Who is Connor Estelle? Man loses job after 'I'm a fascist' remark; raises $20K in donations
A man who openly described himself as a 'fascist' during a political debate is now claiming he was fired from his job for expressing his views — and is asking for donations online to support himself.
Connor Estelle, appeared on an episode of Surrounded, a debate series by Jubilee. He was one of 20 conservatives debating progressive host Mehdi Hasan. The episode, which has now crossed nearly 4 million views, featured Estelle defending autocracy and expressing no concern about being called a Nazi.
He has now launched a fundraiser on the Christian crowdfunding site GiveSendGo, claiming he lost his job due to 'traditional right-wing views' and is a victim of cancel culture. He hasn't revealed where he worked or what role he held.
— TurnTNBlue (@TurnTNBlue)
Who is Connor Estelle?
Estelle goes by the name Pinesap in his fundraising appeal.
In Jubilee's Surrounded debate show, Estelle openly supported autocracy and responded with 'Yeah, I am,' when asked if he would describe himself as a fascist. His laughter and ease while making the admission drew sharp reactions online.
When asked about Nazi persecution, Estelle dismissed concerns by saying he 'frankly doesn't care' about being called a Nazi, and that the Nazis 'persecuted the church a little bit.' When pressed about the Holocaust and Jewish persecution, he admitted it was 'bad' but quickly moved on.
On GiveSendGo, Estelle says he's raising money because 'voicing legal traditional right-wing views' cost him his job. The fundraiser has already crossed $20,000. Some donors used white supremacist codes, including '88', which stands for 'Heil Hitler.'
Estelle spoke about losing his job on the Rift Report podcast, again without naming his former employer. He blamed 'secularism' and 'relativism' for the backlash, claiming such beliefs are no longer accepted in public discourse.
Estelle identifies as a Catholic .
GiveSendGo has previously been criticised for hosting campaigns linked to extremist causes, including those by January 6 rioters.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
MAGA singer's Canada gigs cancelled: Backlash over Sean Feucht's anti-diversity views; organisers cite safety risks
Sean Feuch (Picture: Instagram) US singer Sean Feucht's permit to hold a concert at the York Redoubt National Historic Site in Halifax was cancelled this week by Parks Canada. Officials cited safety concerns following public backlash against his anti-2SLGBTQ+, anti-women's rights, and anti-diversity remarks on social media. Feucht, a religious performer with links to the MAGA movement, was scheduled to perform on Wednesday. His permits for other events in Charlottetown (P.E.I.), Moncton (New Brunswick), and some parts of Quebec were also revoked soon after. LGBTQ+ groups welcomed the decision. Cameron Cassidy, head of Pride P.E.I., said, 'The City of Charlottetown absolutely did the right thing by revoking that permit. It shows respect for the queer community.' But not everyone agreed. James Turk, director at Toronto Metropolitan University's Centre for Free Expression, said cancelling a permit over a person's views is dangerous. 'The foundation of democracy is public discourse, including ideas we disagree with,' he said. 'Censorship only amplifies such voices.' Feucht later performed at a private venue in Shubenacadie, Nova Scotia, hosted by pastors Christine and Neil Barr. They said they faced hundreds of hate messages and some protests but went ahead with the show. In response to criticism, Feucht posted: 'If I had shown up with purple hair and a dress, no one would've cared. But my Christian beliefs are seen as a threat.' Opponents said his views go against Parks Canada's values of inclusion and safety. Turk countered that while physical safety must be ensured, 'a subjective feeling of being unsafe' isn't legal grounds to silence someone.
New Indian Express
8 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Three, including two nuns, held for human trafficking in Chhattisgarh
RAIPUR: Three persons, including two Catholic nuns who had reportedly come from Agra, were arrested by the Government Railway Police (GRP) in Durg on Friday for alleged human trafficking amid suspicion of coerced religious conversion. They were remanded to 14-day judicial custody, a police officer said. The trio were booked under BNS Section 143 (trafficking of persons). All three were caught accompanying three young women aged between 18 and 20 years, hailing from Narayanpur district in south Bastar, after Bajrang Dal activists spotted them at Durg railway station. The group was allegedly preparing to travel to Agra for training and subsequent employment opportunities. Bajrang Dal members staged demonstrations at the Durg GRP police station demanding strict action against those allegedly involved in human trafficking and forced religious conversion. 'The nuns had come to Durg merely a day before without any valid reason. They were about to board a train along with the rescued girls to Agra when we spotted them,' said Ravi Nigam, a Bajrang Dal leader. Members of the Christian community also gathered at the GRP Durg station and were seen defending the nuns. The two nuns — Preeti Marry and Vandana Francis — who had come from Agra, along with Sukhman Mandavi from Narayanpur, were produced before a local court in Durg and remanded to 14-day judicial custody. The rescued girls have been sent to the Sakhi One Stop Centre in Durg. Meanwhile, Congress MP K C Venugopal has written to Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai seeking stringent action against the perpetrators. He also urged the government to uphold constitutional rights and religious freedom in the state. The Congress leader alleged that BJP-ruled states are witnessing a rampant rise in attacks on minorities. 'The latest attacks by Bajrang Dal goons on two Catholic nuns in Durg, Chhattisgarh, point to a tacit support for such hate crimes from the ruling establishment,' Venugopal wrote on X.
Mint
20 hours ago
- Mint
Ex-CEO Jason Christopher Yates pleads guilty to possessing child pornography
In a development sending shockwaves through America's faith-based circles, Jason Christopher Yates, the former CEO of a prominent Christian non-profit, has pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography. Yates, 56, admitted guilt to two felony counts of possessing horrific child abuse imagery in a Minnesota district court on July 22, months after his initial arrest, the USA Today reported. Yates previously headed "My Faith Votes," an influential organisation dedicated to mobilising Christian voters in US elections. His admission of guilt has cast a dark shadow over the group's mission and sparked widespread condemnation. The sinister nature of Yates's activities began to unravel on July 31, 2024, when the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension received a hard drive laden with child abuse images. The individual who handed over the evidence claimed to have received it from a relative of Yates. This relative, by sheer chance, reportedly discovered the hard drive tucked away in a dresser in Yates's office. According to reports, the relative stumbled upon the drive while seeking extra storage for their own computer. What they uncovered instead was a horrifying collection of child pornography. Yates's arrest in October 2024, as per a USA Today report, prompted swift action from "My Faith Votes." The organisation confirmed that Yates had been separated from his role as CEO in early August 2024, even before his arrest became public. Chris Sadler, a board member, immediately stepped in as Acting CEO. "In early August 2024, the My Faith Votes board of directors separated Jason Yates from My Faith Votes and board member Chris Sadler assumed the position of Acting CEO," My Faith Votes stated in a press release to Religion News Service. "Over the last three months, Chris has been working with the dedicated My Faith Votes team to encourage millions of Christians to vote, pray and think biblically about this election in America.' When confronted by agents in September, Yates chillingly confirmed that the images on the hard drive were indeed his and not his relatives. He also made a disturbing disclosure: he had a prior conviction for possessing child sex abuse images, though it had reportedly been expunged from his record. This revelation raises serious questions about the vetting processes within such organisations and the persistent threat posed by such offenders.
