'Investment in saving lives': Contract for alcohol and drugs crisis outreach service approved by Renfrewshire councillors
Elected members authorised senior officers to award deal to nationwide charitable organisation Change, Grow, Live.
A contract for an alcohol and drugs crisis outreach service has been approved by Renfrewshire councillors in a move dubbed an "investment in saving lives".
Elected members authorised senior officers to award a deal for the initiative to nationwide charitable organisation Change, Grow, Live.
The step was agreed at the council's finance, resources and customer services policy board and the agreement will be for two years with an option to extend for a further year, depending on funding.
The contract – which is worth almost £300,000 per annum – is anticipated to start on Friday, August 1, however, the date will be confirmed in the local authority's letter of acceptance.
Councillor Graeme Clark, a Labour representative for Paisley Northeast and Ralston, said at the meeting: "Given that drug and alcohol deaths in Renfrewshire continue to be above the Scottish average and given the increasing complexity of those presenting to our services, I believe that Change, Grow, Live can provide a range of services to support individuals, families and communities that's needed.
"The charity has considerable experience in working with challenging service users with complex needs including those with entrenched drug habits, offending behaviour, homelessness, antisocial behaviour, domestic violence and social deprivation."
He added he has "no doubt" this funding will be an "investment in saving lives".
A report, which will be considered at the meeting, explained why the matter had been brought forward to the board for consideration.
It said: "The purpose of this report is to seek the approval of the finance, resources and customer services policy board to enter into a contract for Renfrewshire Alcohol and Drugs Crisis Outreach Service with Change, Grow, Live.
"The provider will engage with individuals at higher risk of overdose and those who have experienced a near fatal overdose, to provide care and support, and to increase access to life-saving protective treatment.
"At present, the service is delivered by the Renfrewshire Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP) in-house harm reduction response team."
Thomas Paterson, service manager for contracts and commissioning at the HSCP, said: "I agree that they come with an awful lot of experience, a significant provider of alcohol and drug services across the UK, and we're certainly excited about the skills and experience they can bring into Renfrewshire. They will be completely embedded within the alcohol and drug recovery services."
The costs associated with the deal will be met by Renfrewshire Alcohol and Drug Partnership, which is a partnership consisting of the HSCP, council, Police Scotland, Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, Scottish Prison Service and voluntary sector.
The maximum approved value is up to just under £900,000 for the full contract period. The agreement is for two years with the option to extend for a further year on one occasion, but the extension is fully dependent on Scottish Government funding.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
New data reveals Scotland's top care homes In 2025
A brand-new ranking of the top care homes in Scotland has just been revealed, giving families long-overdue clarity on where to find truly exceptional elderly care. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The list, launched by leading Elderly Care Platform Lottie, is part of a wider celebration revealing the top 100 care homes in the UK. It offers a transparent, data-led review of Britain's best-performing care homes, with everything from regulator ratings, to staff and resident wellbeing, and digital innovation taken into account. Fifteen Scottish homes have been celebrated for excellence in care across the UK, with Edinburgh crowned as the capital of elderly care in Scotland, boasting four homes in the top 15. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Leading the way is Lauder Lodge Care Home in Edinburgh, which has been named one of the top five care homes in the UK, praised for its exceptional care standards. The UK's Top 100 Care Homes for 2025 Other notable recognitions include: Queens View Harbour Care Home in Troon, celebrated as a leader in digital presence. The home has been recognised as a leader in technology to connect residents with loved ones and enhance care delivery, redefining modern, community-centred care in 2025. in Troon, celebrated as a leader in digital presence. The home has been recognised as a leader in technology to connect residents with loved ones and enhance care delivery, redefining modern, community-centred care in 2025. Kirk Lane Care Home in Livingston, has been celebrated for offering some of the best wellbeing support for both residents and staff, not only in Scotland but across the UK. in Livingston, has been celebrated for offering some of the best wellbeing support for both residents and staff, not only in Scotland but across the UK. Trinity House Care Home in Edinburgh, ranked among the top UK care homes for its outstanding facilities, home to a luxury salon, private cinema, and jam-packed activity schedule. Will Donnelly, Co-Founder and CEO at Lottie, shares: 'The launch of the Lottie Top 100 Care Index is about recognising the incredible dedication of care professionals who make a real difference in people's lives every day, celebrating the passion and commitment of care teams across the country, who go above and beyond for their residents. "Choosing a care home can be one of the most challenging decisions families face. That's why our top 100 list is based on data-led insights, reviewing key criteria that matter most, such as regulator ratings, facilities, and staff feedback to give families trustworthy insight into homes that deliver exceptional care in their area. Lauder Lodge Care Home in Edinburgh name one of the UK's top 5 care homes in 2025. "With care costs across Scotland averaging £1,439 a week, families are actively seeking trusted and transparent information. Every day, we hear from people who feel completely overwhelmed by the care seeking journey. Our care homes index is here to change that, cutting through confusion with real data, expert insight and a clear benchmark of the best homes in the country.