Latest news with #JohnChristy
CNN
08-07-2025
- Politics
- CNN
The Trump admin just hired 3 outspoken climate contrarians. Scientists are worried what comes next
The Trump administration has hired three prominent researchers who over the course of their careers have questioned and even rejected the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change. Each were given positions in the Energy Department, which is led by Secretary Chris Wright, a former oil and gas fracking executive. The researchers are John Christy and Roy Spencer, both of whom are research scientists at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, and Steven E. Koonin of Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Koonin previously served at DOE during the Obama administration, and earlier was a scientist for the oil and gas giant BP. He, along with others, pushed for a public 'red team' debate on climate science findings during the first Trump administration, but was overruled by political advisors in the White House at the time. The hirings were first reported by the New York Times and confirmed by CNN. In the Energy Department's internal employee directory, Koonin is listed as a 'special government employee,' Christy is listed as 'expert' and Spencer a 'consultant,' according to an agency source familiar with the matter. All three are listed as being under the office of Energy Secretary Wright, the source confirmed. The Energy Department did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment on the hires of the three men, as well as questions on what they were working on at DOE and how long they would be there. CNN has reached out to Koonin, Christy and Spencer individually for comment on their work at DOE. Christy told CNN in an emailed response that he was not on the Energy Department's payroll and was 'just here to help as needed.' Koonin, a theoretical physicist, served as the undersecretary for science at DOE under the Obama administration. He is the author of the 2021 book, 'Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters.' The Trump administration is currently working on overturning a 2009 federal scientific finding that planet-warming pollution poses a threat to public welfare, which underpins many regulations designed to curb the nation's pollution. That effort is being led by the Environmental Protection Agency, but is likely to involve other agencies, including the Department of Energy. In addition, the second Trump administration has taken a hatchet to public spending on climate science research, proposing to eliminate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's research activities altogether while making cuts at other agencies as well. The Energy Department employs numerous climate scientists and houses some of the world's most powerful supercomputers, which are used in part for modeling future global warming and its impacts. Christy and Spencer have long maintained that satellite data does not show the same trends and extent of global warming as surface weather data and have used that to poke holes in the mainstream scientific data. The Trump administration recently let go of hundreds of scientists who were beginning to work on the next iteration of the congressionally mandated National Climate Assessment, which includes input from all climate-related federal agencies. In recent weeks, the administration took down past iterations of these climate assessments, which are the most authoritative reports on how climate change will affect the US. It also shut down the educational website, and laid off its staff. While the scope of their work is currently unclear, some prominent climate scientists are concerned Christy, Spencer and Koonin will be working on an alternative version of the next National Climate Assessment, which would be far more slanted to fringe views on the causes and consequences of global warming. Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University, told CNN the hires signal an effort by DOE to arrive at a predetermined result. 'Hiring Koonin, Spencer, and Christy is not just irregular, it's a recognition that none of the normal channels would not give them the answer they want,' Dessler said. 'This seems to be a thread running through this administration. They don't seek out legitimate expert opinion; instead, they find people to give them the answer they want.' Christy suggested in his email to CNN that he wasn't involved with either the national climate assessment or efforts to overturn the 2009 endangerment finding. 'I don't know what is happening with the National Climate Assessment or the Endangerment Finding,' he wrote. Dessler noted that Koonin, Christy and Spencer are well-known for making value judgements in their supposedly scientific assessments as well as cherry picking data, and the language they use tends to be in the personal-opinion space, rather than the science space. 'There's also a lot of 'I'm not convinced' on areas that everyone else in the field is convinced by ('I'm not convinced climate models are any good'). That's not really a scientific argument,' Dessler said. Climate scientist Zeke Hausfather noted where Koonin and Christy's views, for example, fall in the broader climate science community. 'While Koonin and Christy are among the more reasonable climate contrarians, they represent a tiny minority view representing perhaps 1% or less of climate scientists,' he told CNN. 'While it's useful to assess a variety of views, specifically seeking out and elevating fringe views that are not supported by the vast majority of the scientific research on a subject is deeply problematic.' This story has been updated with additional information.
