The Trump admin just hired 3 outspoken climate contrarians. Scientists are worried what comes next

CNN

a day ago

The Trump administration has hired three prominent researchers who over the course of their careers have questioned and even rejected the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change. Each were given positions in the Energy Department, which is led by Secretary Chris Wright, a former oil and gas fracking executive.
The researchers are John Christy and Roy Spencer, both of whom are research scientists at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, and Steven E. Koonin of Stanford University's Hoover Institution.
Koonin previously served at DOE during the Obama administration, and earlier was a scientist for the oil and gas giant BP. He, along with others, pushed for a public 'red team' debate on climate science findings during the first Trump administration, but was overruled by political advisors in the White House at the time.
The hirings were first reported by the New York Times and confirmed by CNN.
In the Energy Department's internal employee directory, Koonin is listed as a 'special government employee,' Christy is listed as 'expert' and Spencer a 'consultant,' according to an agency source familiar with the matter. All three are listed as being under the office of Energy Secretary Wright, the source confirmed.
The Energy Department did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment on the hires of the three men, as well as questions on what they were working on at DOE and how long they would be there.
CNN has reached out to Koonin, Christy and Spencer individually for comment on their work at DOE.
Koonin, a theoretical physicist, served as the undersecretary for science at DOE under the Obama administration. He is the author of the 2021 book, 'Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters.'
The Trump administration is currently working on overturning a 2009 federal scientific finding that planet-warming pollution poses a threat to public welfare, which underpins many regulations designed to curb the nation's pollution. That effort is being led by the Environmental Protection Agency, but is likely to involve other agencies, including the Department of Energy.
In addition, the second Trump administration has taken a hatchet to public spending on climate science research, proposing to eliminate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's research activities altogether while making cuts at other agencies as well.
The Energy Department employs numerous climate scientists and houses some of the world's most powerful supercomputers, which are used in part for modeling future global warming and its impacts.
Christy and Spencer have long maintained that satellite data does not show the same trends and extent of global warming as surface weather data and have used that to poke holes in the mainstream scientific data.
The Trump administration recently let go of hundreds of scientists who were beginning to work on the next iteration of the congressionally mandated National Climate Assessment, which includes input from all climate-related federal agencies.
In recent weeks, the administration took down past iterations of these climate assessments, which are the most authoritative reports on how climate change will affect the US. It also shut down the educational website, climate.gov, and laid off its staff.
While the scope of their work is currently unclear, some prominent climate scientists are concerned Christy, Spencer and Koonin will be working on an alternative version of the next National Climate Assessment, which would be far more slanted to fringe views on the causes and consequences of global warming.
Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University, told CNN the hires signal an effort by DOE to arrive at a predetermined result.
'Hiring Koonin, Spencer, and Christy is not just irregular, it's a recognition that none of the normal channels would not give them the answer they want,' Dessler said. 'This seems to be a thread running through this administration. They don't seek out legitimate expert opinion; instead, they find people to give them the answer they want.'
Dessler noted that Koonin, Christy and Spencer are well-known for making value judgements in their supposedly scientific assessments as well as cherry picking data, and the language they use tends to be in the personal-opinion space, rather than the science space.
'There's also a lot of 'I'm not convinced' on areas that everyone else in the field is convinced by ('I'm not convinced climate models are any good'). That's not really a scientific argument,' Dessler said.
Climate scientist Zeke Hausfather noted where Koonin and Christy's views, for example, fall in the broader climate science community.
'While Koonin and Christy are among the more reasonable climate contrarians, they represent a tiny minority view representing perhaps 1% or less of climate scientists,' he told CNN. 'While it's useful to assess a variety of views, specifically seeking out and elevating fringe views that are not supported by the vast majority of the scientific research on a subject is deeply problematic.'