&w=3840&q=100)
US lifts sanctions on Myanmar junta allies after general praises Trump
The United States has lifted sanctions on several allies of Myanmar's ruling general and their military-linked firms, a US Treasury notice shows, after the junta chief sent a glowing letter of praise to President Donald Trump.
Junta chief Min Aung Hlaing seized power in a 2021 coup, deposing the civilian government and sparking a civil war that has killed thousands, leaving 3.5 million displaced and half the nation in poverty.
Two weeks ago, the top general sent a letter to Trump, responding to his threat of tariffs by lauding his presidency with praise, including for shutting down US-funded media outlets covering the conflict.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A US Treasury notice on Thursday said sanctions were dropped against KT Services and Logistics, the Myanmar Chemical and Machinery Company, and Suntac Technologies – as well as their managers.
In a statement, a US Treasury Department spokesperson denied there was an 'ulterior motive' in the move, although the notice did not provide a reason for the removals.
'Anyone suggesting these sanctions were lifted for an ulterior motive is uninformed and peddling a conspiracy theory driven by hatred for President Trump,' said the spokesperson, on condition of anonymity.
They added that individuals were 'regularly added and removed' from the sanctions list 'in the ordinary course of business.'
KT Services and Logistics and its CEO Jonathan Myo Kyaw Thaung were described as junta 'cronies' when they were sanctioned in 2022 for leasing Yangon's port from a military firm for $3 million a year.
The Myanmar Chemical and Machinery Company and its owner, Aung Hlaing Oo, and Suntac Technologies owner Sit Taing Aung were sanctioned later that year for producing arms, including tanks and mortars.
A third Myanmar national, Tin Latt Min – who the US previously described as owning 'various companies that are closely related to the regime' – was also removed from the sanctions list.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump sent a letter to junta chief Min Aung Hlaing earlier this month, one among a raft of missives despatched to foreign leaders during his global tariff blitz.
The letter – believed to be Washington's first public recognition of the junta's rule since the coup – threatened Myanmar with a 40 percent levy unless a trade deal was struck.
Min Aung Hlaing responded with a multi-page letter expressing his 'sincere appreciation' for Trump's message and praising his 'strong leadership'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
a minute ago
- Scroll.in
PM Modi unable to reject Trump's claims as US president will ‘lay bare the truth': Rahul Gandhi
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi cannot outrightly state that United States President Donald Trump has been lying about brokering a ceasefire deal between India and Pakistan, as that would prompt the American leader to 'lay bare the truth', reported ANI. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament, the leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha said: 'The prime minister has not said that Trump is lying. It is obvious what has happened. Everyone knows, he is not able to say it. That is the reality.' Trump has repeatedly claimed that he helped India and Pakistan settle the border tensions in May. The US president has also claimed that he pressured both countries into accepting the ceasefire by threatening to stop trade with them. New Delhi has rejected Trump's assertions. Gandhi said on Wednesday that Trump was repeating his claims to pressure New Delhi on a trade deal that is in the works. 'Just watch how the trade deal turns out,' he added. On Tuesday, speaking during a debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor, Gandhi asked the prime minister to ' show courage ' and clarify if Trump was lying about mediating the ceasefire deal. 'Donald Trump has said 29 times that he brought about the ceasefire,' Gandhi said. 'If he is lying… let the prime minister say he is lying. If he has the courage of Indira Gandhi, let him say here that Donald Trump is a liar.' Modi told the Lok Sabha later that no country told India to halt its military operation against terror bases in Pakistan. A day earlier, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar told Parliament that there was no call between Modi and Trump during the Indian military strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. #WATCH | Delhi: On US President Donald Trump's statement on ceasefire and tariffs, Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "It is obvious, Prime Minister has not said that Trump is lying. Everyone knows that he is not able to speak. That is the reality. If PM Modi… — ANI (@ANI) July 30, 2025 The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed. India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following the four-day conflict. On Tuesday, Trump said that the trade deal with India had not been finalised and New Delhi could be hit with a tariff rate of 20% to 25%. Trump added that the final rate of levy had also not been finalised as India and the US were negotiating the agreement ahead of the August 1 deadline. The US president made the comments while responding to reporters' questions about the so-called reciprocal tariffs Washington plans to reimpose on dozens of countries that have not negotiated separate trade agreements with the US by August 1. Trump announced higher levies in April, before pausing those tariffs at a reduced 10% rate to allow time for negotiations. Despite an extended deadline, he has only secured a handful of deals.
