73% of Pinoys want to assert PH rights in WPS in June survey —Pulse Asia
Majority of Filipinos at 73% want the government to continue asserting the Philippines' rights in the West Philippine Sea (WPS), according to the results of the June survey of Pulse Asia.
Stratbase ADR Institute president Professor Victor Andres 'Dindo' Manhit presented the results of the survey during a forum in light of the anniversary of the Philippines' 2016 arbitral win against China over the dispute in the South China Sea.
Based on the results, the National Capital Region (NCR) has the most respondents who agreed that the current administration must continue its efforts in the WPS at 83%.
This is followed by Balance Luzon with 82%, the Visayas with 60%, and Mindanao with 59%.
Only 7% disagreed with the Philippine government's assertion in the WPS. Meanwhile, 18% said that they cannot say if they agree or disagree.
The respondents were also asked about measures the Philippines should continue to implement to effectively defend the country's rights in its seas.
Around 65% said the Philippine government should support the modernization of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Philippine Coast Guard to acquire assets in line with ensuring territorial integrity.
Fifty-one percent said the administration should reinforce alliances and elevate partnerships by conducting joint patrols and military exercises with allies, friends, and partners.
For 33% of the respondents, the Philippine government should establish defense and security agreements with like-minded partners.
Around 14% said the administration should hold leaders accountable and ensure commitment to defend the Philippines' national interest in its maritime territories.
Meanwhile, 12% said the Philippine government should file diplomatic protests and continue to engage China diplomatically.
Commissioned by Stratbase, the survey was conducted from June 26 to 30 using 1,200 respondents.Pulse Asia confirmed to GMA News Online that it conducted the survey.—AOL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Nine years after PCA ruling, US calls out China's defiance in South China Sea
An imposing image of a China Coast Guard vessel patrolling the waters as the sun sets in the West Philippine Sea in March 2025. JUN VENERACION/GMA Integrated News NEW YORK — The United States has renewed its call for China to comply with the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruling that invalidated Beijing's sweeping claims in the South China Sea, marking the ninth anniversary of the landmark decision under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The ruling, issued on July 12, 2016 by the PCA in The Hague, found that China's so-called 'nine-dash line' claims had no legal basis under international law. It also reaffirmed the sovereign rights of the Philippines within its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The decision is legally binding on both China and the Philippines. In a statement, the US State Department said the ruling represents a 'milestone in international maritime law' and remains a critical foundation for resolving disputes peacefully in the region. The US highlighted China's continued harassment of vessels belonging to Southeast Asian nations, including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia. It warned that Beijing's increasingly aggressive posture undermines freedom of navigation, threatens the global flow of commerce, and escalates tensions in the Indo-Pacific. 'Since the 2016 ruling, China has ignored the decision, continuing to assert unlawful and expansive maritime claims while taking increasingly aggressive actions against its neighbors. Beijing's claims directly infringe on the sovereign rights and jurisdictions of Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia, undermining peace, stability, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific,' the statement said. Washington reiterated its commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific and underscored its opposition to the use of coercion or intimidation in resolving maritime disputes. 'The United States supports a free and open Indo-Pacific. We seek to preserve peace and stability, uphold freedom of navigation and overflight, maintain the free flow of trade, and oppose coercion to settle maritime disputes. The United States calls on China to abide by the 2016 arbitral ruling and to cease its dangerous and destabilizing conduct,' the statement added. The anniversary comes amid renewed tensions in the region, with recent encounters between Chinese and Philippine vessels near Ayungin Shoal (Second Thomas Shoal) prompting strong reactions from both governments. The Philippines on Friday renewed its call to China to comply with the PCA ruling, saying all countries, 'regardless of size, might, or capacity must meet their duties and obligations' under international law. On Saturday the Philippines said the nine-year-old arbitral ruling has since served as a guide in peaceful resolution of maritime territorial disputes. 'It is an illuminating precedent for States facing similarly challenging circumstances in the seas, and the clearest of reminders to the international community that the rule of law can be the great equalizer between and among nations, and serve as the bedrock of peace and stability for the international community,' the Philippines' Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said in a statement. China has repeatedly refused to recognize the PCA ruling and said it does not accept any claim or action based on the ruling. Over the weekend, the spokesperson of the Chinese Embassy in Manila claimed that the UNCLOS ruling was a "political circus dressed up as a legal action." 'The Philippines breached the common understandings with China on resolving the disputes in the South China Sea through consultation and negotiation, violated the article of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) which stipulates parties concerned undertake to resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes by peaceful means,' it said. The Chinese Embassy also claimed that the UNCLOS exercised its jurisdiction 'ultra vires' and that the award rendered to the Philippines is 'illegal, null and void.' 'China does not accept or recognize it, and will never accept any claim or action thereon,' it said. —KG, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
15 hours ago
- GMA Network
Duterte's legal counsel: 'No great surprises' in prosecution evidence
