logo
Why 100% fruit juice should come with a sugar warning label

Why 100% fruit juice should come with a sugar warning label

Mail & Guardian24-06-2025
Drinking just one sugar-sweetened beverage (for example sodas or fruit juice with artificially added sugar) a day raises the chances of a child being overweight by more than half. (Towfiqu Barbhuiya/Unsplash)
Apples, oranges and grapes are healthy fruits. But when they are turned into juice they pack as much, or more, sugar than some sodas or energy drinks.
Under South Africa's
won't be required to show a high sugar warning on their packaging because their sugars are 'naturally occurring'. But because of their sugar content, nutritional experts
'Coke has too much sugar, but fruit juices also have too much natural sugar,' says Edzani Mphaphuli, executive director of
Sugar is helping drive South Africa's obesity rise. Over
That's part of what our proposed food labelling regulations are meant to combat.
Under the current draft — which the health department is still reviewing, according to spokesperson Foster Mohale — fruit juices will fall through a definition loophole.
But that's not what researchers who gave input on the rules recommended or what many public health experts
'Our evaluation used the criteria of 'free sugars', where all 100% fruit juices would have carried a warning label,' says Tamryn Frank, a researcher at the University of the Western Cape who was part of the technical team. 'That highlights the importance of reconsidering the best term to include when the final regulation is published.'
The draft regulations say any drink with more than 5g of sugar (just over one teaspoon) per 100ml, or any amount of
If passed in their current form, researchers say almost
Pure 100% fruit juices won't carry a warning label because their sugar is natural. But not all juices are completely natural — some contain added sugar or sweeteners — so those with more than just over a teaspoon of sugar per 100ml will still need to carry a 'high in sugar' warning.
We did the sums to work out which drinks have the most sugar and which will — or won't — need a warning label, according to the current version of the regulations.
Fruit juices
While they didn't have any
'Because they come straight from nature, people think they must be healthy. But it's not exactly the same thing as eating a single fruit,' explains Mphaphuli. 'Juice is highly concentrated and you need to dilute it with water if you're going to give it to a child [to reduce the sugar content].'
Whole fruits are filled with
A
South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition
earlier this year found that almost three-quarters of fruit juices have more sugar than the proposed limit. But, as regulations stand now, only 17% would require a warning label because most of the sugar is natural, not added (because the regulations only look at the total amount of sugar in products with added sugar and not those with natural sugars).
Sodas
Among the three sodas, Coke has the most sugar — and is the only one that contains
The WHO says an adult should not consume more than
Sodas are some of the sweetest drinks you can buy and, research shows, South Africans love them: we
Before South Africa's
While chemical sweeteners, which are often used in 'diet' drinks,
'None of these products are recommended as part of a healthy diet because they don't contain any nutrients other than sugar and energy,' says Makoma Bopape, a nutrition researcher and lecturer at the University of Limpopo. Bopape was part of the technical group who worked on the labels. 'What makes it worse is the fact that some contain sweeteners.'
Energy drinks
Monster has nearly four times more sugar than both Dragon and Power Play and all contain artificial sweeteners.
A 500ml can of Monster has around 13 teaspoons of sugar — more than the maximum sugar intake the WHO
Under the proposed regulations, these three drinks would all need a warning label — either for high sugar or containing artificial sweeteners.
Flavoured water
Of the three flavoured waters we looked at, Bonaqua Pump Lemon is the only one that does not contain any artificial sweeteners.
Even though they're often marketed as 'healthier' options, the flavoured waters we looked at had similar amounts of sugar and sweeteners as sodas. One option had both sugar and three sweeteners — making it more soda than water.
aQuelle naartjie and Thirsti berry use artificial sweeteners to keep the sugar low, but they respectively also contain nearly two and four full teaspoons of sugar in a 500ml bottle.
Bopape says plain water — not flavoured water — should be the preferred drink of choice.
This story was produced by the
. Sign up for the
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drowning rates in SA go up while global figures drop, says Lifesaving SA
Drowning rates in SA go up while global figures drop, says Lifesaving SA