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scotland's Top-Rated Care Homes in 2025 According to Lottie: Lottie's rankings are based on ten key performance areas, including regulatory ratings, staff satisfaction, resident feedback, digital innovation, and facilities. Homes were then recognised across four categories: Quality of Care, Operational Excellence, Digital Impact, and Workplace Culture, creating a transparent and trusted benchmark for assessing care quality across the UK. 15 of the UK's Top 100 Care Homes are based in Scotland: The Cowdray Club Care Home, Aberdeen, Renaissance Care Outstanding area of care: Caring Redwood Care Home, Alness, Meallmore Outstanding area of care: Caring South Grange Care Home, Dundee, Barchester Healthcare Outstanding area of care: Caring Lauder Lodge Care Home, Edinburgh, Care UK Outstanding area of care: Caring Manor Grange Care Home, Edinburgh, Independent Care Home Outstanding area of care: Caring Murrayside Care Home, Edinburgh, Care UK Outstanding area of care: Culture Trinity House Care Home, Edinburgh, Independent Care Home Outstanding area of care: Operational Airthrey Care Home, Falkirk, Meallmore Outstanding area of care: Caring Milngavie Manor Care Home, Glasgow, Hamberley Care Homes Outstanding area of care: Caring Highview House Care Home, Inverness, Barchester Healthcare Outstanding area of care: Caring Howard House Care Home, Kilmarnock, Sanctuary Care Outstanding area of care: Operational Burnlea House Care Home, Largs, Pepperwood Care Outstanding area of care: Caring Kirk Lane Care Home, Livingston, Randolph Hill Nursing Homes Outstanding area of care: Operational Pine Villa Care Home, Loanhead, Mansfield Care Group Outstanding area of care: Caring Queens View Harbour Care Home, Troon, Independent Care Home Outstanding area of care: Digital
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
‘You have to fight tooth and nail': PIP claimants tell of struggle to get awarded as Labour accused of making it harder
Sarah has just found out that she will likely be able to keep her Personal Independence Payment (PIP) after months of worry. The 40-year-old mother-of-one works from home, which allows her to juggle life with being a new parent and her disabilities. Chronic fatigue syndrome in her joints means she regularly experiences brain fog and exhaustion, and needs help. And it's her PIP that makes this possible, helping her to afford a carer, stay in work and spend time with her baby. Claimed by 3.7 million people, the health-linked benefit at the heart of Labour's proposed welfare reforms is designed to help with extra costs incurred by living with an illness or disability. The government's concessions on plans to cut welfare spending now mean that Sarah won't be subject to stricter eligibility criteria when next assessed for the benefit. Instead, from November 2026, only new claimants look set to be subject to the tighter criteria, under Labour's bill going through Parliament. But Sarah says she is struggling to see this as a victory. 'If there's another Sarah who's born a few years later, and ended up in this situation, it's still just as appalling,' she says. 'It's encouraging some disabled people to throw other disabled people under the bus. And it's vicious, because it relies on some people being scared enough to say 'well, we'll take what we can get'.' And like so many others, Sarah did not find applying for PIP an easy process to begin with. 'It feels really deliberate' 'It feels like you're being tripped up constantly,' Sarah says. 'It feels really deliberate, how difficult it is. It feels extremely deliberate. Because there are so many ways it can be made more accessible to disabled people.' Halfway through her assessment for PIP, Sarah's infant daughter started to cry in the other room. This caused her to panic, and she shouted to her husband that the baby might need changing. Because of this 'the assessor said I was clearly able to respond to my daughter's needs and assess what she needed,' Sarah says. 'But I said to him I can't care for my daughter on my own, I rely on other people doing that for me. I need somebody with me while I'm with her.' None of this was included in his report, she claims. And it's not just Sarah. Ginny's husband Tim was diagnosed with myotonic muscular dystrophy in 2006, a progressive genetic condition that affects muscles and movement. The mother-of-two works part-time while also caring for her husband full-time. His PIP award means means Ginny is entitled to a £200 Carers Allowance, which she says is essential to support her family. 'Tim doesn't like to admit it, but people frequently can't understand what he says. Every day I'm asking him to repeat himself as his wife, and I know him well,' Ginny explains. 