Europe walks tightrope amid intensifying US-China rivalry – DW – 07/14/2025
Last week, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur.
The meeting between two top diplomats is especially noteworthy due to Rubio being sanctioned by Beijing in recent years. Chinese officials imposed an entry ban and freeze of assets against the US official.
Before he was tapped by President Donald Trump to become US secretary of state, Rubio had served in the US Senate, where he was a member of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China.
The commission is charged with monitoring human rights and the development of the rule of law in China, and submitting an annual report to the US president.
As a member of this body, Rubio sharply criticized the Chinese government for suppressing the democracy movement in Hong Kong, and for drastically restricting civil rights in the western province of Xinjiang.
Beijing lambasted what it saw as "interference in internal affairs" and placed Rubio on the sanctions list after the US government imposed punitive measures on Chinese politicians.
Last Friday, the first face-to-face meeting between Rubio and Wang took place behind closed doors in Malaysia.
Both sides didn't reveal much on what was discussed but Chinese state media later reported that the talks were "positive, pragmatic and constructive."
At the Saturday press conference, Wang gave a brief summary of the conclusions made: Maintain contacts, avoid misjudgment, manage differences and expand cooperation.
However, he made no mention of whether Rubio would remain on Beijing's sanctions list.
There is a "strong will" in both Washington and Beijing to organize a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, Rubio said after the talks. No date has yet been agreed.
While the US still remains the sole global superpower, the gap with China is narrowing.
President Xi wants China to become a "strong, democratic, civilized, and harmonious socialist nation" by 2049, the centenary of the People's Republic.
A study published by the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) at the start of 2025 projected that China would overtake the US and become the world's top economy over the next three decades.
The US-China competition is already shaping the global economy and politics today, including trade wars, a global arms race and rising geopolitical tension.
The US is now using its economic might to force all economically weaker countries to compromise on trade. On Saturday, Trump announced a 30% tariff on all imports from the EU from August 1.
According to the DPA news agency, the decree will not apply to steel and aluminum. However, they are already subject to high tariffs. The US, for instance, imposes a 25% tariff on cars and car parts imported from the European Union and a 50% duty on steel and aluminum.
The president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen promptly responded, saying that she would take "all necessary steps" to protect EU interests.
At the same time, she said she is prepared to continue efforts to reach a mutually acceptable agreement with Washington. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic was scheduled to hold talks with the US side on Monday.
German businesses have sounded the alarm amid the latest crisis.
The tariffs could damage "economic recovery and innovative strength," said Wolfgang Niedermark, member of the executive board of the Federation of German Industries (BDI).
Confidence in international cooperation would also be affected, he added, noting that Germany, as an export-oriented nation, is just as dependent on free trade as China.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Against this backdrop, the question arises as to upon whom the EU can rely — on the US, an old ally which is now throwing obstacles in the way of globalization, or on the communist China which is now seeking closer ties with Europe and Germany despite ideological differences.
Is a Trump-led US, like China, now seen seen as a "partner, competitor and rival" for Brussels? This is the question asked by China experts Paula Oliver Llorente and Miguel Otero-Iglesias in a new paper issued by Spanish think tank Elcano Royal Institute. The phrasing is borrowed from EU documents defining its relations with China, with the words also being included in the German government's China strategy in 2023.
"Uncertainty has become the defining factor looming over the strategic positioning of the EU in the context of US-China rivalry," the two scholars claim.
"For Germany, Trump's policies and the US-China conflict present historic challenges," said Claudia Wessling and Bernhard Bartsch, China experts at the Berlin-based MERICS think tank.
They point out that the US administration under Donald Trump upended trans-Atlantic relations, shaking some long-held and deeply entrenched beliefs in Germany. At the same time, Germany also cooled its ties with China despite intensive trade and business links.
Just last week, Germany's Foreign Office summoned China's ambassador after Berlin accused a Chinese warship of aiming a laser at a German aircraft on patrol in the Red Sea. The German plane was deployed as part of an EU-led operation to protect commercial ships from the Houthi militia operating out of Yemen.
