logo
Court sets aside R1bn ICT contract that SANParks had awarded to Gijima

Court sets aside R1bn ICT contract that SANParks had awarded to Gijima

The Herald23-04-2025
The Pretoria high court has reviewed and set aside a decision by SA National Parks (SANParks) to award a tender worth close to R1bn to Gijima Holdings for the provision of information and communication technology services for 10 years.
The court ordered that Datacentrix continue to deliver the services to SANParks for 12 months from the date of judgment on the same terms and conditions as set out in the previous agreement concluded in February 2019. The court said it was just and equitable to remit the matter to SANParks for reconsideration of the tender.
Datacentrix was the incumbent after bits successful bid in the previous tender GNP-008-18, in February 2019. That tender was to last until April 2024.
Datacentrix brought the review application before the court in April last year after SANParks had awarded the 10-year tender to Gijima. The tender was for the outsourcing of SANParks ICT services, including its network services, telephony services, internet, cloud and cyber security services and the underlying infrastructure that is integral to SANParks business operations within the 22 national parks under its management and control.
The tender was advertised in September 2023 and was awarded to Gijima in February 2024.
Judge Mandlekosi Motha, in a judgment passed on April 11, described the case as a titanic battle for the SANParks tender, worth just about R1bn.
'Blissfully unaware of this existential threat are the lions, leopards, elephants, rhinoceros and cheetahs, to name but a few affected animals. I am convinced that if these animals had a say in the matter, no-one would be before this court,' Motha said.
In September last year, the Pretoria high court handed down an order dismissing the Datacentrix application for condonation concerning a prayer in its notice of motion, which sought to review and set aside the request for bids relating to the tender.
The court said last year the review application before it had not been brought within the 180 days regarding the review on the request for bids.
In the judgment passed this month, Motha said the preliminary point about the application not being brought within 180 days was not dispositive of the entire case because the prayer which sought to review and set aside the decision to award Gijima the tender was made well within 180 days.
The ground of review was that Gijima failed to submit annual financial statements for the June 2022 financial year and submitted only audited financial statements for the two preceding financial years (June 2021 and June 2020).
Datacentrix said Gijima ought therefore to have been disqualified from the tender evaluation process for failure to satisfy the minimum mandatory conditions of tender.
Motha said the common denominator in all the four disqualifications was the entities' failure to comply with the requirement of three years audited or independently reviewed annual financial statements.
'What is good for the goose is good for the gander. How is it that Gijima was held to a different standard? This is nothing short of disgraceful conduct,' Motha said.
Motha said the fact that SANParks came to court and insisted that only one audited financial statement was required 'stinks to high heavens'.
He said this conduct was totally at variance with the constitutional precepts of fairness and equity.
He said the decision to award the tender to Gijima was not in keeping with the dictates of the constitution, and it would not be far off the mark to characterise the tender process as being shambolic.
'Ultimately, this entire tender process was not in accordance with a tender process that is fair, equitable, transparent and competitive.'
TimesLIVE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the Two-Pot system is affecting South African retirement funds
How the Two-Pot system is affecting South African retirement funds

