Can Ishiba Gain from the LDP's Upper House Losses?
There's a general consensus that the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), Japan's largest political party, and its coalition partner, Komeito, are going to lose seats in the upcoming national election for Japan's Upper House.
Despite the anticipation of more losses ahead, the Upper House election may offer a turning point for Prime Minister Ishiba and his government, assuming he can maintain power.
There's been public frustration with the LDP over the last few years following a string of scandals. This frustration has contributed to the coalition losing its majority in a national election for Japan's Lower House nine months ago. And just a few weeks ago, the coalition lost 12 of the 127 seats in a local election for Tokyo's Metropolitan Assembly.
Despite these recent losses, it's hard to place the blame entirely on Ishiba. And so, his position as the head of the LDP will likely remain, whatever the result of the Upper House.
Politics is often thought of in terms of the next election. After the Upper House, it will be three years until the next major election in Japan (not including the election for LDP President in 2027). That's three years for Ishiba to invest in a policy agenda that sets his apart from recent governments.
As recent debates in Japan's Diet have shown, tax cuts, entitlement programs, and the Japanese economy are top issues. Issues like United States-Japan trade negotiations and geopolitical unrest in the Middle East and Europe are important, but are less meaningful for voters.
Food prices have been particularly prominent in public discourse, lately, given recent spikes in rice prices. Voters listen to a campaign street speech on July 5 in Saitama Prefecture (©Sankei by Naoki Aikawa)
Thankfully for Ishiba, rice prices have been moderating. His decision to replace his previous Minister of Agriculture has helped in this regard.
While it won't have much effect on this month's election, Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda also mentioned just recently that he believes food inflation will subside by the end of the year.
But whether it's rice prices, hotel room rates, which are up due to high tourism demands, or potential energy shocks from geopolitical tensions, it goes to show Japan is not isolated from the global economy.
The Upper House election can be a turning point for Ishiba to start preparing Japan's economy over the next few years for a future when matters like inflation, foreign tourists, workforce challenges, and supply chain shocks are more common in addition to Japan's long-term issues associated with its graying population.
Japan's economy is finally going through a long-awaited transition towards growth. For the last three years, real wages in Japan have finally started increasing at a moderate rate. Tourism is also at an all-time high, bringing in billions in new spending.
However, these benefits come with their own problems. The number of citizens on fixed incomes and pensions is also rising, which is increasing inflation and its impact on people's daily lives.
It's not surprising to hear handouts and temporary tax cuts have made their way into political campaigns ahead of the election. But these are only temporary benefits that add to Japan's long-term fiscal deficit, in exchange for short-term political gain. Meanwhile, they do nothing to solve the problems associated with regional divergence and inflation.
Growing frustration with tourism in places like Tokyo and Kyoto may be the additional boost Ishiba needs to reboot his policy of regional revitalization. But he'll need to be more creative to avoid the political shocks that come with inflation.
Ishiba has always been seen as going against the tide of the LDP establishment. It was one thing that gained him popular public support in the past. It may be the reason he was the winning choice to lead the LDP last September.
Following his own political mistakes since taking over the LDP, however, and possibly anticipating an uphill battle in the upcoming Upper House election, Ishiba has moderated himself over the last year. Instead of looking for big wins in the Upper House election, he has been doing triage to help keep the coalition from losing too many seats.
Recently, Ishiba stated his goal for the election is to maintain the majority the coalition currently holds in the Upper House ー a reasonable and even possible goal.
Given Japan's Upper House elections are staggered, the coalition will keep the 75 seats it won three years ago. The question is whether it can hold on to the 50 additional seats, out of 65 up for reelection, needed for a majority of 125.
It's entirely possible the coalition holds on to its majority in the Upper House, but it will still need to deal with the reality that the coalition has lost significant influence in both houses of the Diet. And that general public support for the coalition has waned.
Whatever the result of the Upper House election, this is a time for Ishiba to become less moderate and more politically creative. It's clear that retrenching into the old coalition establishment may be a safe bet for the election, but he also needs a vision for a new policy agenda, given the coalition's political reality. This may even require new coalition-building with new political partners. Whether Ishiba can gain from the LDP's Upper House losses is up to him.