THE HAGUE – For former President Rodrigo Duterte's counsel, 'there are no great surprises' regarding the personalities and information included in the pieces of evidence disclosed to them by the prosecution. In an interview with GMA Integrated News, Atty. Nicholas Kaufman declined to detail his client's reaction upon seeing the evidence. However, Kaufman explained his team is 'slowly but surely' going through what he described as an 'immense amount of evidence.'' 'I'm not entitled to discuss exactly what the prosecution has disclosed to us, nor am I going to tell you what defence strategy is and what Mr. Duterte's reaction to those items of evidence exactly is. However, what I can tell you is that, as far as the defense is concerned, there are no great surprises here.' Based on the International Criminal Court's Registry, the eleventh and twelfth batches of evidence submitted by the Office of the Prosecutor between July 1 and July 4 altogether contain 2,315 documents. 'Each of these documents sometimes contains something up to 100 pages. So, it's an immense amount of evidence. We have a team of about nine people, all of whom are devoted to reviewing that evidence,'' Kaufman said. ''We're all skilled in data management. We all know how to use the IT systems of the ICC, and we're slowly but surely reviewing all of that evidence, working towards the September confirmation hearing.' Immediate release Duterte's defense team argued in a newly redacted document dated July 10 that the ICC lacked jurisdiction to try him for crimes against humanity related to his war on drugs while he was president and mayor of Davao City. Kaufman also acknowledged 'any initiatives' calling for Duterte's release, including a recent resolution by Senator Alan Peter Cayetano urging the Philippine government to advocate for placing the former president into some form of house arrest. 'I think that any initiative by any Filipino to bring the former president back home [is welcome], whether it be in the Philippines embassy–I'm not sure whether that would be possible given the current administration–or whether it be just back home to the place where he grew up, to the place where he wants to pass away, God forbid that it be many years in the future.' 'But it's every Filipino's right to be tried in front of a Filipino court, in front of a Filipino judge, and to be prosecuted by a Filipino accuser-slash-prosecutor,' Kaufman added. 'Health bulletins' not appropriate Since Duterte's detention, the public has seen him only once–on a live stream at his initial appearance before the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I on March 14. His daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, has since given updates about his physical condition, adding on July 8 that his medical officer at Scheveningen Prison did not report anything urgent about his state. Two days later, the younger Duterte denied what she called a viral photo purportedly showing her father as bedridden. She also deferred requests about the possibility of releasing health bulletins about or pictures of the former president to his lawyer. 'Publishing health bulletins concerning an ICC suspect is not considered appropriate,' Kaufman said. 'It's an invasion of medical privacy. What I can say is that the former president will have to be brought before the court at some stage in the near future. And then the whole world will see the condition that he's currently in.' ICC spokesperson Fadi El Abdallah declined to comment on Duterte's condition, but said the court 'adopts all necessary measures' to ensure the health of the suspects in its detention center. When asked if Duterte is in good health, exactly four months since his detention, Kaufman repeated his usual line: 'He is in good spirits.' 'When I say that he's in good spirits, I'm talking about a man who's 80 years old and has all the medical conditions, mental conditions, and psychological conditions that accompany a [person] of that age. He's been in prison for almost four months now,'' Kaufman said. ''He was taken to prison under certain circumstances beyond his control. You can just imagine what type of effect that has on an 80-year-old man with all the conditions and ailments that an 80-year-old man would normally have. I can't tell any further than that.' —VBL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
19 hours ago
- GMA Network
Duterte camp insists ICC lacks jurisdiction, urges his immediate release
THE HAGUE – Former President Rodrigo Duterte's defense team has insisted that the International Criminal Court (ICC) should end the proceedings in his crime against humanity case for lack of jurisdiction. Repeating the arguments in their May 1 submission, lead defense counsel Nicholas Kaufman and associate counsel Dov Jacobs asked the Pre-Trial Chamber I ''to find that there is no jurisdictional basis for the continuation of proceedings against Mr. Duterte and to order his immediate and unconditional release.'' The latest document, dated July 10, responded to the prosecution's earlier position on June 10, raising concerns over access to evidence and the legal basis of the investigation. The defense said the prosecution delayed the disclosure of key materials related to proceedings during the preliminary examination phase. These materials, the defense argued, were essential to their jurisdictional challenge and had only been disclosed after repeated requests. 'The prosecution's failure to initiate [REDACTED] goes beyond mere oversight. Such wilful neglect palpably impeded the defense's preparation of the jurisdictional challenge,' the defense stated. According to the defense, this delay had a significant impact on their preparation and may have influenced previous motions to disqualify judges. The defense also challenged the prosecution's interpretation of Article 12(2) of the Rome Statute, which outlines conditions for the court to exercise jurisdiction. Duterte's lawyers argued that the ICC cannot investigate acts committed in a state that is no longer a party to the Rome Statute at the time jurisdiction is exercised. ''The Philippines' withdrawal from the Rome Statute became effective on March 17, 2019. When the former prosecutor filed her request, and the Pre-trial Chamber issued its decision more than two years later, the preconditions to the exercise of jurisdiction could no longer be, nor were they, fulfilled,'' the Duterte camp said on May 1. They maintained that a preliminary examination, unlike an investigation, does not require formal conditions and does not carry legal weight once a state has withdrawn. The defense also rejected arguments invoking the 'fight against impunity,' saying such appeals should not override the court's legal boundaries. Citing past rulings, including the Katanga case, the defense argued that 'the pursuit of accountability cannot prioritize victims' expectations over a suspect's right to legal propriety and due process.' While the prosecution argued that Duterte should not benefit from the Philippine government's decision to withdraw from the Rome Statute, the defense countered that the principle of complementarity and ongoing domestic proceedings should be taken into account. ''Mr. Duterte has never expressed a desire to shirk accountability,'' the defense said. In an interview with GMA Integrated News on Saturday, Kaufman reiterated a previous statement attributed to the former president upon his arrest in March. 'It's the right of every Filipino to be tried in front of a Filipino court and a Filipino judge and to be prosecuted by a Filipino accuser or prosecutor,' Kaufman said. Duterte is currently at the ICC Detention Center awaiting trial in connection with the killings in his war on drugs when he was mayor of Davao City and when he was president of the Philippines. 'Many of us want to see him released. He's an 80-year-old man. He should be released, in my opinion, but that matter is subject to litigation at the moment. It's ongoing, and I cannot comment any further on it,' Kaufman said. The confirmation of charges hearing is set to begin on September 23. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
