AI's arrival at work reshaping employers' hunt for talent
TOM BARFIELD
Predictions of imminent AI-driven mass unemployment are likely overblown, but employers will seek workers with different skills as the technology matures, a top executive at global recruiter ManpowerGroup said at Paris's Vivatech trade fair.
The world's third-largest staffing firm by revenue ran a startup contest at Vivatech in which one of the contenders was building systems to hire out customisable autonomous AI 'agents', rather than humans.
Their service was reminiscent of a warning last month from Dario Amodei, head of American AI giant Anthropic, that the technology could wipe out half of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years.
For ManpowerGroup, AI agents are "certainly not going to become our core business any time soon," the company's Chief Innovation Officer Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic said.
"If history shows us one thing, it's most of these forecasts are wrong."
An International Labour Organization (ILO) report published in May found that around "one in four workers across the world are in an occupation with some degree of exposure" to generative AI models' capabilities.
"Few jobs are currently at high risk of full automation," the ILO added.
But the UN body also highlighted "rapid expansion of AI capabilities since our previous study" in 2023, including the emergence of 'agentic' models more able to act autonomously or semi-autonomously and use software like web browsers and email.
Soft skills
Chamorro-Premuzic predicted that the introduction of efficiency-enhancing AI tools would put pressure on workers, managers and firms to make the most of the time they will save.
"If what happens is that AI helps knowledge workers save 30, 40, maybe 50 per cent of their time, but that time is then wasted on social media, that's not an increase in net output," he said.
Adoption of AI could give workers "more time to do creative work" -- or impose "greater standardisation of their roles and reduced autonomy," the ILO said.
There's general agreement that interpersonal skills and an entrepreneurial attitude will become more important for knowledge workers as their daily tasks shift towards corralling AIs.
Employers identified ethical judgement, customer service, team management and strategic thinking as top skills AI could not replace in a ManpowerGroup survey of over 40,000 employers across 42 countries published this week.
Nevertheless, training that adopts those new priorities has not increased in step with AI adoption, Chamorro-Premuzic lamented.
"For every dollar you invest in technology, you need to invest eight or nine on HR, culture transformation, change management," he said.
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Chief Innovation Officer
AI hiring AI?
One of the areas where AI is transforming the world of work most rapidly is ManpowerGroup's core business of recruitment.
But here candidates are adopting the tools just as quickly as recruiters and companies, disrupting the old way of doing things from the bottom up.
"Candidates are able to send 500 perfect applications in one day, they are able to send their bots to interview, they are even able to game elements of the assessments," Chamorro-Premuzic said.
That extreme picture was not borne out in a survey of over 1,000 job seekers released this week by recruitment platform TestGorilla, which found just 17 per cent of applicants admitting to cheating on tests, and only some of those to using AI.
Jobseekers' use of consumer AI tools meets recruiters doing the same.
The same TestGorilla survey found almost two-thirds of the more-than-1,000 hiring decision-makers polled used AI to generate job descriptions and screen applications.
Where employers today are focused on candidates' skills over credentials, Chamorro-Premuzic predicted that "the next evolution is to focus on potential, not even skills even if I know the skills you bring to the table today, they might be obsolete in six months." — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
18 hours ago
- Observer
How AI chats are changing everything
Whether it's ChatGPT, digital journalling tools, or voice-activated assistants, conversational AI has quietly become an integral part of our daily routines. What once felt quirky or futuristic is fast becoming as normal as texting a friend or Googling a question. For years, we've been interacting with machines through Siri, Alexa, or voice-guided GPS. But today's language-based AI models have taken things further. They respond contextually, adapt to tone and maintain coherent dialogues. As a result, everyday users are now engaging with AI not only for answers but for brainstorming, problem-solving and even emotional support. People from all walks of life are turning to AI for learning, creativity and convenience. It's a patient tutor, a fast researcher and a nonjudgmental companion rolled into one. For learners hesitant to raise questions in class or at work, AI offers a safe space to ask, explore and repeat — without fear of sounding uninformed. AI tools don't just deliver facts; they adapt explanations to suit different learning levels. This flexibility makes them valuable in both academic and professional settings. Educators are also integrating AI into classrooms — not to replace effort, but to personalise and deepen learning. Used responsibly, these tools can help students test comprehension, organise thoughts and improve writing. In workplaces, AI is streamlining routine tasks across various sectors. By taking over repetitive chores, AI allows humans to focus on strategic, creative and empathetic roles — areas where human judgment still reigns supreme. As job roles evolve, so will the skills required to balance technological fluency with critical thinking. Still, as AI becomes more embedded in our lives, it raises important questions around ethics, data privacy and the nature of human connection. Concerns about misinformation or over-reliance are valid — but with thoughtful design, transparency and awareness, these tools can be used responsibly. AI is not a replacement for real relationships or therapy, but it can extend support in places where resources are scarce or access is limited. Talking to AI may feel novel now, but it mirrors how past innovations — from telephones to emails — were once met with skepticism. Today, they're indispensable. Conversational AI is poised to do the same: reshape how we think, create and connect.
