
Report claims Amazon raised prices since Donald Trump took office; company says: Setting the record straight
Wall Street Journal analysis
claiming the e-commerce giant raised prices on
everyday essentials
by 5% following President Trump's inauguration on January 20, calling the methodology "fundamentally flawed" and accusing the publication of cherry-picking data.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The WSJ study examined 2,500 common items including cough drops, antibacterial wipes, and chicken broth, finding average
price increases
from Trump's inauguration through July 1. The report suggested these hikes were linked to anticipated
tariff impacts
on international goods.
Amazon disputes report as 'surgical cherry-picking' of data
In a lengthy blog post response, Amazon challenged the Journal's approach, noting the sample represented less than 0.04% of its 6 million everyday essential products.
The company argued that WSJ compared only two specific dates rather than analyzing price trends over time, which Amazon says would show a different picture.
"The WSJ took a very different approach and made several critical methodological flaws that undermine its conclusions," Amazon stated, adding that approximately two-thirds of the analyzed products actually had no price change or decreased in price during the same period.
Amazon specifically criticized WSJ for using promotional prices as baselines, citing examples like Dove deodorant and Yogi Tea bags that were on sale in January. The company claims these items appeared to have price increases only because temporary promotions ended, not due to inflation or tariff concerns.
Amazon cites price cuts on hundreds of items as tariff debate intensifies
Amazon emphasized its track record of meeting or beating competitor prices, citing eight consecutive years of independent research by Profitero showing Amazon as the lowest-priced U.S.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
retailer for everyday essentials.
Consumer prices
rose 0.3% monthly and 2.7% annually according to June Bureau of Labor Statistics data, reflecting broader inflationary pressures across the economy.
Amazon provided examples of hundreds of price decreases during the same period, including a 38% reduction on shower caddies and 37% cuts on craft supplies, arguing the WSJ failed to present a complete picture of its pricing strategy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital
The Senate has confirmed former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital, filling the post after President Donald Trump withdrew his controversial first pick, conservative activist Ed Martin Jr. Pirro, a former county prosecutor and elected judge, was confirmed 50-45. Before becoming the acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia in May, she co-hosted the Fox News show 'The Five' on weekday evenings, where she frequently interviewed Trump. Trump yanked Martin's nomination after a key Republican senator said he could not support him due to Martin's outspoken support for rioters who stormed the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Martin now serves as the Justice Department's pardon attorney. In 2021, voting technology company Smartmatic USA sued Fox News, Pirro and others for spreading false claims that the company helped 'steal' the 2020 presidential election from Trump. The company's libel suit, filed in a New York state court, sought $2.7 billion from the defendants. Last month, Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to send Pirro's nomination to the Senate floor after Democrats walked out to protest Emil Bove's nomination to become a federal appeals court judge. Pirro, a 1975 graduate of Albany Law School, has significantly more courtroom experience than Martin, who had never served as a prosecutor or tried a case before taking office in January. She was elected as a judge in New York's Westchester County Court in 1990 before serving three terms as the county's elected district attorney. In the final minutes of his first term as president, Trump issued a pardon to Pirro's ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted in 2000 on conspiracy and tax evasion charges.


Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US officials open investigation into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith
A US federal agency has formally opened an investigation into former Special Counsel Jack Smith, who led the probe in two criminal cases against President Donald Trump before he resigned from his post earlier this year. The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) confirmed that it was probing whether Smith violated the Hatch Act during his investigation of President Trump. The Hatch Act restricts federal employees from using their position for political activities. The decision by the Office of Special Counsel to open an investigation follows a request by Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton. The OSC, which is an independent agency that investigates the conduct of the federal employees, cannot bring criminal charges as it doesn't have that authority, Reuters reported. The OSC probe against Smith is the latest salvo in the series of actions taken by the Trump administration and his allies against their perceived political opponents. Smith was appointed as Special Counsel by the Department of Justice in 2022 under former President Joe Biden to investigate Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents and his alleged attempt to interfere in the 2020 US presidential election. Smith resigned from his post after Trump defeated former Vice President and Democrats' candidate Kamala Harris. Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who first raised the request for investigation, accused Smith of aggressively pursuing his cases against Trump with the aim of hurting his presidential campaign and called the former special counsel 'a political actor masquerading as a public official'. In a post on X, Cotton said 'That's why I've asked this unprecedented interference in the 2024 election be immediately investigated by OSC.' After President Trump won the election, Smith had dropped both the cases and cited a longstanding Justice Department's policy to avoid prosecution of a sitting president. Trump had denied the charges and said that prosecution cases were politically motivated to damage his presidential campaign.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan
Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has warned Trump that he was 'gravely misled' by Pakistan about the true location of vast natural resources, saying they belong to Balochistan, not Pakistan. read more Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has issued a sharp warning to US President Donald Trump, accusing him of being 'gravely misled' by Pakistan's military leadership about the true ownership of vast natural resources in the region. In an open letter, Mir Yar Baloch stated that General Asim Munir and Islamabad's diplomatic channels had falsely claimed that massive reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals were part of Pakistan, when in fact, he said, they rightfully belong to Balochistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Your recognition of the vast oil and mineral reserves in the region is indeed accurate. However, with due respect, it is imperative to inform your administration that you have been gravely misled by the Pakistani military leadership, particularly General Asim Munir, and by their diplomatic channels regarding the true geography and ownership of these critical resources,' he wrote. He further asserted that these untapped deposits are not located in Punjab—the core territory of Pakistan—but in the 'Republic of Balochistan,' which he described as 'a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan.' 'These untapped reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals are not located within the territories of Punjab, which is the actual Pakistan. They belong to the Republic of Balochistan, a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan. The claim that these resources belong to Pakistan is not only false, it is a deliberate attempt to misappropriate Balochistan's wealth for political and financial gain,' Baloch added. He also warned that granting Pakistan access to Balochistan's mineral riches would empower its military and intelligence services—specifically the ISI—which he accused of a long record of sponsoring terrorist groups. 'Such access would significantly enhance the operational and financial capabilities of the ISI, enabling it to expand its global terror networks, recruit more militants, and potentially facilitate large-scale attacks reminiscent of 9/11,' he cautioned. Reaffirming Balochistan's stand, he declared the region was not 'for sale.' 'We will not permit Pakistan, China, or any other foreign power to exploit our land or its resources without the explicit consent of the Baloch people. Our sovereignty is non-negotiable, and our struggle for rightful ownership and independence continues with dignity and resilience,' he said in the letter. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The statement came after Trump announced a major energy partnership with Islamabad, under which the US and Pakistan would jointly develop what he described as 'their massive oil reserves.' 'We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Meanwhile, Pakistan's largest refinery, Cnergyico, claimed to have finalised a deal with Vitol to import 1 million barrels of American oil, according to the company's vice chairman, Usama Qureshi, who spoke to Reuters.