CNN
08-07-2025
- Politics
- CNN
The Trump admin just hired 3 outspoken climate contrarians. Scientists are worried what comes next
The Trump administration has hired three prominent researchers who over the course of their careers have questioned and even rejected the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change. Each were given positions in the Energy Department, which is led by Secretary Chris Wright, a former oil and gas fracking executive. The researchers are John Christy and Roy Spencer, both of whom are research scientists at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, and Steven E. Koonin of Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Koonin previously served at DOE during the Obama administration, and earlier was a scientist for the oil and gas giant BP. He, along with others, pushed for a public 'red team' debate on climate science findings during the first Trump administration, but was overruled by political advisors in the White House at the time. The hirings were first reported by the New York Times and confirmed by CNN. In the Energy Department's internal employee directory, Koonin is listed as a 'special government employee,' Christy is listed as 'expert' and Spencer a 'consultant,' according to an agency source familiar with the matter. All three are listed as being under the office of Energy Secretary Wright, the source confirmed. The Energy Department did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment on the hires of the three men, as well as questions on what they were working on at DOE and how long they would be there. CNN has reached out to Koonin, Christy and Spencer individually for comment on their work at DOE. Koonin, a theoretical physicist, served as the undersecretary for science at DOE under the Obama administration. He is the author of the 2021 book, 'Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters.' The Trump administration is currently working on overturning a 2009 federal scientific finding that planet-warming pollution poses a threat to public welfare, which underpins many regulations designed to curb the nation's pollution. That effort is being led by the Environmental Protection Agency, but is likely to involve other agencies, including the Department of Energy. In addition, the second Trump administration has taken a hatchet to public spending on climate science research, proposing to eliminate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's research activities altogether while making cuts at other agencies as well. The Energy Department employs numerous climate scientists and houses some of the world's most powerful supercomputers, which are used in part for modeling future global warming and its impacts. Christy and Spencer have long maintained that satellite data does not show the same trends and extent of global warming as surface weather data and have used that to poke holes in the mainstream scientific data. The Trump administration recently let go of hundreds of scientists who were beginning to work on the next iteration of the congressionally mandated National Climate Assessment, which includes input from all climate-related federal agencies. In recent weeks, the administration took down past iterations of these climate assessments, which are the most authoritative reports on how climate change will affect the US. It also shut down the educational website, and laid off its staff. While the scope of their work is currently unclear, some prominent climate scientists are concerned Christy, Spencer and Koonin will be working on an alternative version of the next National Climate Assessment, which would be far more slanted to fringe views on the causes and consequences of global warming. Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University, told CNN the hires signal an effort by DOE to arrive at a predetermined result. 'Hiring Koonin, Spencer, and Christy is not just irregular, it's a recognition that none of the normal channels would not give them the answer they want,' Dessler said. 'This seems to be a thread running through this administration. They don't seek out legitimate expert opinion; instead, they find people to give them the answer they want.' Dessler noted that Koonin, Christy and Spencer are well-known for making value judgements in their supposedly scientific assessments as well as cherry picking data, and the language they use tends to be in the personal-opinion space, rather than the science space. 'There's also a lot of 'I'm not convinced' on areas that everyone else in the field is convinced by ('I'm not convinced climate models are any good'). That's not really a scientific argument,' Dessler said. Climate scientist Zeke Hausfather noted where Koonin and Christy's views, for example, fall in the broader climate science community. 'While Koonin and Christy are among the more reasonable climate contrarians, they represent a tiny minority view representing perhaps 1% or less of climate scientists,' he told CNN. 'While it's useful to assess a variety of views, specifically seeking out and elevating fringe views that are not supported by the vast majority of the scientific research on a subject is deeply problematic.'
