logo
Congress Takes Huge Step To Repeal 6 Student Loan Repayment Plans And Force Many Borrowers To Pay More

Congress Takes Huge Step To Repeal 6 Student Loan Repayment Plans And Force Many Borrowers To Pay More

Forbes30-04-2025
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 29: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks at a press conference ... More with other members of House Republican leadership, following a meeting of the House Republican Conference, in Washington, DC on April 29, 2025. A key GOP House committee passed legislation that would fundamentally reshape federal student loan repayment and loan forgiveness. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
A key House committee passed the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan on Tuesday, a Republican bill that is part of the party's broader effort to enact President Donald Trump's legislative agenda of extending massive tax cuts paid for by slashing government spending. If the bill is ultimately enacted through the budget reconciliation process, it would fundamentally remake the entire federal student loan repayment system by cutting off or pushing out loan forgiveness and forcing millions of borrowers into more expensive repayment plans.
'Today, the Education and Workforce Committee passed the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan—a vital portion of Trump's big, beautiful bill to provide tax relief for American families and small businesses, rein in wasteful spending, and reduce the federal budget deficit,' said the committee in a statement on Tuesday.
'Our current student loan system is broken and has left students holding over $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt, with taxpayers estimated to lose hundreds of billions of dollars on loans disbursed over the next decade,' said Education and Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI) following the commitee's passage of the bill. 'The bill passed by Committee Republicans today not only would save taxpayers over $350 billion but also bring much-needed reform in three key areas: simplified loan repayment, streamlined student loan options, and accountability for students and taxpayers. I'm proud of the Committee's work today to finally stand up and end the status quo of endless borrowing.'
But the proposed changes to student loan repayment programs would have profound impacts for millions of borrowers, potentially leading to higher payments and cutting off loan forgiveness eligibility. Here's a breakdown.
A core element of the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan bill is a complete overhaul of the federal student loan repayment system. And the changes won't just impact new borrowers; many existing borrowers currently in repayment on their student loans would be affected, too.
Currently, there are about a dozen federal student loan repayment plans, broken into two broad groups. There is a collection of repayment plan options with fixed monthly payments over a traditional amortization schedule, without regard to a borrower's income or their ability to pay. This includes a 10-year Standard plan, a 25-year Extended plan, a Graduated repayment option where payments start off relatively low and increase over time, and consolidation Standard plans with terms of up to 30 years, depending on the initial balance.
Then, there are income-driven repayment plans. IDR is an umbrella term that encompasses a collections of repayment plans tied to a borrower's income and family size, with borrowers entitled to student loan forgiveness for any remaining balance by the end of the repayment term, typically 20 or 25 years. Under the IDR umbrella, there are three 'income-contingent' repayment plans including Income-Contingent Repayment, Pay As You Earn, and the new SAVE plan which was designed to be the most affordable IDR option. Separately, there are two 'income-based' repayment plans; an older version of IBR that is the most accessible IDR program, and a newer version of IBR that is about 33% less expensive than it's older counterpart with a 25-year student loan forgiveness term instead of 20. This 'new' IBR plan is only available for borrowers who first took out federal student loans on or after July 1, 2014.
The Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan would upend this federal student loan repayment plan system by narrowing down the number of plans to just two. One 'Standard' plan option would have fixed payments on a term of between 10 and 25 years, depending on the borrower's balance. And a new income-driven option called the 'Repayment Assistance Plan' (or RAP for short) would have monthly payments comparable to the PAYE plan and new IBR, but with a 30-year student loan forgiveness term instead of 20 or 25 – effectively forcing borrowers to repay their loans for far longer.
It would be one thing if, under the bill's terms, current student loan borrowers would be able to continue repaying their student loans under existing plans. That would be largely true for borrowers currently in repayment under Standard and Graduated plans. But for current borrowers in one of the four existing IDR plans, things get very complicated.
A prior version of the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan (called the College Cost Reduction Act) would have grandfathered in current borrowers into the existing IDR system. But the legislation passed by Republicans in the House Education and Workforce Committee on Tuesday would not do that. The bill would repeal all income-contingent repayment plans including the ICR, PAYE, and SAVE plans. It also would eliminate the 'new' IBR plan. That effectively would leave only the older, more expensive version of IBR, and the new RAP plan created by the bill.
If enacted, this will have profound impacts for millions of federal student loan borrowers. The more than eight million borrowers who have been in the SAVE plan will be forced under the bill's terms into the older version of IBR, which could double or even triple their monthly payments. They could opt into the RAP plan instead to have somewhat more affordable payments, but that would extend their repayment term by five to 10 years or more (SAVE allowed for student loan forgiveness on varying timelines between 10 and 25 years).
Meanwhile, borrowers currently in PAYE and 'new' IBR would also be forced into the older version of IBR under the terms of the legislation. This will result in most of these borrowers experiencing roughly a 33% increase in their monthly payments, as the older version of IBR uses a 15% discretionary income formula rather than 10% for PAYE and new IBR. As with SAVE plan borrowers, those who are in PAYE and new IBR could opt to switch into the new RAP plan instead, which would have comparable payments for most middle-income borrowers (although lower-income borrowers would have higher payments under RAP). But the tradeoff is an additional five to 10 years in repayment due to RAP's 30-year student loan forgiveness term. Borrowers would also be locked into RAP if they opt in – they would not be able to change their minds later and switch to IBR.
The situation would be particularly complicated for Parent PLUS borrowers. Parent PLUS borrowers are generally ineligible for income-driven plans, but if they consolidate their Parent PLUS loans into a Direct consolidation loan, that Direct consolidation loan can be repaid under the ICR plan. For older Parent PLUS borrowers on a fixed income, ICR can be a lifeline when no other fixed repayment plans are affordable. But the Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan eliminates the ICR plan.
Under the bill, Parent PLUS borrowers who have already consolidated their loans and are enrolled in ICR as of the bill's enactment would be automatically moved into the older version of IBR – which may actually lower their monthly payments, since IBR is generally a more affordable plan than ICR. But all other Parent PLUS borrowers would be permanently locked out of any income-driven repayment option, since they cannot enroll in RAP and would be barred from enrolling in IBR after the bill's passage.
This would also effectively prevent Parent PLUS borrowers not already enrolled in income-driven repayment from pursuing student loan forgiveness, as well. If these borrowers cannot enroll in IDR, they cannot get their loans forgiven under IDR. They also would not be able to benefit from Public Service Loan Forgiveness, which typically requires that borrowers enroll in an IDR plan.
For the time being, none of these changes to student loan repayment plans have become law yet. The Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan must now go to the House Budget Committee before it can be sent to the full House for a floor vote. The Senate must also pass its own reconciliation bills. Then, leaders from key House and Senate committees must hammer out any differences between the two versions of the bills before they can finalize the legislation, pass it through both chambers of Congress, and send it to President Trump for his signature. There could be changes to the legislation at nearly any step during this process.
If the bill in its current form ultimately becomes law, borrowers could see changes to their student loan repayment plan, their monthly payments, and their student loan forgiveness eligibility by the end of this year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best Political Tweets 7-25-2025
Best Political Tweets 7-25-2025