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

How the Two-Pot system is affecting South African retirement funds

South Africans are increasingly withdrawing from their retirement savings due to the Two-Pot system, raising concerns about long-term financial stability and the implications for the economy. Image: File photo. The Two-Pot system, designed to offer South Africans a lifeline in the event of a serious rainy day, has seen such high demand for withdrawals that experts are concerned that people will have only two-thirds of their savings left. Changes in the law, which came into effect last September, made it possible for people who have retirement savings to access a portion of them now, with the rest remaining invested until they stop working. Under the changes to the law, one-third of retirement savings went into a pot from which withdrawals could be made, and that allows people to pull out money once a year in an amount between R2,000 and R30,000. But there are drawbacks. In addition to the fact that the cash that is taken is subject to tax, any amount due to the South African Revenue Service (Sars) in unpaid tax is deducted from the payout. Those are the short-term consequences – longer-term, withdrawals now will exacerbate South Africa's already low savings rate. South Africans have a negative savings rate of 1.2%, according to Trading Economics. Hwalani Mabaso, executive of everyday advice and distribution at Absa Advice and Investments, says that the tax on withdrawals 'came as a rude awakening to some who saw their expected payout significantly reduced. Financial service providers also had to play catch-up, with reports of some charging excessive admin fees. The learning curve was steep – not just for members, but for the industry itself,' she notes. Michelle Hawkins, senior tax expert at PKF Octagon, says that Sars has collected R15 billion in taxes from Two-Pot withdrawals, of which R1bn was in overdue payments. Mabaso's calculations indicate that a R30,000 withdrawal could mean R22,000 lands in accounts after withholding tax, which doesn't take into account any overdue tax. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading One of Two-Pot's most vocal detractors is former statistician-general, Pali Lehohla. Lehohla tells Personal Finance that pulling money out of an already meager savings pool detracts from fund managers, such as the Public Investment Corporation, being able to invest in key sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and mining. This, Lehohla says, undermines the architecture of pension funds, adversely affecting South Africa's growth prospects. 'If you draw from it, you destroy a nation.' Gross domestic product (GDP) gained a better-than-expected 0.1% in the first quarter of the year after reaching 0.6% in 2024. Phil le Feuvre, member of the South African Reward Association, says that nearly R57bn has been withdrawn from retirement funds since last September. For context, the sector was worth about R4.6 trillion in 2022, the latest research available. Le Feuvre says there have, so far, been almost four million withdrawals, out of an estimated 18.6 million retirement fund members in South Africa. Of these, about 12% were repeat withdrawals following the start of the new tax year in March, he adds. Hawkins is concerned that there have been repeated withdrawals. 'This behaviour raised concerns that the system might be used more as a revolving credit facility than an emergency buffer,' says Mabaso. Yet, Mabaso says the 'bold and necessary reform' has benefitted those South Africans who are battling rising costs as it has been a 'financial lifeline'. She says, in addition to making emergency funds available without totally sabotaging long-term retirement savings, it has also had a macroeconomic benefit. 'Analysts estimate the system injected R40bn to R100bn of liquidity into the economy, boosting consumption and tax revenue, thanks to SARS collecting income tax on withdrawals. Some reports even suggest it could contribute up to 0.5% to GDP growth in 2025,' Mabaso says. Mabaso says, however, that the 'freedom to withdraw comes at a cost'. She explains that someone who pulls money out each year could reduce their retirement nest egg by 30% to 33%, which could be 'a potentially devastating impact in old age'. Hawkins says research conducted by various financial institutions has shown that most drawdowns are going towards debt, school fees, groceries, and other basic necessities. 'The pressures of the cost of living are the key driver for the two-pot withdrawals,' she says. 'Evidence suggests that a portion of the withdrawals is being used to pay off high-interest loans or, worse, fund consumer purchases, defeating the system's intent to promote financial resilience,' Mabaso explains. Le Feuvre adds that some beneficiaries used funds as a deposit to buy a car, leading to increased debt in the long run. 'Overall, the funds helped consumers reduce financial strain but also contributed to new credit uptake.' Mabaso says, like all policy tools, Two-Pot's success depends on how wisely it's used. She says people need educational support to understand tax, compound interest, and long-term implications. 'Handled with care, the system could offer South Africans the dignity of choice and financial resilience.' Reasons people draw draw down from two-pot. Image: Source for graphic: Le Feuvre PERSONAL FINANCE

Lesaka Technologies acquires Bank Zero for R1. 09 billion, boosting its fintech capabilities
Lesaka Technologies acquires Bank Zero for R1. 09 billion, boosting its fintech capabilities

IOL News

time27-06-2025

  • IOL News

Lesaka Technologies acquires Bank Zero for R1. 09 billion, boosting its fintech capabilities

