Duterte camp insists ICC lacks jurisdiction, urges his immediate release
Repeating the arguments in their May 1 submission, lead defense counsel Nicholas Kaufman and associate counsel Dov Jacobs asked the Pre-Trial Chamber I ''to find that there is no jurisdictional basis for the continuation of proceedings against Mr. Duterte and to order his immediate and unconditional release.''
The latest document, dated July 10, responded to the prosecution's earlier position on June 10, raising concerns over access to evidence and the legal basis of the investigation.
The defense said the prosecution delayed the disclosure of key materials related to proceedings during the preliminary examination phase. These materials, the defense argued, were essential to their jurisdictional challenge and had only been disclosed after repeated requests.
'The prosecution's failure to initiate [REDACTED] goes beyond mere oversight. Such wilful neglect palpably impeded the defense's preparation of the jurisdictional challenge,' the defense stated.
According to the defense, this delay had a significant impact on their preparation and may have influenced previous motions to disqualify judges.
The defense also challenged the prosecution's interpretation of Article 12(2) of the Rome Statute, which outlines conditions for the court to exercise jurisdiction.
Duterte's lawyers argued that the ICC cannot investigate acts committed in a state that is no longer a party to the Rome Statute at the time jurisdiction is exercised.
''The Philippines' withdrawal from the Rome Statute became effective on March 17, 2019. When the former prosecutor filed her request, and the Pre-trial Chamber issued its decision more than two years later, the preconditions to the exercise of jurisdiction could no longer be, nor were they, fulfilled,'' the Duterte camp said on May 1.
They maintained that a preliminary examination, unlike an investigation, does not require formal conditions and does not carry legal weight once a state has withdrawn.
The defense also rejected arguments invoking the 'fight against impunity,' saying such appeals should not override the court's legal boundaries.
Citing past rulings, including the Katanga case, the defense argued that 'the pursuit of accountability cannot prioritize victims' expectations over a suspect's right to legal propriety and due process.'
While the prosecution argued that Duterte should not benefit from the Philippine government's decision to withdraw from the Rome Statute, the defense countered that the principle of complementarity and ongoing domestic proceedings should be taken into account.
''Mr. Duterte has never expressed a desire to shirk accountability,'' the defense said.
In an interview with GMA Integrated News on Saturday, Kaufman reiterated a previous statement attributed to the former president upon his arrest in March.
'It's the right of every Filipino to be tried in front of a Filipino court and a Filipino judge and to be prosecuted by a Filipino accuser or prosecutor,' Kaufman said.
Duterte is currently at the ICC Detention Center awaiting trial in connection with the killings in his war on drugs when he was mayor of Davao City and when he was president of the Philippines.
'Many of us want to see him released. He's an 80-year-old man. He should be released, in my opinion, but that matter is subject to litigation at the moment. It's ongoing, and I cannot comment any further on it,' Kaufman said.
The confirmation of charges hearing is set to begin on September 23. —VBL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
9 hours ago
- GMA Network
De Lima files bill to disclose confi, intel fund outlays flagged by COA
A bill lifting the secrecy on the disbursement details of confidential and intelligence funds (CIF) and limiting the CIF allocation to 10% of the agency's budget, among others, has been proposed in the House of Representatives. Former Justice secretary and current ML party-list Representative Leila de Lima on Monday made the proposal under her House Bill 1845, or the CIF Utilization and Accountability Act. IN the bill, all CIF information and documents will remain confidential, but will automatically lose confidentiality and will thereafter be disclosed to the public once the Commission on Audit (COA) issues a Notice of Disallowance (ND) on a CIF disbursement. State auditors issue NDs if when the expenditure is found to be 'either irregular, unnecessary, excessive, extravagant, or unconscionable.' The ND, however, can be appealed by the concerned agency. 'The CIF, including all the information and documents related thereto, will then be subject to inquiries and investigations, with documents and related information to be made public, without need of compulsory processes,' the bill read. In addition, de Lima's proposal states that CIF allocations for any single agency, considering the population serviced, should not exceed 10% of the total annual budget of the agency, unless otherwise explicitly authorized by law. Further, the bill limits the allocation of CIF to agencies as indicated under the General Appropriations Act and to all other agencies, departments, and units 'with mandates related to national security, peace and order, and intelligence gathering.' 