Lawsuits filed after drastic changes to initiative petition process
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – Two lawsuits were filed after drastic changes were made by lawmakers to the initiative petition process in Oklahoma.
'I think they took the idea of direct democracy away from everyday rural Oklahomans, and it offended me,' said Craig McVay, a rural Oklahoma voter.
McVay is listed as a plaintiff in one of the lawsuits. He is one of many who joined in on the lawsuit.
Senate Bill 1027 went into effect at the end of the legislative session. It was authored by State Sen. David Bullard (R-Durant) and prevents more than 10% of required signatures from coming from Oklahoma or Tulsa counties.
Stitt signs bill limiting Oklahomans' access to support ballot initiative petitions
Meanwhile, each of the state's 75 other counties, most of which are rural, are capped at 4% of total signatures.
The lawsuit was filed as McVay et al. v. Cockroft and Drummond and challenges SB 1027's constitutionality.
Supporters of SB 1027 have long argued that the reason it was needed was to give rural Oklahomans more of a voice when it came to signature gathering.
'I've checked a box in every rural part of the state and have been a part of the process the entire time. Now I feel like the legislature just took a swipe at me, and I don't like that,' said McVay.
'I can't imagine having to try to defend this law. It, quite frankly, is indefensible,' said Amber England of Strategy 77.
England has led the way for many initiative petitions over the years and fought at the Capitol when SB 1027 was being discussed by lawmakers.
'We hope the court acts quickly to throw this out so that there's no longer uncertainty,' said England.
According to Strategy 77, key constitutional arguments in the lawsuit include:
County-Based Signature Caps: Senate Bill 1027 limits how many signatures can be collected in each county, violating Article V, Section 2 of the Oklahoma Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause by creating arbitrary distinctions among voters.
Gist Language Approval: The law gives the Secretary of State, an unelected, politically appointed position, unchecked authority to approve or reject petition summaries, violating the separation of powers and placing unconstitutional restraints on free speech.
Circulation and Funding Restrictions: Senate Bill 1027 mandates circulation and funding restrictions that courts have repeatedly struck down as violations of the First Amendment.
Special Laws and Unequal Treatment: The law singles out initiative and referendum proponents for restrictions not imposed on candidates, opponents, or other political campaigns.
'It takes away power from Oklahoma voters. And I hope that the court will understand that and see that for what it is,' said England.
On that lawsuit, Attorney General Gentner Drummond and Secretary of State Josh Cockroft are listed.
The other lawsuit filed was brought on by supporters of State Question 836. They said that they are challenging the retroactive application of Senate Bill 1027.
In their press release, they said that SQ 836 would establish an open primary system in Oklahoma, allowing all voters, regardless of party, to vote in primary elections. The measure was filed in January of 2025 and is currently pending before the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
News 4 reached out to the AG's office and the Secretary of State's Office Friday and have not heard back yet.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Let's not kid ourselves. The US has plenty of kings — even here in SLO County
As I write this, I'm in England, a country with an actual king. His face on the coins and his brother, Prince Harry The Spare, exiled just down the Central Coast in Montecito. As an English republican — that is, someone who believes our monarchy is an outdated constitutional relic and no one should wield power by accident of birth — I know what it means to be a 'royal subject.' Brits still bow to a crown, but at least we admit it. In America, the story's a bit different. It all started so well. You rebelled against George III and threw his tea in the harbor. Then drafted a Constitution to ensure that power would flow from 'we the people,' not from coronations, crowns or family trees. Alas, two and a half centuries later, it could be déjà vu all over again. These days, Americans seem to coronate dynasties in ballot boxes, but still convince yourselves they're free. Democrats kept their own Mad King George on the throne well past his mental sell by date, before crowning Kamala without a primary and Hillary without her husband. All the while, worshipping the memory of the Kennedy royal family. Not to forget Gov. Gavin Newsom, California's coiffed Dauphin, who revealed his own royal ambitions with that unforgettable 'let them eat cake' moment. Sipping wine with his court in the French Laundry while his loyal subjects were locked down at home. Meanwhile, Republicans kneel before Donald Trump like he's the Sun King in a red tie, while still polishing the family crest of the House of Bush and ignoring the unholy shenanigans of Trump's sons posturing and preening themselves for 'Succession'. Party dynasties everywhere. Both replacing ceremonial robes with unelected aristocracies dressed in civilian drag. The crowns are self-funded, while duty's been outsourced to the Musks, McNamaras and Rumsfelds of the world. Which by Royal Decree, otherwise known as my editor, brings us to the recent 'No Kings Day' protests. Billed as a rejection of Trump's authoritarian theatrics, the demonstrations instead felt like a coronation gift. Because nothing emboldens a narcissist like coordinated national outrage. These weren't efforts to persuade or change minds. They were virtue bonfires, designed not to illuminate but to signal. The only real outcome was to embolden the very man they want to exile. The delicious irony is that if the mob are successful in their calls for impeachment, they'll soon be bending a knee to his successor, President Vance! The Republicans have performative form, too. Defending the First