₹39 on meter, ₹172 on app: Bengaluru woman's viral auto fare comparison fuels outrage
Sharing her experience on X (formerly Twitter), a Bengaluru woman posted, 'The price on meter vs the price on Uber. If you don't have your own vehicle in Bangalore, you're s******.'
She also uploaded a photo showing a stark difference: while the auto meter showed ₹39 for a short 2.6 km ride, the Uber app, as claimed by the woman quoted ₹172 for the same distance, nearly four and a half times the metered rate.
(Also Read: Tunnel vs transit: Bengaluru's infrastructure debate on social media heats up amid traffic woes)
Check out her post here:
How did X users react?
The post quickly gained traction, with many X users reacting with a mix of surprise, sarcasm, and indignation. One user commented, 'Woah, you found an auto that agreed to use the meter.'
To this, the woman clarified, 'No, I asked him to turn it on just so I could see the actual price.'
Some users attempted to defend app pricing, citing dynamic models. 'Uber prices are based on supply-demand, while meter prices are fixed by the government,' one user explained, adding, 'But even that logic fails when the government bans bike taxis and removes non-Kannadiga auto drivers. It's all being controlled by the auto mafia.'
Another commuter shared a recent observation, 'In the last couple of days, Uber is showing fares close to what the meter would show, but the drivers just don't accept rides. Ola and Namma Yatri confirm rides, but only when the fare is ₹50 or more than the actual rate.'
Amid soaring prices and limited availability, many called out what they saw as 'absolute exploitation' by aggregator platforms.
Some even noted that owning a private vehicle in Bengaluru isn't necessarily a solution either. 'And in this traffic, even your own vehicle gives a mileage of less than 9 kmpl,' one user pointed out.
The viral post comes at a time when public transport and urban mobility in Bengaluru remain deeply contentious, with users frequently complaining about high fares, lack of enforcement of meter rules, and the recent crackdown on bike taxis, further narrowing last-mile options for commuters.
(Also Read: Bengaluru bike taxi riders use WhatsApp to dodge ban, contact commuters directly: Report)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump slaps new tariffs on dozen countries as India-US trade deal awaits final nod
NEW DELHI : US President Donald Trump has announced a sweeping set of new tariffs, effective 1 August, on imports from more than a dozen countries, including key Asian economies such as Thailand, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, Japan, and South Korea. India, notably, remains off the list—for now—amid ongoing negotiations over a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), which remains unsigned on the President's desk. Tariff breakdown: Asia hit hardest Trump announced the tariffs through letters posted on his social media platform Social Truth. Laos and Myanmar were hit the hardest, facing duties up to 40%. Thailand retained its 36% duty from April, while Cambodia saw a slight reduction to 36% from 49%. Bangladesh's rate dropped to 35% from 37%, and Indonesia held steady at 32%. Malaysia's duty rose by 1% to 25%, while both Japan and South Korea were slapped with new 25% tariffs. Non-Asian countries also affected include Bosnia (30%), Serbia (35%), Tunisia (25%), Kazakhstan (25%), and South Africa (30%). Also read: 'US close to trade deal with India', Donald Trump announces amid new tariffs on 14 countries India holds its ground—for now India, which has offered multiple trade concessions to the US in recent months, was conspicuously absent from the tariff list. This gives the country a pricing edge in labour-intensive sectors like textiles, apparel, electronics, and toys, where its Asian competitors now face stiffer duties. 'As these rival exporters contend with steeper duties, Indian products are likely to gain a pricing edge, offering a strategic opening for Indian manufacturers to expand their footprint in the US and attract greater sourcing attention from American buyers," said Ajay Sahai, director general, Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO). The tariff hike comes just 48 hours before the 9 July deadline for the 90-day pause on Trump's Reciprocal Tariff Policy expires. While the US Trade Representative (USTR) has cleared the draft India-US trade deal, the final sign-off awaits Trump's approval. Indian officials say the agreement is unlikely to be concluded without top-level political intervention, especially on contentious issues like agriculture, dairy, and genetically modified seeds. The move, detailed through tariff letters signed by Trump and posted on his social media platform, Social Truth, comes just as the much-awaited India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) remains unsigned and pending on the President's desk. 'The deal is ready on paper, but it's now a political call," a government official said. 