Accused's digital skills baffle Bengaluru police in 13-year-old boy's kidnap-murder case: Report
Cops believe Gurumurthy may have picked up these digital tricks from his brother, a police constable with experience in the Bengaluru City Police social media division, who is now posted at an embassy in the Middle East, The Times of India reported.
At first, police thought Gurumurthy was an experienced criminal; he hid behind a foreign phone number while calling the parents of the deceased school boy Nischith, demanding ₹5 lakh for the boy's release.
READ | Bengaluru police open fire on suspects linked to kidnap-murder of 13-year-old boy, arrest them: Report
According to one officer, Gurumurthy contacted the victim's mother only once through a WhatsApp voice call, while the rest of the communication switched to WhatsApp texts. Curiously, he typed in English, yet the recipient read the messages in Hindi.
Despite their efforts, police found traditional tracking methods useless, as Gurumurthy used VPN and VoIP tech to cover his digital trail, the report said.
READ | 13-year-old Bengaluru boy's charred remains found after abduction for ransom: Report
Inspector Kumaraswamy B G and his 20-person team had to work swiftly, as Gurumurthy kept moving between neighbourhoods and sometimes vanished from the grid to avoid being caught, it added.
Law enforcement responded with their own tech arsenal, getting help from the state's intelligence branch and the Central Crime Branch. After a prolonged chase, DCP Narayana obtained a clue about an alternate mobile number Gurumurthy was using, leading to his eventual capture.
Senior officers expressed surprise at Gurumurthy's digital prowess. He outmanoeuvred cops at every step. He was careful, using all possible tactics during ransom negotiations. Once he recovers from his gunshot wound, we'll interrogate him further, an official said, as quoted by the publication.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Making undertrials stand with raised arms is not legal'
Days after four undertrials were held guilty of contempt of court and given a bizarre punishment of standing with their hands raised in the air, a sessions court has called the action illegal, asking the magistrate to first understand legal provisions before using its discretionary powers. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Additional sessions judge Anju Bajaj Chandna of Dwarka court passed the order on Friday. The judge set aside the July 15 order passed by judicial magistrate first class Saurabh Goyal. Magistrate Goyal, who was presiding over a complaint case of alleged land grab and forgery in Dwarka's Palam village, had held the four guilty of contempt of court for wasting the court's time and causing delay in payment of bail bonds. The judge made them stand with their hands raised up in the air till noon. Two of the accused, Kuldeep and Rakesh, moved the sessions court, seeking setting aside of the previous order on grounds that it was a gross misuse of law and an act of judicial overreach. Terming the punishment as illegal, the court said, 'The order cannot qualify the test legality and propriety. The order passed by Ld. Magistrate is not only illegal but even the legal procedure has not been adopted'. The court observed that non-furnishing of bail bonds by the accused persons cannot be termed as a contemptuous by any stretch of interpretation. The court observed that the magistrate had failed to take note of the fact that new criminal laws had come into effect from July 1, 2024, and proceedings conducted under the older IPC was an 'incorrect application of law'. The judge added that even if the proceedings are viewed through the IPC and CrPC sections, the order passed is 'absolutely against the substantive and procedural law'. The court said that the accused persons not furnishing the bail bonds did not fall within the ambit of IPC Section 228 (intentional insult or interruption to a public servant sitting in judicial proceedings) and in no manner be taken as an insult or interruption. 'It is also clear that the magistrate did not afford any opportunity to the accused persons to show cause as to why they should not be proceeded against…without hearing, the accused were asked to stand in the court till the rising of the court with their hands straight in the air. The kind of sentence is not contemplated in law,' the court remarked. Explaining that it was the duty of the court to ensure that no person can be detained without proper legal justification, the court said that the Magistrate completely failed in his duty and responsibility to conduct judicial proceedings legally and properly. 'The order is not sustainable…the Ld. Magistrate is advised to properly read and understand the legal provisions before using his discretionary powers,' the court observed.