Amendment until someone reads Toni Morrison's 'Beloved' in a school library, or uses a pronoun they don't approve of. Suddenly, it's not about liberty, it's about 'protecting the children.' Off with the superintendents' heads! Out go the books and the free speech they claimed to revere. Before you think this is just national theater, look closer to home. Right here in San Luis Obispo County, we have our own little Versailles unfolding. Not on the National Mall, but in the council chambers of Paso Robles. Republican Councilmember Chris Bausch, elected to serve the public, decided that transparency was beneath his royal station. When The Tribune filed lawful public records requests, he simply refused to respond, acting like an anointed monarch whose efforts to remove an insubordinate were nobody's business but his co-conspirators. Bausch, like Louis XVI before the fall of Paris, surrounded himself with a small cabal of loyalists. His own royal courtiers, courtesans, jesters and a personal media town crier eager to publish proclamations unchallenged and unchecked. That fantasy collapsed when a judge ordered him to comply. He's now being sued by The Tribune and his own city has filed a cross-complaint. Not to defend him, but to shield itself from the escalating legal bills. Those costs may be considerable. He might not lose his head, but he may lose his house! It's not government; it's dinner theater. This is what happens when public servants begin to act like sovereigns. They forget they were elected, not ordained. That the public record isn't a privilege, it's a right. So yes, let's talk about 'No Kings.' But let's also remember that monarchy isn't just a crown or a title. It's a mindset that alas appears alive and well in Washington, D.C., Sacramento and San Luis Obispo County. We see it when politicians treat protests as treason. When dissent is framed as disloyalty. When transparency is treated as a nuisance rather than a duty. We see it in the left's moral sanctimony and the right's faux populism. Both drenched in grievance and theatre. Both drunk on the applause of their respective courts. The Founding Fathers didn't leave a constitutional monarchy just to stage a theatrical one. So here's a modest suggestion for those who still believe in the promise of The Republic. If you're serious about 'No Kings,' start with your own side. Demand transparency. Question succession plans. Challenge any leader, left or right, who stops listening to the people and starts listening only to their own reflection. The 'framers of liberty' didn't oust a king so power could hide behind corporations, committees, conspirators, dynasties and technocrats. If the people don't reclaim the stage soon, they'll be left clapping from the cheap seats while the curtain falls and democracy takes its final bow. Clive Pinder is an English republican and host of KVEC's 'CeaseFire.' He's navigated monarchies, military juntas and democracies, only to find the real danger lies in the 'true believers''on all sides.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
BBC under pressure amid criticism of ‘death to the IDF' chants at Glastonbury
Sir Keir Starmer has led criticism across the political spectrum of chants at Glastonbury for 'death' to the Israeli military as the BBC faced pressure to explain why it kept broadcasting. Rapper Bobby Vylan, of rap punk duo Bob Vylan, on Saturday led crowds on the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)'. A member of Belfast rap trio Kneecap suggested fans 'start a riot' at his bandmate's forthcoming court appearance related to a terrorism charge. Responding to the chants from Bob Vylan, the Prime Minister said: 'There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech. 'I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence. 'The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast.' A member of Kneecap said 'f*** Keir Starmer' during their performance after the Prime Minister called for the band not to play at the festival. Avon and Somerset Police said video evidence from the performances would be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation. Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis said Bob Vylan's chants 'very much crossed a line'. 'We are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence,' she said in a statement. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said Bob Vylan was 'inciting violence and hatred' and should be arrested and prosecuted. 'By broadcasting his vile hatred, the BBC appear to have also broken the law,' he said. 'I call on the Police to urgently investigate and prosecute the BBC as well for broadcasting this. Our national broadcaster should not be transmitting hateful material designed to incite violence and conflict,' he posted on X. Health Secretary Wes Streeting called it a 'pretty shameless publicity stunt' and said the BBC and Glastonbury have 'questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens', speaking to Sky News. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called the scenes 'grotesque'. 'Glorifying violence against Jews isn't edgy. The West is playing with fire if we allow this sort of behaviour to go unchecked,' she wrote on X. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately said she was 'horrified' and that the BBC should have cut the feed. 'Given the nature of the attacks on Israel, the BBC should not have kept broadcasting that. They should have cut the coverage immediately,' she told Times Radio. Liberal Democrat culture, media and sport spokesman Max Wilkinson said: 'Bob Vylan's chants at Glastonbury yesterday were appalling. Cultural events are always a place for debate, but hate speech, antisemitism and incitements to violence have no place at Glastonbury or anywhere in our society.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel wrote in the Daily Mail that the incident was a 'systemic failure'. 'What happened at Glastonbury was dangerous,' she said. 'Chants calling for the death of Israeli soldiers crossed a line no civilised society should ever tolerate, and it was shameful that the BBC continued with its live broadcast of this incitement to violence. 