The Herald

time3 days ago

  • The Herald

Drowning rates in SA go up while global figures drop, says Lifesaving SA

Drownings in South Africa are increasing, bucking the global trend where the rates are dropping, Lifesaving South Africa (LSA) warned in a statement to mark World Drowning Prevention Day on Friday. 'While global drowning deaths have dropped by 38% over the past two decades, South Africa's rates are rising,' the federation said, adding the World Health Organisation (WHO) estimated at least 2,700 drowning deaths a year, with children under five at the greatest risk. Africa has seen a 3% decline, while South Africa has struggled to deal with the threat. WHO statistics showed at least 1,600 drowning deaths a year in the country, but these figures did not include deaths from flooding disasters, LSA said. 'In South Africa the crisis is worsened by climate change and flooding disasters, such as those in the Eastern Cape in June, and preventable risks such as unsafe farm dams and canals, inadequate water and sanitation infrastructure and traditional baptism ceremonies at rivers and along coastline.'

Poultry sector recovering, prices not expected to increase
Poultry sector recovering, prices not expected to increase

Mail & Guardian

time4 days ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Poultry sector recovering, prices not expected to increase

South Africa's poultry sector is recovering from a devastating outbreak of bird flu and has capacity to meet local consumer demand. (Madelene Cronje) South Africa's The department of agriculture rolled out mass inoculations earlier this month to protect the industry from highly pathogenic In 2023, millions of birds had to be culled, hampering production and driving up poultry and egg prices. The inoculation campaign kicked off with the vaccination of 200 000 broiler breeders at poultry producer Astral. The birds represent 5% of the company's total breeding stock, the department said. Industry experts have welcomed the inoculation drive. 'We had two cases of HPAI in the country, but both were contained and did not spread with minimum losses in terms of production,' said Izaak Breitenbach, the chief executive of the South African Poultry Association. 'We still have an additional one million birds per week slaughter capacity. We currently slaughter about 21.5 million birds per week.' That number reflects normal production levels, which may rise slightly toward December because sales typically increase in the second half of the year. Breitenbach said the industry also has the capacity to exceed this demand if needed 'The industry can cover an increase in demand of about 10% with local production in the short term and probably more in the long term.' Agriculture economists said the success rate for the inoculations will depend on how well future outbreaks are contained. (Graphic: John McCann/M&G) 'There are great expectations that South Africa's recent efforts to vaccinate poultry against avian flu will lessen the likelihood of another devastating outbreak similar to the one that occurred in 2023. Particularly in light of the seasonal influenza outbreak, which usually starts in April and peaks in September each year,' said Thabile Nkunjana, of the National Agricultural Marketing Council. 'However, the initial vaccination is reportedly for at least 200 000 broilers, which is extremely small compared to the size of the industry as a whole. As a result, there is still a chance of an outbreak related to South African poultry production, as well as a current risk of disruptions in the poultry supply, which frequently results in prices that have a negative impact on consumers The layer side of the poultry industry, which raises chickens specifically for egg production, is still producing at lower levels comparable to those before the 2023 outbreak, Nkunjana noted. 'If an outbreak were to occur, the industry would likely experience the same level of pressure as it did in 2023, and egg prices would probably rise once more,' he said. Experts warned that the cost of bird feed could hamper poultry production. Prices have increased on the back of climate conditions as well as international supply. 'Initially feed costs rose when world prices increased sharply in the aftermath of the pandemic and associated supply chain challenges, challenging weather in some key production regions and Russia's invasion of Ukraine,' said Tracy Davids, the executive director for commodity markets and foresight at the Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy. 'When world prices came down, South African prices stayed higher due to the summer drought of 2024. So, feed costs have increased much more than meat prices over the past five years, making life difficult for all livestock producers, but particularly poultry that use feed very intensively. It's the biggest cost component in the sector.' With feed prices declining and the partial lifting of the ban on Brazilian chicken imports earlier this month, the prospects for the sector are looking positive, Davids added. The ban was implemented after Brazil also reported disease outbreaks, but was lifted to support South African consumers' food security, alleviate cost pressures, and help stabilise the supply chain, said Nkunjana.