Bank Zero CEO Yatin Narsai said their acquisition by Lesaka Technologies would allow the online digital bank to accelerate new revenue streams, improve capital efficiency and unlock synergies across their ecosystem. Image: AI Ron Lesaka Technologies' share price shot up 17.1% Friday morning after announcing it has entered into a R1.091 billion agreement to acquire 100% of South Africa's digital lender, Bank Zero Mutual Bank. The companies said Friday the acquisition will be settled through a combination of new shares—such that the shareholders of Bank Zero will own about 12% of Lesaka's shares at the time of completion of the proposed transaction—and up to R91 million in cash. "The acquisition of Bank Zero is a transformative event in Lesaka's journey, enabling us to better serve our consumers, merchants, and enterprise clients by embedding a trusted, well-engineered neobank capability into our fintech platform,' said Lesaka chairman Ali Mazanderani in a statement. "Our focus has always been on using technology to remove friction, lower costs, and challenge legacy banking norms. Joining forces with Lesaka allows us to accelerate that mission at scale—reaching more customers, faster. It represents a critical step for Lesaka and Bank Zero in realising new revenue streams, improving capital efficiency, and unlocking synergies across our ecosystem," said Bank Zero CEO Yatin Narsai. The 12% stake is valued at about R1bn based on the R88.26 share price. The share price was trading at R81.99 on Friday monring. The selling shareholders of Bank Zero—which include its chairman Michael Jordaan, CEO Yatin Narsai, and other key members of the bank—will collectively hold a 12% stake in Lesaka. The transaction is still subject to the regulatory approvals such as by the Prudential Authority and Competition Commission. Bank Zero, founded in 2018, is built on modern technology on an app-driven platform and a zero-fee banking model, offering retail and commercial banking services. As of the end of April 2025, Bank Zero had a deposit base in excess of R400m and more than 40 000 funded accounts across South Africa. Bank Zero's digital banking infrastructure and its operational banking licence, together with Lesaka's fintech and distribution platform, would transform the way Lesaka is able to conduct business in the future, said Mazanderani. These include better servicing of Lesaka's customers through full banking services, unlocking synergies and opportunities, accelerating innovation, and streamlining Lesaka's Consumer, Merchant, and Enterprise divisions—all enabling a shift in the financial profile of Lesaka and empowering the combined group to deliver greater value to consumers and businesses. 'Lesaka expects the transaction to support a more optimised balance sheet in the future, allowing the group to finance the existing and continued growth in lending books through customer deposits, driving stronger lending unit economics,' Lesaka said. In addition, the reduction in the use of bank debt in the group's Consumer and Merchant divisions would help to deleverage Lesaka's debt. After the deal, Lesaka could achieve a more than R1bn reduction in debt.

Nigeria and Brazil sign $1bn agreement to boost agriculture
Nigeria and Brazil sign $1bn agreement to boost agriculture

TimesLIVE

time25-06-2025

  • TimesLIVE

Nigeria and Brazil sign $1bn agreement to boost agriculture

Nigeria and Brazil signed a $1bn (R17.7bn) agreement on Tuesday to boost agriculture, food security, energy and defence in the West African nation, Nigeria's Vice-President Kashim Shettima said. The two countries aim to 'deploy more than R1bn to deliver mechanised farming equipment, training and service centres across Nigeria,' Shettima said in a statement posted on X. A lot of farming in Nigeria is subsistence and land is owned by families or individuals, which makes large-scale acquisition problematic. Nigeria also imports food for its 200-million plus population. 'We are moving from subsistence to scale in agriculture, and in energy we are taking long-overdue steps to attract serious investment into gas production, refining, and renewables,' Shettima said. The agreements were signed in Abuja during a visit by Brazil's Vice-President Geraldo Alckmin to Africa's most populous nation. Shettima told his Brazilian counterpart reforms embarked on by President Bola Tinubu have helped reshape Nigeria's economy. Nigeria is targeting a $1-trillion (R17.7-trillion) economy by 2030, with reforms to agriculture, energy, education and public finance. The country has also asked banks to recapitalise to attract foreign investments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store