New York Times
08-07-2025
- Politics
- New York Times
Trump Hires Scientists Who Doubt the Consensus on Climate Change
The Energy Department has hired at least three scientists who are well-known for their rejection of the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change, according to records reviewed by The New York Times. The scientists are listed in the Energy Department's internal email system as current employees of the agency, the records show. They are Steven E. Koonin, a physicist and author of a best-selling book that calls climate science 'unsettled'; John Christy, an atmospheric scientist who doubts that human activity has caused global warming; and Roy Spencer, a meteorologist who believes that clouds have had a greater influence on warming than humans have. Their hiring comes after the Trump administration dismissed hundreds of scientists and experts who had been compiling the federal government's flagship report on how climate change is affecting the country. The administration has also systematically removed mentions of climate change from government websites while slashing federal funding for research on global warming. In addition, Trump officials have been recruiting scientists to help them repeal the 2009 'endangerment finding,' which determined that greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health and welfare, and which now underpins much of the government's legal authority to slow global warming, according to two people briefed on the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly. It was not immediately clear what the three scientists were working on or whether they were being paid. Representatives for Dr. Koonin, Dr. Spencer and the Energy Department did not respond to requests for comment. In a brief phone interview and follow-up email, Dr. Christy said he was not working on the endangerment finding nor collecting a government salary. He declined to comment further. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Associated Press
12-04-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
Orbis Statement on Proposed Merger Between Tsuruha and Welcia and Proposed Tender Offer by Aeon
LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr 12, 2025-- Orbis Investments (' Orbis ') is a global investment group founded in 1989. We are a significant investor in Japanese listed companies, and have been a shareholder in Tsuruha Holdings Inc. (' Tsuruha ') since 2000. As at 28 February 2025 1, funds and mandates managed by Orbis held 9.7% of Tsuruha's outstanding issued share capital. As a long-term investor, Orbis seeks to engage in constructive dialogue with investee companies on matters of concern, consistent with Principle 4 of Japan's Stewardship Code. Where such concerns persist, we may share them publicly if we believe doing so furthers the interests of our clients. Orbis notes with concern the announcement by Tsuruha of 11 April 2025 regarding the proposed tripartite 'Capital and Business Alliance' between Tsuruha, Aeon Co., Ltd (' AEON '), and Welcia Holdings Co, Ltd (' Welcia '), which comprises a proposed share-for-share merger between Tsuruha and Welcia (the ' Merger '), followed by a tender offer by AEON for shares of the merged entity (the ' Tender Offer '). Orbis opposes these transactions based on its belief that the proposed terms of each of the Merger and the Tender Offer undervalue Tsuruha and fail to provide a sufficient control premium. The Merger: In Orbis' view, the proposed Merger substantially undervalues Tsuruha given that Tsuruha: The Tender Offer: In Orbis' view, AEON acquiring only 11.9% in December 2025 to obtain a bare minimum 50.9% controlling position is deeply concerning: Orbis believes that AEON should offer to buy 100% of the merged Tsuruha entity for cash at a price greater than the ¥15,500 per share AEON paid for Oasis' 13.41% stake in Tsuruha to reflect a control premium. Orbis calls upon Tsuruha shareholders to reject the proposed Merger at the 26 May AGM, and on Tsuruha's board to allow other interested parties to offer a higher price, accompanied by the opportunity to conduct full due diligence to support their potential bids. Indeed, we believe that a fair price to take control of Tsuruha is likely to be in excess of ¥15,500 per share, and could be around ¥20,000 per share. Orbis urges Tsuruha, Welcia and AEON to treat all shareholders fairly, and submits that doing so is essential to protect the public interest in maintaining confidence in the efficiency, fairness and integrity of capital markets. 1 The record date for the purpose of Tsuruha shareholders' entitlement to vote on the Merger. View source version on CONTACT: If you have any questions regarding the contents of this press release, please contact: Investor Contact: John Christy Orbis Investments +1 778-222-0754 [email protected] Media Contact: Steve Schaefer Hewes Communications +1 212-207-9456 [email protected] KEYWORD: EUROPE UNITED STATES UNITED KINGDOM NORTH AMERICA NEW YORK INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FINANCE DATA ANALYTICS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSET MANAGEMENT SOURCE: Orbis Investments Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 04/12/2025 04:12 PM/DISC: 04/12/2025 04:12 PM
