logo
Weekly economic wrap: Rand strongest since December, but falling again

Weekly economic wrap: Rand strongest since December, but falling again

The Citizen30-05-2025
Although the rand kept its head up all week and strengthened even more on the back of the repo rate cut, it lost traction on Friday afternoon.
The biggest economic news of the week was the mostly unexpected cut in the repo rate of 25 basis points, while the rand kept its momentum and reached its strongest level since December. Gold, on the other hand, was not so lucky.
Lisette IJssel de Schepper, chief economist at the Bureau for Economic Research, says the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) decided to cut the repo rate by 25 basis points to 7.25%, which means that the prime interest rate is now 10.75%.
'The dovish tilt, with all six members voting for a cut and one member even preferring a 50 basis points cut, was surprising, but welcome. In addition, the clear signalling around moving to a 3% inflation target is positive and removes uncertainty.'
Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, points out that the rand strengthened to its best level since December, helped by a weaker dollar and the Sarb's repo rate cut, which aims to support the local economy and as inflation remains low.
Busisiwe Nkonki and Isaac Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, also point out that the rand gained further ground this week. 'The Sarb's interest rate cut and the announcement of the imminent lowering of the inflation target boosted sentiment, lifting the local unit to R17.80/$ late Thursday, and on Friday morning it was trading around R17.83/$.'
Unfortunately, the good news did not last, and the rand traded at R18.04 on Friday afternoon.
ALSO READ: Reserve Bank cuts repo rate thanks to lower inflation, stronger rand
Decrease in prices of oil and gold
Oil prices dropped for the second week in a row, with Brent Crude trading near $63/barrel, Botes says. 'This decline is driven by investors remaining uncertain about what will happen with US tariffs, as the legal back-and-forth is making the market more unpredictable.
'Traders are also watching the upcoming expanded Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) meeting, where major oil-producing countries are expected to agree on increasing oil production in July.'
Botes says there is extra tension because Kazakhstan is producing more oil than it is supposed to, which could lead to even more supply than planned. On the demand side, recent US economic data shows the economy shrank slightly in the first quarter, raising worries that people and businesses might use less fuel.'
She says gold prices also slipped to around $3,290/ounce and are heading for a weekly loss, as investors wait for the PCE index, which could affect future interest rate decisions. Investors also remain cautious as they wait for more clarity on US inflation and interest rates.
ALSO READ: Producer Price Index remains unchanged, but an increase is coming
Producer price inflation remains muted
Lebohang Namo, economist at the BER, says producer price inflation (PPI) for final manufactured goods, remained unchanged at 0.5% in April. 'Like consumer inflation last week, this was above consensus expectations following a string of downward surprises.'
Mamello Matikinca-Ngwenya, Siphamandla Mkhwanazi, Thanda Sithole and Koketso Mano, economists at FNB, say continued deflation in fuel, paper products and transport equipment helped keep overall producer inflation contained in April.
Nkonki and Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, say April's producer price inflation provided more evidence of subdued price pressures. Producer inflation held steady at 0.5%, matching our forecast and exceeding market expectations of 0%.
'Deepening fuel price deflation offset higher food prices. Elsewhere, price pressures remained relatively subdued. Food, beverages and tobacco inflation accelerated from 4.1% to 4.7%, while deflation in coke, petroleum, chemicals, rubber, and plastics deepened from 4.1% to 5.5%. Producer inflation will likely rise moderately off a low base in the months ahead.'
ALSO READ: Salaries decreased by 2% in April, but higher than a year ago
Private sector credit extension increased in April
Matikinca-Ngwenya, Mkhwanazi, Sithole and Mano say Private Sector Credit Extension (PSCE) growth increased to 4.6% in April, up from 3.4% in March, largely driven by an acceleration in corporate credit growth, which increased to 6.0% from 3.9%.
Household credit growth was 3.0%, marginally higher than the 2.9% recorded in March. Within corporate credit, growth in general loans and advances rose to 7.4% from 4.3%, overdraft growth climbed to 12.6% from 10.3%, and mortgage advances grew by 6.2%, slightly up from 6.1% in the previous month.
Instalment sales credit growth remained stable and above inflation at 5.0%, compared to 5.1% in prior months, while credit card growth declined sharply to 0.6% from 2.5%. In the household segment, general loans and advances and overdrafts remained in contractionary territory, while mortgage advance growth was stable at 2.3%, unchanged from the prior month.
Growth in other household credit categories remained above inflation, with instalment sales credit at 6.2% and credit cards at 8.5%.
Nkonki and Matshego say the growth in broad money supply improved slightly from 5.8% in March to 6.1% in April, exceeding their expectations of 5.9%. 'The boost in PSCE came from faster growth in loans and advances and a less severe decline in bills and investments.
'The most significant momentum came from companies, where advances jumped from 5.5% to 7.5%, amplified by last year's low base. Even so, company overdrafts and general loans accelerated, while commercial mortgages and instalment sales and leasing finances held relatively steady.'
They also note that the slow recovery in household loans continued, rising slightly from 2.9% to 3%. 'The uptick came mainly from a rebound in credit card usage, while vehicle finance and home loans were unchanged. We expect the recovery in credit demand to gain moderate upward traction in the months ahead, supported by easier financial conditions and firmer domestic demand.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Africa's crypto market faces regulatory reckoning amid tax demands
South Africa's crypto market faces regulatory reckoning amid tax demands