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
15 arrested, 500 booked after violence in Pune's Yavat over 'objectionable' WhatsApp post
The Maharashtra Police has arrested 15 people and registered FIRs against more than 500 individuals after an irate mob vandalised properties and indulged in arson in Yavat in Pune's Daund tehsil over an objectionable post on social media. Pune: Security personnel keep vigil after two groups clashed over an alleged objectionable post on Friday, at Yavat in Pune's Daund tehsil. (PTI) The youth, who posed the objectionable status on messaging platform WhatsApp has also been arrested, an official told PTI on Saturday. Communal tension erupted in Yavat village in Daund tehsil of the city on Friday where several groups of persons vandalised and set ablaze properties over the objectionable content. A huge mob took to the streets to vent their ire and set ablaze a motorcycle and damaged a bakery even as the police lobbed teargas shells to bring the situation under control. Narayan Deshmukh, Yavat police station senior inspector, said 15 people have been arrested so far and remanded in police custody till August 6. Also Read: Mob violence in Pune's Yavat over 'objectionable' WhatsApp post; youth detained "So far, we have registered five cases in connection with the violence. Four of the cases are against more than 500 people who were allegedly involved in arson and damage to property. Of these, more than 100 people have been identified," an official from the Yavat police station told PTI. Police said that those involved in the incident targeted a motorcycle, two cars, one religious structure and a bakery. The police had to resort to tear gas shells and lathi-charge to disperse the mob after they indulged in arson. Meanwhile, prohibitory orders have been issued in Yavat and the situation is under control. 'Preliminary report says no planned conspiracy' Superintendent of Police (Pune Rural) Sandeep Singh Gill said the preliminary probe has not indicated to any planned conspiracy in the incident. He, however, said that no conclusions can be drawn until the inquiry is over. "Till Saturday afternoon, police have registered five FIRs in connection with the incident," Gill said, adding that the person whose objectionable post triggered the violence has resided in the village for years. The official also said the police responded quickly to the violence and brought the situation under control. "A large contingent of security personnel, including State Reserve Police Force (SRPF), has been deployed in the village. Authorities also imposed prohibitory orders under Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) section 163 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) section 144 from Friday night. They will remain in place till the situation is assessed further," Gill was quoted as saying by PTI. Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar also visited the site on Friday and said the youth who allegedly uploaded the objectionable Whatsapp post hails from Nanded and is a daily wage labourer. He put out an objectionable post related to an incident that took place in Madhya Pradesh, which angered the locals and they resorted to vandalism, Pawar said.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC dismisses bail plea of main accused in removing national flag from a Gurugram mosque
The Punjab and Haryana high court has denied anticipatory bail to a Gurugram man who allegedly replaced the national flag atop a mosque with saffron flag observing that conduct of the petitioner had 'serious communal and constitutional implications'. He had argued that was falsely implicated in this case and had no role to play in the entire incident. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) 'The allegations against the petitioner are not vague or general in nature but are specific and substantiated by initial investigation, including purported conversations between the petitioner and the co-accused during the commission of the alleged act. The gravity of the offence and its potential impact on public order and communal peace cannot be overlooked at this stage,' the bench of justice Manisha Batra observed while dismissing the plea from one Vikas Tomar from Gurugram. He had approached high court seeking pre-arrest bail in an FIR registered on July 7 this year under Sections 299,3(5),61(2)AND 2 of Prevention of Insult to National Honours Act, 1971 and causing disappearance of evidence at Bilaspur police station in Gurugram. He had argued that was falsely implicated in this case and had no role to play in the entire incident. Allegations were that on July 7 police received information that the national flag being hoisted on a mosque was replaced with another flag in a Bilaspur locality by unsocial elements. The complainant gave three names to the police and also provided an audio and video recording. During the probe petitioner's role had surfaced, the police had told the court. State's counsel had told the court that there are serious and specific allegations against the petitioner who with an intent to create communal tension in the vicinity, had got the national flag hoisted in the mosque of village Uton removed and instead unfurled a saffron flag in place of the same with an intent to cause hurt to religious feelings of the members of Muslim community. For conducting a deeper probe, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is must. Hence, pre-arrest bail be not allowed, the state's counsel had told the court. The court observed that no extraordinary or exceptional circumstance has been brought on record by the petitioner that would warrant court's interference in his favour. '…in light of the serious communal and constitutional implications of the alleged conduct. …custodial interrogation of a suspected person is qualitatively more elicitation oriented than questioning a suspect …(on anticipatory bail). Many useful information can be disinterred during custodial interrogation,' the bench said dismissing the plea and adding that a deeper and proper probe is required and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is 'must'.