'While the initial guidelines in 2015 may have been appropriate and sufficient at that time, recent developments have exposed the vulnerability of the existing design, implementation, and auditing process of confidential and intelligence funds. Particularly significant among these recent developments is the reported misuse and malversation of confidential funds amounting to P612.5 million appropriated to the Office of the Vice President (OVP) Sara Duterte and the Department of Education (DepEd) of which Duterte served as Secretary,' de Lima said in her explanatory note on the measure, referring to the subject of the impeachment complaint against Vice President Duterte. She then cited the findings of the House Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability panel on its inquiry on such funds which include: confidential funds were appropriated to civilian government agencies whose mandates do not include surveillance, nor involve national security and peace and order confidential expenses were unrelated to national security and peace and order, or confidential funds appropriated for non-confidential activities and expenses liquidation reports submitted had either unreadable, incomplete, unstated, repeating,or made-up or fictitious names of payees; or liquidation reports had forgeries or no signatures at all Special Disbursement Offices (SDOs) hired were clueless on how the confidential funds were spent after turning the funds over to another unauthorized individual upon instruction from Vice President Duterte and absence of reports on accomplishments of the use of confidential funds. 'The obvious misuse and malversation of millions in taxpayer money as a result of exploiting the weak and insufficient guidelines on confidential and intelligence funds, poses a serious threat to the preservation of public trust in the government and the legitimacy of its institutions,' de Lima said. 'As such, legislative intervention is deemed necessary to ensure that CIF are strictly appropriated to justifiable activities and agencies with mandates to maintain national security and peace and order, and are properly audited with as much transparency as permitted without compromising confidential and intelligence operations,' she added. — BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
16 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos chopper conducts fly-by at Malampaya gas field
A presidential fly-by on Monday was conducted in the ongoing Malampaya Phase IV drilling campaign in Palawan. (Screenshot from Anna Felicia Bajo tweet) A presidential fly-by on Monday was conducted in the ongoing Malampaya Phase IV drilling campaign in Palawan. WATCH: Presidential Fly-By on the ongoing Malampaya Phase IV drilling campaign in Palawan ????: PCO — ????Anna Felicia (@annafelicia_) July 14, 2025 Earlier in the day, President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. said they were going to fly by the rig at the Malampaya gas field. He expressed hope that there is a ''reasonable chance of success in finding further reserves.'' In October of last year, Razon-led Prime Energy Resources Development B.V.'s plan to drill new deepwater wells at the Malampaya gas field received a certification, which will pave the way for faster regulatory approvals of the project. Malampaya has contributed over $13.8 billion to the Philippine government since its commercial operations began in 2001. It supplies about 20% of Luzon's electricity needs and has significantly contributed to the nation's energy independence since 2001. —LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
21 hours ago
- GMA Network
PH asserts 2016 arbitral ruling during forum hosted by Chinese think tank
The Philippine Embassy in Beijing has strongly reaffirmed the country's sovereign rights in the West Philippine Sea, citing the landmark 2016 arbitral award, during a forum hosted by a Chinese think tank just days before the ruling's ninth anniversary. The forum, which gathered legal scholars, policy experts, and regional analysts, was predominantly critical of the arbitral ruling and the Philippines' actions in the disputed waters. In a press statement, the embassy said the Philippine delegation used the opportunity to assert the ruling's legal weight and continuing relevance under international law. 'The Award, along with its annexes, proves the validity and legality of Philippine claims, and they are available for everyone to study and read,' the Embassy's representative said during a plenary intervention. The ruling, handed down by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2016, invalidated China's sweeping claims in the South China Sea—particularly those within the so-called 'nine-dash line'—and affirmed that such claims had no legal basis under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Responding to accusations made during the forum that the Philippines was acting as a "troublemaker" in the region, the Philippine representative pushed back firmly, emphasizing Manila's commitment to diplomacy and constructive engagement. 'We disagree with the notion that the Philippines is not willing to engage with China. In fact, even with the Arbitral Award, the Philippines has continued to make efforts to keep lines of communication open, maintain proper dialogue, and engage positively with China as well as other claimant States, both bilaterally and regionally, within the context of our legally settled claims in accordance with UNCLOS and international law,' the official said. The Embassy added: 'We hope China's actions demonstrate genuine willingness to engage and to produce constructive and positive outcomes.' The forum took place amid heightened regional tensions and increasing international attention on the South China Sea. This year marks the ninth year since the 2016 ruling, which has been backed by several countries including the United States, Japan, Australia, and members of the European Union. However, China has repeatedly rejected the ruling, continuing to assert its expansive maritime claims and build artificial islands and outposts in contested areas. On Sunday, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) said it monitored two vessels of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLA) of China in the waters off Occidental Mindoro. Tensions continue as Beijing claims almost all of the South China Sea, including parts claimed by the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague ruled in favor of the Philippinesover China's claims in the South China Sea, but the latter refused to recognize the decision. —Sherylin Untalan/AOL, GMA Integrated News
