logo
A nation's silent victims: Rise in animal abuse cases sparks petition for urgent reform in Singapore

A nation's silent victims: Rise in animal abuse cases sparks petition for urgent reform in Singapore

SINGAPORE: A petition on Change.org is picking up momentum as animal welfare advocates across Singapore raise the alarm: community cats are being harmed, and too little is being done. The plea — now backed by a groundswell of public support — doesn't just call for justice. It demands it. At its heart lies an urgent cry to protect the voiceless, the belief behind which is that behind every case of cruelty or neglect is a pattern that's no longer isolated.
The petition reads: 'If stronger enforcement is not implemented, the abuse will not only continue; it may escalate. A lack of accountability sends the message that harming animals is tolerated.' It warns that each delay risks more suffering and urges the government to act now.
This comes as the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) reports a 12-year high in animal cruelty and welfare cases. In 2024 alone, 961 incidents were confirmed — a stark reminder that silent suffering is unfolding right under our noses. Many of the victims were community pets known to residents, fed daily, and sometimes even named. Some were thrown from HDB blocks. Others were found poisoned, mutilated, or gone without a trace. For those who cared for them, their death was heartbreak — each one a quiet tragedy.
Abandonment was the most common form of cruelty, followed by physical abuse. SPCA defines cruelty as the intentional infliction of pain, suffering, or death, while neglect stems from a failure to meet basic needs.
'Protecting the vulnerable should never be optional. It must be urgent,' the petition reiterates. Many of those who signed it are community cat caregivers who, without state support, pay out of pocket for vet care and rescue operations. For them, the emotional toll is growing, matched only by their frustration.
Adding to the crisis is a dark and growing trade that too often escapes public attention — Singapore's role in the illegal wildlife pipeline. In 2024, authorities uncovered 42 smuggling cases, the highest in recent memory. Living, breathing creatures are being packed into suitcases with no air, kittens are being drugged and stuffed into modified car boots, and birds are being bartered like collectables over Telegram chats. These animals weren't being rescued. They were being sold with their worth reduced to novelty or profit.
NParks and the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority have ramped up enforcement with mobile X-rays and DNA testing, but questions remain: If we can mobilise advanced forensics for smuggled wildlife, why are community animals still left exposed?
Pet businesses are also under scrutiny. In 2024, SPCA looked into 56 cases involving pet groomers and trainers — people who keep pets trusting them with their animals. Among the most horrid was a case where a corgi, left unattended on a grooming table, fell and tragically died after being choked by its leash. What was meant to be a routine grooming session instead ended in horror. Incidents like this reveal deep cracks in professional accountability, with some errant businesses simply rebranding and reopening, leaving grieving pet owners with no answers — and no justice.
The youth demographic is another concern. Fifteen cases of cruelty were committed by minors in 2024, more than double the previous year. SPCA warns that, without intervention, a generation could grow up desensitised to violence. See also Ex-WP MP and PSP member call for universal minimum wage
Singapore has tools — from wildlife DNA labs to enforcement units — and laws that provide up to 18 months in jail and a $15,000 fine for first-time animal cruelty. What's missing, activists say, is the will to use them consistently.
The petition's message is clear: this is not just about cats. It's about the kind of society Singapore wants to be. Community cats are voiceless — but those who care for them are speaking out. Whether the authorities will listen remains to be seen.
Until then, every act of cruelty is more than an isolated incident. It's a national test of our empathy and a call to conscience.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SMRT reports unauthorised post on its X account, says investigation under way
SMRT reports unauthorised post on its X account, says investigation under way

Straits Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

SMRT reports unauthorised post on its X account, says investigation under way

Find out what's new on ST website and app. At 11.08pm on July 27, a photo of a woman in traditional attire was posted on SMRT's official X account, accompanied by the caption 'R'. SINGAPORE – SMRT has reported an unauthorised post to X that appeared on the train operator's official social media account late on July 27. At 1 1.08pm on July 27, a photo of a South Asian woman in traditional attire was posted on the account, accompanied by the caption 'R'. Checks by The Straits Times showed that the post remained online for about 10 minutes before it was removed. During that brief window, it garnered over 2,000 views and was reposted more than 20 times , a figure that is higher than the account's usual engagement rate. SMRT's official X account SMRT Corporation has over 471,000 followers. The page typically posts announcements and update s on disruptions to train services . In response to queries from ST, SMRT on July 28 sa id it was looking into the matter. 'We are aware of an unauthorised post that appeared on our official X account late Sunday night. We have reported the incident to X and are currently investigating this matter,' said Ms Margaret Teo , its group chief communications officer. The post sparked confusion online, with users of online platforms Reddit and HardwareZone sharing screenshots and speculating that SMRT's X account might have been hacked, or that a page administrator had accidentally posted a personal photo. Others questioned if the account had been spoofed. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests Singapore MRT platform screen doors at 15 underground stations to undergo renewal Singapore 'Medium risk' of severe haze as higher agricultural prices drive deforestation: S'pore researchers Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose Singapore Police statements by doctor in fake vaccine case involving Iris Koh allowed in court: Judge Singapore Authorities say access to Changi intertidal areas unaffected by reclamation, in response to petition Singapore No change to SIA flights between S'pore and Cambodia, S'pore and Thailand, amid border dispute Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng ST has sent further queries to SMRT.