But China has disputed Germany's allegations, saying it was "totally inconsistent with the facts known by the Chinese side."
The Chinese Ministry of Defense said the Chinese frigate in question was not in the Red Sea but in the Gulf of Aden at the time.
And if Germany manages to set aside all the differences with China and moves closer to Beijing, it would certainly anger Washington, which still irreplaceable in the European security architecture. Notably, Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine has brought the importance of US military presence in Europe into sharp focus.
"Germany's new government (...) now faces unprecedented pressure to navigate in a geopolitical world amid an ongoing polarization of society at home," underlined Wessling and Bartsch.
That being said, the EU and the US have substantially different threat perceptions of China, said Llorente and Otero-Iglesias.
"The US is trying to fight a hegemonic competitor and an existential threat, while the EU is aiming to establish a balanced relation with a global player," they argued.
Against this backdrop, the experts underlined, "the EU prefers to develop differentiated de-risking strategies to reduce critical dependencies in its economic relations with China."
The German government's China Strategy, unveiled in 2023, indeed emphasized "de-risking," to reduce reliance on China.
Recent years have also seen many German firms investing not only in China, but also in the US.
However, many actors are now recognizing that these business strategies — such as further relocation to China and, increasingly, to the US — may ultimately run counter to the interests of the German economy, potentially leading to a crisis marked by declining exports and job losses, stressed Wessling und Bartsch.
"Thus, the slogan 'derisking, but doing it right' could prove to be a challenging mandate for the new German government."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The EU-China summit will take place in Beijing at the end of July. Could this be a new start for Beijing and Brussels? The answer likely depends on Trump.
His administration has already specified tariffs on the EU and its most important Asian allies, saying Washington will demand a 25% levy on imports from Japan and South Korea from August 1.
The latest US plan for goods from China, however, has yet to be announced. If the trade war between the two escalates once again, China might try to use the EU market to absorb Chinese production overcapacity. In turn, the US could also redefine goods manufactured in the EU through Chinese direct investment as Chinese products and demand higher levies from EU businesses.
All EU states must act together to reduce their external dependencies, the Spanish experts said.
"Different Member States have different types of relations and dependencies with both the US and China, as well as individual interpretations of economic security and strategic autonomy," they pointed out.
This "inherent heterogenous nature" of their trade ties leads to divergent foreign policy priorities, Llorente und Otero-Iglesias argued.
Nevertheless, "partnerships are indispensable for the EU," they added. "China will have to, among other things, open its market to European businesses, and this needs concrete actions and not just promises."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
37 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
US House Set To Vote On Landmark Crypto Bills This Week
US lawmakers are on the verge of passing landmark legislation that will give the much-maligned crypto world much-wanted legitimacy, riding on President Donald Trump's recent embrace of the industry. The US House of Representatives is set to vote on three pieces of legislation this week, including one on the use of stablecoins -- cryptocurrencies pegged to safe assets like the dollar -- that if passed would immediately go to Trump for his signature. The raft of legislation comes after years of suspicion against the crypto industry amid the belief in the Biden administration that the sector, born out of the success of bitcoin, should be kept on a tight leash and away from mainstream investors. But after crypto investors poured millions of dollars into his presidential campaign last year, Trump reversed his own doubts about the industry, even launching a Trump meme coin and other ventures as he prepared for his return to the White House. According to federal financial disclosure forms released last month, Trump pocketed more than $57 million from the crypto venture, World Liberty Financial, that he launched with his sons last year. Trump has, among other moves, appointed crypto advocate Paul Atkins to head the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). He has also established a federal "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" aimed at auditing the government's bitcoin holdings, which were mainly accumulated by law enforcement from judicial seizures. And thanks to his backing, Trump could soon be signing the stablecoin bill -- dubbed the GENIUS Act -- that the US Senate passed last month and that sets rules such as requiring issuers to have reserves of assets equal in value to that of their outstanding cryptocurrency. Stablecoins are considered the safest and least volatile of digital currencies because their value is tied to traditional currency or secure assets such as gold. Another provision of the bill empowers banking regulators to oversee stablecoin issuers in the United States. The legislation could extend the US dollar's influence in the world of cryptocurrency, with dollar-backed stablecoins seen as financial havens from local currencies prone to big fluctuations. The US House is also considering the CLARITY Act that would establish a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets -- including cryptocurrencies and other blockchain-based assets. If passed the bill would require passage in the Senate. The act would clarify and divide regulatory authority between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Gerald Gallagher, General Counsel at Sei Labs, a digital asset firm, said the bills could be a game changer for the industry. "GENIUS and CLARITY provide security and certainty for investors that previously were not available, either intentionally or unintentionally," he told AFP. "This has been a long time coming." The Republican-led House is also considering a bill it calls the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act that aims to block the issuance of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) - a digital dollar issued by the US Federal Reserve. Republicans argue that a CBDC could enable the federal government to monitor, track, and potentially control the financial transactions of private citizens, undermining privacy and civil liberties. It also would require passage in the Senate before going to Trump for his signature.