Author: Riley Walters
Hudson Institute Senior Fellow
The Hudson Institute's Hudson Chair contributed this report on July 7, 2025. Learn more about Hudson on its home and Japan Chair pages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
U.S. copper tariffs threat adds to Manitoba minerals global push
Europe and Asia are in the sightline of Manitoba's mining industry as the United States threatens further tariffs. U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday he'd slap a 50 per cent tariff on all copper imports. He didn't announce a start date. Manitoba was Canada's fourth-largest producer of copper in 2023. The keystone province accounted for 2.4 per cent of production, or 12,000 tonnes, Natural Resources Canada data show. Data on Manitoba's recent copper exports to the United States wasn't available by print deadline. Across Canada, copper and copper-based exports were valued at $9.4 billion in 2023. 'All tariffs are inherently harmful,' said John Morris, co-director of the Mining Association of Manitoba (MAMI). He forecasts the new tax — and its related cost increase — will hurt Manitoba exports and U.S. manufacturers. Companies use copper to make electronics and appliances, among other things. Should the tariff last, mining companies will look to sell in other regions, Morris predicted. Manitoba holds at least two copper mines: Hudbay's Snow Lake operation and Vale's plant near Thompson. Copper isn't the sole focus of either hub. The Snow Lake mine produces gold and zinc; it has a daily mill capacity of 5,300 tonnes. Vale oversees, primarily, a nickel mine. Neither company answered questions about production and exports by print deadline. 'Critical minerals are a commodity with a global demand,' Morris said. 'The issue is, we have established linkages to the United States economy.' MAMI is creating a campaign to market Manitoba minerals globally. New tariffs didn't spark the plan; the association received $1.5 million from the provincial government, and another $100,000 through the provincially-funded Manitoba Mineral Development Fund, this spring. Targeted advertisements via social and traditional media should appear in the fall, Morris said. Europe and Asia will be the ads' recipients. Nineteen European ambassadors and high commissioners visited Manitoba in April. They showed interest in local minerals. Germany's ambassador to Canada listed zinc, lithium and nickel as exports the country was eyeing. 'We're working very close with the Manitoba government to ensure that we'll have success going forward, with respect to exporting of our products,' Morris said. The provincial government created a contingency for tariff relief in its most recent budget. It highlighted up to $300 million for businesses and farmers affected by tariffs, should 25 per cent across-the-board tariffs materialize. The funds haven't been tapped; an across-the-board fee hasn't appeared. Still, copper is the latest export poised for a U.S. tariff. Levies on steel, aluminum and items outside the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on trade have been in place since March. Canada placed 25 per cent tariffs on $59.8 billion worth of U.S. imports in retaliation, not including non-CUSMA compliant U.S.-made vehicles. — with files from The Canadian Press Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Japan Forward
2 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Japan's Floundering Politics Need Shinzo Abe's Legacy
July 8 marked the third anniversary of the assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, an outstanding prime minister and world leader. Abe was felled by a bullet fired by a terrorist as he gave a street corner speech. It happened during the last Upper House election, held in 2022. Once again, we offer our heartfelt condolences. Let there be no doubt that assassination represents a direct challenge to democracy and is absolutely unacceptable. Not only does it take precious lives through violent means, but it also stifles freedom of speech. Since then, politics in Japan have become unstable, and we are confronted with a crisis. This can be seen in the crushing defeat of the ruling parties in the 2024 House of Representatives election and the low approval ratings of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's Cabinet. The time has come to reevaluate "Abe politics." People pray near the scene of PM Shinzo Abe's assassination in Nara City, at 11:32 AM on July 8 (©Sankei by Kotaro Hikono) First and foremost, Abe's political approach was characterized by a coherent national vision and strategy. He boldly sought to preserve the global order and regional peace and stability. The strategic concept of a "free and open Indo-Pacific" that Shinzo Abe advocated has come to be widely embraced by the United States, European countries, India, and Southeast Asian nations. Even after stepping down as Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe's stature and influence remained undiminished, both at home and abroad. Japan's international standing was high while Abe remained alive and well. Countries around the world are currently being upended by US President Donald Trump's tariffs and other issues. Surely, many people wish that Abe, who enjoyed a close personal relationship with Trump, was still alive. In the foreign and national security policy arena, Abe steeled himself to being subjected to fierce criticism from leftist and liberal forces. But, in the end, he successfully shepherded the enactment of security-related laws and paved the way for the exercise of the right of collective self-defense, albeit in a limited form. This was essential to preserve peace and protect the lives of the Japanese people. Sticking with Abe's approach, former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida opted to drastically strengthen Japan's defense capabilities. The current international situation is foreboding. It is Prime Minister Ishiba's duty to clearly explain to the public what is needed to ensure Japan's security. And then it is his job to take action. But, to date, he has done little in this regard. We urge the Prime Minister to demonstrate the resolve required to protect Japan and the Japanese people from the nuclear-armed dictatorships of China, North Korea, and Russia. Ishiba also displays no enthusiasm for constitutional reform. However, such reform is the official policy of the Liberal-Democratic Party (LDP) he heads. Then there is the issue of whether to allow optional surnames for married couples, a step sure to undermine family unity. Ishiba has hinted that he might remove the party discipline requirement if it comes up for a vote in the Diet. Where has his conservative pride gone? Unless the LDP comprehends the significance of Abe's politics and champions them, its core supporters are unlikely to return. Once again, we are in the middle of an Upper House election. Security during the campaign should be as thorough as possible to prevent terrorist attacks and other incidents. After all, it is in everyone's interest to protect democracy. (Read the editorial in Japanese .) Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun
Japan Forward
2 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Trump's Tariff Blitz: Will Japan Fold or Fight?
President Donald Trump has reignited global trade tensions by unveiling a series of letters on July 7, threatening to impose hefty tariffs on major trading partners, including Japan. The move comes as a 90-day pause on Trump's Reciprocal Tariff Plan, initially announced on April 2, is set to expire this Wednesday. While baseline tariffs of 10% on all imports remain in place, the letters outline much steeper levies unless new trade agreements are reached. A letter addressed to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba confirms a blanket 25% tariff on all Japanese exports to the US, effective on August 1. This is in addition to existing sector-specific tariffs already applied to automobiles, auto parts, steel, and aluminum. In the letter, Trump described the US trade deficit with Japan as a "major threat" to the American economy and national security. He warned that any retaliatory measures would be met with proportional escalation: "Whatever the number you choose to raise them by will be added onto the 25% that we charge," he wrote. President Trump's letter to PM Ishiba, dated July 7, addresses the US-Japan trade deficit and announces a 25% tariff on all Japanese exports starting August 1, 2025. Ishiba stated on Tuesday that the announcement was "truly regrettable," but reiterated Tokyo's commitment to ongoing dialogue and the protection of national interests. Japanese trade officials have made several trips to Washington in recent months to seek exemptions through negotiations, but those efforts have so far failed to produce results. Since his first term, Trump has claimed that countries exploit America's vast consumer market, often citing Japan as a prime example. The president argues that Japan's dominant industries, such as automakers and electronics, benefit from access to the American marketplace, while American agricultural and manufactured goods face steep barriers. US President Donald Trump announces details of his administration's latest tariffs at the White House in Washington, DC on April 3. (©Reuters via Kyodo) By rolling out aggressive tariffs, Washington aims to insulate domestic producers from foreign competition and compel Japan to open its market to more US goods. Although a bilateral trade imbalance exists, it only tells part of the story. The US consistently enjoys a trade surplus in services with Japan. Moreover, much of the goods deficit arises from structural economic differences and consumer preferences, rather than Japan's protectionist barriers. For one thing, the US naturally imports more products than other countries as a high-consumption economy. Japanese automakers, in turn, have tailored their vehicles to suit American tastes, often manufacturing them directly in the US. SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son delivers remarks as President Trump looks on during an "Investing in America" event, Wednesday, April 30, 2025, in the Cross Hall of the White House. (©White House/Joyce N. Boghosian) Japan has also been the largest source of foreign direct investment in the US for five consecutive years since 2019. Corporations like Toyota, SoftBank, and Fujifilm have poured billions into their American operations in recent years, creating tens of thousands of new jobs. These sustained investments help mitigate some of the negative effects typically associated with a trade deficit. Even on rice, Trump's criticism often misses the mark. Under World Trade Organization rules, Japan imports up to 770,000 tons of tariff-free rice annually through a minimum access system. In fiscal 2024, it imported nearly the full amount, with US rice making up 45% of those imports, far more than any other country. The US is Japan's largest export destination. If implemented, 25% tariffs would significantly increase the cost of Japanese goods in the American market, reducing their competitive edge and squeezing profit margins. Analysts project that Trump's proposed policy could decrease Japan's real GDP by as much as 1.8%, disrupt global supply chains, and negatively impact corporate earnings across various sectors. Minister of State for Economic Revitalization Ryosei Akazawa (right) and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent shake hands before trade talks in Washington, DC, in May. (Pool photo by Kyodo) The political stakes are equally high. With inflation still weighing on households, the Japanese government remains indecisive on whether to cut or scrap the consumption tax, an issue looming large ahead of a critical Upper House election on July 20. Having already lost its majority in the last Lower House election, Ishiba and his ruling Liberal Democratic Party are walking a tightrope as tariff D-day nears. Despite Trump's accusations of Japan being "spoiled," Tokyo has shown a willingness to compromise under the right circumstances. In 2019, for instance, then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe signed a limited bilateral trade agreement with Trump, lowering tariffs on American beef, pork, and wheat in exchange for a freeze on higher auto tariffs. First Lady Melania Trump, President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, and Akie Abe enjoying a dinner at a robatayaki restaurant in Minato, Tokyo, on May 26, 2019. (©Kyodo) Abe also championed multilateral trade pacts like the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which emphasizes rules-based trade and market reciprocity as an alternative to coercive deal-making. Some of Trump's current demands, particularly wider access to Japan's agricultural market, could have been achieved through the original Trans-Pacific Partnership, from which Trump withdrew in 2017 during his first term. Author: Kenji Yoshida