Buzz Feed

time13 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Best Political Tweets 7-25-2025

American politics — well, frankly, global politics — is chaos right now, but I find it comforting to know I'm not alone in thinking the world has gone bananas. So, here are 25 of the best, most relatable, and sometimes funny political tweets from the last week: Due to photo rights, the images in the original tweet were replaced with the meme. You can read more about the end of the Trump Foundation here. And finally: See you next week!

‘Pod Save America' on Gabbard's Obama allegations: ‘Crock of s—‘
‘Pod Save America' on Gabbard's Obama allegations: ‘Crock of s—‘

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

‘Pod Save America' on Gabbard's Obama allegations: ‘Crock of s—‘

'Pod Save America' host Dan Pfeiffer railed against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's accusations that the Obama administration led a 'treasonous coup' over the 2016 election. 'I don't think we should call this a scandal,' said Pfeiffer, a former adviser to President Obama, in a Friday episode of the podcast. 'Like I don't know what else to call it, a crock of s—' 'They can't even explain the allegation. It makes no sense,' he continued. 'This is the most easily debunked thing in the world.' Last week, Gabbard released a report claiming that the Obama administration manipulated intelligence to create a false narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Gabbard then doubled down on the accusation and unsealed a formerly-classified House Intelligence Committee report on Wednesday that cast doubts on the European country's interest in the 2016 election and his desire to aid President Trump. She called the Obama administration's reported actions 'the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history.' Several intelligence reviews have concluded that Russia sought to influence the contest and that President Vladimir Putin favored Trump in the election. Gabbard, at a White House press briefing on Wednesday, claimed that the evidence pointed to Obama as the main instigator of the efforts and said she was looking into possible criminal implications. President Trump backed Gabbard, calling the intelligence assessment 'irrefutable proof that Obama was seditious.' 'I guess the crime is the creating a false narrative,' co-host Jon Favreau, former Obama speechwriter, said on the Friday episode. 'I didn't think a false narrative could be a coup.' The podcast hosts join fellow Democrats in criticizing Gabbard, particularly as fervor grows surrounding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, which Democrats — and even some Republicans — have called to be released. 'It seems as though the Trump administration is willing to declassify anything and everything except the Epstein files,' said Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, in a statement. Favreau, on Friday's episode, pondered whether the the administration can 'will this scandal in to existence by repeating 'treasonous coup' over and over again.' .

Trump administration to release billions in frozen education funds
Trump administration to release billions in frozen education funds

Axios

time13 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump administration to release billions in frozen education funds

The Trump administration will release more than $5 billion in frozen funds for schools, the Department of Education announced Friday. The big picture: The administration has been facing bipartisan pressure to release the funds, with GOP senators issuing a public plea. Driving the news: The White House Office of Management and Budget completed a review of Title I-C, Title II-A, Title III-A, and Title IV-A ESEA funds and Title II WIOA funds and directed the Education Department to release them, department spokesperson Madi Biedermann said in an emailed statement. The agency will begin dispersing funds to states next week, she added. What they're saying: Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( who was among the Republican lawmakers who signed onto a letter urging the administration to release the funding, said Friday that the funding supports critical programs people rely on. "The programs are ones that enjoy longstanding, bipartisan support like after-school and summer programs that provide learning and enrichment opportunities for school aged children, which also enables their parents to work and contribute to local economies, and programs to support adult learners working to gain employment skills, earn workforce certifications, or transition into postsecondary education, Capito said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store