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

South Africa's crypto market faces regulatory reckoning amid tax demands

The Financial Sector Conduct Authority introduced licensing requirements for crypto asset service providers under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, aiming to strengthen consumer protection by classifying crypto assets as financial products. Image: Independent Newspapers/File AS South Africa's cryptocurrency sector hurtles through a turbulent regulatory and tax landscape, evolving rules and heightened scrutiny are forcing investors and service providers to scramble for clarity. As regulatory authorities tighten their grip, questions loom large: How do capital gains taxes apply to crypto disposals? What exactly are the obligations for those simply holding digital assets? While cryptocurrencies may not be legal tender, the SA Revenue Service (Sars) has made one thing clear — it is treating them as taxable intangible assets, triggering capital gains tax upon sale or disposal. The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) introduced licensing requirements for crypto asset service providers under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services (Fais) Act, aiming to strengthen consumer protection by classifying crypto assets as financial products. Meanwhile, the Gauteng High Court's recent ruling on cryptocurrencies and exchange control regulations sparked significant debate, with the SA Reserve Bank (Sarb) appealing the decision and maintaining its stance that crypto is not legal tender. As the Sarb continues to shape its regulatory approach, crypto investors and service providers face ongoing challenges in adapting to this evolving landscape. Adding another regulatory layer is the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), which enforces anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing compliance, mandating registration and reporting duties for crypto providers. This dynamic regulatory environment seeks to balance innovation with investor safety and financial stability. To get more insight on this, the Sunday Independent spoke to Sebaga Matabane, the chief executive of a leading Crypto Firm as well as a derivatives and fintech expert. Matabane is also a recognised key opinion leader in Africa's fintech and digital assets space and an FSCA-approved key individual. She brings together deep regulatory insight, strategic foresight, and operational leadership. Sebaga Matabane is a derivatives and fintech expert and a recognised key opinion leader in Africa's fintech and digital assets space. Image: Supplied Sunday Independent (SI): How does the capital gains tax framework apply to cryptocurrency disposals for individual investors in South Africa? Sebaga Matabane (SM): When an individual in South Africa sells or otherwise disposes of cryptocurrency — whether by trading, converting to fiat, or using it for purchases — it triggers a capital gains tax (CGT) event. The first R40 000 of gains annually is excluded, after which 40% of the net capital gain is included in the individual's taxable income. For those in the top tax bracket, this translates to a maximum effective CGT rate of 18%. Timing and accurate record-keeping are key, especially as Sars sharpens its focus on digital asset transactions. SI: What are the tax implications for South African crypto investors who only hold their assets without disposing of them? SM: If you're merely holding crypto without selling, converting, or using it, there's no immediate tax liability — but that doesn't mean it flies under the radar. Sars requires all crypto holdings to be declared in your tax return, even if no taxable event has occurred. Think of it as financial transparency now, to avoid compliance issues later. SI: What licensing requirements does the FSCA impose on crypto asset service providers under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services (FAIS) Act? SM: The FSCA now defines crypto assets as financial products, which means any business offering crypto-related services — such as exchanges, trading platforms, or wallet providers — must be licensed as a Financial Services Provider (FSP) under the FAIS Act. This includes appointing approved key individuals, meeting fit and proper requirements, having compliant governance structures, and aligning with ongoing conduct obligations. The intention is to create market integrity, promote professionalism, and ensure consumer protection. SI: How does the FSCA's classification of crypto assets as financial products impact consumer protection in the crypto market? SM: This classification is a game changer. It brings crypto under the same protective framework as other financial instruments, enabling the FSCA to monitor and act against misconduct, misrepresentation, and unfair business practices. Consumers can now benefit from advice from licensed providers, recourse mechanisms, and better disclosure standards. It sets the stage for a more trustworthy and accountable market. SI: How is the SARB approaching the regulation of cryptocurrencies, given that they are not recognised as legal tender? SM: While the SARB maintains that crypto assets do not qualify as legal tender, it acknowledges their growing influence. Its approach is cautious but strategic: it collaborates with other regulators through the Intergovernmental Fintech Working Group (IFWG), explores use cases via sandbox environments, and keeps a close eye on systemic risk, monetary sovereignty, and exchange control circumvention. The Reserve Bank's messaging is clear: crypto is not a threat to ignore, but neither is it a form of money just yet. SI: What is the significance of the Gauteng High Court ruling regarding cryptocurrencies and exchange control regulations, and how might SARB's appeal affect this? SM: The Gauteng High Court's decision that cryptocurrencies are not subject to exchange control regulations has major implications — it effectively opens the door for freer movement of crypto across borders, which could impact capital flows, financial surveillance, and offshore structuring. However, the Sarb is appealing the ruling, signalling its intent to retain oversight. If the appeal succeeds, crypto flows may be subjected to stricter monitoring and reporting, reshaping how exchanges and OTC desks operate. It's a legal pivot point to watch. SI: What challenges do crypto investors and service providers face in navigating the evolving regulatory and tax landscape in South Africa? SM: The biggest challenge is regulatory ambiguity coupled with rapid change. Investors are grappling with complex tax reporting, unclear treatment of cross-border transactions, and a lack of practical guidance. Meanwhile, service providers must juggle licensing deadlines, AML/CFT compliance, FIC registration, and a mounting expectation of institutional-grade conduct — all while trying to remain agile and innovative. Ultimately, navigating this space requires a blend of legal foresight, tax expertise, and operational discipline. It is clear that the country's cryptocurrency sector stands at a critical crossroads, caught between the forces of innovation and regulation. Yet within this turbulence lies opportunity. The regulatory reckoning now underway could very well lay the foundation for a more secure, transparent, and mature crypto market. But success will depend on the ability of players to adapt swiftly, comply fully, and anticipate the next wave of regulatory evolution. In this high-stakes game of compliance and innovation, one thing is certain: the rules are being written — and those who understand them, shape them, or break them will define the future of crypto in South Africa, and Africa as a whole. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.

