Torres Strait Islanders lose bid to hold Canberra responsible for its emissions targets
Fellow plaintiff Pabai Pabai said: 'My heart is broken for my family and my community'.
Federal Court Justice Michael Wigney criticised the Government for setting emissions targets between 2015 and 2021 that failed to consider the 'best available science'.
But these targets would have had little impact on global temperature rise, he found.
'Any additional greenhouse gases that might have been released by Australia as a result of low emissions targets would have caused no more than an almost immeasurable increase in global average temperatures,' Wigney said.
Australia's previous conservative government sought to cut emissions by around 26% before 2030.
The incumbent left-leaning government in 2022 adopted new plans to slash emissions by 40% before the end of the decade and reach net zero by 2050.
'Climate refugees'
Fewer than 5000 people live in the Torres Strait, a collection of about 274 mud islands and coral cays wedged between Australia's mainland and Papua New Guinea.
Lawyers for traditional landowners from Boigu and Saibai - among the worst-impacted islands - asked the court to order the Government 'to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a level that will prevent Torres Strait Islanders from becoming climate refugees'.
Sea levels in some parts of the archipelago are rising almost three times faster than the global average, according to official figures.
Rising tides have washed away graves, eaten through huge chunks of exposed coastline, and poisoned once-fertile soils with salt.
The lawsuit argued that some islands would soon become uninhabitable if global temperatures rose more than 1.5C above pre-industrial levels.
The World Meteorological Organisation has warned this threshold could be breached before the end of the decade.
While Australia's emissions pale in comparison to the likes of China and the United States, the fossil fuel powerhouse is one of the largest coal exporters in the world.
-Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
32 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Influential China course for public servants overhauled
A flagship China programme for the country's public servants is being overhauled to fit the Government's foreign policy priorities, with Southeast Asia and India being added into the mix. The changes come at a difficult time not just for New Zealand's relations with the Asian superpower, but also for China expertise within our country, with a new report warning of a dramatic decline in the ability of universities to teach students about the basics of Beijing.
Newsroom
32 minutes ago
- Newsroom
NZ's AI strategy: ‘light touch' regulation and business opportunities
The Government's AI strategy confirms the country is taking a light-touch approach to AI regulation. This will provide reassurance to businesses looking to embrace the benefits of AI, while also reminding businesses of their governance responsibilities and the need to ensure compliance with existing legal frameworks. The AI strategy follows recent guidance for the public sector, discussed in our previous article. Alongside the AI strategy, the Government has also issued a note entitled 'Responsible AI Guidance for Businesses'. In this article, we explore the key takeaways for New Zealand businesses and next steps. Key takeaways The AI strategy has been developed following a Cabinet decision in July 2024 committing to a strategic approach. The paper recognised a clear strategic direction would 'clear the path for AI to deliver better outcomes for people in New Zealand'. The new strategy seeks to achieve this in various ways: Regulatory clarity and light touch legislation The strategy notes uncertainty about how existing laws apply to AI may result in 'a cautious approach to AI implementation until regulatory clarity improves'. As a result, it confirms New Zealand is taking a light touch and 'principles-based' approach to AI policy. It helpfully identifies New Zealand has existing regulatory frameworks (e.g., privacy, consumer protection, human rights) which are largely principles-based and technology-neutral, and which can be updated if needed to enable AI innovation. This is a pragmatic and positive approach we expect will provide reassurance to businesses exploring the adoption of AI, and will avoid some of the challenges created by detailed standalone legislation such as the EU's AI Act (as discussed in our prior commentary here). Adoption focus The strategy outlines New Zealand's deliberate focus on AI adoption rather than development. That recognises the economic challenge and significant investment required for creating foundational AI. This approach is intended to 'more rapidly realise productivity benefits across the economy without waiting for local AI development to mature'. Upskilling the workforce It identifies that New Zealand faces a shortage of AI expertise across several sectors. The paper notes New Zealand universities are helping to bridge the gap by building a 'future-ready' workforce through specialised programmes, and notes the Government's investment in tuition, STEM, and youth support to boost enrolment and career pathways. In addition, the new 'Responsible AI Guidance' offers a valuable framework to help businesses adopt AI responsibly and effectively. The guidance encourages organisations to clearly define their purpose for using AI, prepare thorough stakeholder engagement and safe testing, and align AI objectives with internal policies. It also recommends building strong governance structures and ensuring compliance with existing regulations. The guidance emphasises the importance of high-quality, unbiased data and cautions against using AI in areas where human judgment is essential. What does this mean for your business? The strategy will provide reassurance to businesses seeking to adopt AI systems, and the Responsible AI Guidance offers a helpful consolidated roadmap. In practice, however, the application of the recommendations can be complex and businesses should start thinking early about the implications of the Government's announcement and how they can respond to the new guidance. We summarise below what we see as the key takeaways and next steps: Clarify your AI purpose: Define what you want AI to achieve in your organisation and ensure the intended use is lawful and aligned with your business goals. Prepare for adoption: This should include identifying current processes that are inefficient and could benefit from AI, engaging with stakeholders for input, and testing solutions in controlled environments like AI sandboxes. Build internal capability: Set up dedicated teams to identify the business's AI objectives and values, develop internal principles to guide the responsible and ethical use of AI, and develop consistent principles and terminology across the business. Establish governance frameworks: Form a governance team to oversee risk, compliance, and regulatory alignment, and maintain transparent communication with stakeholders to build trust. Ensure data quality and ethical use: Use clean, unbiased data to train AI systems, and avoid deploying AI in areas where human judgment is critical to protect individuals' rights and wellbeing. In addition, given the Government's light-touch regulatory approach and preference for relying on existing legal frameworks, it will be critical for businesses to ensure they are familiar with how current laws will apply to the new technology. That should include in particular ensuring that:
NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Torres Strait Islanders lose bid to hold Canberra responsible for its emissions targets
'What do any of us say to our families now?' Fellow plaintiff Pabai Pabai said: 'My heart is broken for my family and my community'. Federal Court Justice Michael Wigney criticised the Government for setting emissions targets between 2015 and 2021 that failed to consider the 'best available science'. But these targets would have had little impact on global temperature rise, he found. 'Any additional greenhouse gases that might have been released by Australia as a result of low emissions targets would have caused no more than an almost immeasurable increase in global average temperatures,' Wigney said. Australia's previous conservative government sought to cut emissions by around 26% before 2030. The incumbent left-leaning government in 2022 adopted new plans to slash emissions by 40% before the end of the decade and reach net zero by 2050. 'Climate refugees' Fewer than 5000 people live in the Torres Strait, a collection of about 274 mud islands and coral cays wedged between Australia's mainland and Papua New Guinea. Lawyers for traditional landowners from Boigu and Saibai - among the worst-impacted islands - asked the court to order the Government 'to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a level that will prevent Torres Strait Islanders from becoming climate refugees'. Sea levels in some parts of the archipelago are rising almost three times faster than the global average, according to official figures. Rising tides have washed away graves, eaten through huge chunks of exposed coastline, and poisoned once-fertile soils with salt. The lawsuit argued that some islands would soon become uninhabitable if global temperatures rose more than 1.5C above pre-industrial levels. The World Meteorological Organisation has warned this threshold could be breached before the end of the decade. While Australia's emissions pale in comparison to the likes of China and the United States, the fossil fuel powerhouse is one of the largest coal exporters in the world. -Agence France-Presse