'The fact the BBC – a national institution – broadcast this hate-fuelled content will risk legitimising and normalising those views in society.' Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has spoken to the BBC director general about Bob Vylan's performance, a Government spokesperson said. The BBC said it showed a warning during the performance and that viewers would not be able to access it on demand. A spokesperson for the broadcaster said: 'Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. 'During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. 'We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.' The Israeli embassy said it was 'deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival'. The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said it would be formally complaining to the BBC over its 'outrageous decision' to broadcast Bob Vylan. 'Our national broadcaster must apologise for its dissemination of this extremist vitriol, and those responsible must be removed from their positions,' a spokesperson said. Bob Vylan, who formed in Ipswich in 2017, have released four albums addressing issues to do with racism, masculinity and class. Bobby Vylan's real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, 34, according to reports. He is listed on Companies House as the director of Ghost Theatre Records, which is operated by Bob Vylan. In a statement posted to Instagram, Vylan said: 'Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place. 'As we grow older and our fire starts to possibly dim under the suffocation of adult life and all its responsibilities, it is incredibly important that we encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us. 'Let us display to them loudly and visibly the right thing to do when we want and need change. 'Let them see us marching in the streets, campaigning on ground level, organising online and shouting about it on any and every stage that we are offered.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Bob Vylan (@bobbyvylan) Kneecap have been in the headlines after member Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence. The group performed after Vylan's set on the West Holts Stage with O hAnnaidh exclaiming 'Glastonbury, I'm a free man' as they took to the stage. In reference to his bandmate's forthcoming court date, Naoise O Caireallain, who performs under the name Moglai Bap, said they would 'start a riot outside the courts', before clarifying: 'No riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine.' In the run-up to the festival at Worthy Farm in Somerset, several politicians called for the group to be removed from the line-up and Sir Keir said their performance would not be 'appropriate'. During Kneecap's set, O hAnnaidh said: 'The prime minister of your country, not mine, said he didn't want us to play, so f*** Keir Starmer.' Kneecap also gave a 'big thank you to the Eavis family' and said 'they stood strong' amid calls for the organisers to drop them from the line-up. A BBC spokesperson said an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance was available on iPlayer. 'We have edited it to ensure the content falls within the limits of artistic expression in line with our editorial guidelines and reflects the performance from Glastonbury's West Holts Stage. As with all content which includes strong language, this is signposted with appropriate warnings.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Simon Wiesenthal Center Slams Glastonbury's 'Bland Response' To Bob Vylan's 'Death To The IDF' Chant
Although Glastonbury and the BBC have condemned Bob Vylan's onstage comments at the England music festival, at least one Jewish human rights organization is not satisfied with the response. Jim Berk, CEO of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, called out both the festival and the network for providing a platform for the 'disgraceful' performance, in which Vylan led the crowd in chants of 'death to the IDF' and 'free Palestine.' More from Deadline Glastonbury Officials 'Appalled' By Bob Vylan's Anti-Israel 'Hate Speech' Chant From Stage BBC Slams 'Deeply Offensive' Glastonbury Set: 'We Have No Plans To Make It Available On Demand' BBC Avoids Kneecap But Live Streams Another Act Leading Crowd Chants Of "Death To The IDF" & "Free Palestine" 'It was sickening, dangerous and chillingly reminiscent of a modern-day Nazi rally,' said Berk, adding: 'It was public incitement, not performance. The explicit calls for violence against Jews, broadcast live by the BBC without interruption, literally gave hate a stage, a microphone, and the stamp of legitimacy of one of Britain's most respected public institutions.' Berk continued, 'And Glastonbury's bland response? Saying the chants merely 'crossed a line' and offering vague 'reminders' to artists is not accountability—it's cowardice. When confronted with explicit calls for violence against Jews, anything short of absolute condemnation and corrective action is complicity.' Referencing Hamas' October 2023 invasion of Israel's Nova music festival, where 378 were killed and 44 hostages were taken, Berk called the chants 'deeply re-traumatizing and terrifying.' 'This is a moment of reckoning. Festival organizers, media outlets, and artists must choose: will they be platforms for peace, or enablers of hate? Because silence is not neutrality, it is a green light for bigotry,' added Berk. 'Festivals must be prepared to halt performances that invoke hate; broadcasters must air festivals on deferred live and use their kill switch to take hate speech immediately off the air. Never again is not a slogan: It's a responsibility. And it's being betrayed on the world's biggest stages.' Following the performance, the BBC has decried the 'deeply offensive' set, which a spokesperson said they have 'no plans to make the performance available on demand.' A Glastonbury rep has said that organizers are 'appalled' by the chants, which 'very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.' Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
