
Kenyan police clash with demonstrators as major roads blocked
Associated Press journalists witnessed an injured person being carried by protesters who were chanting against police.
Kenyans had planned demonstrations on July 7 to protest against police brutality, poor governance, and to demand President William Ruto's resignation over alleged corruption and the high cost of living.
Kenyan riot police barricaded roads leading to Parliament buildings (Brian Inganga/AP)
July 7 , known as Saba Saba, is a significant date in Kenya's recent history, marking the first major protests 35 years ago that called for a transition from a one-party state to a multi-party democracy, which was realised in the 1992 elections. Saba Saba is Swahili for Seven Seven, representing July 7.
Police officers were stopping private and public vehicles from accessing the city centre. They were also blocking most pedestrians from entering the capital, only allowing through those deemed to have essential duties.
'There is no reversing the Gen Z Saba Saba-like spirit,' said Macharia Munene, professor of history and international relations at United States International University Africa in Nairobi.
'Attempt to criminalise protests is reactive and will not work. It instead makes the government appear retrogressive and desperate enough to subvert the constitution.'
Public service minister Geoffrey Ruku had urged all government employees to report to work on Monday, insisting that the demonstrations would not disrupt public services.
Interior minister Kipchumba Murkomen said on Sunday that the government would not tolerate violent protests and that police would be deployed to ensure public safety.
The roads leading to the country's parliament and the president's office were barricaded using razor wire.
On the outskirts of the city in Kitengela town, police fired tear gas on Monday to disperse protesters who had lit bonfires on the road that connects to neighbouring Tanzania.
'They have blocked the roads, blocking us from our work. I am a roadside vendor and I am supposed to get to town and buy merchandise to sell along the road,' said protester Caleb Okoth. 'What do they want us to eat? People are being beaten like dogs for protesting for their rights.'
The country has recently experienced a wave of violent demonstrations, initially sparked by calls for police accountability following the death of a blogger in police custody.
During protests on June 17, a civilian was shot at close range by police officers, further angering the public and prompting plans for additional demonstrations.
On June 25, at least 16 people were killed and more than 400 injured during protests against police brutality, which were timed to coincide with the one-year anniversary of anti-tax protests where over 60 people lost their lives.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
33 minutes ago
- Metro
Physical threat from Iran to people in UK 'now comparable with Russia'
People in the UK are now at threat of physical attacks as much from Iran as from Russia, a major report has found. Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee said the danger to Brits from the Middle East country has increased 'significantly' in the past three years. At particular risk are Iranian dissidents and Jewish or Israeli 'interests', with attacks on those targets not considered attacks on the UK, the report says. It explains: 'It rather sees the UK as collateral in its handling of internal matters – i.e. removing perceived enemies of the regime – on UK soil.' The committee cites comments from the Homeland Security Group, part of the Home Office, which said 'the greatest level of threat we currently face from Iran' is the threat of physical attack. That risk is comparable with the one posed by Russia, it added. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. The report quotes the Intelligence Community as saying Russia and China 'have a scale and a capability which Iran cannot match', but Iran has 'a risk appetite which is very 'pokey' indeed'. According to the source, in terms of threat to the UK, Iran 'would be top of the Championship rather than the Premier League, but rising'. The report on Iran is the result of evidence-taking which came to an end in August 2023 – meaning it does not take into account the impact of the attacks by Hamas on Israel on October 7 the same year, or their aftermath. More Trending That includes the bombardment of Gaza by the Israeli army, the escalation of conflicts with Iranian proxies including Hamas and Hezbollah, and the direct strikes on Iran by Israel and the US last month. A release issued alongside the report says: 'The landscape in the Middle East has changed significantly since the Committee concluded its evidence-taking, however the Report's recommendations remain relevant.' The committee also criticises successive governments for their 'fire-fighting' approach to tackling the threat from Iran. Its report says: 'The government must stop its short-termist, reactive approach: 'longer-term' must mean the next five, ten, and twenty years, not 6-12 months.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Labour's welfare reform bill passes Commons despite 47-strong rebellion MORE: Houthi rebels celebrate sinking ship laden with explosive materials in Red Sea MORE: Date revealed when every phone in the UK is going to get an emergency alert


Powys County Times
39 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Wrongly jailed Malkinson hails benefits rule change, but will continue fighting