'If it's not signed in time, some Indian products with strong export interest may be kept out, and the same could apply to US goods. These could be taken up in later phases." Indian negotiators remain cautiously optimistic that if the 9 July deadline is missed, it could be extended to 1 August—buying time for the trade deal. Until then, India is expected to be spared from a direct tariff blow. Also read: Donald Trump announces 25% tariffs on imports from Japan and South Korea, warns against retaliation Trump's statement 'Large and persistent US trade deficits pose an extraordinary threat to our national security and economy," Trump said in an executive order. 'The 90-day suspension of additional duties, implemented in April, was based on the sincere intentions of our trading partners. That suspension will now be extended until 1 August 2025." 'Where partners take significant steps to align with the United States on economic and national security matters, I may modify tariffs accordingly," he added. The tariff hikes form part of Trump's broader Reciprocal Tariff Policy targeting countries he accuses of maintaining unfair trade barriers against American goods. With India offering market access in sectors like dairy and medical devices, New Delhi hopes its cooperative stance will spare it from a similar fate. Also read: US trade deal down to the wire as tariff pause nears close
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
OECD Tax Framework Collapses as G7 Bows to Trump's reciprocal tax threat
Published : Jul 07, 2025 16:03 IST - 6 MINS READ Developments that have occurred in quick succession have crushed the successful efforts made in recent years to increase global cooperation aimed at raising tax revenues to take on a host of global challenges. Late in June, the non-US six (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the UK) in the G7 announced that they had agreed to a 'side-by-side solution' that amounts to a retreat from the existing global agreement to cooperate on corporate taxation. They have decided to exempt US multinationals from being subject to a minimum tax on their profits of 15 per cent, as required under an agreement sealed in 2021. To recall, after years of negotiation, an agreement titled the 'OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)' was arrived at in 2021 under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), with non-OECD countries too joining the discussion. That agreement was a commitment on the part of over 140 governments to work towards implementing a common framework to tax the global profits of transnational companies that find ways to transfer to and record their profits in low tax locations where they often have little economic activity. The BEPS framework was a means to combat such tax avoidance practices that reduce national and aggregate global tax revenues, and help governments tax profits in jurisdictions where economic activity actually occurs and value creation takes place. Also Read | A summit of subordinates The core of the agreement, which recommended 15 actions, was named Pillar Two of the framework. This was by no means far-reaching. It merely set a 15 per cent floor rate of tax on the profits of multinationals in all the cooperating jurisdictions, which was much lower than the 25-30 per cent considered reasonable by those looking to raise resources for meeting various financing challenges. Dissatisfaction over this and the tardy move to implement the OECD agreement set off demands for a global tax convention under the auspices of the UN, which would give less developed countries more of a say in determining the terms of the agreement and a greater role in its implementation. Some progress has been achieved on this, with a UN General Assembly decision to constitute an ad hoc committee to draft the terms of reference for a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. Negotiations on the convention were to occur over 2025 to 2027. Weaponised tariffs However, from the very start the US—though a party to the OECD agreement—has been expressing reservations about a number of the proposed measures, especially the Pillar Two global minimum tax. With US multinationals being the principal adopters of profit-shifting strategies, they would have been the main targets of any such minimum tax, however low. So, the US, while committed to the inclusive framework, campaigned during Donald Trump's first term as President of the US, for a much-diluted version of the minimum tax proposal. And, in Trump's more aggressive second term, in which he has chosen to weaponise tariffs and taxes, Pillar Two seems to be under attack. Going on the offensive, the original version of Trump's so-called 'big beautiful' budget Bill included a section—Section 899—that authorised the US government to impose 'revenge taxes' on foreign investments emanating from countries that 'discriminated' against US firms in their tax practices. Support for a minimum corporate tax on global profits in locations were they were actually earned was seen as an instance of such discrimination. In the face of that threat, the non-US members of the G7 caved in and agreed to a side-by-side solution that exempts US multinationals from the global minimum tax provision, which amounts to dumping Pillar Two and with it the OECD agreement. That would also undermine efforts to institute an effective UN convention on international taxation, since leading countries are now likely to opt out of