Mint
a minute ago
- Mint
Indian stocks settle with marginal gains; uncertainty looms over US trade deadline
New Delhi [India], July 30 (ANI): Domestic equity benchmarks settled marginally higher Wednesday, possibly due to some fresh buying, but analysts are of the view that uncertainty around the India-US trade front will continue to remain key headwinds. Sensex closed at 81,481.86 points, up 143.91 points or 0.18 per cent, while Nifty closed at 24,855.05 points, up 33.95 points or 0.14 per cent. Both indices started the session largely flat. "The major drag on the market continues to be the negative news on the India-US trade front. President Trump's comment that 'India may have to pay 20-25% tariff' is very negative from the short-term market perspective," VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments Limited, said. Also, the US Fed monetary policy decision today is unlikely to impact the market, Vijayakumar added. "Weakness in the market due to these headwinds can be used by long-term investors to slowly accumulate fairly valued high-quality stocks," he added. Among sectors, selective buying was seen in capital goods stocks, whereas the Realty and Media indices continued to experience profit booking at higher levels, Shrikant Chouhan, Head Equity Research, Kotak Securities, said. The benchmark indices faced substantial selling pressure at higher levels over the past few sessions, with analysts indicating that the India-US new interim deal is unlikely to be finalised before the August 1 deadline. On Sunday, the US administration indicated that the August 1 deadline wouldn't be extended further. At a broader level, however, India's strong domestic fundamentals, a responsive RBI, and good monsoon conditions have been supporting the financial markets. A comfortable inflation number in India is another positive. In 2025 so far, Sensex rose around 4 per cent. In 2024, Sensex and Nifty accumulated a growth of about 9-10 per cent each. In 2023, Sensex and Nifty gained 16-17 per cent, on a cumulative basis. In 2022, they gained a mere 3 per cent each. (ANI)
Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
The US will be the biggest loser from trade ‘wins'
The White House is celebrating new trade deals with the EU and Japan, imposing 15% tariffs on most exports to the US. Despite market gains, the agreements are criticized as detrimental to all parties involved. American consumers will likely bear the brunt of increased costs, while reduced competition could stifle innovation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The White House is trumpeting its new trade deal with the European Union , following a similar agreement with Japan, as a great victory. Both pacts impose tariffs of 15% on most exports to the US, along with other concessions — on the face of it, lifting the threat of open-ended trade war and reaffirming US dominance. Financial markets advanced on the truth, there's nothing to celebrate. Both deals are lose-lose for all involved. The best that can be hoped for is that the administration now moves on to other priorities before more damage is narrow economic terms, the claim that the US has emerged the winner from both sets of negotiations is simply false. Tariffs are taxes. Before long, American consumers will pay most if not all of the increase in costs. And the problem isn't just that imports will be more expensive. US producers of rival products will face less pressure to compete and innovate, and they will raise their prices as well. In due course, these forces will depress US living standards . Always remember, the biggest loser from tariffs is invariably the country imposing costs might be manageable over the long term, as long as the agreements draw a line under recent quarrels over trade. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who struck the deal with the US over the weekend, emphasized this point in justifying the bloc's surrender to American demands — lauding the agreement for restoring stability and predictability for consumers and producers only. For a start, both pacts, like the one struck earlier with the UK, are better seen as framework agreements than finished deals. For example, what does Japan's commitment to finance a US investment fund managed by the White House actually entail? Hard to say. (It's been portrayed as a $550 billion 'signing bonus.' Japanese officials probably don't see it that way.)Under the US-EU deal, some European goods will be given tariff-free access to the US. Which ones? Nobody knows. In both cases, many important details are yet to be finalized. Meanwhile, citizens in Japan and Europe have seen their governments humbled, which makes mounting political opposition and uncertainty all too or when these particular deals are concluded, there'll be new ones to strike — and the contested issues aren't confined to trade policy. If in the future the White House aims to settle all such disputes by reviving the threat of punitive tariffs or tacitly threatening to withhold cooperation on security, von der Leyen's vision of stability and predictability will be confirmed as a dangerously, the administration's supposed triumphs may now affirm its belief that the US is powerful enough to demand submission, as opposed to genuine partnership, from countries it once saw as friends. If so, heightened instability — lethal to long-term planning, investment and global cooperation across the board — won't be just a passing through disruption is a self-defeating strategy. Sooner or later, that will become painfully obvious.
