnel identified multiple firearms in the crowd, one of which was confiscated," the GHF said on Wednesday. Spokesman Chapin Fay denied that tear gas was used or that shots were fired into the crowd, despite multiple eyewitness accounts from Palestinians at the scene. "Limited use of pepper spray was deployed only to protect against additional loss of life," Fay claimed, adding that "warning shots were fired into the air at one point. The medical source at Nasser Hospital said the victims were "heading to the aid distribution centre in northwest Rafah to receive food aid" but the main gate to the centre had been closed. "The Israeli occupation forces and the centre's private security personnel opened fire on them, resulting in a large number of deaths and injuries," the source added. The GHF, an officially private effort, began operations on May 26 after Israel had blocked all food and aid supplies into the Gaza Strip for more than two months, sparking warnings of imminent famine. On Tuesday, the UN said it had recorded 875 people killed in Gaza while trying to get food, including 674 "in the vicinity of GHF sites", since late May. Last week, UN rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani told reporters that "most of the injuries are gunshot injuries". Israel has killed at least 58,573 Palestinians, most of them women and children, since the start of its genocidal war on Gaza in October 2023. The Israeli mass killings, siege, starvation tactics, and systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure are the subject of a genocide case filed by South Africa at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which issued interim rulings ordering Israel to prevent genocidal acts and allow humanitarian aid into the Strip. In parallel, the International Criminal Court (ICC) is investigating war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the occupied Palestinian territories. In May 2024, ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan applied for arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, accusing them of using starvation as a weapon of war and deliberately targeting civilians Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Al-Ahram Weekly
11 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
UPDATED: Israel strikes on Syria draw global condemnation - Region
Israel's air strikes in the heart of the Syrian capital, Damascus, killing and wounding several people, sparked a wave of international condemnation, as world powers warned the attacks threaten regional stability. Defence Minister Israel Katz said Israeli forces struck near the entrance to the Syrian Ministry of Defence on Wednesday. Another strike hit near the presidential palace, on the outskirts of the city. A Syrian interior ministry source told AFP on Wednesday evening that Israeli strikes hit near Damascus, after the earlier raids in the capital that authorities said left three dead and more than 30 wounded. The latest bombardment hit "the vicinity of the Mazzeh (military) airport" in an area where munitions depots are located, the source said. Syrian Health Minister said Israeli aircraft obstructed the entry of a medical convoy into Suwayda by targeting all vehicles heading towards the area. The attacks on Syria's capital come amid continuing unrest in the city of Suwayda, where local Sunni Bedouin tribes have been engaged in fierce clashes in recent days with fighters from Syria's Druze minority, whom Israel views as a potential ally in Syria and claims to be intervening to protect. Damascus deployed its forces to the city on Tuesday and declared a ceasefire, but the fighting quickly resumed. Syria has strongly condemned, in the harshest terms, 'the treacherous Israeli aggression' that targeted government institutions and civilian facilities in both the capital, Damascus, and the governorate of Suwayda, describing it as a deliberate escalation and a violation of Syrian sovereignty and international law. In an official statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the assault was part of 'a deliberate policy pursued by the Israeli entity to inflame tensions, spread chaos and undermine security and stability in Syria,' and described the attacks as 'a blatant violation of the United Nations Charter and international humanitarian law.' Syria said it holds Israel 'fully responsible for this dangerous escalation and its consequences,' and affirmed that it 'retains all its legitimate rights to defend its land and people by all means permitted under international law.' The Foreign Ministry also called on the international community, 'foremost the United Nations Security Council,' to uphold its responsibilities and take 'urgent, concrete measures to put an end to Israel's repeated acts of aggression against the territory of a sovereign state and member of the United Nations.' Here is how the world is reacting to Israel's attacks on Damascus: United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US was 'very concerned' about the escalation in violence. 'We're going to be working on that issue … I just got off the phone with the relevant parties. We're very concerned about it, and hopefully, we'll have some updates later today. But we're very concerned about it,' Rubio told reporters. EU The European Union called on Israel to immediately stop its strikes on Syria. "We urge Israel to immediately cease its strikes on Syrian territory, including on key institutions in Damascus, which jeopardise the lives of civilians and risk undermining Syria's transition," EU spokesperson Anouar El Anouni told AFP. Turkey Turkey's Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the attacks and said they were an attempt to sabotage Syria's efforts to achieve peace, stability and security, according to Al Jazeera. 'The Syrian people have a historic opportunity to live in peace and integrate with the world,' the ministry said. 'All stakeholders who support this opportunity should contribute to the Syrian government's efforts to restore peace.' Omer Celik, spokesperson for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's governing AK Party, also condemned the attacks. 'Israel's attacks pose a security threat to the entire region and the world,' Celik wrote on X. GCC The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) – comprising Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – condemned the attacks in the 'strongest terms'. In a statement, GCC Secretary-General Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi said the Israeli attacks were a 'flagrant violation' of Syria's sovereignty, 'a breach of international laws and norms, and a serious threat to regional security and stability'. Albudaiwi reiterated the GCC's support for Syria's territorial integrity, adding that the continuation of Israeli attacks constituted an 'irresponsible escalation' and disregarded international efforts to achieve stability in Syria and the region. Iran Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also condemned the Israeli strikes, demanding an end to the "unhinged aggression". "The rabid Israeli regime knows no bounds... The world, including the region, must unite to end its unhinged aggression," Araghchi said on X, adding that Iran -- which fought a war with its arch enemy Israel last month -- "supports the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria, and will always stand with the Syrian people". Norway The Norwegian foreign minister said that Israel's recent strikes could undermine efforts towards a peaceful transition of power in Syria. 'Deeply concerned about recent Israeli airstrikes and rising domestic tensions. The escalation risks undermining efforts towards a peaceful, Syrian-owned transition,' Espen Barth Eide wrote on X. He said he was 'alarmed' by the 'escalating violence' in Syria and urged all actors to exercise 'maximum restraint'. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link: