Two schools to lose hearing impairment units
Torbay Council's overview and scrutiny committee agreed to go ahead with the planned unit closures at St Margaret's Primary School and The Spires College.
Councillor Nick Bye, cabinet member for children's services, said the council commissioned 16 education health and care plan (EHCP) places, but only five children were in the placements.
Deputy director of local engagement at the National Deaf Children's Society, Martin Thacker, said deaf children would struggle without the support.
A petition against the plans gained more than 1,600 signatures and a protest was held in the town's centre ahead of the decision.
Mr Thacker added: "Without this support, deaf children can fall behind in lessons, struggle to build relationships with classmates, and experience low self-esteem and confidence.
"Hearing resource provisions are vital for the wellbeing of deaf children and mean they can thrive within mainstream schools alongside their hearing classmates."
Councillor Bye said the closures of the units would not lead to a "change in support".
"It's absolutely a continuation of support, it's no change to support, it's just the way we're funded," he said.
"There is a different funding model. Money will follow the individual pupil."
St Margaret's Academy previously said the council only counted children with an EHCP and not other hearing-impaired youngsters which it also supported.
Felicity Morris, secretary of the parent teachers association at St Margaret's, said the council was taking away specialist support "without meaningful or lawful consultation".
"Parents were not consulted," she said. "Qualified teachers of the deaf were excluded. The heads of both schools weren't asked. They were just told.
"This is not only morally wrong but also legally risky. It is not about buildings and budgets – it's about deaf children, and whether this council will stand by them.
"Don't close the doors on the only spaces where they are truly understood."
Councillor Bye said there were similar numbers of hearing impaired children attending other schools in the Bay, which do not have a hearing impairment unit.
"They flourish there. Surely with the great history and tradition at both St Margaret's and Spires they should be able to flourish there and I'm sure they will," he said.
The committee conceded the consultation and information could have been handled better.
Mr Thacker said the charity was considering its response to the council's decision.
More news stories for Devon
Listen to the latest news for Devon
Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@bbc.co.uk.
Anger at closure of school hearing impairment unit
National Deaf Charity's Society
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ministers fail to rule out cutting Send school plans after campaigners' concerns
Ministers have failed to rule out slashing education plans for children and young people with special educational needs, after campaigners warned against the move. Education minister Stephen Morgan insisted parents should have 'absolutely' no fear that support for children with special needs or disabilities (Send) will be scaled back. But he could not guarantee that the current system of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), which are issued to give children specialist classroom support, would remain in place. In a letter shared with the Guardian newspaper, campaigners have said that without the documents in mainstream schools, 'many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether'. On Monday, Mr Morgan told broadcaster LBC the current system of support is 'failing children, it's failing parents'. Asked if concerned campaigners could have no fear that Send support will be scaled back, Mr Morgan replied: 'Absolutely. What we want to do is make sure we've got a better system in place as a result of the reform that we're doing that improves outcomes for children with additional needs.' But pressed whether the reforms could include scrapping ECHPs, Mr Morgan replied: 'We're looking at all things in the round. 'I'm not going to get into the mechanics today, but this is about strengthening support for system.' On Sunday, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson would similarly not be drawn on whether the plans will be retained. 'What I can say very clearly is that we will strengthen and put in place better support for children,' she told the BBC. The Government plans to publish a white paper in the autumn detailing how it will reform support for Send, according to Mr Morgan. Speaking in the Commons on Monday, Ms Phillipson said children with special needs will 'always' have a 'legal right' to additional support. She said: 'The guiding principle of any reform to the Send system that we will set out will be about better support for children, strengthened support for children and improved support for children, both inside and outside of special schools. 'Improved inclusivity in mainstream schools, more specialist provision in mainstream schools, and absolutely drawing on the expertise of the specialist sector in creating the places where we need them, there will always be a legal right… to the additional support… that children with Send need.' Requests for Send support have risen year-on-year. In total, there were 638,745 EHCPs in place in January 2025, up 10.8% on the same point last year. The number of new plans which started during 2024 also grew by 15.8% on the previous year, to 97,747. Requests for children to be assessed for EHCPs rose by 11.8% to 154,489 in 2024. In a letter to the Guardian, campaigners including the heads of charities, professors, Send parents including actor Sally Phillips, and campaigners including broadcaster Chris Packham warned against scrapping ECHPs as part of any overhaul of support. 'Whatever the Send system's problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections,' they said. MPs have warned ministers have not been clear about their plans, and could face a rebellion akin to last week's welfare Bill revolt, according to the Guardian. In a signal the Government is willing to square up to its rebellious backbenchers, Mr Morgan told ITV's Good Morning Britain that Labour MPs had 'stood on a platform a manifesto commitment to reform the Send system'. He also would not be drawn into suggestions by Good Morning Britain that the reforms were a cost-cutting measure being driven by the Treasury. 'Well, look at the figures. We've actually put more money into the Send system, the £1 billion for high needs announced last year,' he replied to the question. Amid mounting pressure from MPs to scrap the two-child benefit cap, the minister said 'nothing has changed' in the Government's plans, which will see a child poverty strategy report back in the autumn. Mr Morgan added: 'We're looking at all levers to bring down child poverty, but that's got to be fiscally done well, and obviously we need to grow our economy.' Liberal Democrat education spokeswoman Munira Wilson said: 'The Send system urgently needs fixing, but ministers mustn't use that as an excuse to balance the books on the backs of disabled children. 'The Government is ignoring the concerns of special needs families and campaigners, and is in serious danger of sleepwalking into another crisis – just like they did with the welfare Bill. 'Bridget Phillipson must listen to those concerns and come up with a proper solution that protects the most vulnerable in our communities, rather than throwing their support out the window.' During an adjournment debate on Send provision, Liberal Democrat MP Chris Coughlan said there are 'suicidal children with autism, who are repeatedly denied the support that is their right' in constituency of Dorking and Horley. Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'There is an unfair postcode lottery in the provision available depending on the financial position of local authorities and local health services, many of which suffered from years of underfunding under the previous government. 'The Government has recognised the need for reform, suggesting that, in future, mainstream schools could support more pupils with special educational needs. 'If this is to be achieved, access to quality staff Send training will be essential, and schools will need significantly improved funding and access to external support in order to ensure children consistently receive the provision they deserve.'
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Before the government overhauls special educational needs, lessons must be learnt
Whatever else may be said about the government's plans for the education of children with special needs, they cannot be handled in the same, calamitous way as were the reforms to personal independence payments (PIP). As has been said with enormous force during the low-key commemoration of Labour's first year in office, lessons must be learnt. The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, is the lead minister in preparing the schools white paper in October, which will include proposals for changes to the special needs framework. She has already caused some concern by refusing to rule out changing the system of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), and the rights groups and backbench MPs in her party have mobilised in response. In fairness, Ms Phillipson and her colleagues have talked about changes to EHCPs in the past. However, the recent welfare reform bill fiasco has both sharpened anxieties and bolstered the confidence of Labour backbenchers that they can defy the party leadership and block reform. The Labour general election manifesto was also oblique on this point. An element of fear, if not paranoia, has entered the debate, and Ms Phillipson's task has been much more difficult because of the mistakes made by her colleagues – Rachel Reeves as chancellor, Liz Kendall as work and pensions secretary, and the prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer. Ms Phillipson is one of the brighter stars in the Labour firmament, but she will be fortunate if she emerges from this process with an improved EHCP regime or her reputation enhanced. Trust has been eroded. For any government of any party, reforming the special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision for children and young people presents particular challenges, and rightly so. These are among the most vulnerable of people, and they cannot be subject to discriminatory treatment, both as a matter of law and of morality. As a society, there is a duty to provide for children and young people with physical and learning disabilities, and to offer them the best start in life, maximising their independence and life chances. Their parents need and deserve support, and any failure to do so is unconscionable. In contrast to the PIP reforms, there must be no feeling that reform is solely or even primarily driven by the Treasury and the need for savings, though there is no escaping the financial realities. As Ms Reeves and Ms Kendall discovered to their cost, there are red lines that this generation of Labour MPs will not cross solely for the sake of meeting fiscal rules. Ms Phillipson, therefore, must win the arguments – and, as far as possible, carry all those concerned with her as she reshapes the regime and improves it. Therefore, the various groups representing SEND children and parents need to be closely involved in each stage of policy development. This is something she is now well placed to do, given recent events. In any case, because of what happened with PIP entitlements, she has no alternative. The parliamentary Labour Party, emboldened as it now is, will insist on being consulted. When the time comes to publish the white paper, there should be no nasty surprises. If there are, it will be just as doomed as the welfare reform bill. Secondly, this process cannot be rushed, or perceived to be rushed. The deadline of October for the schools white paper is a reasonable one but it should not take precedence over good policy. If the sections on SEND are not ready to be published, then they should be postponed. Indeed, there is a strong case for giving SEND policy a comprehensive study and white paper of its own, given the sensitivities and complexities involved. Again, the lesson of recent events is that a late policy is preferable to a bad policy. There is also a real need for a better understanding – entirely separate from the cost – of the merits of special schools or children's inclusion in the general school system, which will, of course, vary by individual cases. It is also wrong, as seems to be the case now, that variations in provision across different local authorities can be so stark – a postcode lottery. Thirdly, there does have to be some cognisance of the financial trends: why they are happening and how they will evolve. These are not all well understood even by the experts. Many more children are being given statutory rights under their hard-won EHCPs, but the reasons for the sharp increase of some 70 per cent in less than a decade are less transparent. Next year, the projected annual cost of support for children with learning difficulties or disabilities is set to reach £12bn. The system of finance also needs to be changed. At the moment, the costs of statutory SEND obligations are met by school managements and local authorities in the first instance, and they tend to squeeze other important, albeit less vital, priorities. This will put local councils into a large cumulative deficit of £8bn by 2027, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. In other words, more councils will go bust, which helps no one. It would be far more satisfactory if there were a national system of SEND funding based on consistent criteria. Finally – and, again, drawing on an important lesson – the system for SEND and EHCPs should be founded on a cross-party consensus. This, admittedly, is unlikely, but for obvious reasons it would help children and parents, as well as schools and local authorities, to plan ahead and avoid stigmatisation if those with special needs were 'weaponised' for political advantage. That may prove beyond Ms Phillipson's abilities, but she must surely know that she and her government cannot afford another such debacle. This time around, unlike Ms Kendall, she can remind Sir Keir and Ms Reeves of certain political realities.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
How government changes to special needs education could affect children with EHCPs
Campaigners have warned the government not to cut or scrap education plans for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Ministers have refused to rule out slashing the education, health and care plans (EHCPs) that ensures children with special educational needs receive the proper support from their local authority. The government says it has inherited a system that has been "left on its knees", and plans to publish a white paper outlining its proposals in October. But those representing special needs, disability, autism and Down's syndrome charities, as well as a number of high-profile broadcasters and academics, have said "every sign" from the government suggests it will remove the right to an EHCP from children attending mainstream schools. Disability charity Sense told Yahoo News that 'snatching away" ECHP provision for vulnerable children "is not the answer". Whatever the government proposals, it has been warned it could face a damaging battle with its own Labour MPs akin to its embarrassing climbdown in the House of Commons last week over planned cuts to disability benefits. On Monday, Stephen Morgan, the minister for early education, insisted that parents should have "absolutely" no fear that support for children with special needs or disabilities will be scaled back. He told LBC Radio: "What we want to do is make sure we've got a better system in place as a result of the reform that we're doing that improves outcomes for children with additional needs.' But he would not guarantee that the system of EHCPs will remain in place, saying: "'We're looking at all things in the round. 'I'm not going to get into the mechanics today, but this is about strengthening support for system.' He is the second minister in two days to refuse to rule out scrapping EHCPs, with education secretary Bridget Phillipson telling BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'What I can say very clearly is that we will strengthen and put in place better support for children." In October, the government will outline its proposals in a white paper. A Department for Education spokesperson: 'The evidence is clear that this government inherited a SEND system left on its knees – which is why we are looking at changes to improve support for children and stop parents having to fight for help. " The Prime Minister's spokesperson also said on Monday: "It is totally inaccurate to suggest that children, families and schools might experience any loss of funding or support." Introduced in 2014, an education, health and care plan (EHCP) is a legally binding document for children and young people up to the age of 25 who need more help than their school provides through special educational