5. 2% annual inflation in South Africa's residential property prices reported for February 2025
5. 2% annual inflation in South Africa's residential property prices reported for February 2025

IOL News

time2 days ago

  • IOL News

5. 2% annual inflation in South Africa's residential property prices reported for February 2025

For a first-time buyer, investor or seller, understanding the nuances of regional property trends is crucial. Image: ANA Archives The annual national residential property price inflation was 5.2% in February 2025, marginally down from a revised 5.3% in January this year. The Residential Property Price Index February 2025, released by Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) on Thursday, showed that the residential property price index (RPPI) increased by 0.4% month-on-month in February. 'The main contributors to the 5.2% annual national inflation rate were Western Cape (8.5% and contributing 3.3 percentage points) and Gauteng (2.5% and contributing 0.9 of a percentage point). "The RPPI for all metropolitan areas increased by 4.9% between February 2024 and February 2025. The main contributors to the 4.9% annual inflation rate for metropolitan areas were City of Cape Town (7.6% and contributing 2.7 percentage points) and City of Johannesburg (2.9% and contributing 0.6 of a percentage point).' The RPPI for properties sold for the first time increased by 5.5% between February last year and February this year. The index increased by 0.3% month-on-month in February. The RPPI for resold properties increased by 5.6% between the same period. The index increased by 0.4% month-on-month in February. The RPPI for sectional title properties increased by 3.2% between February 2024 and February 2025. The index increased by 0.4% month-on-month in February. The RPPI for freehold properties increased by 6.3% between February 2024 and February 2025. The index increased by 0.4% month-on-month in February. The key takeaway from the February 2025 Stats SA report is the slight dip in annual residential property inflation from 5.3% to 5.2%, alongside a modest 0.4% month-on-month increase, says Dr Meshel Muzuva, an academic programme leader for the School of Business Excellence at the Management College of Southern Africa. 'While the change is minimal, these figures suggest that property prices are beginning to stabilise after a period of more rapid growth. This points to a market adjusting to current economic conditions, particularly rising living costs, interest rates, and affordability constraints,' Muzuva said. Looking ahead, Muzuva said South Africa can expect the property market to grow steadily in the short to medium term. She said key macroeconomic factors at play are the interest rate cuts as the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) has eased the repo rate to 7.25% as of late May, with a prime lending rate of 10.75%, marking the fourth consecutive cut since September 2024. She added that a further 25 bps cuts, possibly to 10.50% prime, are anticipated through 2025, which makes borrowing slightly cheaper, which could help boost home buying in the coming months. The academic programme leader said the inflation dynamics were also at play, with CPI around 2.8 to 3.2%, SARB is comfortably within its target range, creating room for more monetary easing. 'Given that real house prices have struggled for much of the past few years, with weak transaction volumes and slower recovery relative to nominal gains, Global Property Guide believes the resumption of interest rate cuts should gradually boost market confidence, especially for first-time buyers.' Muzuva said it will be important to monitor how consumer confidence, interest rates, and employment levels evolve this year. She said should the SARB move toward interest rate cuts in response to easing inflation, this could stimulate renewed activity in the residential property market. On the other hand, she said if macroeconomic uncertainty persists, SA might expect continued caution among both buyers and sellers. 'The February RPPI suggests the property market is settling into a more balanced phase, no feverish boom, but a healthier, more measured trajectory. Watch for further repo rate cuts and CPI stability, which together could lay the groundwork for renewed market momentum, especially in key metro areas. "For buyers, sellers, developers, and lenders, it's a time to be strategically positioned, keeping a close eye on macro signals to make well-timed moves,' Muzuva said.