Jail for preschool teacher who deliberately tripped toddler four times
Jail for preschool teacher who deliberately tripped toddler four times

CNA

time7 minutes ago

  • CNA

Jail for preschool teacher who deliberately tripped toddler four times

SINGAPORE: A former preschool teacher who repeatedly tripped a toddler at a childcare centre was sentenced to nine months and two weeks' jail on Monday (Jul 28). Saiidah Kamarudin, 34, earlier pleaded guilty to one of two counts of ill-treating the girl, who suffered bruises to her face and bled from her nose. The other charge was taken into consideration for her sentencing. The victim and the childcare centre cannot be named to protect the girl's identity. Saiidah began working for the childcare centre in end-September 2023, but she submitted her resignation the following month. Her employment lasted until mid-November. On the day of the incident in November, Saiidah had taken the 20-month-old girl to the toilet slightly after noon to clean her up. As the girl stood before her, Saiidah, who was seated, swept her leg outwards to catch the toddler's foot, causing the girl to stumble. After this, Saiidah swept her leg inwards, causing the toddler to fall backwards onto the floor. The teacher then lifted the girl to her feet and cleaned her face with a tissue. As the two were headed out of the toilet area, Saiidah repeated the sweeping motion twice. The latter incident caught the toddler on both legs and caused her to fall on her face. Saiidah's actions were captured by a closed-circuit television camera (CCTV). The footage was played in court. SENTENCING ARGUMENTS The prosecution urged the court to sentence Saiidah to a jail term of between 15 and 16 months. Deputy Public Prosecutor Cheah Wenjie said the case represented a "disturbing breach of trust by a childcare professional who deliberately and repeatedly tripped a 20-month-old toddler in her care". "Such calculated violence against a defenceless toddler who was entrusted to the care of the accused strikes at the heart of public confidence in Singapore's early childhood sector," said Mr Cheah. The prosecution pointed out that the victim had bled from her nose and suffered bruises and swelling on her face. He also described the offence as "deliberate and calculated" in nature. "The accused had committed the offences in the private toilet area of the school premises, which was separated by a wall from the rest of the school, making detection particularly difficult. The victim, being unable to speak, could not inform anyone of the offences," Mr Cheah told the court. Saiidah's lawyer, Deepak Natverlal from Crown Juris Law, argued that a jail term was not warranted. He sought the maximum fine of S$8,000 (US$6,250), and for the court to order that she execute a bond of good behaviour for a period. Alternatively, Mr Natverlal argued for a jail term of no more than three months, and a fine of S$5,000. He said that Saiidah, a mother of two, started working at the childcare centre with a view to enrolling her children there. However, she found the curriculum unsuitable and tendered her resignation. Mr Natverlal laid out the circumstances behind Saiidah's resignation, saying these "showed that the accused felt that there were matters in the school that were not child-centric". He said Saiidah had attempted to highlight these matters to the management to ensure that the children's interests and welfare were not compromised. Instead, she felt "quietly aggrieved" when her words went unheeded. "The accused felt unwelcome at this place. The present staff had their own cliques. The accused felt like an outcast from the beginning ... she felt the staff did not take her seriously and made her feel that she was not good enough to do the lesson plans for the children, which, on the contrary, she was capable of doing as she had worked ... before as a pre-school teacher," said Mr Natverlal. The lawyer also cited a defective water heater, poor quality meals for the children, poor hygiene practices and extensive TV exposure as a few other problems she experienced while working at the childcare centre. His client also felt that there was a lack of welfare for teachers like her, who had two young children. Despite these challenges, Saiidah still "endeavoured to do her best" as a teacher, the defence lawyer said. "As a mother of two very young children, the accused feels aggrieved that her actions had led to the child being injured in the manner that she suffered. "The accused acknowledges that she could have behaved better and that it was a solitary incident wherein she had lost her sense of judgment," Mr Natverlal said, adding that Saiidah was remorseful.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store