needs support. An assessment is carried out by the person's local council to see if they need an EHCP, which identifies the person's educational, health and social needs and establishes the additional support required to meet those needs. The government says that more 1.7 million pupils in England have special educational needs. About 5.3% of all pupils have an EHCP. About 278,200 children and young people with an EHCP attend a mainstream school - that's 43.6% of all those with a plan, the Department of Education says. The number of EHCPs has increased, with 638,745 in place in January 2025, according to the Department for Education, a rise of 10.8% from the same point the previous year. The number of new plans that started in 2024 rose by 15.8% to 97,747, while the amount of requests for children to be assessed increased by 11.8% in 2023 to 154,489. The cost of an EHCP can vary depending on the child's needs and what type of school they attend. It can cost a few thousands pounds per year, with mainstream schools expected to spend up to £6,000 per pupil from their SEND budget before requesting additional funding from their council if required, although the government says most pupils' support will cost less than this threshold. However, according to a National Audit Office report published in October 2024, it costs £19,100 per year to support a pupil with an EHCP in a mainstream secondary school. This rises to £23,900 per pupil per year at a state special school and £61,500 per year per pupil at an independent or private secondary school. Last December, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned that spending on SEND is "becoming unsustainable", with the 71% increase in the number of school pupils with EHCPs between 2018 and 2024 driven by three areas: autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and speech, language and communication needs. It said the central government funding for "high needs" was almost £11bn a year. Because local authorities have a statutory obligation to deliver EHCPs, the IFS said high needs spending was consistently higher than funding by £200m to £800m per year between 2018 and 2022, with councils running up large deficits totalling £3.3bn a year. The government is remaining tight-lipped about its plans to be published in October, but the current system of EHCPs has already come in for criticism. Last month, it was revealed that fewer than half of the plans issued last year were done so within the 20-week legal time frame, the lowest level in the six years for which records are available. Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said many families faced lengthy waits for plans and a "postcode lottery in support", with rising numbers of pupils with additional needs and shortages in staff and funding having an adverse affect. He called on the government to invest in core school budgets, specialist staff and wider health and social care services. Whiteman said: 'The broken special educational needs system isn't working for anyone – children, parents, schools or local authorities. 'Something needs to change, and while it is right that the government is looking at fundamental reform, it will be crucial that ministers are able to demonstrate that any proposals strengthen, not weaken, support for pupils with additional needs. 'Any reforms in this space will likely provoke strong reactions and it will be crucial that the government works closely with both parents and schools every step of the way.' James Watson-O'Neill, chief executive of the national disability charity Sense, told Yahoo News: "Snatching away EHC plans from thousands of disabled children, and removing their legal rights to the education they need, is not the answer to the ongoing crisis in the specialist education system. 'The current system is undeniably broken. Disabled children face long waiting times and a woeful lack of services in many parts of the country. And these indefensible delays in support can have serious, lifelong consequences for disabled children. 'But EHC plans in themselves work well in principle - if they are properly funded. The government needs to urgently put a long-term funding plan in place. And any reforms must be developed alongside disabled children and their families, so disabled children's needs are put first.' The government says it wants to provide better support for children "at the earliest stage possible" and reduce the bureaucracy surrounding EHCPs. A new national campaign, Save Our Children's Rights (SOCR), has been set up to urge the government to preserve EHCPs. Headed by parents groups such as Special Needs Jungle, SEND Rights Alliance and SEND National Crisis, and backed by dozens of charities like Mencap, Sense, Disability Rights UK and the Down's Syndrome Association, it also has the support of academics and SEND parents including actor Sally Phillips and broadcaster Christine McGuinness. In a letter with more than 100 signatures, it said: 'Whatever the SEND system's problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections. "Many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether." Special Needs Jungle told Yahoo News: "All of us know about the current system's failures and shortcomings. Families are often faced with a huge gap between the provision their child is meant to receive and what they actually get. "But the problem here isn't the law - it's that the law isn't being followed or adequately enforced. "Particularly in mainstream schools, a reduction or complete snatching-away of EHCPs would threaten the basis of huge swathes of provision. It will likely lead to children either being forced into specialist schools - which is the opposite of what the government says it wants to achieve."