A man who served 17 years in prison after being wrongly convicted of rape has spoken of his 'intense relief' at changes to benefits rules under an official compensation scheme. Andrew Malkinson, who was the victim of one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history, will still have the right to apply for means-tested benefits despite receiving his first six-figure payout from the Government miscarriage of justice compensation scheme. A change laid in a statutory instrument in Parliament on July 1, and coming into force on July 22, means that those who receive such compensation payments can continue to claim benefits. Mr Malkinson said: 'When I was stuck behind my cell door I would never have believed that my case would lead to so many reforms – but I am determined to tear down the system that failed me for so long and is failing so many others. 'I am intensely relieved that thanks to this change to the law, I will still have access to benefits even though the state is starting to compensate me for my wrongful conviction. 'My compensation fund is supposed to pay for the support I need to help me heal, not just day to day life, and that sort of support is expensive, especially as I will need it for so many years to come. 'And this reform will be in place for those who come after me as well.' Mr Malkinson was left living on benefits and using food banks after his release, having to wait two years to get his first interim compensation payment. The 59-year-old has already successfully campaigned to stop prison lodging costs being deducted from payouts, and has spoken out against a £1 million cap on the compensation payments, and rules under which payments are only awarded to people who can prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Ministry of Justice data showed that 6.5% of people who had applied for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice between April 2016 and March 2024 were awarded payouts. Of 591 people who applied, 39 were granted compensation. Mr Malkinson said: 'I remain determined to challenge the completely unfair cap on compensation for the wrongfully convicted – and the ridiculous requirement that a person in my position be required to prove their innocence a second time to get compensated.' His solicitor Toby Wilton urged the government to lift the £1 million cap that was set in 2008. The issue again came to the fore in a separate case in May, that saw Peter Sullivan freed from jail after serving 38 years for a murder he did not commit. Mr Wilton said while the benefits change 'ends a stark injustice', further reforms are needed. 'Miscarriage of justice victims like Andy Malkinson will no longer lose their benefits or social housing on account of having received compensation under the statutory miscarriage of justice compensation scheme. 'They are free to use their compensation payments to try to rebuild their lives. 'But while Andy and other future applicants will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief, the truth is that this change tinkers around the edges of a miscarriage of justice compensation scheme which is not fit for purpose. 'Currently, compensation can only be paid to the very few applicants who can prove their innocence beyond a reasonable doubt – effectively forcing them to prove a negative. 'On top of this, the scheme arbitrarily disadvantages people like Andy who have suffered the most serious miscarriages of justice by capping compensation at £1 million. 'This cap was set in 2008 and would be worth nearly £2 million today, but while the Government has the power to change this cap or remove it, it has so far refused to do this. 'It must act now.'


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Wrongly jailed Malkinson hails benefits rule change, but will continue fighting
Andrew Malkinson, who was the victim of one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history, will still have the right to apply for means-tested benefits despite receiving his first six-figure payout from the Government miscarriage of justice compensation scheme. A change laid in a statutory instrument in Parliament on July 1, and coming into force on July 22, means that those who receive such compensation payments can continue to claim benefits. Mr Malkinson said: 'When I was stuck behind my cell door I would never have believed that my case would lead to so many reforms – but I am determined to tear down the system that failed me for so long and is failing so many others. 'I am intensely relieved that thanks to this change to the law, I will still have access to benefits even though the state is starting to compensate me for my wrongful conviction. 'My compensation fund is supposed to pay for the support I need to help me heal, not just day to day life, and that sort of support is expensive, especially as I will need it for so many years to come. 'And this reform will be in place for those who come after me as well.' Mr Malkinson was left living on benefits and using food banks after his release, having to wait two years to get his first interim compensation payment. The 59-year-old has already successfully campaigned to stop prison lodging costs being deducted from payouts, and has spoken out against a £1 million cap on the compensation payments, and rules under which payments are only awarded to people who can prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Ministry of Justice data showed that 6.5% of people who had applied for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice between April 2016 and March 2024 were awarded payouts. Of 591 people who applied, 39 were granted compensation. Mr Malkinson said: 'I remain determined to challenge the completely unfair cap on compensation for the wrongfully convicted – and the ridiculous requirement that a person in my position be required to prove their innocence a second time to get compensated.' His solicitor Toby Wilton urged the government to lift the £1 million cap that was set in 2008. The issue again came to the fore in a separate case in May, that saw Peter Sullivan freed from jail after serving 38 years for a murder he did not commit. Mr Wilton said while the benefits change 'ends a stark injustice', further reforms are needed. 'Miscarriage of justice victims like Andy Malkinson will no longer lose their benefits or social housing on account of having received compensation under the statutory miscarriage of justice compensation scheme. 'They are free to use their compensation payments to try to rebuild their lives. 'But while Andy and other future applicants will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief, the truth is that this change tinkers around the edges of a miscarriage of justice compensation scheme which is not fit for purpose. 'Currently, compensation can only be paid to the very few applicants who can prove their innocence beyond a reasonable doubt – effectively forcing them to prove a negative. 'On top of this, the scheme arbitrarily disadvantages people like Andy who have suffered the most serious miscarriages of justice by capping compensation at £1 million. 'This cap was set in 2008 and would be worth nearly £2 million today, but while the Government has the power to change this cap or remove it, it has so far refused to do this. 'It must act now.'