Last Chance For Hunters To Have Their Say On Big Game Bill
'This is a crucial moment for New Zealand,' says GAC CEO Corina Jordan.
'The Bill is a major step forward in recognising the value of New Zealand's big game herds and giving them the legal protection they deserve, particularly in areas like national parks where their future is currently under threat and where some of the best hunter-led management is currently occurring.
The Bill will allow the Minister for Hunting and Fishing to exempt a Herd of Special Interest from section 4(2)(b) of the National Parks Act, which currently calls for the extermination of all introduced species 'as far as possible'.
'This change would enable management of high-value big game herds, like deer, tahr, and chamois. It would mean that instead of elimination, a proactive and practical approach can be taken, where they are managed for conservation, recreation and economic outcomes.
'It's about taking a balanced and sustainable approach,' Jordan says.
'Hunters have a real chance to shape how New Zealand manages valued introduced species.
'This isn't just a technical legal change. It's about the role of big game animals in our national identity, our recreation and the rural economy.
'Hunters care deeply about these herds, and the environment. It's time to show that by making a submission,' Jordan says.
The GAC has published a fact sheet to help hunters understand the Bill and submit before the deadline. Submissions close at 11.59pm on Thursday 24 July.
Visit www.gac.org.nz for more information and a step-by-step guide to making a submission.
Submissions can be lodged via the Parliament website or by emailing en.legislation@parliament.govt.nz
The NZ Game Animal Council is a statutory organisation working to improve the sustainable management of game animals and hunting for recreation, communities, commerce and conservation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Another Offensive Launched In The Government's War On Nature
Last week the Minister for Resource Management Reform, Chris Bishop, announced that the government would be intervening, yet again, to prevent councils from progressing environmental protections under the Resource Management Act (RMA). Legislation will prohibit the notification of any new changes to regional policy statements and regional and district plans. It will also prevent notified plan changes from going ahead if they have not yet had a hearing. These will need to be withdrawn within 90 days. The legislation will be passed before the end of the year. 'This is extremely unwelcome and yet another salvo in this government's war on nature,' said, EDS CEO Gary Taylor. 'It would, effectively, prevent any further implementation of national direction under the Resource Management Act, like the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management and National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity. It will also stop councils from improving any environmental outcomes in plans. 'The justification is that it would be inefficient for councils to make changes to their plans when the RMA is set to be replaced with a new system in a couple of years' time. The rhetoric is all about wasted effort. 'But what's truly inefficient is to spend the better part of a decade creating and implementing national direction and then scrapping it. Or for years of work and investment by councils to prepare plans, and even notify them, to be abruptly frozen because of future legislation that we still know very little about and which a new government might repeal anyway. 'The changes are also being framed as a kindness – to relieve pressure on struggling councils. But most councils and their constituents don't want to be patronised and actually want a better natural environment. Between now and when the new resource management system is stood up in 2027, the environment will continue to decline. 'Astonishingly, all private plan changes will still be allowed. So too will work that delivers on the Government's priorities like housing and urban development. 'Councils will be able to apply to the Minister for an exemption to progress other plan changes. But this will be completely discretionary, and not linked to the purpose of the RMA. And it is likely councils will simply not bother to apply where they know they will be denied. 'To top it off, the law change is being done by an Amendment Paper, which means an 11th hour change to the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Bill. This will completely bypass scrutiny by select committee and public submissions. Local government won't have a say. 'It is not just another central government attack on the environment and localism, but also on the democratic process itself,' concluded Mr Taylor. Environmental Defence Society EDS speaks for the environment. It has influence. Since 1971, EDS has been driving environmental protection in Aotearoa New Zealand through law and policy change. That's why it's one of this country's most influential non- profit organisations when it comes to achieving better environmental outcomes. EDS has expertise in key disciplines including law, planning, landscape and science. It operates as a policy think-tank, a litigation advocate, and a collaborator – bringing together the private and public sectors for constructive engagement. EDS runs conferences and seminars on topical issues, including an annual Environmental Summit and the Climate Change and Business Conference. EDS is a registered charity and donations to it are tax-deductible.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Last Chance For Hunters To Have Their Say On Big Game Bill
The Game Animal Council (GAC) is calling on hunters to speak up for the future of big game hunting in New Zealand, with submissions on the Game Animal Council (Herds of Special Interest) Amendment Bill closing Thursday 24 July. 'This is a crucial moment for New Zealand,' says GAC CEO Corina Jordan. 'The Bill is a major step forward in recognising the value of New Zealand's big game herds and giving them the legal protection they deserve, particularly in areas like national parks where their future is currently under threat and where some of the best hunter-led management is currently occurring. The Bill will allow the Minister for Hunting and Fishing to exempt a Herd of Special Interest from section 4(2)(b) of the National Parks Act, which currently calls for the extermination of all introduced species 'as far as possible'. 'This change would enable management of high-value big game herds, like deer, tahr, and chamois. It would mean that instead of elimination, a proactive and practical approach can be taken, where they are managed for conservation, recreation and economic outcomes. 'It's about taking a balanced and sustainable approach,' Jordan says. 'Hunters have a real chance to shape how New Zealand manages valued introduced species. 'This isn't just a technical legal change. It's about the role of big game animals in our national identity, our recreation and the rural economy. 'Hunters care deeply about these herds, and the environment. It's time to show that by making a submission,' Jordan says. The GAC has published a fact sheet to help hunters understand the Bill and submit before the deadline. Submissions close at 11.59pm on Thursday 24 July. Visit for more information and a step-by-step guide to making a submission. Submissions can be lodged via the Parliament website or by emailing The NZ Game Animal Council is a statutory organisation working to improve the sustainable management of game animals and hunting for recreation, communities, commerce and conservation.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Putting Patient Need Ahead Of Treaty Ideology
Welcoming the first-reading passage of the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Amendment Bill, ACT Health spokesperson Todd Stephenson says: "We fund the health system to deliver services, not ideology. But Labour saddled Health New Zealand with Treaty provisions that effectively divided patients by race and distracted from quality, timely care. "ACT says services should be delivered on the basis of patient need and value-for-money – not race. We scrapped the Māori Health Authority, and now we're patching up the rest of Labour's Treaty-obsessed health reforms. "We're stripping out requirements for health entities to be focused on Māori health outcomes, mātauranga Māori, and 'cultural safety'. These settings have led to compliance nightmares where even Chinese acupuncturists are required to demonstrate expertise in tikanga. "Perhaps most importantly – and incredibly, forgotten by Labour – we're introducing an objective for services to be effective and timely. And we're restoring accountability to taxpayers with a requirement for specific targets in the Government Policy Statement on Health. "Kiwis waiting for a hip operation or stuck in the emergency department don't care whether their practitioner has a tikanga-centric worldview. They just want quality healthcare, quickly. That's what we're delivering."