Clarity sought on Helen Botes' position at Johannesburg Property Company
Clarity sought on Helen Botes' position at Johannesburg Property Company

IOL News

time3 days ago

  • IOL News

Clarity sought on Helen Botes' position at Johannesburg Property Company

The DA is demanding answers on whether Helen Botes has returned as chief executive of the Johannesburg Property Company. Image: File The status of controversial Johannesburg Property Company (JPC) chief executive Helen Botes in the entity has again been questioned after allegations emerged on Wednesday that she was back in her position. Botes' return was disputed by the JPC, with its spokesperson, Lucky Sindane, stating that Musah Makhunga was the company's acting chief executive. The JPC board has not responded at the time of publication. Botes had been the City of Johannesburg's acting chief operations officer (COO) until several temporary appointments could not be extended last month, including that of acting city manager Tshepo Makola, who returned to his permanent position of COO. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading This was after Gauteng Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Richard Mamabolo seconded Kiba Kekana as acting city manager. According to DA shadow City of Johannesburg economic development MMC Bongani Nkomo, Botes' contract as JPC boss expired in September last year. He stated that the JPC board has reinstated her months after her contract expired, and without any legal or procedural basis to do so. 'This alleged reinstatement, if true, constitutes a blatant violation of the Municipal Systems Act (MSA) and will be an insult to the principles of transparent, lawful governance,' Nkomo said. He also said this could signal yet another example of ANC-led cadre deployment and backroom dealing, which has long undermined service delivery and accountability in the city. 'Botes' contract as CEO of JPC expired in September 2024. Since then, she has inexplicably continued to occupy a space in the city's administration under the ambiguous title of COO, despite no clarity on her legal appointment status,' added Nkomo. He said with Kekana's recent secondment as acting city manager and Makola's return to his role as COO, questions were now mounting over Botes' official position, if any. Nkomo expressed concerns that the JPC board may have acted unilaterally to reinstate Botes to the position of JPC chief executive without following due legal processes, as no council resolution has been tabled or adopted to approve her reinstatement. Additionally, there is no confirmation that a fixed-term contract or performance agreement has been submitted as required under Section 57 of the MSA, and no formal extension of acting capacity has been granted beyond the legally permitted six months, contrary to what is prescribed under Section 54A. The DA is demanding confirmation of any formal council or board resolution passed on Botes' return to the JPC, proof of Mamabolo's concurrence for any acting extension beyond the statutory limit, and a clear and legal explanation of what position she currently holds within the municipality or JPC, and on what authority. 'If this alleged reinstatement occurred outside of the prescribed legal framework, it is null and void,' Nkomo warned. It has also threatened to escalate the matter to the Section 79 oversight committee and refer it to Mamabolo for urgent investigation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store