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Geoeconomics 2.0: The Real War Is In Chips, Currencies And Control
The world is no longer negotiating peace through treaties or posturing with missiles. Instead, it's wielding tariffs, technology bans, and resource chokeholds as weapons. From Washington to Beijing, New Delhi to Brussels, economic leverage has become the new language of global power. In this new era of geoeconomics, trade routes, tech supply chains, and financial systems are being redrawn—not by markets, but by strategy. And as nations scramble to protect sovereignty and secure advantage, companies and consumers are being pulled into the frontline of an invisible war. What makes this development significant is its departure from the traditional notion of globalization. Trade is no longer just about economic efficiency; it has become an arena of ideological and strategic alignment. As reported by the Financial Times, the current U.S. trade policy under Donald Trump's renewed influence is less about balancing imports and exports, and more about leveraging tariffs as geopolitical tools. Trump has recently announced sweeping new tariffs—30% on imports from the European Union and Mexico, and up to 35% on Canadian goods—framing them not as economic adjustments, but as assertions of national strength. In response, the European Commission is preparing over €70 billion in countermeasures while also seeking to maintain diplomatic engagement. Strategic Supply Chains and the New Resource Wars Parallel to the trade frictions is the reconfiguration of global supply chains, especially in critical sectors like semiconductors, rare earth elements, and artificial intelligence. The U.S. has accelerated its efforts to reshore chip manufacturing, investing heavily in domestic fabrication facilities under the CHIPS and Science Act. These investments are driven less by efficiency and more by the growing sense that technological dependence—particularly on China—presents a national security threat. Meanwhile, China has responded with its own countermeasures, including tighter export controls on rare materials such as gallium and germanium, both crucial to the production of semiconductors and green technologies. According to the Financial Times, these measures are not merely retaliatory but part of a broader strategy to gain leverage in the global technology race. Multinational firms are adapting by shifting operations toward more geopolitically stable manufacturing hubs such as India and Vietnam. As explained by the World Economic Forum, artificial intelligence tools are now central to managing these increasingly complex global supply chains—helping businesses anticipate risk and adjust logistics in real time. The Rise of Economic Blocs The increasing use of economic tools for strategic ends is also driving the formation of geoeconomic blocs. A tighter U.S.–EU alignment is emerging, focused on joint export controls, digital infrastructure and AI regulation, largely in response to China's growing technological influence. At the same time, the BRICS+ alliance—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and new entrants—is working to establish alternative trade systems that reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar. Though still in early stages, this de-dollarization agenda could have significant implications for the global financial architecture. India, in particular, has become a key swing player in this new configuration. According to the Times of India, Goldman Sachs projects that India's economy will reach $10 trillion by 2035, bolstered by its booming digital services sector and expansion of global capability centers (GCCs). With Western firms eager to diversify out of China, India is increasingly becoming a preferred partner in tech, pharma, and manufacturing. Business on the Front Lines Corporations are no longer passive economic actors. Increasingly, they are becoming entangled in the national security concerns of their home governments. Export restrictions on chips and AI models, foreign investment screening, and cybersecurity compliance have made firms like Nvidia, TSMC, and Microsoft strategic assets—not just market players. A recent controversy involving proposed U.S. tariffs on imported copper illustrates the complexity of this environment. As reported by MarketWatch, industry leaders are