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
US stock futures rise as chips gain on Micron results; GDP data ahead
BENGALURU: US stock index futures rose on Thursday, signalling indexes were nearing their record peaks, as robust earnings from memory-chip maker Micron fuelled optimism around artificial intelligence while investors awaited economic data. The benchmark S&P 500 and tech-led Nasdaq were nearly 1% below their record peaks at Wednesday's close, supported by the de-escalation in Middle East hostilities. Chipmakers tracked a 2.7% premarket rise in Micron Technology shares after the company forecast quarterly revenue above estimates, citing growth in demand for its chips used in AI data centres. Nvidia advanced 1.2% after scaling a fresh all-time high on Wednesday. Following Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's congressional testimony where he reiterated a wait-and-watch approach on interest rate cuts, reports suggested President Donald Trump could potentially announce a Fed Chair successor as early as September or October in a bid to undermine Powell. The move could affect the central bank's independence at a time when policymakers are striving to balance the risk of slowing growth and higher inflation, as Trump's wide-ranging tariffs and geopolitical turmoil threaten to drive up prices in the short-term. For the day, investors are focusing on the Commerce Department's final take on first-quarter GDP due at 10:00 am ET, as well as durable goods data for May and initial jobless claims data at 08:30 am ET. Traders are pricing in about 63 basis points of rate cuts by the end of 2025, with a 70% chance of a 25-bps rate cut in September, according to CME Group's FedWatch tool. At 05:21 am ET, Dow E-minis were up 93 points, or 0.21% and S&P 500 E-minis were up 18.75 points, or 0.31%. Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 99.25 points, or 0.44% Shares of sportswear company Nike edged up 0.8% ahead of its quarterly results due before the opening bell. Some of the central bank officials scheduled to speak later in the day include Fed Chicago President Austan Goolsbee, Fed Richmond President Thomas Barkin, Fed Cleveland President Beth Hammack, Fed Board Governor Michael Barr and Fed Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari. On Friday, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report — the Fed's preferred gauge of inflation — will be scrutinised to ascertain tariff-induced price changes in the US economy.
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
UK investors must do more to attract tech firms to LSE
The flood of British tech firms dropping London in favour of a New York IPO (Initial Public Offering) is only set to increase, a boss in Allianz's investment arm, Jeremy Gleeson, has warned. Gleeson, technology CIO at Allianz Global Investors, has no UK companies in his global tech fund citing their high price and scarcity. 'One of the problems that we have when we identify a great European company is that we find the equivalent in the US is trading at a discount,' said Gleeson. 'There are fewer high quality technology companies here in Europe, so when one does make a breakthrough, one is acknowledged as being world class, if you're a European fund manager, that's the one you have to own.' The London Stock Exchange (LSE) is upping its campaign to attract more floats, warning IPO candidates that a US listing could prove expensive. In a document shared with bankers and IPO hopefuls, the LSE said underwriting fees for LSE listings can be more than double those levied by advisors in the UK. US fees typically range between 6pc and 7pc, while cost in the UK are normally between 3pc and 5pc, the LSE's analysis found. It added that companies face a 'lower litigation risk' if they are listed in London. The LSE said 3.3pc of all US-listed firms were sued in 2023, with 215 new securities class action lawsuits over the year. In comparison, the LSE found there have been just five UK class actions against London-listed firms since 2008. The pressure for UK and European fund managers to own home-grown tech companies when there are so few means that American competitors often end up being cheaper. Gleeson gave FTSE 100 tech firm Sage as an example, noting that while it trades at a similar pace to US equivalent Intuit, the American competitor 'has a lot more strings in its bow in terms of markets it covers.' 'They're not just products for small and medium businesses, they do tax products for consumers, and they've got other irons in the fire as well', he explained, meaning that Intuit end up always being the favoured pick by global investors. It didn't used to be this way. Gleeson participated in Darktrace's IPO in 2021, noting that from when the tech company floated to when it was taken over by an American private equity firm, 'it only had one small dip below its IPO price, which the company never really got credit for'. 'There was almost like this 'we don't want to have a technology company be successful in the UK,' he said. 'Unfortunately, maybe that has to change a little bit in the UK amongst the investment community, actually be more warm towards technology companies, rather than seeing them with a mistrust to begin with.' The fund manager also pointed to Arm (a British semiconductor and software design company) a former FTSE 100 constituent saying it was 'really sad' that when the company re-listed, it chose to go to the US, as it would 'have helped if UK investors could have had a good experience with Arm, then it might have encouraged them to think a little bit more about other UK tech companies. Gleeson said: 'Increasingly, it's going to make it easier for UK companies to think about listing overseas, and in the US in particular.' He added, he was trying to be 'benchmark aware' rather than simply buy the biggest tech firms. 'You can go back to the mid-to-late 2000s, where the predominant players in the technology benchmark were IBM, Nokia, Intel, HP,' he explained, arguing that the benchmark shows what the more successful tech companies have been, rather than what they will be. Andy Jalil The writer is our foreign correspondent based in the UK