'He was asked to repeat himself at least five times during the assessment. But when it came to the report, it said the assessor had no problem understanding him.' Ginny says the assessor also wrote down that Tim was managing to work part-time for 25 hours as a library assistant. He was actually working just 25 hours a month, just over six hours a week, Ginny says. 'Do you have a dog?' At a PIP assessment, the assessor will decide if an applicant has limited ability to carry out daily living activities. They do this by asking applicants to carry out a range of activities, awarding them points based on how limited their ability is. According to one former assessor, opening questions might include: 'How are you doing today? How did you get here? Do you have a dog?' An applicant could be forgiven for thinking these questions are just small talk, their PIP assessor being friendly and trying to ease them into the process. But in most cases, the assessment has already begun, the former worker says. How they answer these questions could be the difference between a lifeline to pay for their health-related costs or nothing. The former assessor, who wished to remain anonymous, said this approach is standard for PIP assessors. It is permitted under the DWP 's PIP assessment guide, which recommends assessors carry out 'informal observations' that may 'show discrepancies'. 'As soon as you say to them, 'I'm here to do the assessment, is that OK?' and they say yes, it's started,' she explains. 'And then you'll comment, you'll look around the room for photographs of them on holiday, of children. You're looking for evidence that they're not telling the truth.' According to polling by disability charity Sense, over half (51 per cent) of disabled people with complex needs report feeling humiliated during benefits assessment. A further 45 per cent said the process made their symptoms worse. The charity's policy adviser, Evan John, said: 'I think sometimes when you hear some of the discussion around PIP, somebody might think that it was an easy benefit to claim, but that experience is really divorced from the experiences of disabled people.' 'We'd like to see a system that treats disabled people with dignity, that assess people fairly, but doesn't make them feel like criminals for trying to access the support they need.' 'You have to fight tooth and nail' Neither Sarah nor Tim were awarded any points at their PIP assessment. Instead, they asked for a mandatory consideration, but were turned down and faced a lengthy wait for an appeal at a tribunal. 'We went to mandatory consideration fully aware that they would just turn that down because that seems to be the standard with them,' Ginny says. 'But that was just a step to go to appeal.' Sarah was only given the lowest rate of PIP after tribunal, while Tim was awarded his in light of more medical evidence. Around 56 per cent of PIP assessments resulted in a reward between 2019 and 2024. But around two-thirds of decisions are overturned at the tribunal stage, independent of the DWP, by a panel of decision-makers including a judge. 'You have to fight tooth and nail,' Ginny says. 'All the government's talk about 'people just are getting this too easily' or 'supporting people who have the most severe conditions'. 'In my book, my husband has a severe condition and it just feels like they're redefining disability to suit themselves.' It remains to be seen whether the government's concessions over its welfare plans will be enough to appease wavering backbenchers with MPs set to vote on the measures on Tuesday. A DWP spokesperson said: 'The fact is that PIP assessment suppliers and healthcare professionals are involved in the process but are only one part of the evidence used – they have no role in the decision-making process, and are clearly instructed not to base their opinions solely on the situation seen at assessment. 'We're creating a sustainable welfare system that genuinely supports sick and disabled people while always protecting those who need it most, and at the heart of this is our review of the PIP assessment to ensure it is fit for the future. 'We will work with disabled people and a range of experts on this as we deliver our Plan for Change.'
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
Call to reconsider charges for alert devices used in Shropshire
Plans to charge fees to some of the 2,000 people in Shropshire who depend on devices like personal alarms will be Council decided earlier this month to bill users about £3.50 a week for the telecare service, generating £250,000 each year. The fees will start in the decision has been "called in" for review by Green and Progressive Independent councillors, supported by a meeting on Wednesday cannot overturn the decision, councillors said they wanted to examine the "full impact" of charging. Green leader Julian Dean said his group wanted to test the robustness of the decision. The authority, led by Liberal Democrats since May's election, has said 80% of its budget is spent on social cuts are already in the pipeline to fund a multi-million pound budget said the council should examine how effective the service was in reducing injuries and falls. When the new policy was proposed, a council report said the introduction of the charges would "help to secure future service provision and enable ongoing investment in new technologies".It also noted Shropshire was "one of very few councils" not already charging for the authority argues fees would improve the service's sustainability, and therefore help keep vulnerable residents in their body examining the decision on Wednesday, the People Overview Scrutiny Committee, has a majority of members from the ruling Liberal Democrat the Greens and Labour said agreeing to a fuller review might improve the policy and reduce any negative impact. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