warning that such measures could jeopardize America's ambitions in both artificial intelligence and clean energy, since copper is a critical input for electric vehicles, servers, and power grids. What once would have been a narrow industrial tariff now threatens to ripple across multiple sectors of national importance. The business environment has thus shifted from a focus on cost optimization to one of strategic positioning. Firms are being forced to consider geopolitical risk, regulatory friction, and even military escalation in their long-term planning. Markets and Consumers Caught in the Crossfire These global realignments are not just boardroom concerns—they're already impacting markets and consumers. Investors are seeing increased volatility in sectors sensitive to trade policy, such as energy, healthcare, and tech. According to Business Insider, UBS has advised clients to hedge exposure and focus on firms with deep government ties or strategic sector alignment. Meanwhile, consumers can expect to see higher costs in electronics, vehicles, and digital services. Cross-border regulations on data storage, content moderation, and cloud infrastructure are also reshaping how global digital services function, fragmenting the once-borderless nature of the internet. Strategy Over Efficiency What we're witnessing is a redefinition of economic globalization, where nations act like corporations and corporations act like states. Trade corridors are being redrawn, not just based on cost, but on security, ideology, and strategic trust. The new age of geoeconomics is not about who makes a product cheapest, but who can guarantee supply, protect intellectual property, and align with allies. In this environment, resilience and foresight are worth more than speed or scale. For companies, that means investing in intelligence—not just artificial, but geopolitical. For nations, it means viewing commerce not as an end, but as a powerful tool in a long-term game of influence.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Pushes Fed To Slash Interest Rates To 1%, Sparking Inflation Fears
President Donald Trump is calling on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates to 1% , a move he says would ease federal borrowing costs and stimulate growth. However, economists warn such an aggressive cut could destabilize the economy and reignite inflation. "We need a 1% rate. The Fed is killing growth," Trump said during a campaign rally in Michigan on Monday. The current federal funds rate sits at 5.25–5.50%, held steady by the Fed to combat inflation and avoid overheating the economy. A shift to 1% would mark the most dramatic monetary loosening since the COVID-19 crisis. Economists Caution Against Panic Move As reported by Reuters, Trump's proposal was met with skepticism from leading economists. "Slashing rates that aggressively would be seen as a panic move," said Diane Swonk, Chief Economist at KPMG. "It would signal the Fed sees a severe downturn ahead, even if that's not the case." According to Yahoo Finance, business leaders are already warning that Trump's other proposed economic measures—particularly new tariffs—could fuel inflation, even if interest rates are slashed. Economists note that inflationary pressures remain persistent, especially in housing and energy. Lowering rates too quickly could send the wrong signal to markets and drive volatility in the bond market and U.S. dollar. Debt Pressure and Political Calculations The push comes as federal debt servicing costs approach historic levels. As noted by Reuters, a 1% rate could ease short-term interest payments on the national debt—but might spark long-term instability. Across the Atlantic, concerns are growing. According to The Guardian, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič warned that Trump's broader policy package, including proposed tariffs of up to 30%, could "eliminate" transatlantic trade as we know it. Fed Independence in the Spotlight The Federal Reserve, led by Chair Jerome Powell, has repeatedly stated its independence from political influence. The next FOMC policy meeting is scheduled for July 30–31, with most analysts expecting the Fed to hold rates steady. But the pressure is mounting. As reported by Fortune, market participants are increasingly watching for signs of political sway over Fed decisions as the 2024–25 campaign heats up.