Aid cuts, including by UK, undermine progress on fight against superbugs
Aid cuts, including by UK, undermine progress on fight against superbugs

Mail & Guardian

time4 days ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Aid cuts, including by UK, undermine progress on fight against superbugs

Antimicrobial resistance silent pandemic that already claims more than 1.3 million lives every year. File photo A recent global economic model warns that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) may cost the world economy up to This escalating threat coincides with a decline in international support for AMR surveillance. The Low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa, are likely to bear the heaviest burden because of under-resourced health systems, limited surveillance capacity and growing barriers to effective treatments. AMR arises when microorganisms evolve mechanisms to withstand the effects of antibiotics intended to eliminate them. As resistance spreads, infections that were once easily treatable become increasingly difficult, and sometimes impossible, to cure. This silent pandemic is already responsible for more than By 2050, resistant infections could reduce global GDP by up to 3.1% and push millions into poverty as a result of the cost of prolonged illness and ineffective treatment. Health systems, especially in countries already facing a high burden of disease, are at risk of being overwhelmed. The But Experts caution that even partial reductions in funding may accelerate the spread of AMR in high-risk regions. Such cutbacks can delay the detection of resistant pathogens, disrupt surveillance efforts and weaken public health responses. The consequences are clear: more infections, higher mortality rates and mounting pressure on already overstretched health systems. AMR does not respect borders. Resistant bacteria can emerge in one location and spread globally through travel, trade and migration. Inadequate surveillance in one part of the world increases vulnerability everywhere. Many low- and medium-income countries face compounded problems: limited access to diagnostics, overuse or misuse of antibiotics in both clinical and agricultural settings, as well as underinvestment in water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure. Surveillance programmes supported by international aid help fill these gaps by enabling early detection and informed response. Cutting funding now undermines global preparedness just as AMR risks are accelerating. While AMR is a long-term challenge, the window for effective action is narrowing. Delaying investment now will probably increase the cost and complexity of response in the future. According to recent economic analyses, every dollar spent on AMR containment today could save up to $20 in future health and productivity costs. Continued investment in surveillance, laboratory capacity, workforce training and antimicrobial stewardship is essential for all countries and for global health security. Multilateral partnerships, sustained funding, and equitable access to innovation are critical pillars of any effective AMR strategy. What can be done? Given the recent decline in global funding, it is essential to explore alternative strategies to sustain and strengthen AMR efforts. Reinforce multilateral funding: Donor countries should explore shared funding mechanisms to sustain critical AMR programmes beyond bilateral commitments. Strengthen regional cooperation: Regional AMR surveillance networks can improve resilience and facilitate data-sharing, even in the face of international funding cuts. Mobilise domestic resources: Prioritise public health investment in laboratory systems, data infrastructure, and training to reduce reliance on fluctuating aid flows. Promote responsible antimicrobial use: Stewardship programmes in human and veterinary medicine are essential to slow the development of resistance. Invest in research and equitable access: Support for the development and fair distribution of new antibiotics, vaccines, and diagnostics must remain a global priority. AMR is one of the most urgent and complex public health issues of our time. Progress made in the past decade, through global collaboration, investment and capacity-building now stands at risk. At the very moment when stronger action is needed, international funding is contracting. The decisions made now will shape the trajectory of AMR for decades. Reducing support is not just a financial recalibration; it is a choice that may have irreversible consequences for millions of people worldwide. The global community must act decisively to protect hard-won gains, support countries most at risk and uphold the shared responsibility of safeguarding the effectiveness of life-saving medicines. Dr Jose L Balcazar is a senior microbiologist at the Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA-CERCA), Spain.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store