the convention. The link between the decision on the minimum tax and the proposed revenge taxes was clearly revealed when the US Treasury Department asked the US Congress to drop Section 899 because, in Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's words, the US had secured concessions exempting US companies from the OECD's global minimum tax regime. In fact, the Trump administration seems set to destroy all efforts at combating tax avoidance by threatening action against any international taxation measures that target multinational profits. Days after the 'side-by-side solution' was announced by non-US G7 members, Canada declared that it was scrapping a proposed tax on digital services companies that was to come into effect on June 30. The tax involved was a paltry levy of 3 per cent, which was to apply on revenues earned by firms like Meta, Netflix, and Amazon from cross-border provision of services to Canadian clients. But even that small levy was expected to increase Canada's federal government revenues by $5.3 billion over five years. Trump declared the tax a 'direct and blatant' attack on US firms, and suspended negotiations on a deal on reciprocal and special tariffs. Fearing that the tax would upend discussions on that deal, Canadian Prime Minister Mike Carney said that his government had decided to scrap the levy in order to facilitate resumption of trade talks. Global repercussions This too is likely to be a precedent with global repercussions. Many countries, especially in the EU like France have digital services taxes in place. Germany has been considering imposing a 10 per cent tax on global digital platforms like Meta and Google. And the European Commission has been talking of imposing a tax on the advertising revenues of tech firms. All of these are now under threat, as revoking them may be made a precondition for any deal on tariffs, even though there are signs that a baseline 10 per cent reciprocal tariff on imports into the US will remain and only special tariffs above these are up for negotiation. Also Read | Trade is very central to Trump's world view: Navtej Sarna One of Trump's slogans is that he wants to 'Make America Great Again' by bringing back manufacturing that had moved abroad, not least by relying on import tariffs. That could affect the profits of US firms if they are forced to withdraw from low-cost production locations abroad. Simultaneously, he seems intent on fighting discrimination against US multinationals to protect the profits of US firms. The possibility that the two objectives might be in contradiction seems lost on the President. C.P. Chandrasekhar taught for more than three decades at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He is currently Senior Research Fellow at the Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst, US.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
TikTok new app coming for U.S users, claim reports. Check launch date, how to download
TikTok is reportedly developing a new version of its app or users in the US as the deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets nears. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Americans are reportedly set to get a new version of TikTok as the China-based ByteDance video sharing platform is building a new version of its app for users in the United States, Reuters reported quoting The Information report. This comes ahead of a planned sale of the app to a group of investors. US President Donald Trump has said that he will start talking to China on Monday or Tuesday about a possible TikTok deal. He said the United States "pretty much" has a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video has developed a plan to launch the new app to U.S. app stores on September 5, the report said. Last month, Trump extended to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets of report added that TikTok users will eventually have to download the new app to be able to continue using the service, although the existing app will work until March of next year, though the timeline could change.A deal had been in the works earlier this year to spin off TikTok's U.S. operations into a new U.S.-based firm, majority-owned and operated by U.S. investors. That was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese said the United States will probably have to get a deal approved by did not say who the potential buyer was. The president said earlier in the week that he had found a buyer for the U.S. branch of TikTok, the popular Chinese-owned video app that faces a ban adopted by Congress over national security concerns. A 2024 law required that the app effectively be banned in the United States unless its parent company, ByteDance, sold it to a non-Chinese company. Congress was concerned that sensitive user data could end up in the hands of the Chinese was not clear if the deal would comply with some of the requirements Congress adopted for a sale of TikTok, particularly if ByteDance chose not to share the app's algorithm with the U.S. buyers. Private equity firms have been hesitant to invest in a deal without some form of indemnification.A1. Parent company of TikTok is Byte Dance.A2. Donald Trump did not say who the potential buyer was.
